Wim Dankbaar

How does Dave Perry point this out "quite rightly"? Which of his claims to argument this, do you find particularly credible? Take your pick from these ten: http://davesjfk.com/lettermn.html As for the "very few researchers" you may want to start here: http://jfkmurdersolved.com/researchers.htm And if you don't believe Judyth Baker, you may want to pay the world a service by absorbing the story thoroughly and pointing out how and why she is a hoax. It must be a horror for you to see this book rated with 5 stars: http://www.amazon.com/Dr-Marys-Monkey-Canc...n/dp/0977795306 Dave Perry is not correct. The story of Holt is corroborated through many aspects, expert opinions and evidence, not the least the shadows in the tramp photographs, refuting the "official" tramps story. http://jfkmurdersolved.com/lois1.htm In addition James Files does NOT corroborate Holt's story other than indirectly by placing Nicoletti in Dallas that day. Instead of adhering to Perry's claims, I suggest you investigate the claims of the source himself: http://video.google.nl/videoplay?docid=8250980122157253214 Ask Mr. Perry - for objectivity's sake - to place a link to that video on his Chauncey Holt page! Ask John Mcadams too. Let's see if Mr Perry can run a mile in a New York Minute -- in the right direction. Wim

Gentlemen, I am afraid I don't know what flight plan document is referred to. Tosh, what makes you think I have such a document? The documents I have are here: http://toshplumlee.info/ Wim

Well, it appears that Jack doesn't have the grandeur to admit a mistake. Wim

Raymond, Just give me some specific claims of Perry that you appreciate regarding Files, Judyth or Holt. I cannot do anything with what you said. That's just like saying: In general I have no quarrels with the way O.J. Simpson was acquitted. Please give me some beef to eat. Wim

Raymond, Why don't you give us one (or a few) claims of Perry you like, so we can address them? Wim

Good question!, that I believe I can already answer: Because he never bumped into them thusfar..... But for the rest, I'll give the floor to Dick on that....... Wim

Here's 3 pages that came into my possession 5 years ago. Who's the author? Wim

Bill, I think you should know that Chauncey Holt's son in law recommended me Dick Russell's book "The man who knew too much" as one of the best books he had read on the case, as well as the one which touched closest on the story of his father in law. And I agree! I wonder why, since you praise Dick's books so much, you denounce Chauncey Holt as a "complicated deception"? Wim

Dave Perry is a twit that doesn't deserve a debate on his "work". Jim Marrs told me that Perrry runs Gary Mack, while I thought it was the other way around. Maybe that's a more interesting debate? Wim PS: By the way, Dave Perry won't enter this discussion. That's not his job and he knows he is going to end up with egg on his face!

Duncan, I think it is far more interesting that researchers who spread disinformation, wittingly or unwittingly, should acknowledge they were in error! Wim

Well Jack? I am waiting........ Do you still say that Mrs. Franzen dissappeared or can you bring up the grandeur to admit that you were wrong? Wim

I brought up Dave Perry in reaction to his reaction to my letter to the Dallas DA. Not to discuss his work, although I don't object to doing that. The average person who visits my website, reads the book, or views any of my DVD's, has an opinion. The overall mean of those opinions is represented for example in the reviews of these items (which you can in part find on Amazon.com and Barnes & Noble) I know Dave Perry's deviating opinion well enough, and he can be proven wrong on all his counts, for example on those in his "Top Ten reasons why the James Files story needs help". However, I do not recall any of your counts other than a superficial and unsupported assessment that I am not spreading any truth with the stories of these people, or rather that I am being deceived by them? If you can't or won't elaborate on the arrival of such opinion, I suggest it's better not to express it. Wim

Let me first note that you label James Files, Chauncey Holt, Judyth Baker as "complicated deceptions" . That's allright, everyone is entitled to an opinion. My opinion is that such statements do not bring a solution any closer, but they do however beg answers to the following questions: What exactly is your main reasoning regarding each of these individuals for concluding that they are "deceptions"? What is complicated about them? What is/was their motive, if not publicity and greed? Why is it that the broad public values these "deceptions" as the truth, once exposed to it? In other words, why are you right and is the average person wrong? Wim

That's a very interesting remark, William! Before I take that as an offense, please do explain ..... ! Wim

