@Leslie Sharpsaid, quote:

Quote

 

   You're fully integrated into the Trump Brain.

 

 

Help me find Biden's and I will change sides. 

@Pat Speer said, quote:

Quote

Trump has been the founders' worst nightmare, not Allen Dulles, nor Richard Helms, nor J. Edgar Hoover.

Well at least Trump managed to spare the world a proxy war in Ukraine which already killed 300 000 young men on both sides. Those men are fighting a cruel  Stalingrad-like war in the cities from house to house and a trench war on the countryside comparable to the "Westfront" in World War 1. They are dying in the trenches in a stalemate. 

This pointless Ukraine-war started when after Biden's election NATO slammed the door in Putin's face. The US Deep State, Biden, NATO and some brainless politicians in Brussels elected by nobody  wanted that war and Putin gave it them. 

@Calvin Ye, said: Karl is probably an Trump supporter.

LOL. Since I am an European it wouldn't make much sense to support any of your politicians. But I confess I like Trump and his big mouth. He has wit. He is entertaining. The way he won his debates with Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton was blockbuster cinema. (At one time Jeb debating Trump praised his mother and Trump said: "She should run". - That's the way you kill an opponent. 

And I like RFK jr for entering the arena where his father and his uncle died... this is nearly a suicidal act. And I like it. RFK is an WDC insider who knows how big biz has hijacked politics... What he will do is restore the thing called Administration as an corrective to big biz ending Washingtons role as uncritical collaborator. 

Lot of "like" here... but I should ad that RFK jr said words to the effect that he appreciates that Trump likes him... it was RFK who made then President Trump aware of potential side effects of the so called covid vaccines and that he should investigate that aspect.. but the next day the self proclaimed health Guru Bill Gates came along and persuaded Trump not to investigate the aspect of side effects.  A  partisan battle between the two men RFK jr and Trump would be of no avail. 

@Leslie Sharp said;

Quote

Dorsey's "world leader exception" suggests he's more inclined toward authority than democracy.  "Until 2021, Dorsey applied "world leader" exceptions that enabled President Donald Trump to post content on Twitter that would normally be removed or generate sanctions per the platform's rules.

Don't forget the lizard boy, quote from:

Quote

Facebook and Twitter said the world leader exemption would no longer apply to Trump once he left office.

And who are the guys who should censor world leaders ... the real world leaders? Who are they? Some Schwabs and Gates' and Zucks? Who are they to tell me what I should think and what not. The danger is not exemptions. On the contrary: The danger comes from governments playing god by deplatforming you and punishing you for thoughtcrimes. I do not need a 1984. IMO there are two possibilities for the US in 2024: RFK jr is your next president and the JFKA riddle will be solved and there will be an end of US warmongering all over the world or something will happening to RFK jr and then the US country will go to hell. It will not go to hell with RFK jr as your next president and it will not go to hell with Trump as your next president. It will go to hell with every other candidate as far as I can see. Trump and RFK jr are very different characters but they have more in common as one can imagine. Both men have the capability to turn the US and it's so called deep state upside down and put an end to the cancer of secrecy surrounding world events like the JFKA (Which IMO was a US -Sowjet joint venture and related to the Khrushchev disempowerment in Oct 1964)  and the Covid-outbreak.  (Which was obviously a US-China joint venture in one way or another.) 

Trump and RFK jr are brave men risking their lives, like JFK and RFK were risking their lives. Deep state is in a crisis. He is fighting for his life. He is about to put Trump in jail and trying to character-assassinate RFK jr in a range never seen before ... let's assume Mr Deep State will not succeed and Trump will be republican nominee for president and RFK jr democratic nominee for president and let's think the unthinkable, a Trump-Kennedy ticket with Trump managing foreign policy and Kennedy managing domestic policy  ... science fiction? Who knows. Not me. 😉

Dorsey, quote: "They were pushing him (JFK) to do unnatural things like what happened in Cuba and to do unnatural things like  Vietnam."

Jack Dorsey and the JFKA

The list of high profil JFKA CTers is growing.

Quote

 

RFK jr quote:

As a presidential candidate I take precautions. And I don't do things that I would like to do.   You know. I am not gonna be stupid. I mean I know the risks that are out there very clearly and I am not going to be stupid about it. 

 

I learned since that a presidential candidate has the right to be protected by the Secret Service ... 

Quote

 

@Kirk Gallaway said:

Now what I'm about to say is real forum heresy. Nobody with any power worth a sh-t wants to kill RFK Jr.  even if he were to get the nomination. If you're assuming it's the government after him. As I've said there's no one in government who knows who killed JFK period!

Yes he could be murdered by any number of fanatics. And that's solely because of the availability of guns in the U.S 

His policies are  absolutely no threat to the power establishment. He's almost as corporate as they come  while dressing it in a modern populism. I'm not accusing him of being deceptive. He really doesn't have a clear idea of what he wants.

