Dawn Meredith

Sadly, on this 40th anniversary the media is still ignoring the truth. That would be the best way to honor Bobby's memory: the media grow some b****. Not in our life time, I'm afraid. "Has anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?" Dawn (That song never fails to make me cry)

R. Bartholomew wrote in his 1994 update, to his Fair Play- Article "In any event, the important thing here is that we can now track down that photo Garrison showed to Craig and see if the Latin man is Eladio del Valle. That is who Cuban Intelligence identified as the Rambler driver based on witness descriptions (see Claudia Furiati's recent book, ZR Rifle, Ocean Press, 1994, p. 130). " del Valle was murdered the day Ferrie died. They were friends. Maybe LHO, who knew Ferrie knew del Valle. Therfore he knew the driver of the Rambler. Later Richard would come to believe that it may have been Mac Wallace. But of course he spoke English. Dawn

Just because people are a little more aware of political assassinations is not any protection. The press would ignore the truth. The government would not do a proper investigation. All that has changed in that regard is that things have worsened. So Obama, should he become the next president, will have to do a most careful dance. Change, but not so much that the powers that truly be decide to take him out. Dawn

[quote name='John Geraghty' date='Jun 2 2008, 11:31 PM' post='146733'] Video promo for COPA in L.A. Here is a promotional video for the L.A. conference. Please distribute to mailing lists, your blog and your friends. http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=Cn-2ce6SVpw Thanks John. COPA is fortunate to have you. I hope I can get the streaming to work as I won't be able to get to LA, have to work. Looks like there will be great conferences. Dawn

Why don't you reserve your criticism for this book until after you have actualy read it? I have this book and it is definately the one to get for this upcoming 45th anniversary. There is nothing wrong with Jim's "Christian ethics", he is as profoundly ethical as he is Christian. He is also not online so will not be able to discuss his book here. Dawn

Barr's been trying for years -without success- to get these important records. But, as you can well imagine, they are doubly blocked. Standard confidentiality, also a trust fund to maintian that they remain sealed. Now if someone in the Dr's employ were to do a "Scott" that would clarify a lot, but I don't see that ever happening. LBJ really lost it in his final years so you can bet that these files hold a lot of keys. Dawn

He did not strike me as being overly perceptive on this U-tube presentation. Rather full of himself. Anyone would could be taken in by the Bug wasn't on the side of the angels to begin with, imho. Dawn

Of course Hillary is right in that she must take her campaign to the convention, and the convention isn't until late August. A lot can happen between now and then. Who knows what time will bring? If she conseeds to Obama now, she loses all the cards she has accumulated to advance her interests and policies. If Obama doesn't win on the first ballot, who knows where it will go? Bk Additional Links: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7418142.stm http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/23/cli...ref=mpstoryview http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/20...ons-contex.html After Hillary's beyond insensitive remarks yesterday about the assassination of RFK, (a veiled threat to Obama?) , and this the second time she referred to RFK's assassination during this campaign, she must shut up and go away. Pray she can retain her Senate seat. Her utter lack of shame is revealing of her lack of character, imho. Dawn

Including a page of a letter sent to Janet Reno, from former Senator Richard Schweiker......on what he thought of the W/C.... It would be assumed that you are aware that the "page of a letter" is in fact a page of a letter sent by myself, in which I quoted Senator Schweiker's comments regarding the WC. P.S. It is also a "roadmap" to understanding the manipulations of Specter & Company. Well, Tom you can assume all you care to, ........No I did not know it was"" in fact a page of a letter sent by ( you ) myself, in which I quoted Senator Schweiker's comments regarding the WC."" ....... But they are Senator Schweiker's comments....Many are greatly aware of the dishonest Specter's manipulations..... So a cheers for you, for sending such letter.......I hope you feel better now that is all straightened out..... Ta......B..... Does anyone know if Reno ever responded to anyone's letter, question, the controversey in general re the assassination? My memory is that she never touched it. Dawn

When will people learn that when they are in possession of information that can possibly bring down the rich and powerful the only way to stay alive is by TALKING. I realize that the mainstream press would not likely touch whatever she had to offer, but there are plenty of alternatives, like the one posted here: Alex Jones has shown, now over many years that he will print- or broadcast on tv- the truth, no matter how big or powerful the adversary. Oddly enough, the day this story broke Nancy Grace (on cable news) was also questioning the "suicide" theory for a good portion of her show. Just another day in Washington for these people. Business as usual. "Murder Inc." indeed. Dawn

