Karl Kinaski
-
Posts
1,043 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Karl Kinaski
-
-
-
IMO ... whoever faked CE 718 made a funny mistake. The stock of the (unidentifiable) gun is laying upside down while the forestock and the barrel are laying the other way round.
Stock and forestock/barrel of that gun do not fit. Additionally Stock an barrel are not in the proper angel ... the gun seems buckled.
-
We have at least three main witnesses saying Connally was hit by a separate bullet:
1. Connally himself
2. His wife Nelly Connally
3. S. M. Holland
And two high ranking government officials who believed Connally was hit by a separate bullet but didn't understand the implication of that fact: Dick Russel and Lyndon Johnson. Phone call Russell and Lyndon Johnson( 18. September 1964)
2min in the vid:
Quotequote
Johnson: "What difference it makes which bullet got Connally?"
Russell: "It don't makes much difference."
close quote
Fact is: It makes all the difference.
Quotephone call Russell Johnson 18.9, 1964 quote:
Russell: The Commission believes that the same bullet that hit Kennedy hit Connally. And I don't believe it.
Johnson: I don't either.
close quote
If you don't believe in the single-bullet-theory the whole Warren Commission Report turns to crap. And that's what this report is: crap.
-
The Connallys February 1992 on Larry King.
After her husband Nelly Connally too ( about 6min into the vid.)gives an accurate account of the sequence of the shots. Three different bullets instead of one magic bullet causing all the injuries of JFK and Connally.
She says: 1th shot hits Kennedy in the neck.,
2th shot hits Connally in the back. He said: "My god, they are gonna kill us all.
3th shot hits Kennedy in the head ... she (N. Connally) never turned around but there was brain matter and blood all over the place and Jacky Kenned said: "Oh, god I got his brains in my hand."
-
" ... turning to my right to see what was happening seeing nothing I was in the process of turning to my left and I was struck by a second shot. The third shot struck the President but did not strike me. "
This statement kills the magic bullet and therefore the findings of the Warren Commission. The whole lone nut fairy tail depends on it. I guess Connally was aware of this. But then Connally continued:
"I wanna make it very clear however that simply because I disagree with the Warren Commission on this one detail does not mean that I disagree with the substance of their overall findings."
Nice said. But the substance of "the overall findings" of the Warren Commission is based on the single bullet theory which Connally killed with his prior statement.
This I call schizophrenic.
-
9 minutes ago, Marjan Rynkiewicz said:
Yes, Hickey's accident karnt possibly affect national security (not then, not now), it woz rotten luck, he was just doing his job.
I wonder whether some docs will be made public after SSA Hill dies.
Clearly lots of people knew/know that it was an accident -- & clearly lots of people lied (to blame Oswald)(etc).
I heard JFK slipped on a banana peel in Dallas.-
-
On 1/4/2023 at 6:08 PM, Karl Kinaski said:
"Fascinating". Robert W. Malone when he stumbled over Judyth Vary Bakers story 171 K views on Twitter ... that' s something ...
Judyth Vary Baker January 3. 2023 podcast on Rumble 40 rumbles .... hm ...
Has now 210 K views on Twitter and 11K views on rumble. They most knowledgeable dudes about the JFKA are here, but the action is elsewhere ... Tucker, Twitter, Rumble, Rogan ...
-
This is a clownworld thread, isn't it?
-
Let's not forget Douglas Caddys great contribution to this forum: He claims that E Howard Hunt told him in the 70ties that JFK was killed because he gave the UFO secrets away to the Soviets. 🤣
-
-
-
"Fascinating". Robert W. Malone when he stumbled over Judyth Vary Bakers story 171 K views on Twitter ... that' s something ...
Judyth Vary Baker January 3. 2023 podcast on Rumble 40 rumbles .... hm ...
-
Quote
Denis Morisette, quote: Weitzman's affidavit does not say that it was a Mauser. It says it was a Mauser bolt-action. Isn't a Carcanno a Mauser bolt-action?
I'd like to dive into this.
