-
Posts
6,415 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Joe Bauer
-
-
Since others there that day also reported casket shenanigans...I don't dismiss Ms. Krueger's claim out of hand.
-
4 minutes ago, Chris Davidson said:
So, no thank you TC and friends.
No matter what now, Fox News and TC and friends have been knocked down the credibility ladder by several rungs. More than they ever have before.
-
For all the fear reporting regards the potential for voter machine voter fraud ( especially in large numbers ) countless investigations of such proved there was none.
Trump pushed the big L** that there was voter machine fraud in Bidens favor ( AND STILL IS! ) despite this proof there wasn't.
Fox News never reported the reality of Trump's long term L** pushing to the degree it should have.
That it was dividing and damaging our entire society is so many dangerous and irresponsible ways.
A simple truth news story title regards Trump's never ending and nation dividing l** spreading would have been:
" Trump's False Reality Election Fraud L** Spreading Obsession Hugely Damaging And Dividing America."
Fox News wouldn't dare report Trump's seditious actions in that simple truth way.
Don't want to upset the millions of Trump cult followers who watch their show. Profit before truth.
To heck with journalistic ethics.
-
As credibly challenged as Shaw's reputation is I will always believe that Dorothy Kilgallen was murdered and whoever did it was of the highest level dark side of American power.
The ability of DK's killers to never be exposed is just more proof of their power and the truth that these people have had much more control over our society the last 60 years beyond anything the average American could imagine.
IMO anyways.
-
12 hours ago, Ron Bulman said:
I looked at the name/subject index under both K and P in Best Evidence, In the Eye of History, Crossfire, High Treason, The Radical Right and came up empty. That doesn't mean she wasn't there. If she was in the Navy there should be a record of her service and where she was stationed at the time. Then I found her obituary.
Patricia Krueger Obituary (1941 - 2023) - Francestown, NH - Monadnock Ledger-Transcript (legacy.com)
Wow...what an energetic woman!
I got tired just "reading" her life accomplishment review obituary.
Almost unbelievable the scope of her endeavors.
She could have outworked Martha Stewart!
Sarah ( Moose Momma ) Palin couldn't have kept up with this tour de force woman.
The writer of Ms. Pepe, Disantos, Krueger's obituary seemed to be challenged in how to present her full life recounting.
Almost too much to cover!
Wonder if this woman was somewhat ADD afflicted? On speed? Or, just born a whirlwind of energy and interests?
And through all her incredible energy endeavors she had 8 kids?
8 !!!
Where did she find the time?
Obviously she liked sex.
And throw in her being a JFK conspiracy theorist?
Sounds like a book there!
And you could tell she was a very physically attractive woman to boot!
Sounds like her first three husbands just couldn't keep up with this human dynamo.
Curious though her conversion from a Gary Hart volunteer to a right wing Republican advocate.
I've met a few people in my life with the energy and drive of this woman.
I couldn't be around them without quickly realizing I could never keep up. Some might say they have a little mania in their 24 hour "go,go,go" full on charge into everything they encounter.
The obituary writer clearly infers this woman's "two Kennedy bodies at Bethesda" story was reflective of her eccentric side.
A little nut case trait?
Telling stories with overly dramatic effect embellishment?
Fascinating woman though.
Beautiful looking, hurricane force energy and drive, obviously intelligent.
8 KIDS !!!
-
Just viewed the video posted above regards Tucker Carlson commenting on Sidney Powell's claims of voter machine fraud.
Yes, it is compelling in it's showing TC's asking for more proof of Powell's claim.
However, this is just one particular Carlson commentary episode out of hundreds.
One would need to watch most if not all of Fox News's main prime time reporter election coverage commentaries to get a fair assessment of whether or not Fox News ever purposely mis-reported or falsely reported the voter machine claims or gave them validity in any way.
Notice Carlson never dismisses Powell or her claims in this episode. He simply postulates the need for more proof to back up her claims.
In fact, Carlson endorses the need to look into voter machine fraud. And Fox News gives Powell a stage for making her false claims.
And what of Lou Dobbs and the other Fox News TV show host who did endorse Trump's claim of voter fraud? How long did it take for Fox News to eventually let them go? How long of time did Fox News allow these two Fox News show hosts to spew the big l** to millions of Americans via their air waves?
-
1 hour ago, Lawrence Schnapf said:
AND Tucker, Hannity and Ingram are opinion shows, not news shows nor part of the news division. These are all factors that should help Fox.