The following was emailed to me, from another forum: Wayne Madsen had interviewed Palfrey numerous times and wrote about her. He was interviewed by Alex Jones at 4PM, only at infowars.com, in studio. Madsen said that Palfrey was in cahoots with the CIA. Her ladies all had college degrees and were involved in entrapping various parties so they could be blackmailed (like the entire Congressial membership, for starters). Also, Dick Cheney got a government job for one of the girls. Palfrey was trying to distance herself of it all. But once you're in with the CIA, you're always with the CIA. Just ask OBL. He thought he was rid of them, too.

And where, pray tell, is her little black book with all the names of Washington big wigs? Given that she was to be sentenced in July she was -forgive the pun-sitting on some very valuable information which she could have utilized as a bargaining chip. Nervous "enemies"? You bet: she'd already posted phone numbers. Imagine what she and her attorney could trade for leniency. To gain a better understanding of what may well have happened here there is a rather long article on this part of the forum. The "Dutrox Paedophile Affair: Connections to the very top". It begins in DC, then moves across the world, but comes full circle to our Capital. Dawn

For those who are suspicious about the sudden "suicide" of the DC madam, this article is required reading, imo. Others can simply believe the media spin. Dawn

Thank You David for posting this. It is quite long but imo required reading for anyone who wants to see how our world is truly "run" , on an a far deeper and totally EVIL level. There was not much in this piece that I have not read elsewhere, over the years, but to have it all in one article really explains how Washington "works" why so little of value is ever done. The stuff on Flase Memory Syndrome was especially interesting as I never believed these people to be legit. They all came on the heels of the prosecution (or attempted prosecution) of some of these cases. I remember seeing, back in the mid 90's, that they had military/FBI connections. This was the first decent expose of just WHAT they truly are that I have seen. And the parts on cattle mutilation explained that phony "UFO" connection. Just horrifying that anyone could do this to children. How on earth do people become so depraved? Dawn

There is a magazine which is the trade publication for those who blow up buildings for a living. They published an article on the WTC towers. Perhaps those who seek the truth will read the article. http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%...209-8-06%20.pdf http://www.implosionworld.com/ Erick Erick That excellent paper has already been brought up here but it was worth bring up again. I think the only truther on this forum who looked at it was Ron. Can we assume your views on 9/11 differ from your wife's? Yes Len we can assume this. But Erick also knew virtually zero about the JFK assassination when we met , he just does not as John Simkin calls it, "think critically" on these specific matters. But he's a great guy, a wonderful husband and an excellent, in fact brilliant attorney. (And for me he did read at least 10-12 books on JFK assassination and KNOWS that was a conspiracy). However, like most Americans cannot accept that our government would be involved in 9-11. He's simply blocked on the truth. So we simply do not discuss it, as it only leads to an argument. As for me I do not know how any rational thinking person can see all the evidence and believe the official nonsence. In fact I don't even post on these threads for this reason. Except I will say that there is a lot of disinformation on 9-11 to make those seeking the truth look like idiots. It is what happens in every conspiracy. A tried and true device to confuse: make conspiracy look foolish. Dawn

"Why risk the destruction of the entire agency...?" Nice to see TG is back in usual form. That is laughable TG, if this were not so tragic an event for the country. I concur, (as usual), with Bill Kelly : Who is going to give us the truth? A rhetorical question since there have been many good books on this subject that get as close to the truth as we will likely ever come. The new bok by Jim Douglas -(which I have on order)- promises to be one such book. (Based on the excellent and thorough review by Jim DiEugenio). Dawn

There is another situation taking place that I have yet to see any media member comment on: The "Rush Factor". He has millions of listeners on his popular hate radio show registering as Democrats for the sole purpose of voting for Clinton. That sole purpose being subverting the democratic process. He and his ilk call it "operation chaos". Last night was an example. In my car yeterday I had him on-wanting to know what the enemy is up to- and caller after caller were reporting that they had voted (in Pa) and could not wait to "switch back to Republican tomorrow". Yet not a single talking head has so much as mentioned this. Dawn

Some pertinent extracts here. http://www.ctrl.org/essay2/WEC.html There's a very good essay by Peter Dale Scott using "Were We Controlled?" as part of an exploratory comparison of the JFK assassination and 9/11. Jan: I have not seen or read that book since 1975, so it was interesting to see the excerpts posted here. Would you please post the entire PDS essay, or what it's called. PDS in incomparable on these matters, imho. Dawn btw, I have enjoyed all you have posted here.

