Jump to content
The Education Forum

Duane Daman

Members
  • Content Count

    1,910
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Duane Daman

  1. Yet not one still photo shows the Rover stowed, or being unloaded, or assembled on the Moon, which is what the Apollogists claimed to have tons of and Jack asked to see. Only one video was taken of the Rover being unloaded, allegedly on the Moon. It doesn't make much difference where the LRV was suppossedly stowed, when the photo study in question shows that neither side of the LM was unpacked, yet Rover tracks are visible in front of the LM. Thanks for withdrawling your false claim, but you still haven't told me what IRC stands for. The forum I started with elsewhere_man was an MSN
  2. How do you account for all of the things on your list? .. Try disinformation. I watched a documentary once where a few of the survivors of the Pentagon attack were interviewed .. None of them ever saw any evidence of any jet having hit the building anywhere, while they were crawling out of the wreckage.. Instead, they all described several loud explosions going off that sounded more like bombs. Even the first news reporters on the scene admitted that there was no sign of any huge passenger jet ever hitting the Pentagon. But then they were all there and you weren't, so I guess you must know
  3. When I joined this discussion, one of the Apollogists claimed that there were tons of photos showing the Rover either stowed on the side of the LM, or being unloaded and assembled.. Jack then asked any of you to provide just one still photo of the Rover stowed, or being unloaded or assembled on the Moon .. but to date, none of you have been able to provide that one photo.. I don't see how that equates to "moving the goalposts", other than that excuse is often used when any of the Apollogists have lost the argument. As for Jack's study of the LM (allegedly on the lunar surface) it clearly show
  4. Repeating more silly propaganda against Bart Sibrel won't help you with this one .. There were no crops or video manuipulations in Sibrel's interview with Gene Cernan .. It was one take, showing Gene squirming, sweating, stuttering and screaming at his dogs, as he attempted to correctly answer Sibrel's questions about his alleged trip to the Moon.. Answers that were complete contradictions to that of fellow Apollo astronaut Al Bean.. None of them ever get their "moon trip" stories straight.. It doesn't take a rocket scientist or even a psychologist to see when somebody is lying.. It just takes
  5. Evan - you do agree that you're wrong about me being banned from some pro hoax forum called IRC, do you not?
  6. Yet that one Apollo 15 video still does not equal even one Hassleblad still photo, which is what Jack asked any of you Apollogists to produce. Yes, you did... again.
  7. "Truth needs no defence. Nobody - NOBODY - can ever take the footsteps I made on the surface of the Moon away from me." Gene Cernan, Apollo 17 Apparently Evan never watched 'Astronauts Gone Wild'.. Conspiracy researcher Bart Sibrel took the myth of those footsteps away from Cernan during one single interview in that documentary. The body language of liars is very interesting to observe .. That particular body language can also be observed during that pathetic Apollo 11 post flight press conference. Regardless of what anyone thinks of Sibrel's aggressive tactcs, he knew that the best way to
  8. Ah Craig gets it wrong again .. There's only one Apollo 15 video of the Rover allegedy being assembled on the Moon.. There are no Hassleblad still photos showing the Rover in any quad, or being unloaded or assembled on the supposed lunar surface. Apparently the Apollo astros were too busy taking meaningless pictures of their bootprints.
  9. The diagrams you're referring to only show which quad the Rover was allegedly stowed on the LM .. Meanwhile, there are no "lunar" Hasslebald photos showing the Rover stowed in any quad, much less any photo showing it being unloaded or assembled on the "Moon". Jack might be wrong about the quad number, but he isn't wrong about there being no photos of the Rover being assembled.. Even if it did take two people to assemble the buggy, there's no reason a few photos couldn't have been snapped during the procedure. But like all things Apollo, there's something wrong with this picture too .. Appare
  10. You agree with Lamson that it's ok to take my comment about Jack's studies out of context? .. Gee, what a surprise. Sorry to spoil your silly little game here boys, but no matter how you slice it, one Apollo 15 video does not equate to a still photograph, regardless of which quad the Rover was allegedly stowed.. Which means there are no still photos of any Rover, from any Apollo photo shoot, being unloaded and assembeled on the "moon".. Gee, what a surprise.
  11. YEP! You are finally getting it. Taking my comments out of context only proves that you have no argument.. As usual.
  12. It really doesn't matter what you believe, since you wouldn't recognize the truth if it jumped up and slapped you in the face. You never answered my question .. What does IRC stand for? .. If I'm going to be falsely accused of being banned from a pro hoax site, I would at least like to know the name of it.
  13. Oh come Evan .. The real reason I'm on moderation is because you disagree with my opinion about Apollo and I called you and your Apollogist friends a tag team of disinformationists .. I have never bad mouthed you the way you do me, behind my back, on other forums like BAUT and apollohoax.net. Half of the members of this forum post rude and unkind remarks to those they disagree with, yet I don't see any of them on permanent moderation.. You're only half way "polite" to me on this forum because you have to be, and have admitted as much on apollohoax.net.. Don't be such a hypocrite. btw, what
  14. Jack got the quad number wrong!?!? .. Then I guess every photo analysis study of his must be wrong too! It's funny how you always want Jack to admit to an error, while you and your fellow Apollogists never admit to any of yours. Jack asked for ONE STILL PHOTO showing the Rover being unloaded and assembled on the Moon, yet all you produced was one still photo of the Rover attached to the LM while still in the factory.. Then Lamson tried to pass off one cheesy looking Apollo 15 VIDEO as being several still photos. Priceless!
  15. Kathy, I just read what Rich DellaRosa believes about the Apollo "moon landings" .. He can at least see that the Apollo photography was altered, though he doesn't seem to have a definative opinion as to why it was so obviously staged.. At least he knows the official Apollo record is bogus.
  16. What's a real shame is that closed minded people like you dominate this forum to the point where certain conspiraces ( like 911 and Apollo ) are impossible to discuss in a polite and rational manner. It's ok to have your own opinions about certain subjects without describing those you disagree with as being "paranoid".
  17. Um, .... The reviewer, then, has quite missed the point, LOL. The point is that the lunatic fringe, from both sides of the aisle, and including the paranoid CT'ists, are hijacking the democratic process. You might try reading it or at least glance at the sections visible at Amazon. Your reviewer attempted to hijack the book review to wax about his left wing POV. That's just another example of a fringe element stealing soap box exposure to trumpet his own marginal points.. "a war between .... truth and lies,... Good and Evil"? Just more paranoia. Duane, you are getting into the swing of th
  18. This reviewer got it right when he posted this on the web site promoting this book. By Charles F. Lantz (San Francisco) This review is from: Wingnuts: How the Lunatic Fringe is Hijacking America (Paperback) By pretending that the battle between the current Right and Left political wings is somehow an even battle, between two equally honorable foes, is naive' in the extreme. Simply put, this is a war between right and wrong, truth and lies, and good and evil. If you talk to a right-winger long enough, whether he or she is a member of the Tea-Party, a hard-core Republican, or a self-titled (
  19. Happy Birthday Evan.

