Gil Jesus

1933 Argentine Mauser with stamping on receiver. Could Craig have mistook receiver for barrel ? http://i28.tinypic.com/35hgs9x.jpg

So is hiding behind aliases ( like "Paul Nolan" ) and falsely accusing posters of being pedophiles, both of which McAdams has done. Jim Hargrove has documented John McAdams' shennanigans here: http://www.prouty.org/mcadams

This would seem to support Joe Backes' excellent '99 Lancer Presentation of "Why JFK came to Texas" http://spot.acorn.net/jfkplace/09/fp.back_.../jfk_texas.html

Thanks Harry and thanks for your correspondence in the past. I'm a big fan of your writings.

Kennedy's pal Sen. George Smathers ( D-Fla) relates a conversation he had with JFK on the flight back to Washington the weekend before the assassination. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVZMOVEoC58

Contrary to versions from Johnson and Connally that it was Kennedy's idea to come to Texas, Ted Sorensen says that Kennedy was begged to go there. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z54HP5WdGPY

And the day after the newspapers published the motorcade route, two rifles were brought into the TSBD by Warren Caster. The same day those rifles were brought in, a Dallas Police patrol observed men on the knoll behind the picket fence with rifles.

Documents released by the Assassination Records Review Board show that a conspiracy existed to destroy New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison's JFK murder investigation and that conspiracy was the work of the CIA and its allies in the American media. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0jsGP8_tio

Documents released by the Assassination Records Review Board show that the planned phased withdrawal of American Forces from Vietnam by President Kennedy was REAL and indicate that the plan was REVERSED immediately after JFK's assassination. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcr5Q2RfhSQ

Dear Professor McKnight: When you find those documents, please e-mail me at GJJmail@aol.com. I'm interested in purchasing a copy of them. Thank You.

If the official version of John Kennedy's assassination were true, there wouldn't be any need for monitoring or attacking people who didn't believe it.

THANK YOU......and may I add a thought of my own ? When the criminals control the evidence: a.) there is certain to be "inconsistancies" in the "evidence" b.) the "official" record will be in conflict with what the witnesses saw and the physical and scientific testing conducted afterward. c.) the conclusions of the investgation will point to someone else d.) witnesses will be intimidated e.) witnesses will be ignored f.) witnesses will be threatened g.) police lineups will be "fixed" h.) there will be evidence tampering and yet, do "converts" to the LN side find such behavior NORMAL ? Do any of them understand that THIS CASE WAS A BAG JOB ? That justice WAS NOT SERVED in this case ? Let me put it this way: Kennedy was warned not to come to Dallas or "they" were going to kill him. Kennedy went to Dallas and lo and behold, he's shot down in the street like a mad dog. Were any of those citizens who forewarned of his murder interviewed by the DPD ? Were any of those citizens who forewarned of his murder interviewed by the FBI ? Were any of those citizens who forewarned of his murder invited to appear before the WC ? Wouldn't it have been NORMAL for a murder investigation to talk to anyone who had forewarned of that murder? Wouldn't it have been NORMAL for security to be extremely tight in a hostile city as Dallas ? Not only was it not tight, what little security was planned by the DPD was removed by the SS. IMO, Kennedy was led into an ambush by those who preferred Johnson as president and there was a subsequent conspiracy to hide that fact from the American people. I just don't understand how that cannot be clear to folks.

Best-selling author James Bamford ("Body of Secrets" ,"The Shadow Factory" and "The Puzzle Palace" ) describes the U.S. military's proposal in 1962 to commit acts of terrorism against it's own targets and citizens and to blame it on a foreign enemy as a pretext to war. Could this proposal, known as "Operation Northwoods" have been co- opted by conspirators as a basis for the murder of President Kennedy with the intent of blaming the assassination on Castro ? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88cn6Ce1OgQ