Brings to mind the book "Were We Controlled?" by "Lincoln Lawrence". While interesting in what he had to say about certain aspects of brain stimulation (via remote control) I too long ago dismissed this notion in the case of LHO. This is a great thread, thanks to all for the imput here. This has long been a subject of great interest to me. Dawn

You're joking right?

"A viable alternative to the Tory party"!? Did somebody really just write those words? New Labour are neither alternative nor viable and very soon they will receive an electoral thrashing for neglecting their core political base by "moving …to the centre". And what do New Labour apologists really mean when they say "the centre". Do you mean an unprincipled acceptance of the neo-con political agenda, whether that's illegal wars, rampant privatisation, tax cuts for the rich, slavish subservience to big business or any other such "needs of a modern market economy"? Because that's the reality. New Labour now has its grubby little fingers over every millimetre of this "middle ground" but it doesn't seem to have done its popularity much good. When it does all eventually go bottoms up (and recent polls spell a humiliating disaster for this most pompous of governments) who will their apologists blame then? It used to be the "Loony Left"; they always had them as the scapegoat for previous Labour Leaders' futile attempts to show big business "how to run the capitalist system"! Here's a delicious irony. Neil Kinnock spent most of his leadership struggling to expel The Militant (a small left wing faction inside the Labour Party) on the grounds that it was an "entryist organisation" with ideas "alien to democratic socialism". Year upon year was spent hounding this tiny organisation, even when unemployment was at an all time record, the miners were fighting for their lives and millions lived in fear of the dole, Kinnock, leader of the Official Opposition, saw fit to persist in this hounding, goaded on by the press, and goaded on by his bloated ambitions, until finally, he received his just reward – two election defeats! Ah yes, the irony… Here's Kinnock valiantly kicking out left wing, predominantly working class, "entryists" when all the while the left wing party he ostensibly 'lead' was stealthily being taken over by right wing, predominantly middle class, Tory entryists! You couldn't write it! The role of the Labour party was long ago transformed from a radical socialist campaigning organisation to no more than a safety valve; a 'legitimate' way for workers to let off political steam, to stop them from drawing revolutionary conclusions, but always harnessed by a right wing leadership and herded by future promises of a vague 'socialist' mirage: promises they had no intentions of fulfilling, even if they had the power to do so. By bowing to the inevitable dictats and irrepairable contradictions of a free market economy the Labour Party ultimately (and knowingly!) create despair and disillusionment thus preparing the ground for a new Conservative Government, who then have the authority to push the political agenda further and further to the right. And so it goes on… So be warned America: Hilary or Obama won't make a jot of difference. They'll be no more than a breathing space, a consolidating period, holding the fort for the next wave of assaults from a re-charged Republican Party who will have a legitimate mandate to go even further than this time. Iraq? Iran? Small potatoes. Try China. Or Russia. But first a dose of 'liberal' democracy is needed to lull the masses, to disillusion them with false promises, so that the right can return with a vengeance. Terrifying! This is all very interesting, but I am surprised no one has mentioned,......[i do not know if it is true or folklore, hence I do not use the word "fact"] that Bill Clinton was one of the individuals who was at the airport when Hale Boggs entered into eternity, not that his being present, if that is the case denoted anything other than being at the wrong place at the wrong time.....Does it not seem odd that the Unsolved Mysteries genre has never delved into that topic. Heck, they never even found the plane...... According to Skolnick: "Another "flag officer", dissenting against Commander-in-Chief Clinton's treason was General David McCloud, head of the Alaska Military District. Assassinated by a sabotaged plane crash, McCloud had been in a position to know what the American CIA and FBI had done to cover-up what was done with Congressman Hale Boggs and his fellow airplane passenger, Congressman Nick Begich, Sr. (D., Alaska) when their plane was crashed and seized by a highly secret U.S. group in Alaska. By the way, WHO drove Cong. Boggs to the airport? Why a young man named Bill Clinton." http://www.cloakanddagger.de/media/S_284_S...0SYNDROME_2.htm NB - some interesting 'stuff' on the Clintons in the above piece, indeed!.... Peter: Thanks for the Skolnick piece, (RIP). I just wish he would have cited sources for all he says. AFter I get some work done I am going to google some of this (murder of VInce Foster's wife's step son Neal Moody eg). Skolnick was one of the first people to educate me on how the world really works. I had, in1973, several of his tapes along with his long paper on the 12/8 /72 Watergate plane crash, and that was 100% sourced. ( Dorothy Hunt 's murder, along with many others) . The audio tapes I had were totally sourced, so in the summer of 1974, I flew to Washington DC and spent two days at the Liab of Congress looking up his cites. I left sickened. But not surprised. So the trolls here can call us the "nuts" all they wish. We know what is real and we know the true danger of "where" we are today. Dawn

