Robert Charles-Dunne Posted January 21, 2006 Share Posted January 21, 2006 And their "BOOKS" ??!! Library loads of re-run speculation, rumor, anonymous sources, and regurgitated "quotes?". ALL taken out of context and time-frame. And yet, they have the "Nads" to cite it all as scripture. If the history on offer is incomplete, it is because those who claim to have undisclosed knowledge fail to disclose it. They make grandiose claims about not wishing to violate secrecy oaths, or not wishing to incur the wrath of those who may take offense at any disclosures, or to safeguard friends and their families, etc. Or, having decided to dip their toes in the water by making public assertions, they thereafter rely on the time-tested last refuge of a scoundrel: "I was misquoted" or "That's not what I meant" or "They got it all wrong." But in the final analysis, they offer nothing but critiques of those who try to render history in a way that the average lay person can understand. Outstanding contribution. What a gang of gullible squatters we are forced to endure on this Internet !! Actually, Gerry, nobody forces you to "endure" a damned thing. Sit in the backyard of your trailer allotment, have a cold beer and enjoy your golden years. Given the wholly insignificant value of what you've divulged over the past thirty-plus years, nobody will begrudge your decision, or miss your lack of a contribution. And by the way, if you can't stand the incoming fire from those whom you detest, leave the field. It's really that simple. But then, to whom would you parade your bloated sense of self-importance? GPH ____________________________ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now