The opinionists are aired via the main media cover titled Fox "News. " The average person in this country associates Tucker, Hannity and Ingram with Fox NEWS.
There really isn't any separation of the two,
-
3 minutes ago, Lawrence Schnapf said:
Matt Allison- what are RWNJs?
Right Wing Nut Jobs?
-
26 minutes ago, Chris Davidson said:
Some of us choose not to sell our souls to hypocrites for the sake of a "pie in the sky" JFK news flash.
Bingo, Chris D.
-
For the years I have been posting here I've hardly ever had any personal back and forths with forum members where I had to put up my debating dukes and duck, jab and throw a punch or two but I guess you just can't avoid occasional boxing match debate posting skirmishes.
Regards Fox News and Tucker Carlson I fully admit that I am very politically biased. For all the reasons I have mentioned in my posts.
I am particularly worked up over this Carlson JFKA truth crusader hero campaign because he has teased everyone with a "CIA may have done it" story and on his main broadcast to boot.
I personally feel the man and his Trump propaganda machine organization has damaged this country to such degrees over the last 15 years that this JFKA truth shtick he has come up with can't in anyway balance out that damage or instantly erase his journalistic wrong doings.
And like I first responded to this Tucker crusading hero campaign, how long will those who have jumped on that bandwagon be willing to wait for Carlson's supposed unimpeachable credentials verifying source to come forward and prove TC's history changing claim of JFK guilty parties?
It's going on months now...and ...well...where's the beef!
And since TC's hero image promotion first came about here on the forum...we have been informed of TC's employer's false news reporting fraud on an unprecedented scale... ( remember CBS and Dan Rather being pummeled over "one or two" such incidents?) and of TC's completely hypocritical takes on Trump personally versus his on-air and public one.
TC's ( and Fox News ) credibility and integrity status is taking a hit that is so heavy he and they will never be able to shake it's long term effect...imo anyways.
And to prove "malice" regards this Dominion case...
How hard would that be? Donald Trump is all about getting back vindictive vengeance seeking malice.
That is one of his main motivations in life.
In promoting Trump's stolen election lies on their national news broadcasts and constantly linking the Dominion company name in those broadcasts Fox News was giving Trump's malice towards Dominion full support and enhancement.
And it sure wasn't hard for the Sandy Hook parents and their legal team to prove malice with their billion dollar judgement against Alex Jones...was it?
Maybe the malice challenge will become easier with this Fox News/ Dominion case?
More and more it seems the good guys can beat these media corporations when they knowingly report or even suggest false stories about them.
And
-
2 hours ago, Matthew Koch said:
This is why I hope you never serve on a Jury Joe💯 because Justice is supposed to be impartial and blind. You didn't hear the other sides case which yet you decided that you would side against Murdoch for clearly political partisan reasons
Let us ponder Murdoch's public statements about what he and his main Faux News reporters knew were false statements regarding the election being stolen and the possibility that Dominion had a hand in this theft.
How much more incriminating can Murdoch's statements be in slandering Dominion?
The man said ... we knew what we were reporting was not true! His reporters are on documented record ( e-mails ) saying the same thing.
His reporters are also on record saying they couldn't personally stand Trump, thought he was a disaster.
Yet, in their on air reporting they were praising him for the sake of saving their base support...for the money!
Any jury would see Fox News as a truth reporting fraud with those facts. They would see how Fox News was hurting Dominions reputation with those Trump supporting fraudulent news broadcasts.
They wouldn't need to judge this case with any political bias at all.
The fraudulent truth/Dominion slandering reporting wrong doing on Fox News part is so black and white obvious just through their own incriminating public statements and in-house e-mails etc.
Fox's linking Dominion to their stolen election proposing broadcasts for months and months ( when their reporters themselves knew this was a non-story ) is a no-brainer.
A person completely uninformed with no political leanings at all would easily be able to see how Fox News damaged the reputation of Dominion through their linking their corporate name with their knowingly false stolen election reporting to their 30 to 40 million daily viewers.
-
On 1/31/2023 at 8:59 AM, Joe Bauer said:
I have posted a different agenda proposition regards Bloomberg and his 1 billion dollar 2020 presidential primary campaign effort.
I believe Bloomberg spent his all-time record presidential primary amount ( and for only a 1 and 1/2 to 2 month campaign! ) not to win the primary nomination at all.
