Tom Hume

True to form, I submit, "DR A J HIDEEL" anagrams to: "A J.E.H. RIDDLE" The "riddles" that Nagell and Oswald created were intended to be their Immunization Card, so to speak.

You’ve got to see this! Now that I know how to do opacity, I’ve re-aligned the DD Form 1173 photo and the photo from the bogus SSS Alek J Hidell card. Back in August, I’d thought that the two photos should display a 3-D images when viewed through a Stereoscope. And they sort-of did. But it’s not the Oswald head that’s in 3-D, it’s his chin. And the chin appears to belong to JFK, and was applied to the Oswald figure’s face. The two images under discussion need to be rotated 84 degrees to display the 3-D chin: 11+73 degrees. The Backyard Photos, on the other hand, need to be rotated 88 degrees: 4+11+73 degrees. This is all information I’ve derived from Richard Nagell’s puzzle system. I’m unable to post photos right now, and I’ve sent the new set of images to Sandy (and I’ve twisted his arm a little), hoping he’ll post them for me. The 1173 photos and BYP are part of the same puzzle group, and I’ve asked Sandy to post both sets. While were waiting to see if that can happen, call all of your friends and relatives and see if you can borrow a Stereoscope. https://i.pinimg.com/736x/e8/33/d4/e833d44256637186d9c013e7aac698ac--antique-china-antique-glass.jpg

If you will, focus your attention on boxes #6 and #7 where Oswald’s height and weight are entered. On the Oswald card, it reads 71”, 145, but on the card associated with Richard Nagell, it reads, 7 L”, J 45. I’m going to translate the numbers to letters (key at the bottom). "7 L inches J45" = “H L inches JEF”. This anagrams to: “LEE H, JF’S CHIN” Next, I’m going to anagram “DD Form 1173” and translate only one letter, a “D” to a “3”. “3-D FROM 1173” On August 30 on this thread, the first post on page 11, Sandy posted four photos for me. Both pairs of photos are: one from DD Form 1173, and the other from to Alek J Hidell card. The only difference between the top and bottom pairs is that their order is reversed. If you have a Stereoscope, or access to one, take a look at those photos (link below). The top two photos are merely there for comparison, and the bottom pair show a slight but discernible amount of 3-D. 59a7773777176_OswaldQuartet.jpeg.4c9de1647cb8b79ce9aaa389d4d2a0e0.jpeg Both Sandy and I perceived the slight amount of 3-D in the chin area, but it’s admittedly subtle. It's possible to use a Stereoscope directly on your monitor. The pair of images should be sized so that, say, Oswald's right and left noses are 3 inches apart. Back to the topic of the LO/JFK chin. Lee Oswald’s chin was more pointed than the chin on the DD Form 1173, and he had a bit of cleft to it. Kennedy’s chin was broader and more rounded with just a hint of a cleft. Those that are handy with “opacity”, find some head-on photos of Kennedy and compare chins. Now that I’m a better hand with opacity, I’m going make a new set of four photos similar to the ones linked above, and maybe I can talk Sandy into posting them for me again. I don't know what this exercise could prove, other than lend credence to my contention that Richard Case Nagell was making enigmas and puzzles surrounding everything having to do with his associate, Lee Oswald, and that this 1173 card is a set of puzzles. "RICHARD CASE NAGELL" anagrams to: "R'S CARD GALA: LEE CHIN" (Maybe that's what the black tie is all about) (A=0)(B=1)(C=2)(D=3)(E=4)(F=5)(G=6)(H=7)(I=8)(J=9)(K=10)(L=11)(M=12)(N=13)(O=14)(P=15)(Q=16)(R=17)(S=18)(T=19)(U=20)(V=21)(W=22)(X=23)(Y=24)(Z=25)

I vote for "B Stout", but what do you make of the vertical line running through the "B"? "B. I. Stout"?