I assume you mean interview the jurors? Absolutely interview them, to find out what they thought was both weak and strong about the state's case. It is SOP. I cannot speak for what the law in PA is but in TX. after the trial is over the judge cannot prevent those who wish to speak from doing so. Some have done so here, so I am assuming the law is the same in PA.

Do coincidences occur in this case? I guess so but yesterday I had an intersting one that just resulted in this post. Yesterday I noticed that Len Colby has a web site just below his sig. SO I went to the web site and discovered it to be devoted to trashing the truth movement in 9-11. Later in the day I was telling Terry Mauro- ( via phone)- about this, as we pondered "just who is this Len Colby?" It's one thing to post here and continually be on the wrong side- (in the opinion of most posters) but to devote an entire website, now that takes a lot of time. More organized if you will, I'd even venture to say being paid to do so... Possibly... So, imagine my surprise this am when I looked in on this thread and discovered that both Colby's sig and website is now suddently missing. Interesting timing. So, Len just why did you suddenly remove this information? Hmmm???? Dawn

FBI speaks to Wecht jurors. This case gets worse by the day. Chairman Conyers Deeply Troubled by FBI Juror Interviews in Cyril Wecht Mistrial April 11th, 2008 by Jesse Lee Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers released the following statement in response to reports today that the FBI is attempting to interview jurors in the Cyril Wecht mistrial: I am deeply troubled by reports of FBI agents contacting former jurors who failed to convict Dr. Wecht. Whether reckless or intended, it is simply common sense that such contacts can have a chilling effect on future juries in this and other cases. When added to the troubling conduct of this prosecution, there is the appearance of a win at all costs mentality. The committee continues to investigate this matter. FBI Contacts Jurors After Wecht Mistrial WTAE TV - April 11, 2008 Two jurors in Dr. Cyril Wecht’s federal trial told WTAE Channel 4’s news exchange partner, the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, that the FBI wants to talk with them. U.S. District Judge Arthur Schwab declared a mistrial after the Wecht jury said it was deadlocked on Tuesday. A new trial for the ex-Allegheny County coroner is scheduled for next month. Two of the deadlocked jurors said the FBI called them this week and asked for interviews. U.S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan’s office said it’s common for an investigating agency to call jurors when a case ends in a deadlock. Margaret Philbin, a representative for Buchanan, said the FBI was simply setting up appointments so prosecutors could discuss the case with the jurors. The jurors said they found the found the FBI’s request unusual and intimidating. Wecht’s attorney, Jerry McDevitt, told the Trib he was “troubled” by the FBI’s contact with jurors. Wecht faces a 41-count indictment, mostly on wire and mail fraud charges. Prosecutors allege that he used the coroner’s office to benefit his private pathology practice. Democrats Were Targets in Inquiries, Panel Is Told Philip Shenon, New York Times - October 24, 2007 Richard L. Thornburgh, attorney general in the Reagan and first Bush administrations, charged Tuesday that political reasons motivated the Justice Department to open corruption investigations against Democrats in Mr. Thornburgh’s home state, Pennsylvania. In testimony before the House Judiciary Committee, Mr. Thornburgh became the first former Republican attorney general to join with Democratic lawmakers to suggest that the Justice Department under Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales had singled out Democratic politicians for prosecution. Later in the story: Mr. Thornburgh noted that Ms. Buchanan had conducted a series of high-profile corruption investigations against Pennsylvania Democrats in the months before the 2006 midterm elections, including the one against the former coroner, Cyril Wecht. “During this same period, not one Republican officeholder was investigated and/or prosecuted by Ms. Buchanan’s office — not one,” Mr. Thornburgh said, noting that there had been accusations of corruption against two prominent Republican members of Congress from Pennsylvania in that same period. He said that Dr. Wecht, a nationally prominent forensic pathologist, “would qualify as an ideal target for a Republican U.S. attorney trying to curry favor with a department which demonstrated that if you play by its rules, you will advance.” Dr. Wecht, who is scheduled to go on trial next year, has been charged with 84 criminal counts, including theft and mail fraud, much of it involving his use of a government fax machine and postage meter. Mr. Thornburgh described the prosecution as “bizarre.” Watch Mr. Thornburgh’s testimony (pdf) from the October 23, 2007 hearing: Thornburgh: “It should also be noted that of these three high profile, very public, Democratic prosecutions, one resulted in a misdemeanor macing plea; one resulted in no plea and an alternative resolution; and Dr. Wecht’s case remains pending. All three Democrats were frontpage stories during the run-up to the 2006 election. The damage was done by widespread media coverage with little apparent concern as to whether justice was meted out. During this same period not one Republican officeholder was investigated and/or prosecuted by Ms. Buchanan’s office. Not one. Although a whistleblower in Republican Congressman Tim Murphy’s office accused the Congressman of using paid staff members in his election campaign, no investigation was conducted that we are aware of.” This entry was posted on Friday, April 11th, 2008 at 2:18 pm by Jesse Lee and is filed under Civil Rights, Draining the Swamp, Oversight. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site. Comments are closed.

