All Activity

It could be that the Mexico City office did realize that there was no credible evidence that Oswald had been to the Cuban consulate, and that's why they didn't say so. Or it could be that somebody in MC knew what was going on but did not tell Winston Scott. Or it could be that Scott understood what was going on but that it was too sensitive to put into normal communications. I don't think that a firm conclusion can be made here as a basis for a Mexico City explanation.

I'm just seeing the images here for the first time. Are you saying that the "badge" is above the highest "box?"

If you have not read Gibson's milestone article, you really should. When he first submitted it to me, I was really surprised. Johnson, the master manipulator, was being royally rolled into doing something he did not want to do. If you have not read it, here it is: https://www.kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-articles/the-creation-of-the-warren-commission And here is a story on Hoover's memo the night before Katzenbach's.

The Warren Commission was not Johnson's invention, that is not accurate. Johnson did not want a blue ribbon commission. He had to be convinced to do it by, first Eugene Rostow, and then Alsop. And Alsop then told him that the Washington Post was going to come out with that idea also. LBJ did not want it and Alsop's conversation with him was a masterful piece of flattery, persuasion, and massaging to get him to construct it. I mean, everyone knows what happened after. It was a mess. But what did anyone expect with Hoover running the inquiry? Hoover actually was on record as closing the case before Katzenbach was. In fact, I now think that his memo the night before might have been the model for Katzenbach's. About 80 per cent of the inquiry was done by Hoover. In second was the Secret Service, and as we all know--Elmer Moore for one--they were about as bad as the FBI was. Does anyone even want to talk about the CIA, and that stunt they pulled in Mexico CIty? Which even Hoover saw through after about six weeks. So with those three bodies doing the inquiry, it was pretty much a foregone conclusion. But then you had the MSM basically encouraging it and accepting it and then giving it a rocket boost when it came out. It is really bizarre to me how the MSM did not scream, or even object, to the WC having closed hearings. Not one peep. And the only witness who complained was Mark Lane. I mean closed hearings on the public execution of the president? As per Dulles, remember, Talbot in his biography of the man, revealed that he was the one commissioner who lobbied for the job. Therefore, it might not have been solely LBJ's decision on that one. But he clearly understand after that this was a mistake, and I think he tried to cover it up.

Europe and America should create a Palestinian State and a Marshall Plan for quickly building it. Leave Gaza as-is for a Holocaust-like museum reminding everybody what Hamas and militant Israelis did to the Palestinian people.

Call it what you want Roger. But most people call the evidence that the WC created against Oswald phrases like "faked evidence, "forged evidence," etc. Because I disagree with you. I don't believe Johnson was an essential participant. Yes, I read it. And I criticized it and showed you how it falls apart under scrutiny. What unsupported claims? Almost everything I've said are either known facts, or are theories believed by a lot of people, including Jim D.

Thomas Friedman article https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/26/opinion/israel-war-rafah-riyadh.html?unlocked_article_code=1.nU0.xcOL.lnWoImbfsAnJ&smid=url-share

Thanks Jim!

Wow. Bernie Sanders dunks on Netanyahu. Bernie's commentary should have been headline news in America today. Instead, it was blacked out by the corporate media (as were his 2016 and 2020 Presidential campaigns.) Another good example of why I voted for Bernie in our 2016 and 2020 Democratic primaries in Colorado, (and why I donate to the Progressive website Common Dreams.) https://www.commondreams.org/news/sanders-netanyahu-antisemitism

Gaza’s 37m tonnes of bomb-filled debris could take 14 years to clear, says expert | Gaza | The Guardian

...I've posted a detoured version... Again, the image is BIG...

If the US attacked Cuba and the Soviets responded it would be US starting the war not the Soviets. Remember what Kennedy said about the missiles placed by the Soviets in Cuba: an attack by Cuba using them would be considered an attack by the Soviet Union on the US. Same principle, Gareth Porter is an estimable journalist. Glad to see you reading him. Cliff. But he wasn't advising the government. In any case, exact parity, if that's what you mean, isn't necessary for starting a nuclear war to be madness. Kennedy was able to get something like 80votes in the Senate to pass the limited nuclear test ban treaty that Fall as a first step to the disarmamnet he sought because people were realizing the MADness.

