Jump to content
The Education Forum

David Josephs

Members Who Can Delete Locked Attachments
  • Posts

    6,150
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by David Josephs

  1. You must have some FBI friends Michael... If interested, I can post the rest... DJ 1. COINTELPRO Techniques for dilution, misdirection and control of a internet forum 2. Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation 3. Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist 4. How to Spot a Spy (Cointelpro Agent) 5. Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression ______________________________________________________________________________________ COINTELPRO Techniques for dilution, misdirection and control of a internet forum.. There are several techniques for the control and manipulation of a internet forum no matter what, or who is on it. We will go over each technique and demonstrate that only a minimal number of operatives can be used to eventually and effectively gain a control of a 'uncontrolled forum.' Technique #1 - 'FORUM SLIDING' If a very sensitive posting of a critical nature has been posted on a forum - it can be quickly removed from public view by 'forum sliding.' In this technique a number of unrelated posts are quietly prepositioned on the forum and allowed to 'age.' Each of these misdirectional forum postings can then be called upon at will to trigger a 'forum slide.' The second requirement is that several fake accounts exist, which can be called upon, to ensure that this technique is not exposed to the public. To trigger a 'forum slide' and 'flush' the critical post out of public view it is simply a matter of logging into each account both real and fake and then 'replying' to prepositined postings with a simple 1 or 2 line comment. This brings the unrelated postings to the top of the forum list, and the critical posting 'slides' down the front page, and quickly out of public view. Although it is difficult or impossible to censor the posting it is now lost in a sea of unrelated and unuseful postings. By this means it becomes effective to keep the readers of the forum reading unrelated and non-issue items. Technique #2 - 'CONSENSUS CRACKING' A second highly effective technique (which you can see in operation all the time at www.abovetopsecret.com) is 'consensus cracking.' To develop a consensus crack, the following technique is used. Under the guise of a fake account a posting is made which looks legitimate and is towards the truth is made - but the critical point is that it has a VERY WEAK PREMISE without substantive proof to back the posting. Once this is done then under alternative fake accounts a very strong position in your favour is slowly introduced over the life of the posting. It is IMPERATIVE that both sides are initially presented, so the uninformed reader cannot determine which side is the truth. As postings and replies are made the stronger 'evidence' or disinformation in your favour is slowly 'seeded in.' Thus the uninformed reader will most like develop the same position as you, and if their position is against you their opposition to your posting will be most likely dropped. However in some cases where the forum members are highly educated and can counter your disinformation with real facts and linked postings, you can then 'abort' the consensus cracking by initiating a 'forum slide.' Technique #3 - 'TOPIC DILUTION' Topic dilution is not only effective in forum sliding it is also very useful in keeping the forum readers on unrelated and non-productive issues. This is a critical and useful technique to cause a 'RESOURCE BURN.' By implementing continual and non-related postings that distract and disrupt (trolling ) the forum readers they are more effectively stopped from anything of any real productivity. If the intensity of gradual dilution is intense enough, the readers will effectively stop researching and simply slip into a 'gossip mode.' In this state they can be more easily misdirected away from facts towards uninformed conjecture and opinion. The less informed they are the more effective and easy it becomes to control the entire group in the direction that you would desire the group to go in. It must be stressed that a proper assessment of the psychological capabilities and levels of education is first determined of the group to determine at what level to 'drive in the wedge.' By being too far off topic too quickly it may trigger censorship by a forum moderator. Technique #4 - 'INFORMATION COLLECTION' Information collection is also a very effective method to determine the psychological level of the forum members, and to gather intelligence that can be used against them. In this technique in a light and positive environment a 'show you mine so me yours' posting is initiated. From the number of replies and the answers that are provided much statistical information can be gathered. An example is to post your 'favourite weapon' and then encourage other members of the forum to showcase what they have. In this matter it can be determined by reverse proration what percentage of the forum community owns a firearm, and or a illegal weapon. This same method can be used by posing as one of the form members and posting your favourite 'technique of operation.' From the replies various methods that the group utilizes can be studied and effective methods developed to stop them from their