Karl Kinaski
-
Posts
1,305 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Karl Kinaski
-
-
Police-radio heard: "We breached the building, there is blood in the bathroom, second shooter on the loose ..." at 22min24sec of clip ...
Sh...t .. they knew there was a second gunman ...
Oswald was not and Crooks was not a lone gunman. Jeff Morley should do his homework.
-
Police-radio heard: "We breached the building, there is blood in the bathroom, second shooter on the loose ..." at 22min24sec ...
-
What this running object is, I don't know, but I am sure that at the end of it a human figure is looking over the roof. To me that fast Objekt is to small to be a part of a human being.
Have just the clip.
-
-
This is a review of a movie GOVERNMENT GANSGTERS by Oliver Stone posted on X one day before Butler:
-
1 hour ago, Paul Bacon said:
Well, if he moved right after the first three shots, that would put the 3 shell casings to his left (or even under his body).
Obviously he did move, because his dead body is too far below the roof ridge to have been able to shoot over the ridge.
I look forward to more information. 🤔 The video is a pain in the a** because it's blurred out exactly where we could be getting more details.
The sniper guys on the roof lied, when they said they lost sight of Crooks while they were on the second floor behind the building of the "Crooks" building.
Quote Gateway pundit, article by Benjamin Wetmore Jul 20. 2024
He() relates that the snipers in the 2nd floor section of the AGR
building were watching the rooftop shooter as the shots rang out – and did nothing.Quote“I was looking all around to get law enforcement’s attention before the shots, and I could tell it was coming, because as I was standing there for several minutes I kept thinking ‘why is Trump still talking?’ You expect someone to be on the radio or whatever the protocol is, to get Trump off the stage. I knew this isn’t good. I expected the shots to start, and then they did. It was mass chaos. I was looking at the guys on the second story, my eyes
were jumping three or four different places, I could see that they saw him and were looking at him and watching what he was doing, but they didn’t do anything.“ -
People are asking what kind of commission should investigate the attempted murder of Trump. How about a blue ribbon commission with Elizabeth Warren as its head?
As members of that Commission, I could suggest Liz Cheney, Victoria Nuland, Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer, Michelle Obama, and Robert De Niro.
Joking aside:
-
5 hours ago, Matt Allison said:
Like all truly patriotic Americans, I am so looking forward to this traitor going to prison where he belongs.
Since Trump is in no coffin, prison would do? In your state of mind? Just asking.
-
Something stinks.
YouTube comments.
QuoteDid you notice in the full body cam video they counted only 5 shell casings to the right of the shooter and then 20 minutes later 3 more casings to the left side of the shooter. Casings only eject to the right. Guess where the ones on the left came from?In another segment they said there were 5 shells. The audio sure sounds like there were different shooters.Why did the body cam footage from 20 minutes prior to the "Grassley" release count only 5 casings? When and by whom did the the additional three casings appear? Exactly where were the three additional casings found in relation to the original five and the body of Crooks?Why would that gun eject in two different directions.? -
-
The Trump assassination attempt cover up is a poor copy of the JFKA cover up. But I fear It won't hold water for 60 years.
-
Butler Memorial Hospital docs: It was a bullet.
Physician of Obama and Trump, Jackson: It was a bullet
FBI: It was a bullet.
Matt Allison: No.
David Van Pein: It was something.
-
Remember the investigation of Oswald's pubic hairs ? Wray's FBI is doing it again.
Wray is not sure if there is a telescopic sight on Crooks rifle. But he knows all about a drone found in his car which is complete irrelevant to the actual shooting. The Trump assassination attempt cover up is a poor copy of the JFKA cover up.
-
14 minutes ago, David Von Pein said:
Donald Trump was quite obviously struck by something
And "something" shot at him? Or could the "noises" "somebody" heard at Butler be backfire of a motorcycle?
-
3 hours ago, Matt Allison said:
Yes, for those not aware, Ronny Jackson is not a good person.
I am sure your are a better person ... and a better physician too. And better in evaluating the ear wound than the staff of the Butler Memorial Hospital.
Ronny L. Jackson said in that document:
QuoteI have reviewed President Trump's medical records from Butler Memorial Hospital, where he was initially evaluated and treated for "Gunshot Wound to the Right Ear". Having served as an Emergency Medicine physician for over 20 years in the United States Navy, including as a combat physician on the battlefield in Iraq, I have treated many gunshot wounds in my career. Based on my direct observations of the injury, my relevant clinical background, and my significant experience evaluating and treating patients with similar wounds, I completely with the initial assessment and treatment provided by the doctors and nurses at Butler Memorial Hospital at the day of the shooting.