I'd be really interested in hearing your theory on why the CIA (presumably it was the CIA) set the trap for Nixon Stephen. Either in this thread or another. -------- Myra, I would strongly strongly strongly recomend the book Secret Agenda by Jim Hougan. I first heard of it on this forum and it sprained my hyperbole, for which I had always been proud. Ill just say its a really really really interesting book to read. Hope I can chime in on your question: 1) Detente-- ironically something that may have done in his debating partner of 1960 2) Centralizing "too much" power within the Whitehouse in the opinion of the CIA and Joint Chiefs-- again similar things were said about JFK and McNamara 3) Rumors that spread in the permanent buraucracy during secret backchannel negotiations-- another possible similarity. 4) wage and price controlls-- anathama to rightist economics 5) PERCEIVED continuation of Keynsian social spending. 6) differences over Vietnam poilicy 7) Kissinger, Henry. Catcher, batting 7th. 8) The War of the FBI succession. I heard that phrase used somewhere. What I think it means is that some saw Nixon as impinging on FBI turf in a similar way as he was impinging of CIA turf. Here the death of Hoover was significant. Thanks for the book recommendation Nathaniel; I'll look for it. Not sure I understand some of the items on your list. For example #7. Are you saying the CIA wanted to get rid of Kissinger? And, can you elaborate on #8. Are you saying Hoover was one of the conspirators against Nixon or a victim like Nixon? Another book rec. on point here is "Who Killed John Lennon?" by Fenton Bresler. But Lennie is not interested in learning the truth. Nate jolly good job here, but of course you know it's wasted on him. Thanks also Peter for the Mae Brussel reminds. She was one amazing woman. John Judge told me 10 years ago in Dallas about the cancer/ CIA house and fire. I asked him what got her wacked, what was she working on? "Satanisn in the military" was his reply. (This has also also been a huge interest of mine as it- Satanism- is hand and hand with other black ops. I have been thinking a lot recently about all the serial killers we have had, and the advent of MKULTRA. When I heard James E. Ray's brother talk on coastto coast about Jame's being messed with in the military, it got me thinking about this again. (This coincided with Manson stories, new bodies) and being reminded of the brainwashed Manson girls. The killers. ) So I googled Manson and MKULTRA. INteresting and lots of hits. Of course John Lennon was murdered by a conspiracy. It took me a long time to face that, (though I thought it possible from the start ). And I read the entire Playboy interview, before falling asleep, Dec. 8th, 1980, only to get the call: "He's dead." I was inconsolable. So all Len's strawman arguments are just that. But on this long Friday I appreciate all the great responses from the other posters, who post to the peron who least wants what Lennon asked for: "some truth", (and peace, and love). John Simkin called people who put these connections together and see the truth "critical thinkers". Craig and Len are here to hijack every thread, no matter how much evidence is presented to these types you will be met with refusal to see. Gratz did it endlessly with his Castro did it foolishness. Dawn