 

IMO RFK jr. should tighten up his security. His father was killed because his security was lax... he relied not on professionals but on friends... and nobody back checked when somebody was sending in additional security... because of that Eugene Tane Caesar an additional "security man" wearing an uniform was able to shot RFK in the head. Look what security apparatus Musk, Bezos and Zuckerberg have.. Trump is surrounded by Secret Service men for the rest of his life like every other Ex-president.. RFK jr. should not fall victim to the same mistake as his father... BTW: Kirk: Do you really believe that a presidential candidate who repeatedly says his father and his uncle (a sitting president and a presidential candidate) where killed by the government is no threat to that very same government which is hiding key facts surrounding those crimes? 

Quote

 

@Kirk Gallaway

 Bobby never mentioned his brother wanted out when he was running. Can you imagine a politician whose greatest issue was to wind down the Vietnam war  and bring peace, would act with such restraint on the campaign trail?  

 

 Because he had not really very much time to elaborate on the subject? He announced his run for president on March 16th and was shot on June the 6th with still fife months of campaigning laying ahead of him. 

It's all over.  Prigoschin is going home. Maybe he forgot that Russia is a big land in which you can get easily lost with your 5000 troops. Maybe he run out of gas. 😉 Maybe he liked the idea to retire in Belarus. As I understand it that insurrection was dissolved without a single shot. Prigoschin and his men will not be detained or prosecuted. 

Now, let us imagine 5000 heavily armed "white supremacists" marching to Washington and let us imagine what the Biden administration would do...  

This thread does not belong here.

 What makes the US 2024 presidential election that interesting is that the Deep State has not only a RGK jr as adversary but a former president too. Trump and Kennedy, as different they are maybe as human beings, are challenging the Deep State in broad daylight. JFK was a dove compared to those two brave millionaires, RFK jr and Trump... anyway: JFK started that fire... as far as I can see it: The killing of JFK gave "them"  60 more years ...

Fun fact: In a 1966 telephone conversation with Dean Rusk regarding a RFK remark about the Vietnam war, LBJ lamented: "The Kennedy infiltration is all over the place..." 2023/2024  Deep State has to fight a "Kennedy infiltration" and a "Trump infiltration"  ... I wouldn't like to be in Jake Sullivans shoes. 

Besides the US-MSM "Get Kennedy" agenda, there are "letters" ... 

Howard P. Willens, another character appearing in the video linked in the first post wrote as far as I know the last Warren Commission Whitewash book. It is called HISTORY WILL PROVE US RIGHT. 

Willens was directly involved in the intensive FBI surveillance of Mark Lane. He considered "full surveillance" of Lane in the letter to Rankin wich I can' t attach because of the limited upload-size. 

In late summer and fall of 1963 Kennedy and De Gaulle were de accord regarding what to do in Vietnam. 

Quote from A Certain Idea of France The Life of Charles De Gaulle by Julian Jackson:

Quote

 De Gaulle also told Kennedy that he would not stand in the way if America felt obliged to intervene. But in August 1963, (...) de Gaulle decided to go public in a solemn communiqué announcing the need for a unified, independent and neutralized Vietnam. 

The idea of neutralizing Vietnam was in the heads of Kennedy, De Gaulle, and the Diems and  considered in Hanoi. 

Even Vo Nguyen Giap the leading General of North Vietnam said in retrospect. (Same source as the Salinger quote).

Quote

 

Quote:

Kennedy and his Secretary of Defense McNamara launched the special warfare with "search and destroy" tactics against the Vietcong by US airborne troops. When that failed, Kennedy considered a partial withdrawal from Vietnam. But in 1963 he was shot and the hawk Johnson came to power ... 

 

To add to the confusion: HSCA-Blakey and WC-Belin discussing the fact that their two official taxpayer-funded reports don't fit. Host: Howard Hunt protegee William Buckley jr. 

37 minutes ago, Michael Griffith said:

Most of this is based on far-left mythology.

JFK had no interest in a coalition government in Vietnam, nor did the Diem brothers.

JFK was determined to keep South Vietnam free. The White House tapes alone make that clear. 

There was already a Vietnam War. The U.S.-South Vietnam vs. North Vietnam war had been going on since 1960, when North Vietnam decided to increase the flow of troops and weapons into South Vietnam. That is why JFK authorized numerous increases in American military personnel and military aid. We had over 16,000 military personnel in South Vietnam by November 1963. 

1999? Okay, so Salinger made this claim 36 years after the fact. One can only wonder why he did not reveal this in the '70s and '80s when a number of other Kennedy aides and friends came forward with claims that JFK had told them he was going to totally disengage from South Vietnam after the election. 

You really should read Selverstone's new book The Kennedy Withdrawal.