activities. Technique #5 - 'ANGER TROLLING' Statistically, there is always a percentage of the forum posters who are more inclined to violence. In order to determine who these individuals are, it is a requirement to present a image to the forum to deliberately incite a strong psychological reaction. From this the most violent in the group can be effectively singled out for reverse IP location and possibly local enforcement tracking. To accomplish this only requires posting a link to a video depicting a local police officer massively abusing his power against a very innocent individual. Statistically of the million or so police officers in America there is always one or two being caught abusing there powers and the taping of the activity can be then used for intelligence gathering purposes - without the requirement to 'stage' a fake abuse video. This method is extremely effective, and the more so the more abusive the video can be made to look. Sometimes it is useful to 'lead' the forum by replying to your own posting with your own statement of violent intent, and that you 'do not care what the authorities think!!' inflammation. By doing this and showing no fear it may be more effective in getting the more silent and self-disciplined violent intent members of the forum to slip and post their real intentions. This can be used later in a court of law during prosecution. Technique #6 - 'GAINING FULL CONTROL' It is important to also be harvesting and continually maneuvering for a forum moderator position. Once this position is obtained, the forum can then be effectively and quietly controlled by deleting unfavourable postings - and one can eventually steer the forum into complete failure and lack of interest by the general public. This is the 'ultimate victory' as the forum is no longer participated with by the general public and no longer useful in maintaining their freedoms. Depending on the level of control you can obtain, you can deliberately steer a forum into defeat by censoring postings, deleting memberships, flooding, and or accidentally taking the forum offline. By this method the forum can be quickly killed. However it is not always in the interest to kill a forum as it can be converted into a 'honey pot' gathering center to collect and misdirect newcomers and from this point be completely used for your control for your agenda purposes. CONCLUSION Remember these techniques are only effective if the forum participants DO NOT KNOW ABOUT THEM. Once they are aware of these techniques the operation can completely fail, and the forum can become uncontrolled. At this point other avenues must be considered such as initiating a false legal precidence to simply have the forum shut down and taken offline. This is not desirable as it then leaves the enforcement agencies unable to track the percentage of those in the population who always resist attempts for control against them. Many other techniques can be utilized and developed by the individual and as you develop further techniques of infiltration and control it is imperative to share then with HQ. Now that we're aware.... and have given actions labels.... shaft from wheat should be very obvious DJ
  2. Yeah... I'll send those off as soon as you post your photogrammetry work and results of the measurements in the BYPs and Altgens 6. You mean you can't send things directly to John? Can't find him on the internet? You as poor at Searching the internet as you are at MATH? You talk alot... but do have the chops to DO or only scold for not doing... and let's see... a Physics professor or a wanna-be photographer who cares not a bit for the assassination, and spends his days as a <Deleted by Moderator>... You're excused now old man... time to get your Flintstones lunchbox and go home.... David - please do not accuse members of being a xxxxx. Thank you,
  3. Name a single person other than you and the old man who agrees with him and finds his experiments "honest" {crickets chirping}
  4. http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=19297&view=findpost&p=261642 One need only check this post for Mike's idea of photographic analysis - the man with the 16 inch gun standing just behind BDM in Willis... And as I've asked/said before Mike... put forth any LN FACT you'd like... and we can see how "authentic" these "facts" are. Here's one: (f) Within these limitations, however, the Commission finds that the agents most immediately responsible for the President’s safety reacted promptly at the time the shots were fired from the TSBD Let's see your take on this FACT as presented by the LNers.... Here's mine. 60 frames or over 3 seconds prior JFK was supposedly shot from the TSBD The SS agent MOST RESPONSIBLE for his safety is staring at him while the other is ??? Given how absurd this FACT is... and how EASY it is to refute... Are you really that confident that the LNers have ANY FACTS with which to hang their hats? Surely not on the photographic talents of the old man here... he barely remembers which president we are talking about, let alone cares about any TRUTH. CL has to defend the films and photos, he has no choice being a LNer and married to the WCR/HSCA.... The rest of the THINKING WORLD knows better.... Maybe you and CL should know that 1963 called and they want their conclusions back... by 1964 the house of cards was already falling apart. All the CYA in the world can't change that.