Bloomberg knew he didn't have a chance in **** for that outcome.
In my common sense contemplation analysis Bloomberg's agenda was to make sure the surging vote count candidacy of Elizabeth Warren and the decent one of Bernie Sanders was curtailed and cut off up to and after Super Tuesday.
And that Joe Biden win the nomination.
Throughout the beginning months of the primary, Warren was doing well. She at one point was the highest vote getter!
Biden was well behind her and was also well bested by both Warren and even Sanders in the debates up to that according to polls. Biden even lost support after each debate.
Warren and Sanders came across as more alert and vigorous in those debates imo.
Biden looked tired, made some stumbling gaffes and really didn't have as clear of message regards his political agenda goals compared to Warren's and Sander's.
Bloomberg's biggest concern about the 2020 election was not Donald Trump.
It was a possible Democratic party candidacy of Bolshevists Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders.
He clearly stated this in a recorded talk he gave to a gathering of Goldman Sachs execs/investors before he announced his own very late entry into the primary campaign.
I don't have the quotes in front of me, however they were clear in the message that he ( Bloomberg) feared major social reform advocating Warren and Sanders as a more dangerous threat to America than Trump. Especially Wall Street America and the often referred to 1%.
It was right after Biden was seriously fading in the polls that Bloomberg launched his illogical mind blowing massive financial campaign.
Within days even we were getting Bloomberg campaign literature in our mail boxes.
He was also instantly running national TV and I believe even radio ads as well.
It was a blitzkrieg effort.
Bloomberg wasn't even counted in the first primary campaign months. After he entered, the highest he ever got in national polls was slightly more than 10%?
His entering the primary so late and with quite limited established national recognition support seemed just too illogical in my political knowledge thinking.
I kept wondering why Bloomberg was doing this when it was obvious he didn't have a chance in h*** at the nomination.
I believe he stated he entered to race because he didn't think "any" of the Democratic candidates would be able to beat Trump?
I thought that was a BS explanation. It didn't make sense. In making this claim he was including Biden?
Bloomberg's candidacy did draw down Warren and Sanders poll numbers. Biden's numbers began to increase.
By Super Tuesday Biden was surging ahead of Warren and Sanders.
In the weeks before Super Tuesday Biden's camp had made an all-out effort in bringing in black vote support for his campaign and away from Warren and Sanders who's political ideologies were clearly more beneficial to black American interests.
I believe deals were made with the highest Black political leaders and groups to sway their support toward Biden. It's only a speculative guess on my part but I believe Biden promised to name a black woman as his VP choice to seal the ultimate full out support deal.
Super Tuesday sealed the nomination for Biden with entire black voting blocks giving him states that should have gone to the more progressive Warren and Sanders.
Bloomberg's true "Save America" mission was accomplished.
His mind blowing, record setting BILLION DOLLAR, illogically brief 1 to two month long primary campaign run came to an immediate stop.
His most feared threat enemies Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders ( not Donald Trump ) were toast.
In this sense Michael Bloomberg actually WON.
Biden has always been much more corporate friendly than the progressive wing of the Democratic party. Delaware has been a tax haven for them for decades.
Curious though, was any of Bloomberg's 1 billion dollar campaign run monies expenditures tax deductible?
Bump.
-
-
21 minutes ago, Paul Cummings said:
Ruby and Oswald were seen together by the staff at Austin's BBQ.
I posted a link to an interview of an Austin's Barbeque employee/waitress.
The interviewer was trashed by at least one forum member here who is highly respected.
Maybe the interviewer was discredited at some point. I don't know enough about him to say either way.
However, I heard this woman's statements about who she saw in her restaurant regards Ruby, Tippit and others.
As well as seeing someone who to her looked like Oswald, sitting with an older man as they both spoke to each other in a foreign language.
Could this older man have been George DeM?
The woman worked at this restaurant for almost two years she said. It would be easy to prove or disprove that claim.
She sounded rational and honest to me. Her reason for not coming forward sooner was plain and simple fear.
She worked with the waitress who was having an affair with DPD officer Tippit, Johnny Maxie Witherspoon.
A Mary Dowling worked at another diner restaurant named Dobbs. She said Tippit would come in regularly for morning coffee. She also stated she once saw Oswald come in to her restaurant as well.
-
It's hard to totally dismiss the statements by Carousel employees like Bill DeMarr ( a memory expert!) made to Dan Rather on national TV just days after 11/22/1963 that he (they) saw Oswald in the Carousel audience just a week or two before.
