Evan Marshall

Perhaps a search of folks exiting the US using various forms of transportation might discover "Some nobodies" who upon further examination might prove valuable!

corruption can be and often is everywhere. A Dallas copper I knew and trusted told me Fitz success almost always involved African American Defendents

Just in case no one has figured it out, the Dallas PD was wildly incompetent and could catch a cold in a rainstorm.

"Credibility" sometimes means they support your belief of what happened rather than what actually happened. Long before I became a copper in 1969 detectives would place 3 or 5 fingers on their chest to indicate who they should pick. 1963 would be about the right time frame and Dallas a prime location for such abhorrent behavior.

Witnesses if not separated will provide you with a composite response which will be of no value and if you don't ask the right questions, they will often not volunteer information.

Witnesses if not separated will provide you with a composite response which will be of no value and if you don't ask the right questions, they will often not volunteer information.

As a retired Detroit Homicide Sgt I'd be more troubled if they all agreed.

Perhaps it might be very valuable to see who else was expelled in the same time frame.

I'll be spending the next four weeks in Arizona and Texas meeting with co-authors for my 4th and 5th books to be published. Neither have anything JFK related

I said most not all. When witnesses are not separated before being interviewed, they cross pollinate each other. Sarcasm about something you know nothing about is unbecoming!

20 years with Detroit PD including twice assigned to the tac unit, twice to homicide, csi, trained&qualifed as a sniper and the original firearms instructor for Detroit SWAT I can assure you that most ear and eyewitnesses are useless.

less than 24 hrs before? Utter nonsense!

We need to remember Oswald was trained on the M-1 Garand. A semiautomatic rifle that held 8 rounds and was accurate. Why hesitate to steal an excellent rifle if you really planned to murder the President?

I did two separate tours in Homicide interrupted by being the original training Sgt for Detroit SWAT. The more experience I got at Homicide the less I was motivated not to rush in and make instant conclusions. Interviewing is a job while interrogating is an art that is slowly learned. The guys who broke me in at Homicide were experts at interrogation and told me rather firmly to watch and listen!

Sounds credible does not mean IS credible. Without the opportunity to sit down face to face and go over her story repeatedly looking for changes and inconsistencies are critical. What motivates people to lie is the question.

Watching a filmed interview is not the same as being there AND interviewing and interrogation are two different processes. Why do people lie many years after the event? My pop was a documented witness for a dramatic event and 50 years later other claimed to be there too and their lies were easily dismissed. She sounds credible but the key would be to be in the room.

Before I did two tours at Detroit Homicide, I thought that eyewitnesses were genuinely of value. They often are not and even many cops are not. The key is to keep that separated so they don't crosspollinate their testimony.

Have you ever shot an AR-15? Have you watched were your brass lands? Everybody is an expert on the subject of gunfighting until they actually shot at or their X-Box breaks.

Nonsense. I've shot thousands of rounds out of AR-15's. M-16's, and M4's and the round never landed in my lap though I did once get a hot 5.56 case between me and my body armor in the middle of a drug raid that left me with a nifty scar!

Well, perhaps but it wasn't fired anyway and did all the bullets you claim were all end up in JFK?

An AR-15 is a semiauto rifle and is incapable of firing a burst of rounds. I currently own three and they are weapons designed and capable of firing only one round at a time.

It seems to me that if Phillips knew Oswald wasn't in Mexico he must have KNOWN where he really was during this time frame.

I am fascinated how Phillips has morphed from a conspirator to a reliable source of information

I was attending Brigham Young University in Utah on 11/22/63 and watched the new reports and having a young brain remembered all sorts of information that did not fit the one lone nut killed JFK and then another lone nut killed him. I also remember the Kilduff press conference where he pointed to his forehead when talking about a bullet to the head. It took me a few years, but I read the 26 volumes and noticed how many times testimony was interrupted and taken off the record just when things got interesting.