-
Posts
1,208 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by Jonathan Cohen
-
Pierre Lafitte datebook, 1963
Jonathan Cohen replied to Leslie Sharp's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Truer words have rarely been spoken on this forum. Thanks for at least trying to fight the good fight, Greg. -
Pierre Lafitte datebook, 1963
Jonathan Cohen replied to Leslie Sharp's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Uh, except that it has, by Roland Zavada: https://archive.org/stream/ZavadaReport/Zavada+Report_djvu.txt http://www.jfk-info.com/zavada1.htm It's incredible that you, as someone who seems to believe nearly every major piece of evidence in the case has been falsified or altered, jumps right in with both feet to trumpet the veracity of the "Lafitte datebook." A "coherent reason" would be to make money and insert one's self/selves into the JFK assassination case, which unfortunately has already happened with Judyth Baker. By the way, this forum is hardly made up of "an independent panel of experts" ... -
Oswald's tale - Norman Mailer
Jonathan Cohen replied to Eddy Bainbridge's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
I agree with your assessment of this book, Eddy. Mailer also made a cantankerous and entertaining appearance at the ASK Symposium in Dallas around the time of its release. -
A Problem with "Prayer Man"
Jonathan Cohen replied to Leslie Sharp's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
No, I’m not saying the “crime” would be solved. But a positive ID of Oswald on the steps would by definition prove a conspiracy and as such invalidate every “Oswald did it alone” argument which has persisted since 1963. That may not be enough for you, but it’s perfectly reasonable that it would be enough for many other researchers who have devoted decades to the subject. I truly don’t understand the implication that the research community should be in any way obligated to throw all their chips in on your version of events, particularly given the questionable veracity of the datebook upon which it rests. -
A Problem with "Prayer Man"
Jonathan Cohen replied to Leslie Sharp's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Whether there is or isn't is, to me, irrelevant at this late date. Researchers, and the general public, rightly want DEFINITIVE proof ... not datebooks of unknown authenticity, not absurd theories about Lee Harvey Oswald doppelgangers, not a default position that all of the film and photo evidence from Dealey Plaza has been faked or altered. A definitive determination that Oswald was indeed standing in front of the TSBD during the assassination would end 60 years of debate in one fell swoop. -
A Problem with "Prayer Man"
Jonathan Cohen replied to Leslie Sharp's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Leslie, do you honestly believe that these so-called "amateur researchers" who had their "attention seized" are now incapable of studying any other aspect of the Kennedy assassination besides the identity of Prayer Man? I also find it a bit odd that you are passing judgment on what topics people "should" be studying. For instance, should Jefferson Morley stop suing the government so he can instead devote his full time and attention to a datebook of unknown authenticity? -
Roger Craig and the Deputy Interviews
Jonathan Cohen replied to James DiEugenio's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Tom, I have a hard time taking Marion Meharg's deposition seriously on this matter ... do you believe him, given all the circumstances? -
Roger Craig and the Deputy Interviews
Jonathan Cohen replied to James DiEugenio's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Walking out of the Book Depository after helpfully directing a reporter to a phone, boarding a bus, exiting that bus, getting into a taxi, and arriving at his rooming house. To believe otherwise means every witness to those movements was lying or grossly mistaken, no? -
Roger Craig and the Deputy Interviews
Jonathan Cohen replied to James DiEugenio's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
They could be "accurate" in the sense that those people did make such statements, but that hardly means they're correct, and they in no way jive with Oswald's known movements from the time he left the Book Depository to the time he was arrested. -
Nobody “ran” anything involving the tramps and there was no “purpose all along.” The only “diversion” was people like Bob Dylan trash-digger Alan Weberman claiming the men were secret CIA agents.
-
Ron, in my opinion, impossible-to-verify theories about shadows in photos do nothing to invalidate the arrest records and the actual 1992-era statements of two of the three men.
-
The three tramps are Gus Abrams, Harold Doyle, and John Gedney, and we have both their arrest records and their own post-LaFontaine confirmations to prove it.
-
Except that they aren't three different people and never have been...
-
Admiral Burkley, through his attorney, may have "attempted" to step forward to "debunk the WCR narrative," but it's quite unclear if he ever actually did. As such, he's not really a useful example per Paul's question. From the ARRB final report: The Review Board contacted the children of deceased Vice Admiral George G. Burkley, former military White House physician to Presidents Kennedy and Johnson, to find out if their father had deposited his papers at any institution, or if they possessed any assassination records. The staff came up empty-handed. According to House Select Committee on Assassinations records, Burkley's personal attorney apparently told the HSCA that his client believed there was a conspiracy to kill President Kennedy. Mr. Illig, Burkley's attorney, however, is now deceased. The Review Board staff asked Burkley's daughter, the executor of his estate, to sign a waiver allowing the Review Board access to papers at Illig's law firm, but she declined to sign and return the waiver.
-
You will never be convinced you are wrong, because you can always fall back on your beloved "all the evidence is fake" trope. But by all means, go "do your work" involving Lee Harvey Oswald doppelgangers, fake tramps, fake evidence, fake films, fake witnesses, fake documents ... When does it ever end?
-
Amen, times 100.
-
Kennedys denounce Bobby, Jr.
Jonathan Cohen replied to Joseph Backes's topic in Political Discussions
Do you expect people to feel reassured about ANYTHING simply because "Rand Paul agrees" with it? I sure don't ... -
Hornberger, FFF on the "Fraudulent" JFKA Autopsy
Jonathan Cohen replied to Benjamin Cole's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
You, and others here, seem incapable of accepting the fact that someone can disagree with entrenched JFK conspiracy theory lore (ie., that all the evidence is fake, that there were two Oswalds) WITHOUT being a "LNer." Why is that so difficult to understand? -
No matter what spin he tries to put on it after the fact, Kennedy is on video in the Post article linked in my original post, saying exactly the words attributed to him. Furthermore, according to a study by the Office for National Statistics, Jews had a higher mortality rate from COVID-19 in the United Kingdom compared to other ethnic groups.
-
I am astonished people here are willing to look past idiotic and frankly disturbing statements from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. such as the below, made earlier this week at a fundraising dinner in New York: “COVID-19. There is an argument that it is ethnically targeted. COVID-19 attacks certain races disproportionately,” Kennedy said. “COVID-19 is targeted to attack Caucasians and black people. The people who are most immune are Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese.” “We don’t know whether it was deliberately targeted or not but there are papers out there that show the racial or ethnic differential and impact,” Kennedy hedged. https://nypost.com/2023/07/15/rfk-jr-says-covid-was-ethnically-targeted-to-spare-jews/