The day before he died in Washington Vietnam was very much on Kennedys mind. He not only talked to Salinger about negotiations with the North, he had a Vietnam conversation with Malcolm Kilduff too: (quote from Douglas' book THE UNSPEAKABLE): (This is November 21. 1963)

Quote

Kilduff said he came into the Oval Office the morning of November 21  to prepare the president for a press briefing. Kilduff discovered that JFK's mind was instead on Vietnam.  Kennedy said to  Kilduff:  "I've just  been given  a  list of the  most recent casualties in Vietnam. We're losing too damned many people over there. It's time for us to get out. The Vietnamese aren't fighting for themselves. We're the ones who are doing the fighting. 
"After I come back from Texas, that's going to change. There's no reason 
for us to lose another man over there. Vietnam is not worth another Amer­
ican life. " What Kennedy meant was clear, Kilduff said: "There is no question that he was taking us out of Vietnam. I was in his office just before we went to Dallas and he said that Vietnam was not worth another American life. There is no question about that. There is no question about it. I know that firsthand ."

Back to Ellsberg: Can anyone explain to me why Ellsberg is a hero, Snowden a traitor and Assange just another inmate? --For the US MSM I should add. 

@Michael Griffith

IMO JFK wasn't about to abandon the south. His words to Salinger suggest he had in mind to bring Hanoi and Saigon to the negotiation table to work out a "Laotian solution". The Diem brothers had already established a channel to Hanoi. All looked well. But within three weeks the Diems and Kennedy were dead. BTW killing the Diems wouldn't have made much sense without killing Kennedy. Whoever killed the Diems knew without killing Kennedy there would be no Vietnam war. 

The Interview with Salinger was recorded in 1999 for a series of the German TV channel MDR  (Mitteldeutscher Rundfunk) if I remember correctly. 

 Marinas fairy-tale about Ossi with the rifle on the porch in front of his apartment in NOLA, told by Priscilla Johnson McMillan in her storybook "Marina and Lee" , quote: 

Quote

One evening during the last week of August, she and June went
for  a  stroll.  Arriving  home  about  twilight,  they  found  Lee  on  the
porch perched on one knee, pointing his ri e toward the street. It
was the  rst time she had seen him with his ri e in months—and
she was horriffed.
“What are you doing?” she asked.
“Get  the  heck  out  of  here,”  he  said.  “Don’t  talk  to  me.  Get  on
about your own affairs.”
A few evenings later she again found him on the porch with his
rifle.
“Playing with your gun again, are you?” she said, sarcastically.
“Fidel  Castro  needs  defenders,”  Lee  said.  “I’m  going  to  join  his
army of volunteers. I’m going to be a revolutionary.”
After that, busy indoors, Marina frequently heard a clicking sound
out on the porch while Lee was sitting there at dusk. She heard it
three  times  a  week,  maybe  more  often,  until  the  middle  of
September. Often she saw him clean the rifle ... 

Quote from the book Me and Lee by Judyth Baker:

Quote

 As  September (1963) progressed,  Lee  transformed  himself  into  a  quiet homebody.  Neighbors  noticed  that  he  spent  many  hours  reading  on  his porch. At night, he was often still reading by lamplight. Mrs. Garner, the apartment manager, testified that Lee couldn’t possibly be working, as he was  spending  all  his  time  reading  books  on  the  hot  porch,  clad  only  in yellow beach shorts and wearing flip-flops.

Nobody saw Oswald with a rifle on that porch... not in August and not in September 1963... never... except Marina and she "saw" him nearly every day there from end of August till the middle of September... 

 Kennedy was about to enter into negotiations with North Vietnam, when he was killed. 

Quote from the book "Apokalypse Vietnam" by Wolfgang Schneider. (Published by Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag 2001)
 

Quote

 

Interview, Pierre Salinger:

"In November 1963, Kennedy sent me to Tokyo to prepare for a visit there in six weeks. He gave me the words to take with me (November 21, 1963 afternoon). "I will enter into a dialogue with the North and make it clear that there will be no war." On November 22, 1963 my plane took off (from Hawaii) three hours later I received word that he had been murdered."

 

Quote

B. Cole said: The intel-state wants the RFK Jr. campaign dead in its crib, or better yet, stillborn. 

That's the way I see it ... 

Quote

John Cotter said: Western “democracy” is a sick joke, and I wouldn’t be surprised if 2023 is the year in which the whole rotten edifice – the empire of lies, as Putin called it – comes crashing down, and the junta that grabbed power 60 years ago is swept away.

Maybe. But they will not give up without a fight.  The only way for them to hold their sick grip of power is to create another artificial world-crisis. As I understand it they are in a hurry to create a artificial energy-refugee-crisis. In the US as well as here in Europe. Maybe they have a third thing in petto. (They could pauperize us through a willfull hyperinflation.) 

Swarms and swarms of mockingbirds.

At the moment RFK jr gets more MSM "attention" than Saddam in 2001 ... 17 months prior to the election "they" are trying to put Trump in jail and burry RFK jr under piles of horse ...s ... hit ... 

Starting 16min 13 sec of the video Anna Merlan "explains" what a conspiracy theorist is ... psychologically ... making crystal clear what me, you, we are ... 😉 

 deleted

 deleted