DeMarr's memory game centered on his ability to match audience member's faces with their stated objects ... and in the order of their stating them!
Was DeMarr known to be good at this act?
Or was he loudly laughed at by a bunch of drunk patron's in a seedy strip joint because he made too many mistakes with it?
Carousel comedian Wally Weston claimed he jumped off stage and socked a Lee Oswald look-alike who was shouting to him that he ( Weston) was a GD Communist!
Beverly Oliver's story of being introduced to "my friend Lee" by Ruby himself while sitting in the club with Jada one night might be a whopper, maybe not. But it still adds at least more thought to the possibility.
Karen Bennett Carlin ( Carousel stripper "Little Lynn") always seemed the most intriguing to me about her sharing of things she saw or heard regarding Ruby and other nefarious types that she may or may not have seen Ruby interact with. Who may have visited Ruby in his little back office behind closed doors.
She said on more than one occasion that she didn't want to express her true feelings about what she may have seen or heard about anything JFK related and of Ruby's connection to anyone or anything related to it.
She seemed genuinely scared.
My guess is Carlin saw some people, heard some things in her time at the Carousel that she didn't want to see and hear.
Maybe Carlin saw Dallas policemen ( plain clothes? ) meeting with Ruby in that back room office?
Maybe some out of town serious faces guys looking like typical underworld types?
Ruby mixed with them all.
Ruby's Carousel was Dallas's own "Rick's Place" if you ask me.
Seedy and tacky yet still full of intrigue and shady characters from every economic, political and police strata popping in and out.
-
Carlson and his Trump/Republican propaganda machine company are taking a truth reporting credibility hit more damaging than anything that Faux News or any major national TV news organization has ever been through before and our nation has ever seen.
In fact, because of their admitted "knowing" their reporting was journalistic cardinal sin false combined with their "years" of doing this with even "their owner admitting this" ... talk of the FCC pulling them off the air or in the least losing their licensing...is real!
America has never seen a national news reporting scandal like this ever. The biggest credibility damaging one to a degree it's unprecedented.
I noticed every far right wing radio propaganda show host on air now is avoiding talking about their national television brethren's credibility collapse like the plague.
Their mentors have given them diversion playbook instructions to instead talk about any Biden attacking subject they can to fill the truth avoiding silence and void, which is so obvious, it's the loudest sound on their airwaves.
Biden's economy disaster talk is their main hiding place now.
Dead silence on the Fox News credibility scandal.
-
5 hours ago, Lawrence Schnapf said:
only to half the country. dont drink the Koolaid from your favorite MSNBC host. Fox will not lose the lawsuit.
Fox will not lose the lawsuit?
If I'm on the jury and I just heard Fox News owner Murdoch say what he said about his own company's main reporters ( and even himself ) knowing/admitting their Trump/Dominion reporting was false, but he and they kept up the l*** for one reason only ( "the color green") ...
Sorry, as Dallas Homicide Captain Will Fritz said on 11,23,1963 regards Lee Oswald's guilt in the murder of JFK...
"This case is cinched!"
-
Amazing how Tucker Carlson ( and FOX NEWS ) have been destroyed by these latest revelations of their years of fraudulent reporting.
Carlson's credibility is taking an even bigger hit with his January 6th ( Wag The Dog ) downplaying and false reality creating regards the January 6th, coup attempt.
Just a couple of months ago Carlson was being praised to the hilt here on the forum as some type of JFKA truth crusading hero.
Amazing how quickly and dramatically fake images can be exposed.
-
13 years old?
No way!
He sounds like a very intelligent 20 year old.
Steven Spielberg....you need to mentor this young talent.
-
On 3/10/2023 at 9:56 AM, Michael Crane said:
Was Ruby bi-sexual? I don't mean that in a derogatory way.I heard the assassination was planned by a bunch of homosexuals.
Sworn testimony of Karen Bennett Carlin (Carousel Club Stripper "Little Lynn" ) for the Warren Commission April 15th, 1964 at the Fort Worth Post Office Building:
Mr. JACKSON. Did you know or had you heard anything concerning the possibility of any kind of homosexuality on the part of Jack?
Mrs. CARLIN. Yes.
Mr. JACKSON. Is that just a rumor running out there, or what?
Mrs. CARLIN. That was from his mouth. He was always asking the question, "Do you think I am a queer? Do you think I look like a queer? Or have you ever known a queer to look like me?" Every time I saw him he would ask it.
