Wim Dankbaar

Here is a clip of Mike Brownlow interviewed Emmy award winning Peter R. de Vries: http://jfkmurdersolved.com/researchers.htm

Can someone point out to me where Mrs. Smith claims she was standing exactly? Wim

I am certainly NOT agreeing that "Frenchy" and Doyle are the same man. I am agreeing with YOU. Wim PS: Also Doyle was 32 in 1963. Frenchy looks 10 years older if you ask me.

Thanks James, Can you also do one with the picture of Harold with the kids? Just his head in the middle picture? Wim

Who can make a few comparisons like above with the contemporary pictures posted in the first post of the thread? Wim One more below:

The first one is Charles Frederick Rogers, the second one is the tramp as photographed in Dealey Plaza nov 22 63, the third is Harold Doyle.

He passed away yesterday September 10, 2008 in a nursing home in Williamson WV. Wim Harold Dean Doyle, 77 of Williamson, WV, a special part of History, departed from this earth and went to meet the Lord on September 10, 2008 at the Trinity Helathcare. He was well known for being one of the three tramps on the grassy knoll in Dallas, Texas when Pres. John F. Kennedy was assassinated, and he came face to face with Lee Harvey Oswald. He was born on December 8, 1930 at Red Jacket, WV the son of the late Walter and Kelsy McCoy Doyle. He was also preceded in death by 2 sisters and 3 brothers. He was a professional Hobo and a Veteran of the US Army. Survivors include one daughter, Francine Salinas of Arizona, two sons, Manuel Doyle of Fort Riley, Kansas and Bruce Doyle of Spokane, WA., one sister, Pat Hearblin of Pritchard, WV, special caretaker, Kelsie Runyon of Pinsonfork, Ky. and four grandchildren. Funeral services will be held Sunday, September 14, 2008 at 2 PM at R. E. Rogers Funeral Home, Belfry, Ky. with Lonnie Francis officiating. Burial will follow in the Don Runyon Cemetery, Pinsonfork, Ky. Visitation will be held after 6 PM Saturday at R. E. Rogers Funeral Home.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OyI0P6WYIY

http://www.manuscriptservice.com/MikeWilliams/

http://video.google.nl/videoplay?docid=-6811330180001581365 Plus yanking Mike's chain Dear Amazon.com Customer, We've noticed that customers who have purchased or rated JFK And Sam: The Connection Between the Giancana And Kennedy Assassinations by Antoinette Giancana have also purchased Files on JFK: Interviews with Confessed Assassin James E. Files, and More New Evidence of the Conspiracy that Killed JFK by Wim Dankbaar. For this reason, you might like to know that Files on JFK: Interviews with Confessed Assassin James E. Files, and More New Evidence of the Conspiracy that Killed JFK will be released on September 1, 2008. You can pre-order yours at a savings of $10.18 by following the link below. Files on JFK: Interviews with Confessed Assassin James E. Files, and More New Evidence of the Conspiracy that Killed JFK Wim Dankbaar List Price: $29.95 Price: $19.77 You Save: $10.18 (34%) Release Date: September 1, 2008 Product Description Contrary to the belief that Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone assassin in Dealey Plaza at the time that President John F. Kennedy was shot, this account maintains that a gunman located on the grassy knoll delivered the final, fatal shot. Based on interviews with James E. Files, the alleged gunman, the chronicle proposes that the assassination was initiated by the CIA in collaboration with organized crime—Sam Giancana, Charles Nicoletti, and Johnny Roselli, in particular. Subsequent discoveries made through the assistance of a number of retired FBI agents also implicate two anti-Castro terrorists protected by prosecution from the Bush administration—Orlando Bosch and Luis Posada Carriles.

