Christian Toussay Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 (edited) OK, so I am trying to continue this presentation, hoping that now the links will stay: I have modified the Google Pix settings accordingly. If that works, I will repost the missing images on the precedent files. The segment on the head wounds established, among other things, that the official record has been tampered with: - the cavity and bone flaps on top of the head should be seen in the original Moorman picture - the volcano-shaped occipital exit wound should be seen in the "original" Zapruder film: it doesn't because it has been deliberately blurred - the occipital wound is actually present in the autopsy picture, and those who testified to the contrary can now be impeached, like those who forged the record - the frontal entry wound is actually visible in the autopsy picture, and those who did not testify to it can also be impeached There was evidently a massive tampering of the photographic evidence in the case: this could only be done by the immediate and coordinated actions of the Federal Government. How was it done? Let's take a quite striking example, and at the same time let us solve one of the many collateral mysteries of the JFKA: the "box discrepancy arrangement in the Sniper's Nest", which originates from an evident conflict between 2 pictures of the Sniper's nest, taken by two differents photographers at slightly different times. To make it short, one (Dillard) shows one box partially visible on the left, while the other (Powell) actually shows a full barricade of stacked boxes lined up across the window. Because of time constraints for Oswald known movements, Conspiracy Theorists see there proof of Oswald's innocence or at least other accomplices involved in moving the boxes. Lone Nutters are not comfortable with this fact, relying on light and shadow tricks to explain it away, not convincingly. That is where the situation stands as I write this, 61 years after the fact. Now let's see how this mystery is resolved, thanks to this unconventional, but extremely efficient process I am proposing to the JFK Community. I post below a version of the Powell picture: it is recorded in my file as the "Gert Powell Colored Version": I either downloaded it from JFK Lancer or the Robin Unger Gallery. I post below a version of the Dillard picture: this is known as the "FBI Version", notorious for the ominous black arrow that points at ...nothing: So the discrepancy between the two images is clear to see. So let's see now if the process, which has revealed three assassins in Dealey Plaza and the true nature of JFK's head wounds, can help us here. As it happens, it can. Below is a processed result from the Powell data bank. Prepare to be angry. Very angry: I post below an intermediate result (remember, the process is iterative: each step in the "cleaning up" of the image under analysis is documented by a specific file), showing the forgery literally "in the making": you can see the fake box contour around the man's head... So this is a solid example of one of the technique used by the forgers: just hide unwanted details under " special effects" added to the film or picture of concern. We will see more of them, but first: I don't know about you, but I am intellectually curious. So this black arrow pointing to nothing in the Dillard FBI version sort of piqued my curiosity. Why would an FBI analyst, studying this image taken in the immediate aftermath of the shooting, put an indicative arrow pointing at...strictly nothing. I will present tomorrow results obtained on the Dillard picture. Again, prepare to be very angry... Edited April 26 by Christian Toussay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Govus Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 (edited) @Christian ToussaySo sorry, the most recent links don't work. A shame. Speaking as an artist, I can say the images you have managed to share are very interesting! I notice there's yet another image hosting service you could try. I see this one allows for hosting a picture indefinitely. https://postimages.org/ Edited April 26 by George Govus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Bertolino Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 10 hours ago, Christian Toussay said: OK, so I am trying to continue this presentation, hoping that now the links will stay: I have modified the Google Pix settings accordingly. If that works, I will repost the missing images on the precedent files. The segment on the head wounds established, among other things, that the official record has been tampered with: - the cavity and bone flaps on top of the head should be seen in the original Moorman picture - the volcano-shaped occipital exit wound should be seen in the "original" Zapruder film: it doesn't because it has been deliberately blurred - the occipital wound is actually present in the autopsy picture, and those who testified to the contrary can now be impeached, like those who forged the record - the frontal entry wound is actually visible in the autopsy picture, and those who did not testify to it can also be impeached There was evidently a massive tampering of the photographic evidence in the case: this could only be done by the immediate and coordinated actions of the Federal Government. How was it done? Let's take a quite striking example, and at the same time let us solve one of the many collateral mysteries of the JFKA: the "box discrepancy arrangement in the Sniper's Nest", which originates from an evident conflict between 2 pictures of the Sniper's nest, taken by two differents photographers at slightly different