Quote, Chauncey Marvin Holt: SELF PORTRAIT OF A SCOUNDREL
(He was ordered to modify some Carcanos prior to the assassination)
Quote. We were explicitly instructed to acquire and modify, in accordance with specific
instructions, carbine and rifle versions of a weapon referred to as the
Mannlicher-Carcano. Our astonishment at these instructions was due to the fact
that this weapon, which was standard issue to the Italians in World War I and II,
is a very inferior piece of equipment and although it is commonly referred to as
Italian Carcano-Mannlicher, the only part attributable to the great Austrian gun
designer, Mannlicher, was the magazine. The breech mechanism was of a
modified Mauser action developed by Paraviccini and Carcano at the Turin
Small Arms Factory in Italy.Given, that ( acc. to Chauncey Holt) there were modified Carcanos around prior to assassination, for the first time, it occurred to me, that the rifle found on the sixth floor that day may have been a "composite rifle" ... "they" (Chaunceys instructors in this particular case) not only used a Carcano, because the magazine was Mannlicher and the breech mechanism Mauser, but modified it further, for example they could have stamped "Mauser 7.65" in the barrel of a rifle which was a Carcano ... why ... to create a forensic nightmare ... just a thought ...
-
QuoteRay Mitcham ...Posted March 30, 2017
I remember reading a couple of years ago, that Weitzman's daughter said that her dad privately maintained till his death that it was a Mauser he found in the TSDB. Unfortunately I don't remember where I read it. Anybody else ever see the comment? (...)
Joe Bauer: Roger Craig cleary mentiones Weitzman in Mark Lane's Doc. "Two Men In Dallas."
And Boone.
Quote, WHEN THEY KILL A PRESIDENT by Roger Craig.
(Craig is in the TSDB 6th floor. The three cartridges have been found already.)
QuoteWe were told by Dallas Police to look for a rifle—something I had already concluded might be there since the cartridges found were,
apparently, from a rifle. I was nearing the northwest corner of the sixth floor when Deputy Eugene Boone called out, “here it is.” I was
about eight feet from Boone, who was standing next to a stack of cardboard boxes. The boxes were stacked so that there was no opening
between them except at the top. Looking over the top and down the opening I saw a rifle with a telescopic sight laying on the floor with
the bolt facing upward. At this time Boone and I were joined by Lt. Day of the Dallas Police Department and Dallas Homicide Captain,
Will Fritz. The rifle was retrieved by Lt. Day, who activated the bolt, ejecting one live round of ammunition which fell to the floor.
Lt. Day inspected the rifle briefly, then handed it to Capt. Fritz who had a puzzled look on his face. Seymour Weitzman, a deputy
constable, was standing beside me at the time. Weitzman was an expert on weapons. He had been in the sporting goods business for many
years and was familiar with all domestic and foreign weapons. Capt. Fritz asked if anyone knew what kind of rifle it was. Weitzman
asked to see it. After a close examination (much longer than Fritz or Day’s examination) Weitzman declared that it was a 7.65 German
Mauser. Fritz agreed with him. Apparently, someone at the Dallas Police Department also loses things but, at least, they are more
conscientious. They did replace it—even if the replacement was made in a different country. (See Warren Report for Italian Mannlicher-
Carcano 6.5 Caliber).
At that exact moment an unknown Dallas police officer came running up the stairs and advised Capt. Fritz that a Dallas policeman had
been shot in the Oak Cliff area. I instinctively looked at my watch. The time was 1:06 p.m. A token force of uniformed officers was left
to keep the sixth floor secure and Fritz, Day, Boone, Mooney, Weitzman and I left the building. -
Quote
W. Niederhut wrote: What strikes me about the video clip is Angleton's odd, inappropriate affect-- as if his life of spying on the citizenry, orchestrating murders, and finally getting sh*t-canned was amusing to him. He acts like a sociopathic child who just got busted for torturing the cat.
I wonder, if Angleton and Hillary Clinton have something in common in that regard. 🙂
-
He was on the phone all night, got liitle sleep and seems drunk. This was the end of a 30 year career at the core of IC power ... deep state decided he had to go.
-
Sry. Wrong link. Corrected it.
-
CLIP Angleton in front of his home 24.12. 1974 shortly after he was fired
Quote, J. Morley THE GHOST ...
QuoteTHE NEXT DAY (22.12. 1974), ANGLETON’S home on 33rd Road was besieged by reporters. One of them was Daniel Schorr, a CBS news correspondent famous for his blunt questions. He marched up to the front door and rang the bell. A groggy-looking, stoop-shouldered man in pajamas opened the door and pointed at The Washington Post on his doorstep. Schorr was standing on it.“I certainly didn’t expect you, Mr. Schorr, to trample on the press,” said
Angleton.
