Jack White Posted January 19, 2010 Author Share Posted January 19, 2010 But I have Jack, otherwise I wouldn't say so. Anyone can check it with a large variety of utilities. Show us YOUR test, John. Thanks. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted January 19, 2010 Author Share Posted January 19, 2010 OK...here is another one for the naysayers and debunkers and anti-alterationists.Robin kindly posted an excellent enlargement of a frame from the Bell film allegedly showing Sitzman, Zapruder, and the Hesters. What is supposed to be the Hesters seems to be a Picasso rendering of a small pyramid and a pile of rocks...oh, wait a minute...I am not qualified to say what is in the image. OK...everyone look and YOU TELL ME WHAT IS SEEN. Fair enough? Jack I'm waiting for someone to tell me how I manipulated this image to turn the Hesters into a small pyramid and a pile of rocks. Surely I have squashed the dynamic range or pixelated the parallax, or something. Please explain how I can get such strange results, since you do not see what I see. I am at a loss to explain why my computer sees things that others cannot see. Please! Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Dolva Posted January 19, 2010 Share Posted January 19, 2010 I just increased the gamma and adjusted brightness and contrast and discarded the obvious result. Do it yourself, but stop before the range compression becomes as much as in the image you posted. Or are you suggesting the burden of proof is on me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted January 19, 2010 Author Share Posted January 19, 2010 Here is a study of Wiegman frames I did many years ago. It is from one of the earliest Wiegman frames, BEFORE THE JFK LIMO REACHES THE UNDERPASS. It shows the pedestal with nobody on it. No Zapruder. No Sitzman. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted January 19, 2010 Author Share Posted January 19, 2010 I just increased the gamma and adjusted brightness and contrast and discarded the obvious result. Do it yourself, but stop before the range compression becomes as much as in the image you posted. Or are you suggesting the burden of proof is on me? I am suggesting nothing. I do not care what you do or do not do. Showing a study is better than describing a study. Do as you please. You are under no obligation of any kind, and I have not suggested that you are. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted January 19, 2010 Author Share Posted January 19, 2010 Here is a study I did years ago re the Weigman film, showing that BEFORE THE LIMO REACHES THE UNDERPASS nobody is atop the pedestal. The pedestal is in sunlight. Zapruder and Sitzman should be seen. They are not. Somebody please tell me what I have done wrong. Please. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted January 19, 2010 Author Share Posted January 19, 2010 Here is a study I did years ago re the Weigman film, showing that BEFORE THE LIMO REACHES THE UNDERPASS nobody is atop the pedestal. The pedestal is in sunlight. Zapruder and Sitzman should be seen. They are not. Somebody please tell me what I have done wrong. Please. Jack I know (been through all of this before) that now some of you are going to ask me to prove that the limo was still on Elm during the Wiegman run. Well here is a study I did many years ago, clearly showing the limo in a Wiegman frame. I first published this in the 1980s in Gary Mack's CoverUps! newsletter. Believe it or not! Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted January 19, 2010 Author Share Posted January 19, 2010 OK...here is another one for the naysayers and debunkers and anti-alterationists.Robin kindly posted an excellent enlargement of a frame from the Bell film allegedly showing Sitzman, Zapruder, and the Hesters. What is supposed to be the Hesters seems to be a Picasso rendering of a small pyramid and a pile of rocks...oh, wait a minute...I am not qualified to say what is in the image. OK...everyone look and YOU TELL ME WHAT IS SEEN. Fair enough? Jack I'm waiting for someone to tell me how I manipulated this image to turn the Hesters into a small pyramid and a pile of rocks. Surely I have squashed the dynamic range or pixelated the parallax, or something. Please explain how I can get such strange results, since you do not see what I see. I am at a loss to explain why my computer sees things that others cannot see. Please! Jack I am getting impatient. Someone please tell me what I did wrong here. Surely some expert knows. Is that pile of stuff on the grass REALLY THE HESTERS? Inquiring minds want to know. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted January 19, 2010 Author Share Posted January 19, 2010 Everyone is studiously ignoring replying to this posting, hoping it will cycle off of page one. I will not let it leave page one till I have replies from the ALTERATIONS ARE IMPOSSIBLE crowd. All I want to know is why two humans have been replaced by a pyramid and pile of rocks. There has to be an explanation for this phenomenon, and I suspect that one of you knows. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Unger Posted January 19, 2010 Share Posted January 19, 2010 Everyone is studiously ignoring replying to this posting, hoping it will cycle off of page one. I will not let it leave page one till I have replies from the ALTERATIONS ARE IMPOSSIBLE crowd. All I want to know is why two humans have been replaced by a pyramid and pile of rocks. There has to be an explanation for this phenomenon, and I suspect that one of you knows. Jack Hi Jack Later when i get home from work i will post some more of the Weigman frames you are refereing too in your study. As for the Hesters in Bell. I agree, they do look very odd. I will try to get a clearer version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Unger Posted January 19, 2010 Share Posted January 19, 2010 Everyone is studiously ignoring replying to this posting, hoping it will cycle off of page one. I will not let it leave page one till I have replies from the ALTERATIONS ARE IMPOSSIBLE crowd. All I want to know is why two humans have been replaced by a pyramid and pile of rocks. There has to be an explanation for this phenomenon, and I suspect that one of you knows. Jack Hi Jack Later when i get home from work i will post some more of the Weigman frames you are refereing too in your study. As for the Hesters in Bell. I agree, they do look very odd. I will try to get a clearer version. Groden Scan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted January 20, 2010 Author Share Posted January 20, 2010 Everyone is studiously ignoring replying to this posting, hoping it will cycle off of page one. I will not let it leave page one till I have replies from the ALTERATIONS ARE IMPOSSIBLE crowd. All I want to know is why two humans have been replaced by a pyramid and pile of rocks. There has to be an explanation for this phenomenon, and I suspect that one of you knows. Jack Hi Jack Later when i get home from work i will post some more of the Weigman frames you are refereing too in your study. As for the Hesters in Bell. I agree, they do look very odd. I will try to get a clearer version. Groden Scan. Thanks, Robin. Actually, the top part is my work from the 1980s. However, I did not do the colorized one. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean Hagerman Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 OK...here is another one for the naysayers and debunkers and anti-alterationists.Robin kindly posted an excellent enlargement of a frame from the Bell film allegedly showing Sitzman, Zapruder, and the Hesters. What is supposed to be the Hesters seems to be a Picasso rendering of a small pyramid and a pile of rocks...oh, wait a minute...I am not qualified to say what is in the image. OK...everyone look and YOU TELL ME WHAT IS SEEN. Fair enough? Jack I'm waiting for someone to tell me how I manipulated this image to turn the Hesters into a small pyramid and a pile of rocks. Surely I have squashed the dynamic range or pixelated the parallax, or something. Please explain how I can get such strange results, since you do not see what I see. I am at a loss to explain why my computer sees things that others cannot see. Please! Jack I am getting impatient. Someone please tell me what I did wrong here. Surely some expert knows. Is that pile of stuff on the grass REALLY THE HESTERS? Inquiring minds want to know. Jack I agree with you Jack Looks like a pile of rubble to me, the Hesters are nowhere in sight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean Hagerman Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 Robin Those are awesome Bell frames you posted! I have never seen the Bell film or frames that clear Great job Dean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Unger Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 (edited) RobinThose are awesome Bell frames you posted! I have never seen the Bell film or frames that clear Great job Dean Thanks Dean. I copied a television version of Oswalds Ghost. Pity i couldnt get it in True HD (1080) But i don't have a HD recorder, so i had to settle for a lower resolution version. hence the slight green tint. This is the last compilation: Edited January 20, 2010 by Robin Unger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now