But sure, Matt Allison and Pat Speer knew better than Ronny L. Jackson and all the doctors and nurses at Butler Memorial Hospital... since we know that Pat Speer knew better than all the Parkland physicians who threated Kennedy, too...
BTW Watchin Wray (obviously also a great physician) for hours I nearly fell in love with Hoover ...
-
19 minutes ago, Pat Speer said:
On my. That's Trump's doctor. That's the same guy who routinely lies about Trump's weight, who cashed in on these lies for public benefit.
@Pat Speer: obviously you have some reading issues: The document says explicit that that physician served OBAMA and TRUMP.
the crucial paragraph of the document is:
QuoteDuring the Congressional Hearing two days ago, FBI Director Christopher Wray suggested that it could be a bullet, shrapnel or glass. There is absolutely no evidence that it was anything other than a bullet. Congress should correct the record as confirmed by both the hospital and myself. Director Wray is wrong and inappropriate to suggest anything else.
End of shrapnel story.
-
10 minutes ago, Pat Speer said:6 hours ago, Benjamin Cole said:
Two centimeter wound? That is front to back. Why inconsistent with a bullet?
What??? The wound was described as blunt and down to the cartilage. It is NOT a hole through the ear.
End of shrapnel story: Wray is talking sh...t.
-
54 minutes ago, Jean Ceulemans said:
... there is no telling yet. Like I said, not enough information available.
Which is odd, isn't it? Fourteen days after the event and that body cam clip. Did the others not lift the body? For instance, this first aid lady kneeling next to Crooks. A lot of people were already on that roof for 20 minutes when this body cam dude appeared. And when that EUS guy counts the shells, "two, three, four, five...," nobody corrects him...
-
-
15 minutes ago, Jean Ceulemans said:
I´m not sure but didn´t he reposition between the first 3 and the burst of 5? As you have said, those first could be under his body.
You are joking, right?
-
Watch 4min56sec of that body cam footage: EUS man counts 5 (FIVE) shells next to Crooks body ... not 6, 7, 8 or 10 ... FIFE ... may I quote a commentary from the commentary section of this body cam video?
Excerpt from transcript of video:
Quoteaccess clear4:50out watch out for show4:52cases two three four five right there4:55who comes up4:59no more ball no more guys up here Co5:01give me a solid perimeter get guys5:03Credit: PoliceActivity Channel Y TUBE:
Five shells fit perfectly with the audio analyses of Chris Martenson
.Note: when this EUS man counts five shells none of the other dudes up there contradicts him. There was consensus among those on the roof. FIVE shells.
-
42 minutes ago, Tom Gram said:
Yes, he does count out 5 shells. That doesn’t necessarily prove there were only 5 shells on the roof.
There are enough angles in this video and it seems high resolution enough for someone to do some screen captures and analysis of the shell casings. I was only able to make out 2, maybe 3. They are hard to see on the roof with all those little black spots.
That said, considering that audio snippet with the first three, well-spaced shots followed by the five right on top of each other, I am intrigued.
Yes five shells fit perfectly with the audio analyses of
Quote. Note: when this EUS man counts five shells none of the other dudes up there contradicts him. There was consensus among those on the roof. Quote from the transcript of the video:
Quote4:52
out watch out for show
4:55
cases two three four five right there
4:59
who comes up
5:01
no more ball no more guys up here Co
5:03
give me a solid perimeter get guys
5:05
prepped to clear the
-
Excerpt from transcript of video:
Quoteaccess clear4:50out watch out for show4:52cases two three four five right there4:55who comes up4:59no more ball no more guys up here Co5:01give me a solid perimeter get guys5:03 -
Watch 4min56sec of that body cam footage: EUS man counts 5 (FIVE) shells next to Crooks body ... not 6, 7, 8 or 10 ... FIFE ... may I quote a commentary from the commentary section of this body cam video?
Quote@Snithers
vor 1 Stunde
Whoever thinks this was not a government hitjob on Trump, is an imbecile.Credit: PoliceActivity Channel Y TUBE:
Death of DeMohrenschildt
in JFK Assassination Debate
Posted · Edited by Karl Kinaski
Two moderators cooking up 17 year old threads with OT comments? Could anybody explain to me the deeper meaning of this? I ask Chat GPT, quote:
Here are a few possible interpretations:
Count me out.