Thanks Ray, but this is very bad news. If some think he was a stand-in in the BYPs, and his full name was “Roscoe Anthony White”, and his full name anagrams to, “AN HO/ROSCOE, THEY TWIN”, then now what? AFTERTHOUGHT EDIT: Ray, I was being slightly facetious when I posted the anagram of Roscoe White, but only slightly so, and I honestly did not know his middle name. I’ll make a short statement of what I think, and if anyone would like to talk about it, let’s do it on another thread and let this one stay focused on Ricky. Opinion: I think the BYP are puzzles and the photo’s of the Oswald character are composites of Lee’s head, and another persons body. The photo’s were probably taken with a Stereo Realist camera tilted 88 degrees to the right. CE133A and 133C are a 3-D pair, which used Wesley Frazier’s body with a 3-D photo of Lee Oswald’s head attached. To perceive the 3-D, the photos have to be aligned properly and a common Stereoscope is required. I have demonstrated this 3-D backyard effect on another thread, but the discussion went nowhere, and my photos have since been denied by Photobucket. I think it’s very likely that there were originally 4 backyard photos, and that Roscoe White was the body double in CE133B and it 3-D companion photo that never saw the light of day. If I had a Roscoe White 3-D argument to make, there would be little point, as there is no second RW photo. I’m working with what I believe is a huge anagram puzzle system created by Richard Case Nagell. He was creating assassination enigmas and puzzles and he was working with Oswald. I think the 3-D Backyard photos are huge, but I need is a very good graphics person to help demonstrate this.

This is apropos of nothing, except maybe Paul’s BYP hypothesis, but I like this anagram of “ROSCOE WHITE”: “'E' SWITCHEROO” (In my hypothesis, "E" was RCN's code name for the assassination, and "E" stood for "Edgar") Did Roscoe have a middle name?

On Sunday, Chris wrote: “...I question why ... LT. J.G. Ayers was identified as a “1st Lt.” when he was in reality a Lt. “J.G. ie “junior grade”. https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=98552#relPageId=4&tab=page Edit: Oops! On Monday, Sandy made this guess about the penmanship in 1st Sgt Stout’s name entry: “[signed by P (?) Stout 1st Sgt]” It looks more like “B I Stout 1st Sgt” to me. What do you think? Question: Supposedly, Oswald would have surrendered his active duty ID card during out processing. Do we by any chance know his active duty E-2 card number? Tom

I think you all have done a first-class job of digging up and analyzing the available information, and your conclusions, many of them, appear to fit the information. Opinion: From my point of view, however, you might be ignoring an important possibility. The possibility that Lee Oswald was under cover, and working with a small team of other undercover spies - Angels that were pretending to work with the assassination team, but in reality were trying to thwart the attempt. The possibility that for roughly six years Richard Nagell was running Oswald and his doppelganger in a secret Intelligence program. And as a sideline for his own protection, and the protection of his crew, Nagell did something he was naturally good it, he built clever letter puzzles into all of his activities and the activities of his two Oswalds, and he created baffling enigmas surrounding Oswald’s patsy bona fides ordered by Nagell’s bad-guy superiors. Nagell was too close to Oswald and the other team members, and he needed to take himself out, which he did, leaving his crew to finish the job he’d planned. His plan failed. I think that as an Army Intel person, and then an undercover CIA type, Nagell had access to all the forms and technology he needed to pull his stunts, and I think the DD Form 1173 is just one of many seemingly baffling stunts that have been both interesting and baffling us for over 50 years. In my opinion, Nagell wanted Oswald to go to trial. Properly informed, a team of experts for the defense could have easily analyzed Nagell work and testified to the years he skillfully dedicated to telling the unfolding saga of the two Oswalds. I think that if there was one assassination expert that was also as good at solving letter puzzles as Nagell was at creating them, you all might be convinced. While I think I might know the basics, unfortunately I'm not that person - I’m just trying to attract him or her.

Notice the green “F” in the upper right corner of the Alek J Hidell SSS card. It also appears to be the same color as the “Alek J. Hidell” signature. The ideal puzzle phrase for this "F" anomaly appears to be, “GREEN CORNER ‘F’”. This anagrams to: “FORGER, Nee RCN” Moving to the left to the green alias edge, “GREEN ALIAS EDGE” appears to be the intended phrase, and this anagrams to: “ID, GAGE LEE EARS. N” And yes, “GAGE” is an acceptable alternative spelling for “GAGUE”. The next anagram appears to direct us to the N 4, 271, 617 ID card, which contains the same photo. “GREEN ALIAS EDGE” anagrams to: “N 4... ID, LEE EARS GAG” And, "i.e. GI EARS DANGLE" And, "GEE, 'I' EARS DANGLE" From everything I’ve seen so far, much of the ID cards puzzle material is suggesting that this is a photo of Lee’s doppelganger Igor, and he’s wearing Lee’s ears. The LO ears are extra big and extra low by design, because this gag is suggested by several anagrams of Lee Harvey Oswald, and Richard Case Nagell. "Lee Harvey Oswald" anagrams to: “YO, A LEE’S 1173 WEAR V” “YO, V HEAD, EAR SWELL” “YE V HEAD, LOW L EARS” “V HEAD, LOWLEY EARS” etc. There’s more to come.

