Jonathan Cohen

You will never be convinced you are wrong, because you can always fall back on your beloved "all the evidence is fake" trope. But by all means, go "do your work" involving Lee Harvey Oswald doppelgangers, fake tramps, fake evidence, fake films, fake witnesses, fake documents ... When does it ever end?

Amen, times 100.

Do you expect people to feel reassured about ANYTHING simply because "Rand Paul agrees" with it? I sure don't ...

You, and others here, seem incapable of accepting the fact that someone can disagree with entrenched JFK conspiracy theory lore (ie., that all the evidence is fake, that there were two Oswalds) WITHOUT being a "LNer." Why is that so difficult to understand?

No matter what spin he tries to put on it after the fact, Kennedy is on video in the Post article linked in my original post, saying exactly the words attributed to him. Furthermore, according to a study by the Office for National Statistics, Jews had a higher mortality rate from COVID-19 in the United Kingdom compared to other ethnic groups.

I am astonished people here are willing to look past idiotic and frankly disturbing statements from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. such as the below, made earlier this week at a fundraising dinner in New York: “COVID-19. There is an argument that it is ethnically targeted. COVID-19 attacks certain races disproportionately,” Kennedy said. “COVID-19 is targeted to attack Caucasians and black people. The people who are most immune are Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese.” “We don’t know whether it was deliberately targeted or not but there are papers out there that show the racial or ethnic differential and impact,” Kennedy hedged. https://nypost.com/2023/07/15/rfk-jr-says-covid-was-ethnically-targeted-to-spare-jews/

Nowhere in any of Pic's testimony does he say that the person in the photo was NOT his brother. He simply says he didn't recognize him, which is perfectly logical considering he hadn't seen him in person years.

They've been offered countless times on this forum and others, so there's literally no need to repeat them.

There is no such person as "Harvey." It is also preposterous to infer from John Pic's Warren Commission testimony that he actually believed his half-brother Lee had been "replaced" by some other human being.

There's no Harvey. Never was, never will be. Any reasonable person studying this case will plainly see that there are numerous perfectly logical explanations for any alleged "conflicts" in the school records that do not require doppelgangers or idiotic, decades-long government conspiracies.

There was no "Oswald Project" and there was one and only one historical Lee Harvey Oswald. Everything else is just delusion.

This is also a ridiculous assessment of Mark's work, and the work of other accomplished posters on this subject such as Robert Charles Dunne and Jeremy Bojczuk. Are you accusing Mark of being a "WC apologist" simply because he rejects the shoddy research and the accompanying preposterous interpretations Armstrong draws from it?

Absolute nonsense, because there never were "two Oswalds." Mark Stevens authoritatively shredded the Stripling theory in this thread.

Michael, this question is already being discussed on this very thread.. see James DiEugenio's earlier replies.

So? This in no way lends credence to the notion that the film was "altered" at Hawkeye Works or NPIC. In fact, I find it ludicrous to believe the evil conspirators would go to such trouble on just ONE of the assassination films when they could in no way be certain that OTHER films wouldn't surface later and completely contradict the now-altered Zapruder footage.

Uhhh... how about to study it and determine its evidentiary value to the crime?

Nope, because clearly there's nothing to miss. If they had real evidence of alteration, they'd be screaming it from the mountaintops.

Do some reading? Your snotty tone notwithstanding, gee, I’d love to, but I can’t find a single substantive update about this project more recent than 2019. Please, James, do enlighten us about why this documentary has still yet to appear after a decade, if it truly does contain bombshell revelations about the film’s authenticity? What are they waiting for? Maybe they haven’t actually proven anything at all?

Hasn't this been in the works for years? A decade or more? Couldn't one assume that if they truly found evidence of alteration, the whole world would know by now?

This forum never ceases to amaze. Never thought I'd see the day again when someone would purposefully quote from James Fetzer for any purpose other than laughing aloud at his absolutely ludicrous theories.

Unless the photo was taken shortly before or immediately after the assassination and can provably be shown to have been taken in or around Dallas, what possible relevance could it have?

No, there's nothing mysterious about it at all, considering Angleton's longtime close relationships with Israeli government officials, particularly those in intelligence circles. It's all spelled out quite clearly in Jefferson Morley's Angleton biography "The Ghost."

So, in other words, there's nothing mysterious or out of the ordinary about this photo. Moving on...

For once, I agree wholeheartedly with Roger !

Silly Ben! Don’t you know Garland is far too busy perpetrating “hoaxes” against Donald Trump?