Look who's talking. You were given the opportunity to prove how Files is a load of crap, and you failed miserably. You can try to hide it by lying that you "proved" anything. Dishonesty? Con artist? No self respect? Look in the mirror! You take pleasure in "yanking my chain", right? You're too weak to even lift it. My chain is yanked daily by far more significant and non-pathetic people. For crying out loud. And now we have you claiming that the single bullit theory IS possible, too proud and stubborn to admit a blunder. You know, if I didn't know better I would think you're a disinformation asset, but since you're so meaningless, I know it's just stupidity. The only thing you deserve , is a complete ignore. Here's to yanking your chain: By Tony Stewart "Crimewriter/author" (Bloomington, IN United States) - See all my reviews Wim Dankbaar's book "I SHOT JFK" is truly a fascinating piece of history, reviving the reality of President John F. Kennedy's assassination, while disproving the Warren Commissions "so called" one gunman theory. There have been many mythological theories of what supposedly happened on that dreadful November 22, 1963, but Dankbaar has bought the facts to the table, financing the greatest investigation of all time to crack the case. Confessed killer-assassin James Files, and a member of organized crime may have been the shooter on the grassy knoll, or was he? The facts are all here! Although officially declared "not credible," by the FBI, thorough research and video taped interviews presented in Dankbaar's , unsurpassed book may have proven otherwise. What did James Files have to gain by confessing to the murder of our beloved President? He was already rotting away in prison serving time for attempted murder of an Illinois police officer. Confessing would have only added more time to his sentence. Unless his confession was indeed true, and he wanted to get it off his chest. After all, if his story was correct, he had been living with the guilt for many years. A remorse that would be unbearable for anyone with a conscience. And the world already knows that even if new facts arose the FBI wouldn't want to open old wounds after all these years, especially on the death of a President. As a Kennedy research of over 30 years, and the forthcoming author of a new book on John F. Kennedy, I say let the evidence speak for itself. I highly recommend Dankbaar's masterpiece "I SHOT JFK." In my professional opinion, this may be perhaps the finest evidence ever bought to light on the Kennedy assassination. Review by 7ony Stewart, author of Dillinger, The Hidden Truth JohnnieDillinger@aol.com By Spike Stewart (Los Angeles, California United States) - See all my reviews This review is from: Files on JFK (Paperback) Facinating read! I've read many accounts re: Nov. 22 conspiracy. This story rang true to my gut. It's simple, direct and believable. I'm not going to delve into specifics here, but I think if one has an informed backround of information pertaining to the events of that time, this tale translates a credible scenerio. I enjoyed it and concidered it a gift. 11 of 13 people found the following review helpful: Better Believe It, March 12, 2007 By Gman (Somewhere in kansas) - See all my reviews This review is from: Files on JFK (Paperback) I don't know what Vince's problem is unless he's a disinformation tool--that could well be--but this one (Files on JFK) is, with all its disjointed syntax, goofball proofreading errors (a rash of (sic)s in a bunch of letters, but whoever sicc'd 'em on that portion of the book missed about 500 more in the same area), mangled English, is one of the most interesting of all the books since the start of this whole JFK industry. It rings true. And is supported by a lot of other outside documentation. Net: it's very hard to dismiss this one. And I've read many hours of the kind of crap that gives JFK research a dopey name. (Much of it by those whose reason is just that) It's non-linear in its presentation, jumps around, has many unexplained "interviews" and conversations, and jumps from a letter exchange between Joe West and JF that shows both sides, to a lot of letters to Vernon which leave out all of Vernon's. One thing I found disturbing was the fact it left in social security numbers in one case, plus exact addresses including zip codes and phone numbers for people who should be protected from that. Sloppy stuff. Bottom line: it belongs in any serious researcher's library. It. Is. Believable. 