times. To make it short, one (Dillard) shows one box partially visible on the left, while the other (Powell) actually shows a full barricade of stacked boxes lined up across the window. Because of time constraints for Oswald known movements, Conspiracy Theorists see there proof of Oswald's innocence or at least other accomplices involved in moving the boxes. Lone Nutters are not comfortable with this fact, relying on light and shadow tricks to explain it away, not convincingly. That is where the situation stands as I write this, 61 years after the fact. Now let's see how this mystery is resolved, thanks to this unconventional, but extremely efficient process I am proposing to the JFK Community. I post below a version of the Powell picture: it is recorded in my file as the "Gert Powell Colored Version": I either downloaded it from JFK Lancer or the Robin Unger Gallery. I post below a version of the Dillard picture: this is known as the "FBI Version", notorious for the ominous black arrow that points at ...nothing: So the discrepancy between the two images is clear to see. So let's see now if the process, which has revealed three assassins in Dealey Plaza and the true nature of JFK's head wounds, can help us here. As it happens, it can. Below is a processed result from the Powell data bank. Prepare to be angry. Very angry: I post below an intermediate result (remember, the process is iterative: each step in the "cleaning up" of the image under analysis is documented by a specific file), showing the forgery literally "in the making": you can see the fake box contour around the man's head... So this is a solid example of one of the technique used by the forgers: just hide unwanted details under " special effects" added to the film or picture of concern. We will see more of them, but first: I don't know about you, but I am intellectually curious. So this black arrow pointing to nothing in the Dillard FBI version sort of piqued my curiosity. Why would an FBI analyst, studying this image taken in the immediate aftermath of the shooting, put an indicative arrow pointing at...strictly nothing. I will present tomorrow results obtained on the Dillard picture. Again, prepare to be very angry... The differences between the box positions between the Dillard and "Powell" photos can be explained by the difference in camera perspective. The same 3-dimensional box positions can look different in two dimensional photographs taken from different positions. Comparing to photos taken a few minutes later, the boxes do seem to have been moved, but the Powell and Dillard seem to be consistent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Andrews Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 (edited) Christian, why not put all photos for a post in one file, and upload that to File Factory or WeTransfer for readers to download as a set? Edited April 26 by David Andrews Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerry Down Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 18 hours ago, Christian Toussay said: OK, so I am trying to continue this presentation, hoping that now the links will stay: I have modified the Google Pix settings accordingly. If that works, I will repost the missing images on the precedent files. I still haven't seen a single image you've posted. You should consider using this free image hosting website. I've been using it for years with no problem: https://imgbb.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Toussay Posted April 26 Author Share Posted April 26 (edited) 11 hours ago, George Govus said: @Christian ToussaySo sorry, the most recent links don't work. A shame. Speaking as an artist, I can say the images you have managed to share are very interesting! I notice there's yet another image hosting service you could try. I see this one allows for hosting a picture indefinitely. https://postimages.org/ Hi.. Thanks for your interest in this. I will try the hosting link you shared... Ok, have uploaded a file: there are several options: "Link", "Direct Link, "Hot Link". Which one should I choose? Edited April 26 by Christian Toussay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Toussay Posted April 26 Author Share Posted April 26 6 hours ago, David Andrews said: Christian, why not put all photos for a post in one file, and upload that to File Factory or WeTransfer for readers to download as a set? ..Yep, I think I will resort to that if I can't solve that link problem. Do you know if there is a limit for the number of people having access to it? Let me know... Because, for understandable reasons, the field of photo analysis in the JFKA is today considered somewhat irrelevant, I wanted to show in the thread, by displaying some results, that this research is very different from has been done in the past. It is about applying 21st Century tools and method while approaching the record not as photographic sets, but as batch of data. All previous analysis of the record were based on enhancing specific details of an image. Thus, someone would "see" something in an image, and then redraw and/or color it to "revel" his interpretation to the viewer. This is not at all what is done here: full pictures or frames are processed (or large segments), applying known methods of problem solving used to reduce uncertainty/unknowns in finite data sets. As it happens, uncertainty/unknowns in pixel data sets are expressed as blur, i.e. uncertainty about the exact boundaries between groups of pixels of different value. So the process is simply applying well-established tools of data processing to the specific sub group of pixel. When I conceptualized this (1998), and looked for any scientific application (I was quite sure I had merely rediscover something long-known of specialists in the field), I was quite surprised I could not find anything. But a few years later I did... I will conclude this "Decoding Dallas" presentation with a segment about "The Science Behind the Results", where I will show to those interested that the process I propose is not "Voodoo Science" and the results presented not an exercise in pareidolia. On the contrary... Well, let me try to solve that lik problem now. Thanks to all members who are trying to help.