Jump to content
The Education Forum

Bernice Moore

JFK
  • Posts

    3,556
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Bernice Moore

  1. thanks jack you said it imo black is white and white is black,,lee .But as the AARB material started to filter through and Doug Horne became more vocal there appeared to be a change in attitude and the personal attacks more profound .I am not an educator but I do enjoy learning the rest of this site is incredible and there is much to be gleaned from it .But please lets get back to the research and leave the personal stuff where it belongs.. Ian

    i fully agree ian as the truth has been spilling out from doug horne's great work i expected as did so many others, i am quite sure..that the levels of Attacks would resound loudly and become much more vociferous and often they did and they have as expected.it will continue.....the truth always has been and will be ..especially within the assassination of the president.. do not take all too seriously it takes one some time to get use to the noise levels on any of the forums..they rise and ebb with time...and try not to take what is said as being very seriously personal and really meant as such.... it usually is blowing off steam cause they whomever got out on the wrong side of the bed or just spilt their coffee or soda..do not dwell on such at all or you will never last grow a bit of a thicker shell if needed if it gets to you and often stay away from whom you see as provacateurs is good advice,,let them bury themselves they do so in the end..but stand up for yourself and your opinions....end of rattle..take care and best all b..

  2. hi chris yes i believe there is at the tsbd but it is not very clear..i wish robin would reply either to the emails or here, perhaps he is working, he was here this morning...later i imagine hopefully he will......or are you saying this comp was yours...thanks much..b

  3. scroll down

    NUMBERs 28, 29. Two photographs showing that no one could have fired any shots from the sixth-floor window and that the cartons in the window were arranged to look like a sniper's nest three days after the assassination. Photo number 28 is the official photo of the sniper's nest taken by Dallas police photographer Robert Studebaker. It was probably taken on November 25, three days later. Photo number 29* was taken by Dallas Morning News photographer Jack Beers at 3:30 P.M. on the day of the assassination. The most important thing the photos show is that the real position of the boxes at the time of the shots did not allow enough space for anyone to be in a firing position.

    http://www.ratical.com/ratville/JFK/GoD.html

  4. WELL I HAVE IT :D UNDER YOUR NAME I DO NOT IMAGINE THE THREAD FROM 2006 MAY STILL BE THERE ON THE F YOU COULD HAVE A LOOK NEVER KNOW...I WILL DIG DEEPER SEE IF ANYTHING FURTHER COMES UP...B...

    THE THREAD WAS CALLED JERRY ORGAN SMOKE AND MIRRORS AUGUST 2006 THIS BELOW IS YOUR COPIED PASTED REPLY...IF THIS HELPS...B

    I just noticed that is NOT Mrs. Hester standing at the corner.

    The collar of her dress is entirely different. Hester photos show

    a large rolled drooping collar, but this woman does not have that

    Jack

    CORRECTION ME THINKS THE COMP IS BY DUNCAN OR AS IT SHOWS THE YOUNG MAN IN THE CORNER FROM THE TSBD AND HE HAS BEEN LOOKING FOR HIM SO JACK THIS COMP MAY NOT BE FROM YOU BUT THE POSTS ARE..FROM THE FORUM..SORRY BOUT THAT I WILL ASK DUNCAN...B

    sort of collar.

    the comp was posted in january 2009 i have written and sent it to duncan am trying to trace it...take care...b

    Duncan says no it is not his that it may be Robins but i believe he was here last evening..if so he would have let us know but i have written to him.... For the new members i mark them in the corner or subject line when downloading whose work they, are now on this one i did not on occasion i goof, just mentioning this to you that if you start your collection make sure you do then credit is given where it is due..i had it in jack's hester folder for some reason but he says it is not his, so i shall search some further and perhaps robin will get back to us..sorry bout such will get it straight...b :)

  5. JACK AUG 25TH 2006 YOUR POST

    I just noticed that is NOT Mrs. Hester standing at the corner.

    The collar of her dress is entirely different. Hester photos show

    a large rolled drooping collar, but this woman does not have that

    sort of collar.

    Jack THAT'S ALL I HAVE ON IT..TXS B

  6. hi jerry pleased to see you snaggled the copies of the artifact also....quote Jim Fetzer ''There is a pattern here. Mack sought to manipulate Mary Moorman from stepping into the street, as David Lifton has explained in the Appendix to "Moorman in the Street". He has participated in deceptive documentaries by offering specious arguments for not taking probable shooting locations seriously. He--and The 6th Floor Museum--are stonewalling my request to obtain a copy of the 4x5 slide of frame 317. And here is denies what everyone can see with their own eyes--that this is no artifact! I am reminded of that old Richard Pryor joke: "Who are you going to believe--me or your lying eyes?", in the new, updated version from Gary Mack!

    Jim i have wondering the why we have not read anything further about the request to Gary for frame 317 what's the hold up Gary why?? shame......must you wait for those new specs..before you can see to find it..??.enquiring minds want to know...i think there may be only one reason Gary that you would not want to share a copy of the 4x5 slide of frame 317. and me thinks all here know the reason...get a move on and grant the request so the research can continue,,or is there some reason perhaps you do not wish it to..?? take care you need to...b.. :)

  7. quote:

    What is the source of your frame? My frame comes from the Groden

    disk from years ago. If your frame comes from a newer version, it

    means that someone has taken the trouble to revise the film to remove

    the artifact...at a later day, meaning the coverup fakery is still continuing.

    Does that not alarm you?

    Thanks.

    Jack

    The frame comes from the Discovery Channel DVD " Murder in Dealey Plaza "

    Robin,

    Most copies have that scratch and a very similar one about a second later, but other copies don’t have it. The source of the scratch is the original, first generation 16mm copy negative made by UPI of the original film in 1963, so all prints made from it show the same scratch mark.

    However, the first generation 8mm print made in Dallas for the FBI doesn’t have the scratch nor, presumably, does the original missing film. Both first generation copies are owned by The Sixth Floor Museum.

    Gary Mack

    Thanks, Robin...for the source, which is much more recent than the Groden disk, which I have had more

    than ten years.

    Gary is full of BS that the artifact represents a "scratch". See attached. Do you or anyone else agree with

    Mack?

    Jack

    i think gary may need to make a optometrist appt tomorrow..this was your post of the artifact within robins frame .and comment ...b

  8. thanks john to tell you the truth i think there is an overwhelmingly protesting too much about jack's work it is another of those times that we have seen in the past where many who will and do jump on board for the sake of either not having any studies of their own to compare or ..not knowing of what they speak or c just to be seen as going along to get along..it is the get jack show sometimes called THE JACK ATTACK... i do not know where he gets his stamina from it must be TEXAS and the many have piled on and that cannot be denied...all one must do is go through the threads it is a shame that, as i feel it only demeans the research community as a whole and makes one wonder if at times we do more hsrm to ourselves than many an outsider could possibly but it is allowed and will carry on...we all must live and learn as they say only trouble is as we both know some never do..txs for the come back...take care//b ps imo there certainly is too much protesting i have not changed my mind...on that point :rolleyes:

×
×
  • Create New...