The following post got quickly buried on “The Stamp on the Military ID card” thread, and I think it’s worthy of consideration by those comparing photos of Oswald. Since I seem to be mainly talking to myself, I’ll post my subsequent takes on Oswald’s DD Form 1173 here. Because of their interest in the Harvey and Lee aspect, this post is mostly directed to David, Jim D, and, Jim H, and it’s about “ears”. Since the subjective puzzle system I’m working with doesn’t appear to yield information about Lee Harvey Oswald and his twin (figurative or literal twin?) before about 1957, and there’s what I might call ‘hints‘ that Richard Nagell worked with the twins for six years, I can’t make any guesses about H&L’s childhood from the puzzles. Without bombarding you with anagrams, I’ll just present one anagram that is an idealized representative of others. “Richard Case Nagell” anagrams to: “RC CHANGE ALL ID EARS” Years ago, before my puzzle skills improved, one thing that put me off about the Harvey and Lee scenario was that, while I agreed that the photos of the adult Lee Oswald were suspiciously variable, LHO’s ears were always characteristically the same. While it may not be 100% true, I’ll bet we’ve all heard that ears are like fingerprints, that no two are the same. And I’ll also bet that the “ear” problem has bothered the Harvey and Lee folks too. In the most vocal public statement of Richard Case Nagell’s life, while he was being arrested in El Paso for blasting a couple of holes in the wall of a bank, he blurted out: “CAPITALISTIC SWINE” And this is one of his most important puzzles. Without attempting to solve it here, I’ll just mention the two anagrams that literally fall out of “Capitalistic Swine”: “CIA TWIN SPECIALIST” And, “L/I, TWIN CIA PATSIES. C” “I” is always LHO’s ‘twin”, “I” stands for “Igor”, and I part company with the Harvey and Lee scenario on this point: Igor, Case, and Oswald, were on the same side - ICO - good guys. Summary: "RC CHANGE ALL ID EARS" I'm still working on the DD Form 1173 puzzles, but right now my guess would be that the photo is of Marina's husband's doppelganger wearing Marina's husband's ears. Tom

We can see many erasure areas on the SSS card because the erased areas obviously persist. “Richard Case Nagell” anagrams to: “A.H. CARD, L ERASE CLING” Or, “ERASE CLING L A.H. CARD” The alias signature is in bright green ink. “Richard Case Nagell” anagrams to: “L.H CARD, GREEN ALIAS. C” David probably noticed when he was aligning the head on the Alek J Hidell card on the other thread that it needed to be straightened roughly 4 degrees. “Richard Case Nagell” anagrams to: “L.H. ALIAS, 4 DEG ARC. RCN” And “Richard Case Nagell” anagrams to: “A RICHARD C’S L ANGLE, 4” (In CE 133A and 133C, the subject is also at a 4 degree tilt. "Lee Harvey Oswald" anagrams to "LHO SWAY REVEALED", "L HEAD OVERLAY WES" etc.) The Lee H Oswald DD Form 1173 is green. “Richard Case Nagell” anagrams to: “ALAS, L GREENISH CARD” Or, "A L CARD, a la GREENISH" Seeming to refer to the 1173 card in Lee's wallet on 11/22, “Lee Harvey Oswald” anagrams to: “22, O LEAVE AYERS' 1173” And, “WE’VE A AYERS' 1173. LO There's been much discussion on this thread about the puzzling stamped circles in the area of the 1173 photo. “Richard Case Nagell” anagrams to: “1173 CIRCLE AREA SNAG” In the exact center of these circles on the card is a capital letter “G”. “Richard Case Nagell” anagrams to: “N CIRCLES A 1173 ‘G’ AREA” Referring to the Ayers signature with the strange flying lowercase “e” at the end, “Lee Harvey Oswald” anagrams to: “AYERS 1173, LO WAVE ‘E’” Or, "LO 1173, AYERS WAVE 'E'" There’s a bunch more and I’ll try to compile them into a proper post. But my point is that a major story telling technique of Richard Nagell’s “ICO” group was to create enigmatic events for us to notice and solve, and many, if not most, had their roots in naturally occurring full anagrams of the names of the ICO members. Most of the examples above are not very informational, they are there to let us know that the ICO group was intentionally creating events. Many of these corresponding anagrams/events, however, turn into, or lead to, information-packed puzzles. Maybe in my old age, I’ll start living out the anagrams of my name. This would mean that I’d take up nude skydiving, become a professional jockey, always wear a red propeller beanie, have an image of Pee-wee Herman tattooed to my forehead, and subsist on a diet of nothing but Kumquats. And that’s just the short list. Anagrams as self-fulfilling prophesies. Please believe that I have anagrammed the daylights out of all of my friends names, and once in awhile, I find something interesting that pertains to them, and I surprise them with it. Start anagramming “Richard Case Nagell”, “Lee Harvey Oswald”, and “Igor Vladimirs Vaganov (which I submit was a created name), and you will find many, if not most, of the confounding enigmas associated with the assassination. Start solving ICO's anagram puzzles, and you may discover that everything is connected. I don’t think this has been mentioned before, but take a look at the top line of the bottom two paragraphs on the Hidell card. The word “violation” has been toyed with. This, I submit, was so it would be noticed and I think I know why, but I’ll leave it to you to discuss what you believe it says. Something similar happened to the number "62" on Nagell's phony version of Oswald's 1173 card. A=0)(B=1)(C=2)(D=3)(E=4)(F=5)(G=6)(H=7)(I=8)(J=9)(K=10)(L=11)(M=12)(N=13)(O=14)(P=15)(Q=16)(R=17)(S=18)(T=19)(U=20)(V=21)(W=22)(X=23)(Y=24)(Z=25)

