Chris Davidson

10.4mph - 8.6mph = 1.8mph x 1.47 = 2.646ft per sec x 1.8sec = 4.76ft = see graphic above. 2.646ft per sec/18.3 = .1445ft per frame 4.76ft/.1445ft per frame = 32.94frames = https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/25932-the-motorcade-puzzle/?do=findComment&comment=445523

I believe you need to check your plat in relationship to the Elm St turn. I've indicated with the vertical red stripes a difference in the radius. The red horizontal line with the 4.68ft designation(front end of cars) is a difference indicator between where I would plot the Wiegman start and where you have it starting at z280. Your cars back end is your z270. I have the mayors car at 16.25ft in length which is the spec given for that car from the manufacturer. If this makes sense, I'll then convert the differences moving forward.

Mr. SPECTER. Well, can you describe the view you say is from the right-hand side of the automobile? Mr. KELLERMAN. That is right. Mr. SPECTER. So that would be on the side of the road where the Texas School Book Depository Building was? Mr. KELLERMAN. Yes, sir. Mr. SPECTER. And approximately where did those pictures begin and end? Mr. KELLERMAN. These pictures began as we turned off Houston Street onto Elm. Wrong side of the road for Towner.

Wiegman had his camera fully wound before he started shooting the 36.5 seconds of the z sync segment. In essence, he shot all but approx 1/2 second of footage before a rewind was necessary. imo 16mm film = 40frames per foot x 22ft per full wind = 880 frames 36.5sec x 24 fps = 876 frames He stopped filming after Hester entered the colonnade but is picked up by Bell/Couch rising and then starting his run down the knoll to film the Newmans. The time difference connecting the Wiegman rise from Bell/Couch is 1.7 seconds. I truly don't believe Wiegman was winding his film as he was starting to stand and head down the knoll to film the Newmans. Nor do I believe during his run down the knoll he was winding his camera. Nor do I believe when he reached the Newmans that he rewound his camera. I do believe he had his camera fully ready to shoot and shot 36.5 seconds of a 37 second limitation for that rewind. The network television version has a total of 1095 frames(converted from 24fps to 30fps) for the 36.5 second version. 30 x 36.5 = 1095 That version is a 3/2 pulldown result. In essence, for every 4 real(progressive) frames that existed, an extra one was created. 4/5 = .8 1095 x .8 = 876 frames Yes, Myers has the Wiegman start sync wrong at z246, not the frame rate. imo 36:15 below is reflective of a 30fps clock, so 15/30 = .5 second

The preponderance of "coup" evidence keeps growing and growing. https://news.yahoo.com/trump-loyalist-jeffrey-clark-shut-045937632.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall https://twitter.com/alex_mallin/status/1422728769584906242

Mark, Sometime in the distant past(I'll see if I can find it again) I supplied a graphic that showed the turning radius/position for the mayor's car was tighter than what you were showing, when you had the Wiegman film starting/syncing at extant z295. You now have the Wiegman film starting/syncing at extant z280. The supplied graphic shows you tightened up the turning radius of the mayor's car. In doing this, your Wiegman frame rate dropped. If an even tighter radius exists, does this create another Wiegman frame rate reduction in your opinion?

Do all individuals with micro-bloodclots experience the same/any symptons and degree of severity? https://www.factcheck.org/2021/03/scicheck-viral-posts-misuse-vaers-data-to-make-false-claims-about-covid-19-vaccines/ https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-vaers-12000/fact-check-vaers-data-does-not-prove-covid-19-vaccine-deaths-exceeded-12000-idUSL1N2P21DB

It's helping me clarify the (almost) exact differences between two competing scenarios. 33 frames (+/-) 1 frame Frame Markers for example: 100,133,166,200

Publication date noted: https://www.genengnews.com/news/blood-clotting-patterns-in-lungs-of-covid-19-patients-may-help-explain-apparent-differences-in-mortality/

"For what it's worth" (Buffalo Springfield) https://news.yahoo.com/youtuber-bet-physicist-10-000-120100405.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall

The distance between JBC/JFK was 2.4ft before JFK started any type of forward leaning. His leaning also lowers his head height. imo If the shooter was aiming for JFK's head he would have to lead(aim a little higher) to account for the limo speed. imo I'll leave it up to you to place/imagine what JBC's body position would be at circa extant z274.

Something like this:

Besides other items and speaking ballistically, the County Records rooftop aligns quite nicely with JBC's back/chest(possible thigh) wounds. I tend to believe the shot was fired at z273 and whizzed past JFK's hair at z275 in keeping with the document's 6ft prior to their existing shot span(do the math using the red boxes) which is approx extant z274 based on Nelli's reaction time thereafter, coincidentally while the vertical panning of the zframes hiding JBC's chest occurs.

Nicely crafted connecting these jigsaw puzzle pieces.

Didn't apply any lighting effects. Those are four consecutive frames from original footage.

A few more.

Head flopped. Eyes/nose lowered. Shoulders angled.

Getting back on track. As you watch the whole gif, listen to the song and apply the words to the duplication of the extant zfilm funnies. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxgETJq0T80 Too bad the song wasn't from the music group "Squeeze", how appropriate that would be.

Yes, they made sure all aspects led back to the 6th floor, no matter how many deceitful attempts were made.

The WC knew the true limo speed long before the "official" reenactment in May 1964 was completed. There were multiple recreations months before that. Ask yourself why the reenactments didn't match the same speed as the extant zfilm. The faster the limo, the less frames required. Time/distance compression/decompression. Think anamorphic/squeeze lens concept. Once that sinks in, I'll move onto the ratio's involved. imo

Same frames as previous gif, aligning the limo:

Understanding the concept should help you understand the alterations:

Back End:

Comparing two shots/splices watching the sprocket hole play catch up. Amazing the panning speed had slowed between the two, considering the limo speed was approx the same at both incidences.