  5. I trust the two of you will be very happy together Rago and Lamson.... now THERE'S an exacta....
  6. That you and Lamson see eye to eye is NO SURPRISE "Rago"... I'm sure the two of you will be very happy together... Blind leading the blind. I am not trying to establish ANYTHING other than the dishonesty with which Lamson creates his experiments and proclaims every one else here photographic imbeciles... He's a con artist and you obviously cannot tell the difference between FACT and FICTION as evidenced by your posts. Now, do you have anything to offer related to the SHAM of an experiment and the differences between PANNING and CHANGING LOS the old man offered to counter Costella or you just promoting the "man hiding behind the tree in nix" theory? (btw - the kneeling man in front of the wall was done ON PURPOSE to show you that people can be created out of shadows and leaves... Just like all the people you keep saying you are finding....) Do you understand my post illustrating the differences and why the old man's experiment is a sham... or not?
  7. Thanks for your offer Mike... yet I will pass... There is no one hiding behind that tree... sorry, your conclusions and lack of supporting evidence, and refusal to even consider things like coroborration of an event are legendary... your input is simply not welcome.... like the old man.... you have your agends and by God, you're gonna stick to it.... YOU want to start that thread, go right ahead. Furthermore, the old man could care less what actually happened... all he cares about is trolling and over charging his clients while he spends his time here playing the idiot. So I keep him busy... ... as my contribution to the rest of the membership's peace of mind The cards and letters of thanks never end.... Later DJ
  8. Thanks for the great article John... It always amazes me how "patriots" always look to destroy the very traits that make us FREE AMERICANS... It is our expressed RIGHT to try and abolish the UAAC... or support it with our full hearts... In the very same way Minchell can say what he does about Lane... Lane can say the same about the goverment... Yet one is a hero, the other a commie agitator.... Welcome to Amerika
  9. Craig, dumbing down would be a STEP UP for your work.... You and your work are simplistic at best.... a scam and charade as usual... and a directed attempt to disrupt and annoy at worst... you're a gnat on a bull's a$$ who thinks he's an elephant - a pathetic old man wishing he'd have paid attention to the hatred he brings upon himself First learn to add/subtract/multiple/divide well enough to understand speed and distance... then maybe you can believe your little girl offerings need "dumbing down" what an amazingly pompous a$$ you are.... you do understand THAT is your rep... right? that REP you are so concerned with and proud of.... Start a thread CL... see who actually cares - see who wants to play your games and enjoys your posting company... Show off that BIG BRAIN old man... before you can't remember where you left it.
  10. No need to "take apart your work" old man... it's complete crap from the word GO. Has been for years... will be for years to come. All you need do is post it. You now gonna play your, "here's a photo, tell me what's wrong with it" game? {yawn} or the "here's an experiement - see how I'm pulling the wool over your eyes" game? This is no SURPRISE to anyone but you CL.... old people like you are the last to understand THEY are the problem. The only FANTASY here is the one between your ears in believing your posts contribute anything... teach anything, resolve anything. At BEST you're a LNer DVP/VB wanna-be without the prerequisite knowledge of your bible, the WCR. You wave your hands about telling all how photography is supposed to work... cause you actually know very little about the assassination.... yes indeed CL... you're a real mystery, and a complete failure on every forum you infest. Carry on like a little girl again now CL... it's all you seem good at.