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Toussay Posted April 26 Author Share Posted April 26 3 hours ago, Gerry Down said: I still haven't seen a single image you've posted. You should consider using this free image hosting website. I've been using it for years with no problem: https://imgbb.com/ Hi.. Thks, I'll try it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Toussay Posted April 26 Author Share Posted April 26 12 hours ago, George Govus said: @Christian ToussaySo sorry, the most recent links don't work. A shame. Speaking as an artist, I can say the images you have managed to share are very interesting! I notice there's yet another image hosting service you could try. I see this one allows for hosting a picture indefinitely. https://postimages.org/ Ok, so I have reposted above the images originally posted. I used the link you proposed, and I chose the "direct link" option. Crossing my fingers now... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Toussay Posted April 26 Author Share Posted April 26 (edited) 11 hours ago, Richard Bertolino said: The differences between the box positions between the Dillard and "Powell" photos can be explained by the difference in camera perspective. The same 3-dimensional box positions can look different in two dimensional photographs taken from different positions. Comparing to photos taken a few minutes later, the boxes do seem to have been moved, but the Powell and Dillard seem to be consistent. ...Maybe they could, but as the result I am trying to post here establishes without a doubt, this is not the explanation: the apparent discrepancy is caused by the removal of the image of a man in dark blue uniform standing in the window about 10/30 seconds after the last shot. You will find the same type of "discrepancy", and the same explanation, for the ruler's position in the back-of-the-head autopsy picture: it makes no sense in the original picture, measuring nothing, but makes sense when the image is cleaned up of the forgery, revealing the wound that is being measured... I posted those images, but I must admit I have lost count of which ones were visible, and when. Any specific results you might be interested in, I can send you by e mail... Edited April 26 by Christian Toussay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jean Ceulemans Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 In the first enhacement of Powell, is the figure raising his left arm? Almost touching his chin with his left hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Toussay Posted April 26 Author Share Posted April 26 (edited) 29 minutes ago, Jean Ceulemans said: In the first enhacement of Powell, is the figure raising his left arm? Almost touching his chin with his left hand. ...Glad to see the links are working... Will wait to see if it lasts.... Re your question: I would not think so, because we can see apparently undisturbed light distribution on the area which would be covered by the arm. The man, to me, appears to be merely standing and looking down, with his arms to his sides. He may still be holding the weapon seen in Hughes frame n°2, but that would be an extrapolation... Let me add this, which I think is important: the presence of this assassin, 20/30 seconds after the last shot, confirms what we saw in the segment about "The Assassins' team Behind the Fence", where a man in DPD uniform can be seen, standing on a car trunk, behind the shooter. Both men shows absolutely no sign of worry about being apprehended, identified, or caught on film. The man behind the fence, actually, was meant to be seen, giving the impression that the area was under police control and thus secure. Again, that is in direct contradiction to the classic scenario of some disgruntled party pulling some Mission: Impossible stunt to kill the President, and getting away with it because of "skeletons in the closet" that they used to blackmail the Federal Government into the Lone Nut conclusion. This is not what we see here: we see the Sniper's Nest shooter, 20/30 seconds after shooting at the President, cool as ice, looking casually down the street to check the aftermath of the shooting. So my analysis here is that those men knew, somehow, that they had absolutely nothing to worry about... Edited April 26 by Christian Toussay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jean Ceulemans Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 (edited) Did some enhancing myself, there is indeed "something" going on there, but it's hard to draw a conclusion. Shadow tones are consistent imo Edited April 26 by Jean Ceulemans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jean Ceulemans Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 Was looking at a different structure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jean Ceulemans Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 It would be easier if you could indicate what part is being worked on, it´s hard to figure out the size and place of the detail Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now