..Well, at least you see an image, and it doesn't look like Lee Harvey Oswald, does it? Actually, the large black eyes are dark glasses. I am not sure whether your post is serious or a joke: I will answer to all serious questions and queries about the results or methodology used here. I don't have much time for funny banter, on the other hand. No offense meant, if that's not the case. If, however, you are interested in the UAP phenomenon, like I am, I will post in the last segment of this "Dallas Decoding" presentation, dedicated to "The Science Behind the Results", results obtained on two images: - one from the Nasa Clementine Mission to the Moon - one from from the Kumburgaz video If you are interested in this phenomenon for real, you know what I am talking about. For casual readers: - The Clementine photo has been the subject of much speculation because it is very heavily blurred, leading some researchers to believe that the blurring was intentional, intended to hide something on the moon surface that the NASA did not want the general public to know about. I will present results showing what NASA tried to hide. - The Kumburgaz video is notorious for its quality and duration (and resilience: videos were filmed during several consecutive years at the same spot) and the fact that it was authenticated by the Turkish Government. It shows long, good quality shots of what appear to be the cockpit, or some bay area, of an unknown airship, with "people" visibly moving around: I will present results showing the face of the occupants of this unknown ship. I will present those results here just as an example of the application of the process to material not related to the JFKA, to show that this is a methodology (though a very simple one) that works operationally, regardless of the context. If there is a specific forum here on this subject, though, let me know; I'd be glad to contribute.

Do you know why Lyndon Johnson did not want Robert Kennedy to be *his* Vice President in 1964? Because he did not want to put anyone on the Democratic ticket who would murder him. The reason LBJ would say something like that is LBJ knows that Robert Kennedy knows that LBJ murdered JFK. And the other reason for that comment is LBJ knows that he and Sam Rayburn strong armed/bullied JFK in a hostile takeover of the Vice Presidential spot for LBJ on the 1960 Democratic ticket. And the reason WHY LBJ made a hostile takeover of the Vice Presidency was because relations with the Kennedys were so rancid and toxic that LBJ knew that if JFK were elected president, the Kennedys would immediately move to have LBJ overthrown as the Senate Democratic Majority Leader - that gig was over. The context of the conversation below is LBJ telling his longtime pal and former aide Texas Governor John Connally why it would be completely unacceptable for LBJ to have RFK on the Democratic ticket. LBJ to John Connally (7/23/64) on why he would not have RFK as his Vice President on the 1964 Democratic ticket: "I'm not going to let them put somebody in bed with me that'll murder me." [Michael Beschloss, Taking Charge: The Johnson White House Tapes, 1963-1964 (1997), p. 470] [Lawrence Leamer, Sons of Camelot: The Fate of an American Dynasty (2004), p. 18] … Also in [Laurent Guyenot, The Unspoken Kennedy Truth, pp. 7-8] Lyndon Johnson speaking with John Connally on the phone (7/23/64) about how he is not going to take Robert Kennedy as a VP on the Demo ticket: QUOTE I think I’ll have that conversation…. I’ll call you afterwards and we probably will have to make a deep pitch to governors … and … leaders… and see if they’ll stay with the President. Then I just think I have to say that if they don’t, I’m not going to let them put somebody [Robert Kennedy] in bed with me that’ll murder me. Then I just can’t be president. Then that’s exactly what he [Robert Kennedy] wants. Because then with his having enough support to be Vice President and I got out, he’d have it more than anybody else has. … But I don’t think my self-respect could suffer a defeat at the convention and then take the presidency. Do you? UNQUOTE [Michael Beschloss, Taking Charge: The Johnson White House Tapes, 1963-1964 (1997), p. 470]

Joe, The Generals and CIA were the perpetrators of the assassination. They designed it to looked like Cuba and Russia were behind it. The General didn't report that the Cubans/Russian were behind the assassination because they are not an investigative body. J. Edgar Hoover did indeed discover the evidence that the Cubans/Russians were behind the assassination. The faked evidence, that is. But he didn't know it was faked. At least not until much later.