  11. of course not old man... who would be here to call you on your never ending BS... Let's see you've been DESTROYING posters in your mind for years... Even on this thread... what a complete joke of a human being you are old man.... Pathetic then, pathetic now and forever. Watching you get all worked up... typing so fast your fat little fingers can't keep up... No time to review your post for fear of missing something to "comment" about... you are a joke... an ongoing joke. Posted 14 July 2010 - 03:57 AM Lampoonson is here to annoy. Ignore him. I am not questioning his motivation. It is just an observation; all of his postings are merely annoying. Jack I'm sure my posts are annoying to you Jack, I've destroyed more of your stupid claims than you care to count. Showing the depths of your photographic ignorance has been quite enjoyable. Edited by Craig Lamson, 14 July 2010 - 04:00 AM.
  12. Thorn? just can't help that ubber ego of yours, can you? Gnat's on a bull's a$$ old man.... that you think swatting at you from time to time is giving you the attention you so desperately need, is what makes this entire thing so sweet and humorous... You regurgitate what I post as your own words and think you're clever... Ain't nobody here gives a sh!t what you have to say or offer old man... and as long as we can keep you running in your little circles trying to prove how smart you think you are... Others here can get real work done... without your trolling. Thanks for playing, impotent old man... now run along and play with your exacto knives, broomsticks, coffee cups and your other props... Little children should be seen playing with themselves, not heard... run along now and try to keep you big mouth shut while the adults have adult discussion... bye now....
  13. Oh you sad and pathetic old man... EVERYONE could give a rat's a$$ about what you have ever said and what you will ever say.... EVERYONE has repeatedly wished you simply move on, crawl back under that rock... . EVERYONE gets their daily jollies watching you froth, and drool and spit and curse... then bring out those kindergarten insults... Yes indeed old man... that you believe EVERYONE is waiting for YOU to do ANYTHING is a seriously funny joke and a great indication of the level of self importance you place on your sad little life. Stick your exacto knife where it belongs... your sham of "Photo expert" has gone so far beyond wearing thin... you're transparent You've been a worthless annoyance to EVERYONE within the JFK community for YEARS... Didn't get the memo I guess. Damn, you are so EASY. So you go spin your wheels and prove to us how your BS experiments are worth spit... don't be too offended when no one answers the door when you come calling. We've got MUCH better things to be doing. See ya around old man.... The hook is baited with a fat and juicy one... all you need to do is open your mouth.... once again,
  14. Correct, Ian. Rotation does not account for why the images of the people are closer together in the colorized version... My gif illustrates very plainly that the sizes of the two images are NOT the same... not even close. So what accounts from the space differences?
  15. Oh this will be so much fun destroying you, your ignorance and arrogance. Your reputation ends with this davie. Enjoy the next few days.... While you are waiting for your reputation to be destroyed maybe you can tell us why this statement of yours in NOT a complete falsehood... "Thank goodness he is kept off so many other forums so people can discuss topics ..." Here are some more of your "gems" old man... feel the love? And this remains the VERY BEST you ever offer... what WOULD we do without you - right? Plus, you SAID you were going away for a while.... potty break finally over? Running back to Duncan's forum where you can say anything, do anything without worry of censure? There MUST be a single place on the internet where SOMEONE is glad to see you... but like your posts, there simply is not evidence to support the idea.
