-
Posts
1,208 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by Jonathan Cohen
-
Warren Burroughs, the Popcorn Man
Jonathan Cohen replied to T Weier's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Excellent point, and yes, they absolutely should. -
Warren Burroughs, the Popcorn Man
Jonathan Cohen replied to T Weier's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Actually, nobody is saying that. What we're saying is that "torn" can clearly have more than one meaning. And in the absence of clarification, no one can definitively say whether the bill was torn in two or just simply torn but intact. -
DiEugenio's book review of Armstrong's Harvey and Lee
Jonathan Cohen replied to Steve Roe's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Indeed, and Jim has often praised the work of folks like Robert Charles Dunne, who has done more to destroy the idiotic "Harvey and Lee" theory than just about any other poster here. -
Everything's a lie, everything's fake. Pretty convenient to just trot that out as an excuse every time someone challenges you on your claims.
-
Warren Burroughs, the Popcorn Man
Jonathan Cohen replied to T Weier's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Since you didn't actually answer my question, I can then only conclude that you do not see any distinction between an intact dollar bill with a tear in it and a dollar bill that is torn completely into two or more pieces. -
Warren Burroughs, the Popcorn Man
Jonathan Cohen replied to T Weier's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Are you serious? Who cares what a search engine labels them as. Are you actually trying to claim that there's no distinction between a dollar bill with a tear in it and a dollar bill that is torn completely into two or more pieces? -
Warren Burroughs, the Popcorn Man
Jonathan Cohen replied to T Weier's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Haven't you ever had a torn dollar bill in your wallet that wasn't actually torn into two distinct pieces? -
DiEugenio's book review of Armstrong's Harvey and Lee
Jonathan Cohen replied to Steve Roe's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
I don't believe he's ever written one himself, although he has stated on this forum many times that he is "agnostic" about the validity of the theory. -
One of the most unintentionally hilarious statements ever made on this forum, especially since it comes from someone who believes in evidence fakery to a preposterous level as the ludicrous "Harvey and Lee" doppelganger theory. You're the one pushing long-debunked misinformation.
-
Bart Kamp's Lancer presentation
Jonathan Cohen replied to Jonathan Cohen's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Because this has turned into a pointless back and forth and it needs to stop. David Von Pein is a member in good standing of this forum, whether you like it or not. Nobody asked to hear what you "would have done" to him if you were a moderator at the time. -
Great! If you're so satisfied that "many of us," including you, "know the answers to these questions," you can step out of the thread and let actual discussion flourish. And by the way, the book is called "Destiny Betrayed," not "Best Destiny" ...
-
Bart Kamp's Lancer presentation
Jonathan Cohen replied to Jonathan Cohen's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Great. So you can stop bringing up the subject again and again? -
So just because David Josephs espoused some theories about the nature of the Mexico City episode, we should just globally declare that it no longer bears any scrutiny or study?
-
Re Paul Landis? 11/22/63 FBI Memo Confirms?
Jonathan Cohen replied to Benjamin Cole's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
We'll never know, as Dealey Plaza is a natural echo chamber and people claimed to have heard shots from multiple different directions. However, there's no way to deny shots were fired from behind, unless you can explain away rear entry wounds to both JFK and Connally's backs ... -
The Men Who Killed Kennedy (Episode 9)
Jonathan Cohen replied to Greg Burnham's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
So the History Channel retracted the episode and apologized for it for.... what reason, precisely? -
Bart Kamp's Lancer presentation
Jonathan Cohen replied to Jonathan Cohen's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Indeed. Instead, we have to deal with Sandy Larsen, for no apparent reason, trying to reopen an issue that was dealt with years ago. Move on. -
You are wrong, as Ben Cole has pointed out. You have missed the distinction between Oswald being impersonated on the phone and him being physically present at the Soviet embassy, where he met Kostikov.
-
These things are not mutually exclusive. There's zero reason why Oswald could not have been in Mexico City while also being not guilty of the assassination.
-
The exoneration of Lyndon Johnson?
Jonathan Cohen replied to Roger Odisio's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Sibert to the HSCA in 1978: "When the body was first observed on the autopsy table, it was thought by the doctors that surgery had possibly been performed in the head area and such was reflected in my notes made at the time. However, this was determined not to be correct following detailed inspection and when the piece of bone found in the limousine was brought to the autopsy room during the latter stages of the autopsy." Secondly, that photo is in no way "proof" of surgical alteration. Once again, you consistently present things as fact that are absolutely not fact. It's nothing more than your theory, and one not supported by the actual evidence or the majority of serious researchers.