Tony Krome

On 9/17/2022 at 6:10 AM, Chris Davidson said:

 

Does that front door open by pushing in, or only by pulling out as per the top pic?

6 minutes ago, Ron Ege said:

Absolutely not.  

From military shooting and now pleasure shooting at the target range experience, my ears would be ringing, big time. 

Thanks Ron. I have no shots fired from the SN. Cheers

3 hours ago, Ron Ege said:

as a former marine

I'd like your opinion on this; If you were hanging out a 5th floor window diagonally below the Sniper's Nest watching the motorcade, and a high powered rifle was fired 3 times from the SN, is it possible that you could describe the sounds as coming from somewhere below? Thanks

The transcript;

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Did you shoot the President?

OSWALD: I work in that building and --

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Were you in the building at the time?

OSWALD: Naturally if I work in that building, yes, sir.

If we remove the second question;

OSWALD: I work in that building and naturally if I work in that building, yes, sir.

hmmm ...

7 hours ago, Roger Odisio said:

The encounter with the reporters was brief and disjointed (many questions were hurled at Oswald in rapid succession). 

The person X who asked "were you in the building at the time?" was the same person X who asked "did you shoot the president?" immediately before. To be clear, this person X asked this exact same question as another person before him. So if Oswald was directing answers at this person X, let's look at the first response: Question from person X "did you shoot the president? Response "I work in that building". That doesn't make sense right? It appears Oswald was not responding to this person X. Next we have the "were you in the building at the time?" question from person X. Oswald responds with a sarcastic "naturally" as if he felt that his previous answer was sufficient, an answer to someone else. not this person X. In a nutshell, we don't know the context of Oswald's response when he said "I work in that building", and therefore we don't know what the answer "naturally, if I work in that building, yes sir" actually relates to.

2 hours ago, James Norwood said:

While the evidence is only sketchy

4 hours ago, Miles Massicotte said:

Linnie Mae Randle also saw Oswald with a "brown, heavy bag" that morning, so yes I believe that Oswald had a package of some kind. 

Ok, and what did Oswald reportedly say about such a package, and/or curtain rods?

8 minutes ago, Miles Massicotte said:

Then why did BWF insist that LHO's "curtain rods package could not have been the rifle/rifle bag due to its size? It is an absolutely vital piece of the Warren Commission narrative

You are convinced there was a package, just the dimensions are in dispute, right?

13 hours ago, W. Niederhut said:

2220 Thomas Place

9 minutes ago, Henry Frost said:

Here's the full transcript from CNN:

http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1710/28/csr.01.html

Actually listen to the video, the CNN transcript is incorrect. it's obvious when you hear it. Oswald had a black eye, he was not a black guy.

8 minutes ago, Henry Frost said:

He asked Oswald twice if he was black.

Are you having fun or are you serious? What I hear is "How'd you get the black eye?"

18 minutes ago, Henry Frost said:

From the transcript:

OSWALD: I don't know what this is all about.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Aren't you the black (ph) guy?

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Did you kill the President?

OSWALD: No, sir, I didn't. People keep asking me that.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Aren't you the black (ph) guy?

OSWALD: Sir?

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Did you shoot the President?

OSWALD: I work in that building and --

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Were you in the building at the time?

OSWALD: Naturally if I work in that building, yes, sir.

So we know Oswald is not black. Genius.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Aren't you the black (ph) guy?

That was a different person who asked that, and thats not what he asked, he asked "How'd you get the black eye?" and he asked that twice.

The guy I'm talking about is here;

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Did you shoot the President?

OSWALD: I work in that building and --

I'm asking Bill Brown if he believes Oswald responded to that person.

On 9/13/2022 at 3:15 AM, Bill Brown said:

On film....

Reporter:  "Were you in the building at the time?"

Oswald:  "Naturally, if I work in that building, yes sir."