Dick, Why don't we send a letter together to Obama with the request to re-open the case? After all, since the last "probe" by the HSCA, (didn't they conclude it was probably a conspiracy?) much new buried information came floating to the surface - like Johnny Roselli - and many people came forward with new significant testimony since then. Maybe this would be a good starting point: http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/pdf/Watkins.doc Isn't it funny that the only response I got to this, came from Dave Perry, Gary Mack's friend? I wonder why Mr. Watkins wouldn't give me the courtesy of such an answer:

John, are you meaning to admit that the US goverment is ruled by fear, rather than by freedom of speech, justice and democracy? Yes I have, thanks. By the way, today I received my copy of the book. Indeed the text on page 177 reads: If there were TWO MEN, then why is only one identified in the next sentence: Wim

Well, Ted Bundy doesn't compare with Files, but he got a lot of fanmail in jail. From women. Does that confuse you? Define love! Are you asking me or Pam? My answer is NO! Pam's answer is that Wim "should have a heart", absolve the debts she made with him and give her back a book she signed over to him (which I would never publish by the way if it were only for the defaming lies about Zack Shelton and me). In return she would cease her slander. Was Ted Bundy a killer? What I do, is separate the issues. Would you trade places with him? Oh well, the standards of honor vary among individuals. There 's a mafia book called "Bound by honor". And Pam's standards of honor are not mine Wim

I would call it megalomania and delusional grandeur. "Out of touch with the real world" also comes to mind. Please let's give this "good hearted woman" a break! After all, it was God's unconditional love and compassion to have Jimmy blow JFK's brain out. But wait folks! HE sent Pamela down to earth to touch Jimmy's heart and make everything all right! Pam is the new messiah. Now she only has to square away Satan's disciple, called Wim Dankbaar. God has even given her the right to use conspiracy and murder as means to accomplish her mission. But Ssssstt! Keep this for yourself! DO NOT SAY ANYTHING TO DANKBAAR this is FYI only. Again, this is VERY CONFIDENTIAL. Who's buying Pam's story? Anyone? Please give her 2 - 3 million, it's worth it! You know why? Because Jimmy's "love" for Pam, who is guaranteed the ONLY woman he loves is the only real interesting part of his story! Best of all: Not only can she pay back the funds she loaned from Satan, she will also buy Jimmy a pardon and the story will have a happy ending in Hawaii, where they will live happily forever. Finally she will have peace of mind and not have to anger herself about the injustice done to her, which as you now will understand is NEVER her own fault. It's just Satan doing his job: Date: Nov 7, 2008 2:44 AM I presume that Mrs. Pamela Ray has made you aware of attempts to reach a new agreement with me that would enable her to resume publication of the book "Interview with History". I regret to inform you that our negociations have recently come to an impasse, causing Mrs. Ray to resume violating my rights, publicizing libelous/defaming statements about my person, and breaking earlier promises. I noticed that Authorhouse has relisted the book with a caption "coming soon", no doubt on Mrs. Ray's request and in anticipation of good faith efforts to work towards the said new agreement: http://www.authorhouse.com/BookStore/ItemD...okid~40995.aspx However, the present situation, as well as Mrs. Ray's lack of good faith attitude, make it unlikely that a new agreement can be reached and thus that the book will be available any time soon. Therefore I ask you to halt any promotion and listing of the book by Authorhouse, as agreed before. I am sorry I can't be more positive. When things change for the better, you will be the first to know. With thanks for your compliance in advance, Respectfully, Wim Dankbaar