Mr. JACKSON. Do you mean he would bring up the subject himself?
Mrs. CARLIN. Yes; he would say, "Do you think I look like one or act like one?"
Mr. JACKSON. Did he say he was?
Mrs. CARLIN. No; he just asked me, "Do I look like one."
Mr. JACKSON. But he never admitted to you of being one?
Mrs. CARLIN. No.
Mr. JACKSON. Or ever made any statements that indicated that he was a homosexual?
Mrs. CARLIN. Not to my knowledge.
Mr. JACKSON. What you have told us here is all that you know about his abnormality, if any?
Mrs. CARLIN. Yes. -
-
3 hours ago, Andrew Prutsok said:
I'm not certain that "commonality" you refer too ever really existed, at least not to the extent we were all taught about The Great Melting Pot that was the United States in elementary school.
Immigrants, even the ones from the "Non-Shithole Countries," as the former president referred to them, took generations to fully assimilate. There were over 1,000 German language newspapers in the country in the 1890s, nearly 200 years after Germans started arriving on these shores and still 75 years after the great immigration wave of the 1820s. These papers lingered on, with most of them shutting down due to World War I but others limped along into the 1940s. In the 1880s there were 5 German language newspapers in Cincinnati alone.
I read once that the US was the fourth largest Spanish speaking country in the world. I don't know if that's true, but I bet we were once the second largest German speaking country in the world.
My point is that even the people most of us here would recognize as sharing "commonalities" didn't come here and just automatically become good Americans. It took generations. Who's to say the experience of the Latinos -- documented and undocumented -- will be any different?
The economic despair you reference, too, is not unique to California. Here in Montana, in the western part of the state, partly fueled by the popularity of the Yellowstone TV series, there has been a flood of wealthy people the last several years driving home and rent prices out of the range of normal people. Many there are sleeping in cars campers.
Don't apologize for the doom and gloom. It's appropriate.
Appreciate your sympatico response post AP.
America is in the midst of unprecedented change socially.
I know about the German immigrants history you cite and your correct proposition that it took 75 years for them to assimilate to the point of abandoning using their own language over English.
But, the Southern Border Hispanic illegal immigration event is very different in it's unprecedented massive numbers context.
Also, how much this massive illegal and poverty stricken immigrant wave has drawn on and stressed our social services, hospital and health care, school systems, jails, police, housing, etc. Busting budgets in all these major areas of social and physical infrastructure.
In just 30 years, the entire state of California ( the largest population state in the nation by far- 40 million! ) has become a Hispanic majority one.
That massive demographic change in just 30 years is truly mind boggling.
I think the true number of illegals is closer to 30 to 40 million in that time.
And whether it's the Hispanic/Catholic culture or not, this migrant wave does have a much higher birth rate than any other ethnic group.
So, including their second generation, American born children...both groups add up to well over 50 million now...and are growing exponentially.
German immigrants never comprised 20% of our population in 30 years of their coming here.
Some might say that California, Arizona and a great part of Texas are now more a nation of as much Mexican and other Central American culture, heritage and language as what we knew as mostly Anglo-American up until 1980.
That's why some refer to California as "Calexico" now.
It's a fascinating question to wonder how this is all going to play out in the years ahead.
By the way. It's a fact that the majority of our homeless population is of Caucasian and African American ethnicity.
Why is that?
-
Some thoughts on the state of America. California anyway.
In most of our most populated states and especially urban areas we are "too" diverse.
Diverse culturally, ethnically, economically, socially, politically, linguistically, religiously, historically and on and on and on.
In too many important ways we've absolutely lost our commonality, imo.
I can only speak specifically however about California as I live here. I have lived here for 71 years.
Illegal immigration is so massive here it has totally changed everything about California in the last 40 years. Maybe 1/3rd (or more?) the state being 1st and second generation of this out-of-control migration flood?
With the Hispanic ethnic population being the clear majority here now.
Millions of these new immigrants speak Spanish as their main language. Anyone living in California now knows that half the state communicates in Spanish before English.
Not speaking Spanish is actually a communication handicap if you travel pretty much anywhere in the state outside of the higher income and very rural areas.
Hundreds of entire school systems are 90+ percent filled with 1st and second generation Hispanic children, mostly of illegal immigrant parentage. Thousands of schools. Millions of kids.