Oh I don't know, Roger. Maybe whatever it was that got the whole police force out to arrest Oswald... which they did at Texas Theater. I didn't say it was valid evidence. Say what? LBJ was hoping for a death bed confession from Oswald. Why would he have hoped for that if he knew Oswald was innocent? Of course LBJ and Hoover thought Oswald was guilty. That IS the easy choice! I'll let J. Edgar Hoover tell you. Here is what he said to LBJ over the phone regarding the evidence implicating Cuba: "This angle in Mexico is giving us a great deal of trouble because the story there is of this man Oswald getting $6,500 from the Cuban embassy and then coming back to this country with it. We're not able to prove that fact, but the information was that he was there on the 18th of September in Mexico City and we are able to prove conclusively he was in New Orleans that day. Now then they've changed the dates. The story came in changing the dates to the 28th of September and he was in Mexico City on the 28th. Now the Mexican police have again arrested this woman Duran, who is a member of the Cuban embassy... and we're going to confront her with the original informant, who saw the money pass, so he says, and we're also going to put the lie detector test on him." Oswald reportedly had been paid $6500 for the hit in the Cuban Consulate. And was paling around with Silvia Duran and some Cuban officials while in Mexico City. (This according Elena Garro, June Cobb, and Gilberto Alvarado.) And then there was the evidence that Oswald met with KGB assassinations chief Valeriy Kostikov at the Soviet Embassy. And the letter Oswald supposedly sent to the Soviet Embassy in Washington DC saying that he had conducted his business with Comrade Kostin (i.e. Kostikov).

To me, this looks like a Grey alien, with large black eyes.

Trump's daughter-in-law, (Lara Trump) the newly-minted co-chair of the Republican National Committee, bizarrely claiming the GOP has election security lawsuits pending in "81 states." - Alina Habba - "If he's not in Manhattan, which is a completely blue state, where they only pulled blue state members of the jury on purpose, well, that's a different game." The Trump people seem to be geographically challenged. Steve Thomas

RO: But do not obscure the fact that the amorphous group that wanted to get rid of Kennedy had several factions. Only some of them thought it was a good idea to use the murder as a pretext to go after Castro, which would have led to a war with the Soviets, who were pledged to respond such an attack, not to mention Kennedy that had given them a no invasion pledge barely one year earlier. </q> Khrushchev would start a war he couldn't win over Cuba? Nonsense. According to Gareth Porter's The Perils of Dominance the USSR didn't reach nuclear parity until 1965. Sandy, it wasn't Harriman who contacted AF1 to inform LBJ the lone gunmen was in custody -- it was McGeorge Bundy.

I've stated this several times over the years. If Russia and/or Cuba were really behind the JFKA our military and intelligence people and LBJ himself would have known this. Okay...if so, what would you think their response would be or should have been in a retaliatory sense? The action of killing ( or even organizing his killing...even through a Manchurian Candidate ) our sitting President is about as egregious an action one could imagine one adversarial nation perpetrating against another... debatably an act of war! LeMay and other top military people had to be restrained from promoting or even considering a "first strike" action against the Soviets during the Cold War. I think those Dr. Strangelove mentality characters would have wanted a justification event to occur to promote their most aggressive agenda. What better justification event could there be than the killing of our president? So, the fact that this super retaliatory scenario was not even reported in any well documented way by the Generals known for holding that sentiment suggest ( to me anyways ) that they knew Russian and Cuba were not the perpetrators of the JFKA. And even if any first strike talk was struck down despite Russia and Cuba being involved and we knew it...don't you think we would still have hammered the Soviets and Cuba in some other massive ways to retaliate for their ultimate act of war action against us? Yes, for the next 5 decades we kept Cuba in a hugely enforced international trade blockade lockdown economically but no more than before the JFKA. Our undermining actions against the Soviets were no more aggressive than before the JFKA. I cannot believe that we didn't know whether the Soviets and Cuba were behind the JFKA. I sense we knew they weren't.

..Yep. Actually, the image is BIG. You have to get a correct scale of how a person would look like through that window. I realize that I have been working fro more than 20 years with these images, and which is not he case for casual viewers. I will post a detoured version asap... There it is. The star is positioned just above the man's head, giving you a sense of scale:

It would be easier if you could indicate what part is being worked on, it´s hard to figure out the size and place of the detail

Was looking at a different structure