Encouraged by his sense of humor, Schorr asked if he could come in. He found himself in a house strewn with books in many languages, mementos of Italy and Israel, and pictures of Cicely and the children. Angleton agreed to talk to Schorr, but only off-camera, saying he would be in mortal danger if recognized.
Each time Schorr asked him about the allegations of improper CIA activities in the United States, Angleton digressed about the Cold War. When Schorr tried to bring him back to the question he had asked fifteen minutes earlier, Angleton said, “I am not known as a linear thinker, Mr. Schorr. You will have to let me approach your question my way.”
(Clip starts here)When he was done, Angleton donned his black coat and homburg and walked out the front door, down the brick steps, and slowly across the lawn into the wilderness of TV cameras. He stopped as if hypnotized. Schorr grabbed a microphone lying on the ground and the cameraman started filming.
“Why did you resign?” Schorr asked. “I think the time comes to all men when they no longer serve their
countries,” Angleton said.
“Did you jump or were you pushed?” someone asked. “I wasn’t pushed out the window,” said Angleton.
He got into his Mercedes and drove away. That night, Christmas Eve 1974, millions of Americans heard the name James Jesus Angleton for the first time. All three TV networks reported on the Times story, along with the categorical denials of former CIA director Richard Helms. All three played footage of Angleton emerging unsteadily from his front door. Angleton’s ordeal was surreal and unimaginable, except that it was actually happening: newspaper reporters camped out on his lawn, a career of secrecy expiring in the view of millions, his craft of counterintelligence scorned, his mission mocked, his Agency stripped bare by reporters he thought were righteous and ignorant -
@Jim ... IMO the 65 documents starting here, and ending here are covering the activities and Q&A sessions of the "Taylor Board of Inquiry of the Cuban Operation" very well, resulting in JFKs NSAM 55 where he gave the JCS the full responsibility to lead the Cold War (28.6.1961) and Schlesingers recommendation for a rebuilding of the CIA (30.6.1961). The Kennedy administration was moving fast ... but so were it's arch-enemies.
I believe the crux of the whole affair is buried in document 200. When Dean Rusk was asked about the strange visit of Cabell and Bissell in his office when the news of the canceling of the D-Day air strike had arrived in Quarters Eye. (It took Bissell and Cabell 45 Minutes to go from Quarters Eye to State which were just half a mile apart. The No 2 and No. 3 of the CIA were at last ambiguous about the D-Day air strike cancellation.
This is, what occurred acc. to Dean Rusk when asked by the Taylor-Board:
Quote, Memo for the Record 200. (Location Rusks Office, date 4. May 1961) The quote is buried in the middle part of the memo.
QuoteQuestion: Was it understood that control of the air was considered essential to the success of the landing?
Secretary Rusk: Yes, it was understood that it was essential to the success of the landing, but there was an inadequate appreciation of the enemyʼs capability in the air. Furthermore, neither the President nor I was clear that there was a D-2 air strike. We did have it in our minds that there would be a D-Day air strike. Following the D-2 air strike there was considerable confusion. It wasnʼt realized that there was to be more than one air strike in the Havana area. The President was called on this matter and he didnʼt think there should be second strikes in the area unless there were overriding considerations. We talked about the relative importance of the air strikes with Mr. Bissell and General Cabell at the time. However, they indicated that the air strikes would be important, but not critical. I offered to let them call the President, but they indicated they didnʼt think the matter was that important. They said that they preferred not to call the President.
Question: Did you attempt to advise the President as to the importance of the air strikes?
Secretary Rusk: I had talked to him and he had stated that if there werenʼt overriding considerations the second strikes shouldnʼt be made. Since Mr. Bissell and General Cabell didnʼt want to talk to the President on the matter, I felt there were no overriding considerations to advise him of. I didnʼt think they believed the dawn air strikes were too important. I believe that Castro turned out to have more operational air strength than we figured.