The same in most all other sections of our communities.
Jobs, Jails, hospital patients you name it.
Spanish is "not" a second language in half the state. English is.
But it isn't just the massive illegal Latino immigration flood that has so noticeably changed California's culture.
This state has always been a magnet for immigration ( illegal and legal ) for many other mostly poor people from different cultures. For decades.
California has millions of 1st, second and now 3rd generation Asian citizens. Chinese, Vietnamese, Pilipino, Indian, Korean, etc. etc.
California's African American population has shrunken in the last 30 to 40 years.
Surely because of the cost of living here which is now mind boggling and even criminally gouging high.
And California is also economically way too diverse.
A wealthy minority owns the majority of homes, properties, businesses and land.
The working, rent crushing class is the clear majority.
If you are a renter in California, you are typically a stressed out month-to-month living slave.
Everything cost "way more" in California than most other parts of the country. Besides rent...gas, utilities, taxes, food, health care ...almost everything. Crazy high.
Gas is well over $5 a gallon and has been for a long time with no price let up in sight.
California is for sure the leading economic stress state in the union.
Also, there is no more religious affiliation commonality here anymore.
The different immigrant culture and religious adherences are nothing like the old ones that dominated Californian society up until the 70's.
In the past the social term "diversity" has usually connotated a liberal, American welcome-to-all mind set.
But there is clearly an overkill point to this social reality.
California is "too" diverse now. In some ways out of control.
There is a social and cultural value confusion going on here.
The one common bond however is how financially stressed the majority of non-home owning citizens are. Your neighbor may be Hispanic, Pilipino, Korean, Indian, Somoan, Chinese, Vietnamese, gender different, religiously different, politically different...but if you are living on the rent edge every month with them...you at least have "something" in common.
Poverty breeds fellowship in some ways eh?
Getting back to almost unbelievable out of control illegal immigration, you can't take in 25 people ( almost all dirt poor ) into a house built for 4 or 5 without the house falling apart due to the simple over-demand use. Plumbing, structural, parking, utility usage, cost of running and maintaining, loss of privacy, etc.
The house being a metaphor for the state of California.
It's infrastructure, it's social welfare programs system and budgets, it's policing and jails, hospitals, schools, all being stressed to breaking points with just way too many people flooding in and putting demands on the entire structure.
I really feel for the millions of children of illegals, who are suddenly thrown into housing situations like this and a world where they are financially way on the other side of the tracks versus other kids.
Where most of them come from, everyone is poor. You don't feel bad being poor if everyone you know and live among is poor too. But thrust into a world of not having the better things in life that they see all around them, certainly must breed resentment anger? Maybe even susceptibility to identifying with criminal gangs more than regular society?
Their illegal parents do not rise to middle class in their time usually. It takes being a second generation lift to that level if at all.
And top all this out of control legal and illegal immigration over population and ever growing economic diversity stress chaos with half a million homeless people camping in almost every major city and you have ...well... a societal mess unlike anything America has ever seen.
Oh, and throw in a super serious long term and ever growing water shortage crisis for all of Southern California and it's 25 million residents.
And one major added natural disaster stress like a massive earthquake devastating LA or the Bay Area...could trigger a societal breakdown unlike anything we could imagine. A huge and long term federal military intervention type event.
Sorry for the gloom and doom take on all this.
But California is just in this reality space right now.
Who knows what our future here holds.
-
Article published today on CNN news site.
Officer Fanone is a very good writer imo.
In his article he very coherently captures the important truths about McCarthy, Carlson and the January 6th coup attempt.
Opinion: Tucker Carlson's spin on January 6 is a lie. I was there
Thanks Moderators
in JFK Assassination Debate
Posted · Edited by Joe Bauer
Deep research findings and postulations directly focused on the JFKA are the main foundation essence of the forum imo.
Debates over their contents and credibility get super heated at times.
It's those critical examination skirmishes however that test their mettle especially when offered by equally intelligent and well researched JFKA academics.
I find those debates not only stimulating but informative.
Too bad the "56 years" thread got too over-heated and personal. Often times I also found it's postings stimulating and informative and it's posters very intelligent and thoughtful.
I have had mixed feelings about it's JFKA relevance validity sometimes yet still felt that the state of the world and our current national political scene in general can't totally be dismissed as not having at least some connection to JFK times and the assassination itself.
Still, I'm going back to the more JFKA focused threads for now. My main forum interest roots if you will.