  16. Something had to have happened during the enlargement process.... Duncan is right, while they SHOULD be easily overlaid upon each other and match... they dont. What up? (not sure why the gif does not play... click to see color overlay)
  17. Duncan... When the B&W version of BM was "enchanced" to convince us there is someone there... the contract was increased so that blacks are very deep and the whites increase in size considerably... Without seeing a quality blowup of the original... it is very hard to know what is enhanced and what is developed correctly... (btw, the crop fomes from the "Duncan" moorman youposted a while back...) Cheers DJ
  18. Whatever gives you your little jollies CL... See, what you AD HOM trolls forget is that the EVIDENCE is what's important... you want to believe you have a "reputation" here that's anything other than as a xxxxx, your self-indulgence knows no bounds. You, old man, are a joke... an ongoing, absurd, rambling, spitting, drooling joke... Watching you get all worked up into a lather... sitting at your computer teeth clinched... fat little fingers tapping away in your attempt to PROVE how right you are... Let's see there CL... how about a link to ANYONE AGREEING WITH YOU... . or a link to ANYTHING you've contributed here... Or a thread in which you have not exhibited xxxxx behavior.... Maybe, just maybe... Admin would prefer you spend some time FIXING your reputation... so that whenever you post we can ALL do something other than shake our heads and laugh.... But you're BIGGER THAN THE ISSUES aren't you CL... it's all about who you think you ARE, not what a pathetic attempt you continually make at proving a point. or how poorly you know that material, how poorly you understand the assassination... or how you connot commit to a position - you're a critic... plain and simple... nothing original comes from a critic... you need someone, anyone, to offer/create something... so you can show your off that BIG BRAIN of yours.... This will be it for me here... You go toil away at your PROOF so we all can see what a big man you are.... like so many others who have left because of your putrid stench all over this forum... I'll just check in from time to time to see if your story ever changes... xxxxx. Some examples and the infinitely amusing - CL's 3 little inches Year after year and your story NEVER changes... "It is because Craig says it is" Now go back to bed, it's past your nap time
  19. Unlike your waiting for me old man, I dont wait around for your posts... they just show up... we all have a nice laugh... you curse and mumble, spit and drool then leave. You're just a bunch of nonsense and misdirection with a few little girl insults thrown in for good measure.. Here's an idea... go be self important, find a real reason, and then come on back and let's see more of your personal DJ obsession shine thru... Your experiment was a shame just as you are a sham... but hey... THANKS for the vacation. Maybe we all can read thru the forum threads now without getting nauseous from your presence...
  20. Whatever you think old man.... From your posts we can tell how much you care about the assassination, learning, teaching,sharing and discovery... It's all in your posts Craig... your childish insulting, as if you've never left kindergarten... let's see math wiz... a cup with a 4" height and 4" diameter.... if you leaned a pencil from one corner to the opposite cup lid... what does your math mind tell you the angle is??? Finishing your cup and adding a straight edge I get almost a 50 degree angle since I don't know how wide the bottom of your cup is.... wider bottom, lower angle. Furthermore, you post how the camera does not move yet pans, while the camera in your experiment MOVE and does NOT PAN... this is you being honest? this is a representative experiment? what a joke. There's nothing wrong about that statement at all... as Zapruder pans the LOS of his camera does not change with respect to these poles. If Z jumped off the pedastal, then yes.. it changes. If Z raises the camera ofer his head... change... but he is only panning... as he pans right and the sign moves LEFT in the frame, the LOS from the lens to the poles do not change... Your experiment is fundamentally flawed... your arguments weak and worthless.... but hey, at least you try. Fancy words for - "he turned his head to the right while