You both make some great observations. Johnson kept saying publicly that he wouldn't take the VP spot if offered. I believe that that was the case until Hoover got hold of Kennedy's medical records that indicated that his doctors opinion was that he would not live past the age of 45. (May 1962 ) Once Johnson got to see those records, his mind changed very quickly. He told someone, "I'm a gambling man, darlin' and this might be the only way I ever get to the White House". ( to succeed a President who died of natural causes ) His campaign manager, John Connally, leaked to the press that JFK was a very sick man, without of course saying where he got his information from. In addition, Joe Kennedy was pressuring his son to offer the second spot to Johnson because JFK was very weak in the primaries in the South. Kennedy saw no harm in making the offer to Johnson because he believed Johnson would refuse it. But when Johnson accepted the offer, all hell broke loose. Bobby in particular went to Johnson's suite to tell him that the offer had been rescinded. Johnson then called JFK and threatened to release Kennedy's medical records, showing that the Kennedy campaign had publicly lied when it denied that JFK had Addison's Disease. JFK backed off, telling Johnson to ignore what Bobby said and that RFK "was out of the loop". Johnson was now on the ticket. But May 1962 did not bring the death of JFK. Instead, there was a gala birthday party at Madison Square Garden to celebrate the President's STILL BEING ALIVE, highlighted by the singing of "Happy Birthday to You" by Marilyn Monroe. In what must have seen to be a cruel twist of fate, it was Johnson who was now "out of the loop". His opinions were asked for less and less by the Kennedys. He was being phased out of all major policy input. He was nearly invisible. "Where's Lyndon?" his constituents were asking back in Texas. In addition, RFK's justice department was tightening the noose around Johnson's neck with the investigations of Johnson cronies Billie Sol Estes and Bobby Baker. At the time of JFK's murder, Maryland insurance man Don Reynolds was supplying members of Congress with documentation of Johnson's extortion and racketeering. Time had been running out for Johnson. In addition, as Mr. Kelly points out in his above posting, Kennedy's policies had run afoul of the CIA, the anti-Castro Cubans and the right-wing extremists who made Dallas, Texas their home. Add to that montage of anti-Kennedy resentment, some members of the Secret Service, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, J.Edgar Hoover and the Dallas authorities, and you have not only a group of people who preferred Lyndon Johnson as President, but people who controlled where and when the President appeared and decided how much protection he would have. Kennedy was warned not to come to Texas or "they" would kill him. Who was "they", Oswald? Not hardly, my friends. Kennedy was LURED to Texas with the "testimonial" dinner for Rep. Albert Thomas. ( You remember him, the congressman who was contemplating retiring becuase of cancer--the same man who "winked" at LBJ aboard Air Force 1 in that famous photo, and who had a sudden change of heart and ended up NOT retiring after the assassination). Does anyone know that Connally first wanted the trip to take place in August, at Johnson's BIRTHDAY ? What a wonderful birthday present to be handed the one thing LBJ ever wanted, the Presidency !!!! But nah, that was too obvious, so it was planned for November. Anyways, great observations, guys, I'll stop yammering now. Peace.

man, where'd you find this right-wing KOOK, Pasadena? ROTFLMFAO! Looks to me like we have a LNer from Australia here.

Looks like the original channel was suspended and he started a new one. This guy's been thrown out of more places than O.J.Simpson.

see for yourself: www.youtube.com/dvp1122

This guy is never seen publicly. He won't post a picture of himself or any bio info. Sounds like an alias for someone we would all recognize.

Gil Jesus examines the controversy surrounding the different sling mounts on the "backyard" rifle and the depository rifle. Did the Depository rifle REALLY belong to Oswald ? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vq25loEpBro

Harry, Weren't the guys who put out the Kennedy Wanted for Treason ad/poster from the US Army in Germany? BK Col. Finck served in the US Army in Germany from 1955-1958 Richard Snyder from the American Embassy in Moscow, served in Frankfurt and Munich Bernanrd Weisman met Larrie Schmidt in Munich in July/August 1962.

The Murchison Party http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awGbwIIIYug The "Box 13" Scandal http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onZ76_i93IY

More reason to doubt that Ruby's killing of Oswald was spontaneous. Photographic and video PROOF that Ruby was stalking Oswald from the time of his arrest. And Senator didn't know this ?

Me ? I'd also like to hit the target either stopped or as slowed down as possible. I'd also like it to be as close as possible. All three of the previous successful Presidential assassinations occurred while the President was either not moving or walking at 2.5 mph and all three assailants fired from a distance of three feet or less. That's why I think the sewer drains provided the best location to hit the target without being detected, plus it provided protection for the shooters from stray/missed shots. It would also explain why the SS removed the motorcycle escort from the sides of the limo on the night before the assassination, to give those shooters a "clear" shot at the President.----IMO

As someone who is unsure as to whether there is anything significant in this issue, insofar as it relates to Pres. Kennedy's death, I would say that as a hopefully detached observer, that this project was allegedly not very popular in the railroad industry, it would not be a great assumption to say consequently, that any alternative energy project would have been progressive legislation and that the status quo in politics was a very dominant feature in those days, just as it is now, for that matter. So all this may lead somewhere, I have a thread active on lawsuits of the era, if someone can find a connection, I would be glad to look into it. See http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.ph...=8797&st=45 Might it also not be popular with the Teamsters ?