-
Posts
2,346 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by Vince Palamara
-
CHICAGO PLOTS AND THREATS 3/23/63 AND 11/2/63
Vince Palamara replied to Vince Palamara's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Secret Service agent Elmer Moore. -
Documentary on ‘Last Second in Dallas’
Vince Palamara replied to Michaleen Kilroy's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
remastered video I just posted: -
Documentary on ‘Last Second in Dallas’
Vince Palamara replied to Michaleen Kilroy's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Interestingly, ABC'S BILL LORD HIMSELF commented on my version of the video above: -
Documentary on ‘Last Second in Dallas’
Vince Palamara replied to Michaleen Kilroy's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
I concur--fantastic documentary. One thing that does bother me (that Tink duly notes in his book) is the fact that ABC's Bill Lord interviewed DPD James Chaney and said that "his uniform was splattered with blood." Tink says that he can't see any blood, so it can't be true...I am not convinced. In any event, Chaney having blood on his uniform is even more evidence of a frontal shot (in addition to Chaney's comment that JFK was "struck in the face" by a bullet): -
CHICAGO PLOTS AND THREATS 3/23/63 AND 11/2/63
Vince Palamara replied to Vince Palamara's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Jim Moore-the local Dallas CIA agent, not the same as the lone-nut author (relation? Who knows...) -
CHICAGO PLOTS AND THREATS 3/23/63 AND 11/2/63
Vince Palamara replied to Vince Palamara's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
As a side note, not only did Blaine get it wrong when he said Harvey Henderson wasn't even on Bolden's shift, Blaine himself told me in 2005 that he was a part of Bolden's shift. As you can see from the above, he was not. -
CHICAGO PLOTS AND THREATS 3/23/63 AND 11/2/63
Vince Palamara replied to Vince Palamara's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
SEE ALSO [thanks to Stu Wexler-my Lord, I forgot all about these. Someone sent them to me a year ago]" -
CHICAGO PLOTS AND THREATS 3/23/63 AND 11/2/63
Vince Palamara replied to Vince Palamara's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Hi, Ron! Please see the docs I just added above -
CHICAGO PLOTS AND THREATS 3/23/63 AND 11/2/63
Vince Palamara replied to Vince Palamara's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
see the docs I just added above -
CHICAGO PLOTS AND THREATS 3/23/63 AND 11/2/63
Vince Palamara replied to Vince Palamara's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
see my extended comment with images above -
CHICAGO PLOTS AND THREATS 3/23/63 AND 11/2/63
Vince Palamara replied to Vince Palamara's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
This vindicates Abe- he thought of Harvey Henderson as his boss on the detail. Former agent Gerald Blaine ridiculed him, even going so far as to say that HE (Blaine) was on Bolden's temporary shift...Blaine lied again: Blaine lies about "no racist" agents: see my third book. Harvey WAS on Bolden's shift- Coughlin even said Bolden was right about this. O'Rourke made a powerful case for conspiracy, debunking Blaine's LHO-did-it theory. -
CHICAGO PLOTS AND THREATS 3/23/63 AND 11/2/63
Vince Palamara replied to Vince Palamara's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Hi, Stu--wow; I cannot believe I did not add this and a couple related items to my post. Thanks for this! I agree-very important. I believe this came from one of the new file releases from either 2017 or 2018. Note the dates--not late 1967 "conspiracy" 'stuff' (as some would dismiss this) but contemporary information (11/25/63) -
Documentary on ‘Last Second in Dallas’
Vince Palamara replied to Michaleen Kilroy's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
It is not only excellent, it is going viral: in just a few short days, it is over 216K views!!! -
CHICAGO PLOTS AND THREATS 3/23/63 AND 11/2/63
Vince Palamara replied to Vince Palamara's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Yes, indeed! -
CHICAGO PLOTS AND THREATS 3/23/63 AND 11/2/63
Vince Palamara replied to Vince Palamara's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Hi, Larry. That is from the Black article: http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg Subject Index Files/V Disk/Vallee Thomas Arthur/Item 05.pdf -
CHICAGO PLOTS AND THREATS 3/23/63 AND 11/2/63
Vince Palamara replied to Vince Palamara's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
I edited the images to enlarge them, in case you got in there real fast before I made the necessary changes -
[Click on all images to enlarge] I. EARLIER 1963 CHICAGO TRIP THREATS (PRIOR CHICAGO TRIP OF 3/23/63): Col. George J. McNally, Head of WH Signal Corps and former Secret Service agent; on Texas trip and countless other ones FDR-LBJ: “But during the Chicago visit [3/23/63], the motorcade was slowed to the pace of a mounted Black Horse Troop, and the police got a warning of Puerto Rican snipers. Helicopters searched the roofs along the way, and no incidents occurred.” A Million Miles of Presidents by Col. George J. McNally, p. 204 (1982 manuscript released by his widow; McNally died in 1970)---sounds amazingly like the one for 11/2/63!
-
https://www.sbs.com.au/ondemand/video/1969525315933/the-assassination-of-jfk Video coming later (if no copyright concerns kick it out haha)! The major UK documentary (now seen in Australia and elsewhere and soon to be worldwide) contains 15 major segments from yours truly! Dr. Wecht was filmed the same day (we live in the same hometown!), but separate from me (Covid concerns + timing). Ken O'Donnell's daughter/author Helen O'Donnell makes a nice appearance, while Phillip Shennon does the "Oswald did it but ya never know-could be more to the story" trip. I have mixed feelings (but mostly positive) about the documentary: they did a sensational job including so much of my security/Secret Service concerns and information that it rivals or is actually BETTER than my short TMWKK appearance and my A COUP IN CAMELOT 15 minutes or so! On the other hand, while they allude to a plot and more to the story, they clearly go with Oswald as the (a) shooter, although they duly note his "I'm just a patsy" and other statements. Wecht receives short time but is able to criticize both the rifle and the single bullet theory. From MY perspective, sensational; from a pro-conspiracy standpoint, not so hot BUT I have seen much worse--at least dissent and other points of view are presented. In this day and age (2021 and the MSM), it is great!