There were not only overriding considerations FOR the D-Day air strike to take out the three remaining T-33 jet fighters, this air strike was absolute essential to the whole operation. Cabell and Bissell knew that and kept quiet. Their intention was to sabotage the operation from within to force Kennedy to use US military and start a big
war in Cuba, when he was barely 100 days in his tenure. Had Kennedy fallen for this dirty trick there never would have been a Camelot. IMO Kennedy knew the implications and that was why he said NJET to the use of US military force. (Confusing Kennedy was the nature of their game ... and they lost ... for the moment ... )
BTW. If Rusk is right than he and JFK never knew of a air strike prior to the D-Day strike ... which is odd. What is clear is that JFK approved the Day Day strike an Sunday, quote Fletcher Prouty JFK. THE CIA, VIETNAM AND THE PLOT TO ASSASSINATE JOHN F. KENNEDY.
Quote
... Kennedy had approved the dawn air strike (on D-DAY) at 1:45 P.M., April 16, 1961.
This quote is from the Taylor letter, paragraph 43: “At about 9:30 P.M. on April 16, Mr. McGeorge Bundy, Special Assistant to the President, telephoned General C. P. Cabell of CIA to inform him that the dawn air strikes the following morning should not be launched until they could be conducted from a strip within the beachhead.”No wonder Bundy admitted he had “a very wrong estimate of the consequences.” First of all, U-2 photos taken late Saturday, April 15,
showed the three T-33 jets parked wingtip to wingtip on a small airstrip near Santiago, Cuba. One eight-gun B-26 alone could have wiped them out on the ground. The CIA’s operational commander at Puerto Cabezas was sending four B-26s to do the job that one could have done easily—provided the T-33s were caught on the ground. The brigade was scheduled to hit the beach at sunrise. That would alert Castro’s air warning system and put the T-33s in the air. As reported by Wyden, the Bundy call to Cabell stating that no air strikes could be launched until after the brigade had secured the Giron airstrip constituted a total misreading and a complete reversal of the approved tactical plan. The dawn air strikes were essential to destroy the three T-33s on the ground—the only way the slower B-26s could destroy them. With them out of the way, Castro would have had no combat aircraft. The brigade would have been subject to no air attacks, their supply ships would have been safe ... -
It is a letter to the president and four memos, isn't it?
-
@Micah Mileto
Maybe Dulles had the neck (bullet wound) in his mind while Humes was talking about the scalpel incisions of the neck and the chest. Seems like a communication problem between the two men. Which adds to the complete farce of the WC hearings ...
Edit:
IMO that was the case.
Quote of the WC hearing piece you mentioned.
Quote(Humes) ... So when we examined the President in addition to the large
wound which we found in conversation with Doctor Perry was the
tracheotomy wound, there were two smaller wounds on the upper
anterior chest.
Mr. Dulles . These are apparently exit wounds?
Commander Humes . Sir, these were knife wounds, these were
incised wounds on either side of the chest, and I will give them in
somewhat greater detail. -
4 hours ago, Micah Mileto said:
I love the part when Allen Dulles walks into Dr. Humes' testimony late, and when Humes was describing the chest tube incisions made at Parkland, Dulles asks "Are you describing exit wounds?", to which Humes replies "Sir, these are knife wounds".
Dulles playing the interested fool ... LOL ... Little correction: It was a tracheostomy-tube put in at the very same point of the neck entry wound which was widened by scalpell for that reason.
-
@Matt Allison , quote:
QuoteEverything you wrote in your post sounds like the boilerplate script the Russian xxxxx farms spend all day posting on social media in their ops to destabilize the U.S.
... you say that JFK was about to cancle the Vietnam war the time he was killed comes from a Russion tr...oll farm ...LOL... and good by.
-
Just one of some straight lines from the JFKA to the Ukraine war. JFKA Cover up bullshit artist Gerald Ford ... rewarded with the White House ... Fords White House Chief of staff: Dick Cheney ... his daughter: Liz Cheney, strong promoter and supporter of the Ukraine war. (JFK - among other reasons - was killed because he was about to cancel the Vietnam war. Trump was removed by a the emergence of a manmade virus and suspicious Presidental elections becaus he never would have started a war in the Ukraine ... believe it or not: There is a certain high cabal in the US with a "wars must never end" agenda ...
Robert Kennedy jr. about to run for president
in Political Discussions
Posted
Now that' s something ... maybe the only way all JFKA files will see the light of the day ...
I wish him good luck.