    No wonder we've always locked horns.. We share the same Aries the Ram, April the 3rd birthdate!!

    Have a good one!

  20. The still camera takes one photo each time the user presses the shutter button. A typical movie camera continuously takes 24 film frames per second as long as the user holds down the shutter button, or until the shutter button is pressed a second time. What's highly entertaining is your continuned pretense of "beating Jack into the ground", when in this instance, it's he who has beaten you .. All he asked for was ONE SINGLE STILL PHOTO OF THE ROVER BEING UNLOADED AND ASSEMBLED ON THE MOON.. but so far all you and your Apollogist pals have provided is ONE cheesy looking Apollo 15 VIDEO, whic
  21. Did HAARP take out Sen. Ted Stevens for exposing Obama’s weather war? Top US Senator Assassinated as Obama ‘Weather War’ Plunges World Into Chaos By European Times Union A new report prepared for Prime Minister Putin by Russia’s foreign military intelligence directorate (GRU) states that a former top United States Senator, Ted Stevens, was assassinated this week after he attempted to gather evidence “proving” that President Obama has unleashed America’s devastating “weather weapons” against the world. As we had previously reported on in our August 3rd report titled “Russia Burns, China Dro
  22. Possibly because they are all on different frequency levels and HAARP and chemtrails are designed to effect only certain technologies. Electromagnetic Frequency Spectrum http://donsnotes.com/tech/em-spectrum.html What do HAARP, Chemtrails, and Global Warming all have in common? http://mrscottyl.blogspot.com/2010/09/what-do-haarp-chemtrails-and-global.html
  23. Connection Between Chemtrails, Geoengineering, GMO, and HAARP What are chemtrails and how do chemtrails and HAARP work together? CIA Project Cloverleaf was the initial aerosolized heavy metal chemtrail spraying op. Chemtrail barium salts absorb electromagnetic radiation, aluminum dioxides reflect it. Chemtrail spraying allegedly commenced over N.A. by the early 1990s, using commercial & military airplanes and being sold as a Greenhouse gas/global warming mitigation strategy of the skies, which was & still is primarily in the hands of the U.S. military. Barium, aluminum, thorium an
  24. DID HAARP CAUSE THE EARTHQUAKE IN JAPAN? The earthquake and tsunami in Japan was caused by HAARP and not by solar or other natural activity argues a Swedish reader in his report below. A look at the induction magnetometer charts from last year’s earthquake in Haiti as well as from the recent earthquake measuring 9.1 on the Richter scale that triggered a tsunami and destruction on the Japanese east coast show surprising similarities that point to an artificial cause and the use of HAARP technology. In the case of Haiti, low frequency signals of 2,1 Hz were detected for 40 hours before the e
  25. Non-traditional Nuclear War in progress On Sunday, Alfred Lambremont of Expolitics TV interviewed nuclear scientist Leuren Moret who explained that the recent earthquake and nuclear events in Japan were intentional and caused by military-grade high-tech weaponry equivalent to dropping a million nuclear bombs. HAARP weaponry triggered the earthquake in Japan, an applied Environmental Modification (ENMOD), silently and invisibly, appearing to be a "natural event." Moret is a geoscientist who worked at the Lawrence Livermore Nuclear Weapons Laboratory on the Yucca Mountain Project, and became
×
×
  • Create New...