4 of 4 people found the following review helpful: Very thorough, well documented, gives not just solid info of who did it, but who ordered it and why., December 22, 2007 By M. Hulsebos - See all my reviews What gives this book weight is it's thoroughness, and how well it is documented. The author actually interviewed James Files and videotaped it, one of only 2 video interviews Files has given. Seeing the video was an eye-opener, and the clincher for me as to whether or not his story is real. In my mind, it is. But this book tells the story of not just the operatives on 11-22-1963, but the background of what and who motivated it. There are pieces of the puzzle in this book that are not found elsewhere. This may be the most complete and convincing documentation that the assassination was a conspiracy. The book points out that the cover-up continuing to this day is evidence that the government still acts in shady ways. That is why this story is still relevant. 15 of 18 people found the following review helpful: Most probable book on JFK murder I ever read, July 24, 2006 By Han Pfann "Han" (Den Helder Netherlands) - See all my reviews It took me some time to read this extensive research-journal sometimes having to get back and forth re-reading parts. But boy, these people went to a lot of trouble, trying to get to the bottom of this dramatic event. In fact I consider their efforts as heroic, as they would not be the first to die of too much knowledge. Everything in the book is well documented, in combination with the web-site www.jfkmurdersolved.com everything can be extensively self-researched. They do not claim to know it all, but just the part of the operation that they researched. I certainly hope this book and the DVD will help to make people realize that conspiracies do exist, and things often are very different from what they appear to be. Our elected representatives need to be checked over and over again because they are precisely what we ourselves are: people with our own agenda's, needs and greeds. Han Pfann Den Helder Netherlands 13 of 21 people found the following review helpful: Awesome, January 8, 2006 By Fatjack "Jack" (Saginaw, MI USA) - See all my reviews This review is from: Files on JFK (Paperback) This book is super great and to me very truthful about the JFK assassination and the people behind it. It is to bad that the high officals in the U.S. don't take the time to really show the general public the real truth of the assassination. Mr. Dankbarr has spent alot of time in bringing this truth to the world. He should be given some kind of an award for this. The DVD of James E. Files confession is also a work of art and should not be over looked. I have been trying to follow the JFK assassination and find the real truth of what really happened that day in Dallas on November 22, 1963 since the day it happened. I, back then had a strong feeling that JFK's fatal shot was from the front. Even though I was only 16 years old, I did alot of hunting and knew how a bullet would throw JFL's head back from a front head shot. Like most people I beleived what they (Warren Commission, FBI, CIA) where tekking us and wanting us to beleive until this book and DVD became available. This book has created in my mind,without a resonable doubt, that there was a conspirancy to assassinate JFK. Thank you very much Mr. Wim Dankbarr for being truthful and taking time to let the general public and the world know the truth of what happened on November 22, 1963 in Dallas Texas. Jack Almy 10 of 16 people found the following review helpful: A must read..., November 19, 2005 By Nicholas Whalen (San Francisco, CA) - See all my reviews This review is from: Files on JFK (Paperback) Being familiar with the story of James E. Files for years now, I had always wondered about his motivations for confessing to being one of the shooters on the grassy knoll. What kind of crazy man would do such a thing I asked myself?? When I read Wim Dankbaar's Files on JFK this past month, many of my burning questions were answered. For example, Dankbaar demonstrates who Files really is through detailed correspondence with the late Joe West and later Bob Vernon, wherein the reader learns that James Files never intended his story for the media, that the lead on James Files came from the FBI of all sources and not from Files himself (for all those skeptics who think that Files is just some sick prankster who is just seeking attention), and that Files is sorry for ever revealing his role in the assassination and that his life has only grown more difficult as a result. Apart from excellent primary sources like the correspondence, the book is jfkmurdersolved.com in book form, which anybody who has visited the site can attest, is loaded with a gigantic amount of relevant and sometimes new information on the assassination. Kudos to Wim Dankbaar for compiling such a well researched book. Nick Whalen San Francisco, California 13 of 18 people found the following review helpful: Buy the book and READ it..., August 30, 2006 By R. Mertens "Rachje" (Rotterdam, Netherlands) - See all my reviews This review is from: Files on JFK (Paperback) I don't have to waste a lot of words on it; buy it and read it. Better yet, buy the dvd as well and watch the interview with James Files for yourselves. There's no way someone could make this up and act naturally like he does in front of the camera. And then there's all the evidence that substantiate his claims. LN'ers WANT to believe LHO did it, sane people add up the factual evidence. Two thumbs up for this one ! 