Vince Palamara

LOL----they are referring to the Rolling Stones classic song Sympathy For The Devil: Sympathy for the Devil The Rolling Stones Please allow me to introduce myself I'm a man of wealth and taste I've been around for a long, long year Stole many a man's soul to waste And I was 'round when Jesus Christ Had his moment of doubt and pain Made damn sure that Pilate Washed his hands and sealed his fate Pleased to meet you Hope you guess my name But what's puzzling you Is the nature of my game I stuck around St. Petersburg When I saw it was a time for a change Killed the czar and his ministers Anastasia screamed in vain I rode a tank Held a general's rank When the blitzkrieg raged And the bodies stank Pleased to meet you Hope you guess my name, oh yeah Ah, what's puzzling you Is the nature of my game, oh yeah I watched with glee While your kings and queens Fought for ten decades For the gods they made I shouted out, Who killed the Kennedys? When after all It was you and me Let me please introduce myself I'm a man of wealth and taste And I laid traps for troubadours Who get killed before they reached Bombay Pleased to meet you Hope you guessed my name, oh yeah But what's puzzling you Is the nature of my game, oh yeah, get down, baby Pleased to meet you Hope you guessed my name, oh yeah But what's confusing you Is just the nature of my game Just as every cop is a criminal And all the sinners saints As heads is tails Just call me Lucifer 'Cause I'm in need of some restraint So if you meet me Have some courtesy Have some sympathy, and some taste Use all your well-learned politesse Or I'll lay your soul to waste, mm yeah Pleased to meet you Hope you guessed my name, mm yeah But what's puzzling you Is the nature of my game, mm mean it, get down Woo, who Oh yeah, get on down Oh yeah Oh yeah! (woo woo) Tell me baby, what's my name Tell me honey, can ya guess my name Tell me baby, what's my name I tell you one time, you're to blame Oh, who Woo, woo Woo, who Woo, woo Woo, who, who Woo, who, who Woo, who, who Oh, yeah Woo, who, who Woo, who, who Oh yeah, what's my name Tell me, baby, what's my name Tell me, sweetie, what's my name Woo, who, who Woo, who, who Woo, who, who Woo, who, who Woo, who, who Woo, who, who Oh, yeah

I don't know what happened to the image, but here it is again. In case you can't read that, it is also on my blog: https://vincepalamara.com/2020/10/10/from-fbi-agent-frank-oneills-book-a-fox-among-wolves/

Wow---I did not know he passed away. Sorry to hear that.

I wrote to him a lot back and forth on Facebook earlier this year (we presented at the Third Decade conference in Fredonia, NY back in June 1991). He is doing well and still interested---he inquired as to JFK Lancer archiving his materials.

Thanks haha! Yes- very true.

Definitely! I remember the halcyon days of roughly 1988-1993 (pre-Stone movie to pre-Posner) when it seemed that the case was electric: seemed to always be on television, even if it was just tabloid tv specials. Bookstores had whole JFK assassination sections. Jackie, JFK Jr, Teddy, and Governor Connally were still alive. Print journals ruled the day. There was a certain naivete to those times. Looking back at it, it seemed the running theme of the fascination with the case was dramatic entertainment.

The Paine experts: Steve Jones, Barbara LaMonica and Carol Hewett. These three were big in the (mid-late) 1990's and all seemed to disappear by 2000 or so. Best-selling author Harrison Livingstone (twice for High Treason + High Treason 2): deceased February 2015. Anna Marie Kuhns-Walko: health reasons made her retire. I used to hear from her on Facebook now and again a few years ago, but no longer. Kathlee Fitzgerald (assistant to Livingstone- helped with research for High Treason 2 and Killing The Truth): deceased 3/17/2019 Canadian researcher Ulric Shannon: in 1991, Ulric was a 17-year-old wunderkind at Jerry Rose's Third Decade conference in June 1991. Ulric went on to contribute to both the Third and Fourth Decade journals, as well as write several major articles still up at McAdams' site. He retired around 2004ish and is now Ambassador of Canada to Iraq! Medical evidence expert Kathleen Cunningham retired around 2000 and donated her materials here: https://digital.lib.usf.edu//content/SF/S0/03/19/00/00001/U29-00082-C51.pdf

Carol was amazing--her, Steve Jones and Barbara LaMonica were the three Paine experts. They all faded away at the turn of the century. Kathleen Cunningham, a medical evidence expert, likewise gave up the ghost and donated all her archives to a Florida university and quit. I believe the end of the ARRB, the turn of the century, and 9/11 made some people think that was that.