filming" he neither moved the "nodal point" up or down, left or right... he simply panned right Two and a half years ago, on this same thread.... Same Sh!t, Different YEAR, Month, Week, Day, Thread, Post.... No matter how far one goes back, any ANY THREAD on ANY FORUM CL behaves the same, receives the same "praise" and believes in his bloated ego he is contributing. Good thing the man's work and posts stand on their own... Click gif to see how Z simply pans between these two frames.... and compare to Costella's gif http://www.assassinationscience.com/johncostella/jfk/intro/sign.html CL makes these claims about nodal BS yet asks us once again to just take his word.. Well, as we continue to see... his word and work leaves a lot to be desired
  21. Thanks Robin... I hope you see that I was not challenging whether these poles were off vertical... I also hope you are illustrating here that even with the LOS change between these two images, the POLES remain in the same... the left image appears taken from further north Now, if the poles themselves barely change vertical angles with that large a movement of Line of sight... how exactly does Zapruder move the camera enough to generate the EXTREME shift we see in the Zfilm? Click to view What I am challenging is Lamson's experiment to illustrate why the poles SHOULD be different in different frames... and the fraudulent way in which he goes about it. The CAMERA is not changing its vertical or horizontal line of sight relateive to these poles... the CAMERA is panning... In Lamson's experiment he moves the camera horizontally - if we were to extrapolate the movement and the distances to Zapruder... the movement would have him fall off the pedestal. It's a dishonest experiment from a man who regularly witholds information from the presentation of his "photographic proofs" and then ad homs detractors rather than deal with his dishonesty Now, since all he does is wait for me to post so he has something to say... I'm looking forward to an insult laden response rather than an honest explanation for why he tries to deceive. So these poles are 5-10 degrees off vertical? Now take a cup and lean a pencil from the bottom on one side to the top on another... looks a whole lot like a 45 degree angle.... ANY MOVEMENT of LOS will make this pencil change its angle relative to the background. As usual, CL cannot - nor does he even try to prove the motion of his camera in the experiment relates to the movement of Z's camera thru these frames.... One of the main reasons I can barely stomach posting here is that CL's entire purpose is to xxxxx and annoy. Can anyone remember a post in which he actually proposes something HE believes other than his three little inches of cloth? Which again, when presented with the jacket and shirt and wound lining up replies he could care less... THIS is the type of person y'all want to battle with every single #$%$#@ day ?? Thank goodness he is kept off so many other forums so people can discuss topics without his holier than thou, "I don't really care about the assassination anyway", "I'm just here to be amused" attitude. It finally take Greg to comment for him to finally come clean... y'all can keep him DJ
  22. Cause putting the REPRESENTATION OF THE SIGN POSTS AT A 45 DEGREE ANGLE WAS SUCH A GOOD REPRESENTATION OF THE ACTUAL SIGN POSTS - RIGHT? With all your ability you could not reproduce the posts as they appear in REAL LIFE? Instead, knowing that a leaning representation would look even more off vertical as you moved the camera, You set it up - the exacto knive is placed in a manner to illustrate YOUR point, rather than to reproduce the event. and you move the CAMERA relative to the knife... while in Z the camera does not move relative to the posts. If NOT VERTICAL, then the LATERAL or VERTICAL movement of the camera should reveal this lean - accepted... except the CAMERA does not move off axis relative to the sign posts and the images behind them. When the wall is lined up correctly, which means the Line of sight IS THE SAME, the post should not move... yet they do http://www.assassinationscience.com/johncostella/jfk/intro/sign.html I do not believe your experiment accurately reproduces what Costella is saying... and once others understand you DID place the knife at such an extreme angle and didNOT move the camera similiar to Z... Your little experiment is worthless....
