Maarten Coumans Posted September 22, 2006 Share Posted September 22, 2006 Mr. Valenti, Why do you take this so personal. Did I step on your toes? Remarks like: "If that is a dent in the car, when did it get there? Is it a bullet strike? Or a pebble from the street? Did somebody throw a rock? Or if it is a dent, was it there earlier?" I heard earlier. From someone else...... " Or a pebble from the street?"........... Come on ........ You godda be kidding. For the rest, do your own homework. For everyone else. I was trying to find members who had any additional info on, wheather or not. Since a bunch of serious people struggling with a trunk, may be remembered. Maarten Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Crowe Posted September 22, 2006 Share Posted September 22, 2006 A bullet can be seen in the Z-Film? please show me this....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mark Valenti Posted September 22, 2006 Share Posted September 22, 2006 Maarten, Don't take it personally, it's all about the JFK killing and finding the truth. If you see a dent on a car, it's okay to wonder if it came from a variety of sources. You were making a suggestion it was a bullet strike. I was making suggestions that it could be from a number of other sources - if there is in fact a dent on the car, which we still don't know for sure. If you've ever had a car windshield crack from a flying pebble on the road, you would understand the reference I made. Your theories and hunches are scrutinized by everybody, not just by people who think your ideas are good ones. When I read your post I remembered that you are the guy who thinks he sees a bullet in the Z-film. I believe that hunch, mixed with these new ones, points toward a methodology which is indicative of your discernment tendencies. I'm not saying they're bad or good, I'm only saying they point toward assigning an easy solution to that which is, at this point, inscrutable. Cheers, MV Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted September 22, 2006 Share Posted September 22, 2006 (edited) Maarten,Don't take it personally, it's all about the JFK killing and finding the truth. If you see a dent on a car, it's okay to wonder if it came from a variety of sources. You were making a suggestion it was a bullet strike. I was making suggestions that it could be from a number of other sources - if there is in fact a dent on the car, which we still don't know for sure. If you've ever had a car windshield crack from a flying pebble on the road, you would understand the reference I made. Your theories and hunches are scrutinized by everybody, not just by people who think your ideas are good ones. When I read your post I remembered that you are the guy who thinks he sees a bullet in the Z-film. I believe that hunch, mixed with these new ones, points toward a methodology which is indicative of your discernment tendencies. I'm not saying they're bad or good, I'm only saying they point toward assigning an easy solution to that which is, at this point, inscrutable. Cheers, MV When I saw the Parkland limo photo, the first thing I noticed was the wide chrome band around the spare tire cover. A comparison with Zapruder raises interesting questions. Jack Edited September 22, 2006 by Jack White Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. William King Posted September 22, 2006 Share Posted September 22, 2006 Jack... I have several pictures of the limo before, during and after the assassination, and there is no wide chrome band around the spare tire cover in any of them. I don't think the car ever had one. JWK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mark Valenti Posted September 22, 2006 Share Posted September 22, 2006 (edited) When I saw the Parkland limo photo, the first thing I noticed was the wide chrome band around the spare tire cover. A comparison with Zapruder raises interesting questions. I'm sure I remember seeing a photo depicting the rear of the limo at Parkland - I think it was a Corbis photo. I'll see if I can find it. Edited September 23, 2006 by Mark Valenti Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted September 22, 2006 Share Posted September 22, 2006 Sometimes comparisons are easier at the same scale. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Richards Posted September 22, 2006 Share Posted September 22, 2006 I'm sure I remember seeing a photo depicting the rear of the limo at Parkland - I think it was a Corbis photo. I'll see if I can find it. (Mark Valenti) Here is a rear view of the limo at Parkland. Also of interest is the man on the left of frame carrying what looks to be some kind of official pouch. Anyone recognize him? James Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mark Valenti Posted September 22, 2006 Share Posted September 22, 2006 Sure - that's Bennett Cerf. Just kidding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted September 22, 2006 Share Posted September 22, 2006 (edited) As a photographer for 50+ years, I have never encountered a surface reflectivity oddity like this! It possibly has to do with the films being used, or perhaps a polarizing filter. Also, the one on the right is shot with auxilliary flash. while the other appears to just use available light. Jack Edited September 22, 2006 by Jack White Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maarten Coumans Posted September 22, 2006 Share Posted September 22, 2006 Jack wrote: "Is my photo-analysis faulty?" YES. Please correct, edit your posts. Mark........ Maarten Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted September 22, 2006 Share Posted September 22, 2006 Jack wrote:"Is my photo-analysis faulty?" YES. Please correct, edit your posts. Mark........ Maarten Sorry. Apologies. Sometimes photos are deceptive. And a previous poster addressed you as Ms. I think. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Unger Posted September 24, 2006 Share Posted September 24, 2006 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted September 24, 2006 Share Posted September 24, 2006 (edited) delete Edited September 24, 2006 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Choor Posted September 24, 2006 Share Posted September 24, 2006 Jack wrote: "Is my photo-analysis faulty?" YES. Please correct, edit your posts. Mark........ Maarten Sorry. Apologies. Sometimes photos are deceptive. And a previous poster addressed you as Ms. I think. Jack Haha, Jack, this is EXACTLY how you misinterprete all pictures concerning JFK, for instance the Moorman picture and your "Badgeman-phantasy"! Gr. Paul. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now