9 of 11 people found the following review helpful: ATTN: Gerald Posner - Finally it is Case Closed!, September 15, 2007 By S. V. Orsi "SVO" (Chicago, IL) - See all my reviews I am convinced James Files is recalling events and not telling a story, especially after viewing the companion DVD. Either that, or he is the best xxxx I've ever heard. There is no way he could've manufactured the things he said or have even known about some of the details. After viewing both you simply have to believe Oswald was exactly what he said he was... a patsy. And just think, the so called "experts" like Vincent Bugliosi and Gerald Posner actually believe in the "Single Bullet Theory" and a "Lone Nut" assassin, despite all the evidence to the contrary and what has been uncovered in the 44 years since 11/22/63. It's amazing how those with no credentials or expertise whatsoever in criminal investigation, forensics, or pathology can be so sure of what they say while overlooking the eyewitness testimony of the numerous people who heard a shot from the Grassy Knoll, and the opinions of actual experts in forensics and pathology like Cyril Wecht. Of course The Warren Commission also dismissed eyewitness testimony as well as any evidence that didn't fit their predetermined outcome, so none of us capable of critical thinking should be surprised. What is really disturbing is the fact that the national media endorsed the books from Bugliosi and Posner while work such as this gets no coverage. Here's hoping this book and the companion DVD will acquire some major distributorship and national media attention soon! 10 of 18 people found the following review helpful: A Must-Have JFK book, June 28, 2006 By David R. Wayne - See all my reviews This review is from: Files on JFK (Paperback) This is one of the most under-rated books out there and a must-have for serious students of the JFK assassination and I've read most of them. Just the interviews with Tosh Plumlee and Chauncey Holt are well-worth the price of the book; they are very well-researched and provide extremely valuable information from well-documented sources. 1 of 1 people found the following review helpful: FILES ON JFK, August 7, 2008 By RON L. MILLER "RON MILLER, TENNESSEE DIVER" (ATHENS, TENNESSEE) - See all my reviews AS A FORMER HOMICIDE DETECTIVE AND IN CHARGE OF A HOMICIDE DISTRICT TEAM IN MY STATE , I HAD MANY QUESTIONS ON THE JFK ASSASSINATION. READING THE BOOK ON FILES ANSWERED 99% OF MY QUESTIONS. ANY ONE WHO WANTS TO KNOW ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED IN DALLAS NEEDS OT READ THIS BOOK, IT IS A BOMB SHELL FOR SURE. RON MILLER 4 of 4 people found the following review helpful: Files on JFK, December 22, 2007 By Lynda M. Woodall "Patriot" (USA) - See all my reviews Astounding confession and intriguing information. The book answered alot of questions for we seekers of the real truth. James Files came across convincingly candid with an amazing amount of substantiated facts. This knowledge should be loudly proclaimed in the mainstream of our public media and our history books should be changed, once and for all, to reflect the truth about the JFK murder. The fact that a US agency, the CIA, contracted hired assassins from the mob as well as using George Bush Sr's own CIA Operation 40 group to carry out this unthinkable dark deed is something the American people have a Constitutional right to know. To think that a majority of our presidents since that day and many of our trusted agencies have used blood and our tax dollars to cover up their coup de tat is unacceptable and shameless. They should be exposed for who they are and those who are still alive punished not pardon! I hope that this book becomes common knowledge amongst the American people and the world as well. Only then will we be able to again call ourselves a free nation and not an international party joke. Signed a Patriot of the United States that used to be. 5 of 6 people found the following review helpful: author Dr. Hughes on Wim's Files, June 18, 2007 By John R. Hughes "neurologist" - See all my reviews This review is from: Files on JFK (Paperback) Wim Dankbaar has devoted his entire professional life to exploring Files and his role in the JFK assassination ever since he sold his computer company. Therefore, there is no one who knows more about this important assassin than Wim. Furthermore, Wim has spent hundreds of hours on the relationship between the Files assassination of JFK and all other relevant matters. He has become very popular in the Netherlands where he appears frequently on TV and the Dutch people have tuned in because they recognize his great wealth of information.The book is highly recommended.