  23. My family and I have been in Ventnor City... about 3 miles south of AC for almost 100 years.. Been thru MANY storms, Hurricanes, last year's freak windstorm and Irene... there has NEVER been water on Atlantic and Ventnor avenues... The Longport Marina photo - bottom right across inlet - is where we keep our boats... that photo shows about $50 million worth of homes with sand left from the water that went from ocean to Inlet.. ============= Maybe Len can find some humanity under all his complaining... Maybe - just maybe, Len can turn the channel when he doesn't like the show rather than yelling at the TV In years past you actually "contributed" here, I used to enjoy reading your POV... you seemed to have knowledge and the ability to discuss... Now you just keep sounding like a whiny child... on thread after thread after thread. So big bad Tom hurt your feelings... take a hint:
  24. Let's add in a few more calcs on the film itself and maybe Chris you can help tie it all together... for if there was alteration with information removed… the Original film HAD to have more frames – 48fps is the only other option to 16fps In the Archive Horne tells us we have 6'3", 75", of film that contains Assassination imagery... what we do not learn from his statement is whether he means 486 total frames or just from 133-486 = 353 frames Regular 8mm frame dimensions Camera aperture size (HxW): 3.68 x 4.88mm Frame area: 17.96sq. mm (3.68x4.88) Aspect ratio: 1.33:1 16:9 useable frame area: 13.4sq. mm (75%) normal frame rate: 16fps 3.68mm = .14488 inches PER FRAME 75" of film = 517 frames / 18.3 = 28.25 seconds of film Zapruder was 486 frames / 18.3 = 26.56 seconds of film 28.25-26.56= 1.69 seconds of film missing at 18.3 (QUESTION for anyone: how many frames of developed images are there on the A SIDE of the film, the PERSONAL SIDE and pre motorcade frames… I’ve seen the numbers somewhere but can’t put my hands on them – Horne says there were about 177 frames shot pre-motorcade…25.6 inches of film) That is the only imagery on the 33’1”of film that makes up the “IN CAMERA ORIGINAL” (btw a blank spool has 25 feet of useable film per side, not 33, the final length will include leaders and such placed on the frame portion of the film at processing.) 75” has images, then there are 2 spliced sections of completely BLANK FILM (not leader, film) HOW CAN ANYONE CLAIM THIS IS AN IN CAMERA ORIGINAL when the 0183 and Processing edge printing is NOT on this film as well? Anyway, 486 frames of film = 26.56 seconds of film at 18.3, at 48fps = 1275 frames (IF the entire film was taken at 48fps – since the camera easily switched from 16 to 48 fps, it is virtually impossible to tell when this would have been on and off) No let me make a point while asking a question… if one was to take a 48fps shot film and removed the 2nd and 3rd frame from each 3 frame segment, wouldn’t this now look like a film shot at 16fps ? The distance between frame exposures goes from 1/48th to 1/16th of a second and what we see in frames 1/4/7/10/13 on a 48fps film SHOULD BE the same as frames 1/2/3/4/5 on a 16fps film of the same event from the same location. If frames 1/4/7/10/13 are placed next to each other, run at 16 and RE-filmed at 16fps, wouldn’t the IS area of these frames ALSO BE 1/16th of a second apart? So why 18.3fps and how does the NPIC even know to consider 18fps THAT weekend? LIFE has already provided NPIC, by Sunday evening, the frames, at 18fps, on which shots are seen: 190/264/312… Doesn’t this suggest that “264” is the SBT seen at 224 – how are they 40 frames off? To recap: A film at 48fps would look exactly like a 16fps film if we were to remove the 2nd/3rd frames from each 3 frame sequence There are enough frames per second at 48fps to create a believable 18.3fps final film and still remove almost 2/3’s of the frames. There SHOULD BE 517 frames worth of exposed film in 6’3”… there are only 480 frames in the extant portion of the assassination (6 damaged frames 156/7, 208/9/10/11) Not every bit of the film needed to be filmed at 48fps…. Yet there are tell-tale signs of alteration… 1 – no Stop/Start indication at z133 2 – break at 156 3 – break at 207 4 – damage/replacement at z341, z350 5 – no IS area on 486 Adding now Altgens claiming the headshot was right in front of him… and I’m pretty confident that 156 – 350 was originally 48fps… I just can’t decide whether Z would film the whole thing at one speed to allow for any changes needed… or not. 132 to 133 is about how much time? At 48fps there are plenty of frames to choose the right one to be 133… and to remove ALL the excess… 5 seconds(?) of film at 48fps is 240 frames, PLUS the 2 of 3 frames between 1-132 & 133-156 to get the speed to 18.3. We can deal with 157-207 and 212 thri 350 once we have a few answers here... DJ
  25. Chris... if you look very carefully, I believe you can just make out the real EVIL behind all of this.... I too can prove he was there... cause I say so and nobody in the entire WCR volumes says he was not there...... Cheers buddy... DJ
×
×
  • Create New...