C. Douglas Dillon, former OSS and anti-Castro, is definitely someone to raise eyebrows at. That said, I have found no hard evidence of anything.

thanks for the info!

haha--thanks for your succinct comment

What do you think of this book? It was/is a best-seller and a steady seller with 800-plus reviews and a very nice aggregate average on Amazon, yet (maybe I missed it) I never hear anyone talk about it. Thoughts? I have my own but I am waiting to hear from all of you.

Hi! I don't view Rowley in a harsh light. In other words, he isn't someone I am overly suspicious of. He was a former FBI agent and was friends with Hoover. I am mad that he did not punish the nine agents who drank the morning of 11/22/63. That said, I view him thru more of a incompetence/negligence point of view than anything sinister, per se.

thanks for sharing!

Some guy sent this to me with the caption "Vince!!! They put Oswald together like some dummy corporation for years!! Here is how the CIA knew to use him as a patsy later on!!" Still, it is an interesting coincidence. Comment?

Honest Answers about the Murder of President John F. Kennedy: A New Look at the JFK Assassination https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/163424334X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_hsch_vapi_tpbk_p1_i4 coming 3/19/21 (paperback and kindle; available for pre-order now) Thousands of books and articles have been written about the murder of JFK, many of which are large in volume and short on facts. Quite often, these works try to reinvent the wheel, attempting to cover every single area of the assassination, as well as many tangential and unessential points, as well. The reader is often left exhausted and confused. The sheer volume of pages, conflicting facts, and theories leaves one unsatisfied and, quite frankly, not sure exactly what did happen on 11/22/63. This book seeks to separate the wheat from the chaff. It is 55-plus years later: it is time for real, honest answers in an easy-to-read and understand format. Proof of a conspiracy; no theories; to-the-point; a perspective on the assassination for the millennial age and beyond. Based on years—decades—of primary source research and having read countless books on the subject

THE TOP FIVE BOOKS: The JFK Assassination by James DiEugenio Destiny Betrayed SECOND EDITION by James DiEugenio The Girl on the Stairs by Barry Ernest The Lee Harvey Oswald Files by Flip de Mey (warts and all) Inside The ARRB (Volumes 1-5) by Douglas Horne

One thing I can "give away": it is a PRO conspiracy book. It strongly advocates for conspiracy in the death of JFK.

Hi, Dan! I will see if I can (the publisher seems to prefer I keep a tight lid on it until publication). That said, see my other comments to everyone else. If I can, I will

I believe my book is a paradigm shifter for the better. It's greatest strength is the benefit of hindsight (56-plus years), the ARRB releases, etc. My big "tag line" on my book is that it is NOT the "same ole same ole": SBT, Oswald's bio, theories, rinse, repeat, zzzzzz Also----no tangential waters: dozens/hundreds of pages of "fluff". I like everything to the point.

Thanks, Anthony! Oh, yes---Trine Day seems to be doing well. Kindle is really keeping things going, no doubt. My first two books have done very well...my last two books did so-so. Unfortunately, not a whole lot of people are into the Secret Service like I am LOL My new book coming out early next year is something people have been asking me to do, off and on, for years---write a detailed book on just the assassination and what I believe/know happened. I think it turned out really well.

It covers all aspects regarding the assassination- the physical evidence, the eyewitness evidence, the medical evidence, Oswald, Ruby, Tippit, suspects, the state of the case, what is valid, what is not, etc.. I firmly believe in the phrase "don't bore us- get to the chorus." You won't find dozens or hundreds of pages of tangential material where you are asking yourself "when can we get to the point" or "is this truly relevant and important?" I wrote a massively detailed work that gets straight to the point and is firmly NOT the "same ole same ole" when it comes to many assassination books.