That's not the point. You said the single bullet theory is possible. How is it possible if you accept that the bullet did not transit through JFK? After all, the basis for the SBT is that it transited through JFK. You just said that you don't believe that it transited through JFK. So why did you say the SBT is possible? Wim

Mike Williams wrote: So this means you accept that the bullet penetrated Kennedy, entered in his high back and exited through his throat? It means you don't accept the evidence that the back wound was probed during the autopsy and found to be a shallow wound with no exit, right? You know, I have other things to do as well than following and commenting on your popshots. I believe I have refuted everything you said about Files, but if you're unsatisfied, you're welcome to restate the specific points you are desiring answers for. Have you inflated yourself to the "big people" now? Based on what? Maybe you should start with updating your biography information accordingly? "I am very new to the study of the assassination of John Kennedy, and find all areas of study interesting. " Wim

So Mr. Purvis attributes a superiority to himself to determine what and who is stupid, even if the majority disagrees with him. Who is stupid? Wim

No, I have not noticed, but It doesn't surprise coming from Purvis. Please DO explain! By the way, the statement that "without the single bullet theory, you have no single assassin", comes from Dr. Cyril Wecht. And thusfar I cannot shoot holes in that statement. So yes, please give me the explanation on how he is wrong! Please tell me how Oswald could have caused all the wounds in JFK and Conally with three shots (one miss), if one of his two hits did not penetrate both men? Wim

Guys, Isn't it an iron hard fact that the back wound was probed and found to have been a shallow wound with no exit? Mike Williams said: Wow! That's basically the same what Gary Mack says! No further comments.

See my exchange with Gary here: http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/mack.htm A forum member here offered the following: Well, I think that's a good offer. So Gary, Why is the abundant evidence that no bullet penetrated the torso of Kennedy not "hard evidence" for the impossibility of the single bullet theory? I realize you never post on the public forums that you and Perry monitor, but you know how to contact me. Awaiting..... Wim PS: As a side matter, Should the sixth floor museum, as the purported owner of the Zapruder film, not do something about the wide and free availibility on the Internet (a.o. Youtube and Google video) of it? I mean, what is the reasoning that the museum allows that, but tries to charge for use in other media like TV?

McCord would always keep Hunt and Phillips out of the wind. They were all in the same bed: MCCORD, PHILLIPS: FEBRUARY 1961 A Memorandum for the Record, dated February 1, 1961, from Kammer. Subject: (deleted) #188074" stated: "On this date Subject's case was coordinated with Mr. McCORD of Security Research Service, in connection with Subject's operational use with the US by WH/4/Propaganda. The implications of a Counter-Intelligence operation within the States by this Agency, and the possibility Subject might come to the attention of the FBI through association with Court Wood, were discussed. Mr. McCORD expressed the opinion that it is not necessary to advise the FBI of the operation at this time. However, he wishes to review the case in a month. The file of the Subject, along with that of the WH man who is supervising the operation (DAVID ATLEE PHILLIPS #40695) will be pended for the attention of Mr. McCORD on March 1, 1961." A CIA document dated February 1, 1961, about the Fair Play for Cuba Committee stated TO: C/EAB/OS ATTN: Mr. Belt VIA: WH/4/Security ATTN: Mr. Kennedy Subj: Fair Play for Cuba Committee 1. At the request of DAVE PHILLIPS, C/WH/4/Propaganda, I spent the evening of January 6, 1961, with Court Wood, a student who has recently returned from the 3-week stay in Cuba under sponsorship of the Fair Play for Cuba Committee. 2. Court and his father both have voiced very strong pro-Castro sentiments and are extremely critical of our foreign policy in general. 3. I've been advised by Mr. PHILLIPS to continue my relationship with Mr. Wood and I will keep your office informed of each subsequent visit. 4. This is forwarded to you as a matter of information and to become a permanent part of my security file. (deleted) WH/4/Registry [Handwritten note] February 1, 1961, M/R Subject stated this is operational with no specific goal in mind. (Deleted) and Wood went to high school together and although they travel in different circles they on occasion see each other. Wood has (deleted) is a (illegible) player beginning with the time (deleted) file applicant. (Deleted).