Oswald admits, on film, that he was inside the building at the time of the shooting.  Therefore, Oswald was not out by the front steps.  If Oswald was not out by the front steps, then he is not prayer man.  If Oswald is not prayer man, then who cares who prayer man was.

 

That reporter you quoted asked another question immediately before. Do you believe Oswald responded to that question?

4 hours ago, W. Niederhut said:

 I must have missed the "debunking."

10 minutes ago, Ron Bulman said:

I can't remember which but in Eye of History the attendant to Humes, Jenkins, O'Connor, David or Custer whichever remembered them investigating a wound to the right temple.  Told to stop, Humes called to the gallery, coming back and saying we will move on from this.

Mass psychosis at Parkland, people pointing at imaginary entry wounds, people describing occipital blowouts. Glad it all got sorted.

20 minutes ago, W. Niederhut said:

Tony,

     I must admit that this is a more convincing likeness.  The nose, teeth, hairline, and ears look nearly identical.

     Do you know who published these photos?

The one on the left would be a studio photo with touch-ups for vanity. The centre one I believe is post assassination at some court appearance. Same lady, the glasses change her appearance, nothing more.

.

.

40 minutes ago, Jonathan Cohen said:

"Findings" is a generous word to describe what Armstrong has brought forth. I don't think many people quibble with how his research has generated a wealth of relevant source documents, and the fact that he's made them all available through Baylor is very commendable. However, his interpretation of this information is flawed beyond belief and ultimately quite preposterous. There are dozens of threads on this forum where reasonable alternate explanations for Armstrong's theories have been presented, none of which require a decades-long secret government program involving multiple doppelgangers. Tracy Parnell's Web site is a fantastic repository for laying out the logical fallacies of the "Harvey and Lee" theory.

Saved me replying, cheers

Totally debunked, surprised people still talk about it.

8 hours ago, Sean Coleman said:

From an EF posting in 2020 by a ‘guest.’

Interesting stuff that just opens the door to more weapon related questions- where’s the holsters pistol, where did it originate, who fitted it and so no and so on…

Anyone have a good pic of the "Beckley" holster?

Belin: Do you know whether or not this was one of the hulls that was found at the School Book Depository Building?

J. C. Day: I think it is.

I've been looking at the condition of the strap on CE139 since David Von Pein posted a close-up shot of it recently, see here;

strap

And here;

CE139

It appears to be in excellent condition, buckles all shiny, leather looks great, the strap holes showing no sign of excessive use like an old belt.

J. C. Day: "It appeared to be a cheap wartime gun with a telescopic sight and kind of a worn leather strap on it"

He picked up CE139, right?

1 hour ago, Bill Brown said:

In 1968, during an interview (along with Penn Jones) with the L.A. Free Press, Roger Craig was asked about the Tippit shooting.  Craig told the interviewer that the shooting occurred at 1:45.
Jones immediately corrected Craig, informing him that the shooting occurred around 1:15.  Craig responded with "Oh?  Is that right? Okay." (or words to that effect, I'm going by memory) 
The bottom line is, in 1968, Craig obviously had no idea what time the Tippit shooting occurred.

Then years later, in the early 70's when writing his manuscript, Craig tells the story of being in Dealey Plaza and hearing of the shooting of the police officer in Oak Cliff.  In the scenario, Craig supposedly looks at his watch and notes that it said the time was 1:06.

 

1968:  Craig has no idea what time the Tippit shooting occurred

 

Early 70's:  Craig suddenly remembers looking at his watch and it said the time was 1:06

 

Yeah right.

Roger Craig told Free Press that Tippit was killed about 1:40, not 1:45 as you stated. People make mistakes recalling times.

40 minutes ago, Henry Frost said:

Indeed, I also found this very interesting. It also opens up the possibility of two snipers working together on the sixth floor during the shooting. Arnold Rowland saw a man with a rifle in the West window, on the other side of the "snipers nest".

A sniper who stands at Port Arms obviously visible to casual onlookers from the street? A sniper who protrudes his barrel from a window for anyone to see?