What is Hybristophilia Syndrome? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybristophilia James is a little ambigious in his statements, but I guess it depends on who he talks to. Prison is a lonely place you know. Wim James Files, letter Oct 8, 2004: "As for the interview , don't put it on the inter-net because of me. As far as I am concerned, I really no longer care about it. Do what you think is right for you ********* But for the interview you do what is best for you. I told Pamela some time back to forget it and for us to get on with our lives. But I do thank you for wanting to do it. That is nice of you, but not neccessary. But thanks anyway." ++++++++++++ Some more comments received from sane people: Pam is doing a great job making the Files story seem totally whacko. I think most people will think this site is the product of a malfunctioning mind. ++++++++++++ Wim, I see on the Education Forum that Pamela Ray has a lot of NICE!!! things to say about you. There's something about her that I just don't like. I think she has used and manipulated Jim for her own purposes. +++++++++++++ She's a coniving, scheming, bitch that thought she could play on a lonely inmates emotions to get what she wanted +++++++++++++++ Dear Messers. Wim Dankbaar, and Dan Marvin, Wim, I respect your judgment, and you are probably right. I am fed up with this mud slinging bitch, also. Further, Jimmy regrets this all, as his comment is that she is out of control. She refuses to listen to Jimmy, and Jimmy now realizes that he told her too much in the past. Even worse, she quotes everything wrong, out of context, or just exaggerates to make herself look better. Can you avoid dealing with her ever again, or are you too, like Jimmy, stuck trying to deal with her ? Over Jimmy's, and my numerous objections, she has posted on JFK Lancer. Jimmy and I are both livid with her. Jimmy can not control her at all. I am trying to get Jimmy to sever all relations with her. Respectfully, Bruce Patrick Brychek. Dear Messes. Wim Dankbaar, and Dan Marvin, Wim, Very Wll put, My Trusted, and Respected Friend. I hope you know, but I will state it anyway. I will always do everything in my power to protect Jimmy, Wim, and Dan in all of our undertakings, past, present, and future. Rest assured, I will try to keep The Four Muskateers on the same track at al times, seeking to protect us, and our quest for the truth, and protecting us from our enemies, and those that pretend to be our friends, but have their own secret agendas at their center of thinking. Jimmy is livid about Pam's postings on JFK Lancer, including his poetry. It has been some time since I have seen Jimmy so visibly upset. Jimmy wrote to you at my request so you know that I am not making up anything whatsoever. Wim, and Dan, I Thank You both for Jimmy and myself for your courage, support, and sincerity with me. Jimmy asked me to Thank You both, from the heart. I am fed up with Pam Ray. I tried to deal with her, and I now regret it, as she put my name on JFK Lancer, and my hate mail has increased beacuse of her. Rest assured I told Jimmy so. Wim, maybe you should post Jimmy's letter on The JFK Forum, only? Think about it. Best Always to you and Dan, and both of your families. Respectfully, Bruce Patrick Brychek http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/images/JFWD1.JPG http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/images/JFWD3.JPG http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/images/Brucecard.JPG http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/images/Brucecard2.JPG

Maybe you did not understand. I am saying that the first bullet (from behind) snaps the head forward, and the bullet from the front then blows the head backwards. I am further saying that the shoulders move back as a result of the first bullet from behind, namely by the force that the head applies on the pivot point of the forward tilt movement. That pivot point is where the head is fixed to the body = the shoulder area. The stick example was to illustrate this. To call that "nonsense" is most likely an indication that you did not understand? Let me put it this way: If you have a ballpoint lying on the table and you push the tip downwards, the base of the pen comes off the table, right? (= the opposite direction of your push.) That is because the tip and base connected, like a head is connected with a body. A similar phenomenon applies to JFK's head (the tip) moving forward and his shoulders (the base) moving backward. Is it clearer with this example? Wim

Agreed! I note that Jack asked me to explain how he was in error, but he has not yet responded to my question if he accepts it now. Does that mean that Jack will push it again at some point in the future? Or can we say goodbye to debating whether Mrs Franzen was replaced in Nix by another woman? Wim

Bill, I have nothing to add and I am convinced of what I pointed out. I believe the evidence in Zapruder is very supportive of what I say. It is not that I don't like to hear what you believe, it's just that I find your reasoning not convincing. I would like to add that according to experts (like Mantik and Robertson) the medical evidence also points to two (simultaneous) head shots (front and back) and in my analysis the Zapruder film supports this decisively. You reject the shot from the back, that's your prerogative. I don't have to accept your viewpoint and you don't have to accept mine. Wim

Forgot to ask: Is there also a Part I? Is it possible to give the text of that? Maybe a scan? Wim

Oh wow! Thanks John. And does the book really have this in it: Does it state "passports" in plural and "two men"? Wim

Relevant page below. Not everything is factual. Carr never said that the man he saw running towards him (which I believe was Richard Cain) stepped into a stationwagon. The driver of the stationwagon, picking up Oswald later on Elm Street was Davis Morales in my opinion. Therefore I believe that Richard Cain and David Morales were on the sixth floor, and not to fill book orders.