You mean this list? http://www.amazon.com/review/product/14196...mp;pageNumber=3

Len, you're quite right. Slip of the pen in connection with Badgeman. Wim

Well, that has been refuted by Hunt himself. He knew that plans to assassinate JFK were in the works. He was asked to participate but refused, or so he said. You can harly call that "no connection whatever with the President's death". I do not believe Hunt when he denied any role, but even if I did, by having the advance knowledge and keeping his mouth, he became already an acomplice at least. Wim

Use of probes: Robinson had vivid recollections of a very long, malleable probe used during the autopsy. His most vivid recollection of the probe is seeing it inserted near the base of the brain in the back of the head (after removal of the brain), and seeing the tip of the probe come out of the tracheotomy incision in the anterior neck. He was adamant about this recollection. He aslo recalls seing the wound high in te back probed unsuccesfully, meaning that the probe did not exit anywhere. The point is, this document confirmes what Robinson told me. Since then I have eaten my own words below. The wound trajectories were probed from inside the skull, through the gaping hole in JFK's head. The probe came out at the throat wound. This means that the throatwound was indeed an exit wound from a bullet fragment of the bullet that hit him in the head, NOT an entry wound from a bullet. It also means (once again) that the single bullet theory didn't happen, for the wound trajectory in JFK's back did have NO exit, so no bullet penetrated the body like the single bullet theory portrays. And of course, without the single bullet theory, there is no singel assassin. Maybe the most flagrant aspect is that all the autopsy doctors must have known this when the Warren Commision defrauded the American public with their lie. Post by Bruce P. Brychek (one of James Files’ best friends, who visits James regularly) 4. As of 03.26.2005, Jimmy was/is unaware of any second team of shooters. Though this is possible, but not probable, it would have been on a "Need to Know" basis, assuming arguendo, that there was a Second Team of Shooters, and further assuming that they were deployed by the "Same Source," capable of even sharing the knowledge. Jimmy's thought on the neck would are, that he was shooting Mercury loads, because they purposely explode upon impact. He thinks that pieces from his Mercury load came through Kennedy's neck, and also hit the windshield from the inside. Answer from Wim: Jimmy should stay away from speculation. Although his need to know knowledge actually enhances his credibility, and also proves that he is not "well read" on the assassination, there is no way that the throat wound was inflicted by a fragment from his bullet. The throat wound was caused by another bullet from the front (it could only have been from the south knoll in my opinion). It was a neat little round hole, recognised by all the Parkland doctors as an entry wound from a small caliber bullet.

Purvis, I add your name to another list. Gary Mack, Dave Perry, Gerald Posner, Vincent Bugliosi, George Bush, Edward Epstein, and hey, even Bob Vernon, are on it too. I'm sure you'll enjoy the company Joe West will never be on it. By the way, Files was wrong. I hope I don't spoil your day with this. If you're ready for more "moronic" reviews like this, let me know. Or on second thought, don't bother, I smell you from a mile away. Wim

Hey Bill, So you think because the Japs made and aired a program on James Files, that's proof he's full of xxxx? Well then, following that theory, why has he not been aired in the USA yet? Maybe your guys should start with the Japs too? Wim

Well yeah, the splice means something was taking out. If you see that as "alteration", I agree it was altered. The remaining film was not altered in any way. Basically I'm with Groden on that.