Reserved.

Reserved.

Reserved.

Sorry to change the subject, guys, but I’ll be brief. Because of their interest in the Harvey and Lee aspect, this post is mostly directed to David, Jim D, and, Jim H, and it’s about “ears”. Since the subjective puzzle system I’m working with doesn’t appear to yield information about Lee Harvey Oswald and his twin (figurative or literal twin?) before about 1957, and there’s what I might call ‘hints‘ that Richard Nagell worked with the twins for six years, I can’t make any guesses about H&L’s childhood from the puzzles. Without bombarding you with anagrams, I’ll just present one anagram that is an idealized representative of others. “Richard Case Nagell” anagrams to: “RC CHANGE ALL ID EARS” Years ago, before my puzzle skills improved, one thing that put me off about the Harvey and Lee scenario was that, while I agreed that the photos of the adult Lee Oswald were suspiciously variable, LHO’s ears were always characteristically the same. While it may not be 100% true, I’ll bet we’ve all heard that ears are like fingerprints, that no two are the same. And I’ll also bet that the “ear” problem has bothered the Harvey and Lee folks too. In the most vocal public statement of Richard Case Nagell’s life, while he was being arrested in El Paso for blasting a couple of holes in the wall of a bank, he blurted out: “CAPITALISTIC SWINE” And this is one of his most important puzzles. Without attempting to solve it here, I’ll just mention the two anagrams that literally fall out of “Capitalistic Swine”: “CIA TWIN SPECIALIST” And, “L/I, TWIN CIA PATSIES. C” “I” is always LHO’s ‘twin”, and “I” is “Igor”, and I part company with the Harvey and Lee scenario on this point: Igor, Case, and Oswald, were on the same side - ICO - good guys. Summary: "RC CHANGE ALL ID EARS" I'm still working on the DD Form 1173 puzzles, but right now my guess would be that the photo is of Marina's husband's doppelganger wearing Marina's husband's ears. Tom

We can see many erasure areas on the SSS card because the erased areas obviously persist. “Richard Case Nagell” anagrams to: “A.H. CARD, L ERASE CLING” Or, “ERASE CLING L A.H. CARD” The alias signature is in bright green ink. “Richard Case Nagell” anagrams to: “L.H CARD, GREEN ALIAS. C” David, you probably noticed when you were aligning the head on the Alek J Hidell card that it needed to be straightened roughly 4 degrees. “Richard Case Nagell” anagrams to: “L.H. ALIAS, 4 DEG ARC. RCN” And “Richard Case Nagell” anagrams to: “A RICHARD C’S L ANGLE, 4” (In CE 133A and 133C, the subject is also at a 4 degree tilt. "Lee Harvey Oswald" anagrams to "LHO SWAY REVEALED", "L HEAD OVERLAY WES" etc.) The Lee H Oswald DD Form 1173 is green. “Richard Case Nagell” anagrams to: “ALAS, L GREENISH CARD” Or, "A L CARD, a la GREENISH" Seeming to refer to the 1173 card in Lee's wallet on 11/22, “Lee Harvey Oswald” anagrams to: “22, O LEAVE AYERS' 1173” And, “WE’VE A AYERS' 1173. LO There's been much discussion on this thread about the puzzling stamped circles in the area of the 1173 photo. “Richard Case Nagell” anagrams to: “1173 CIRCLE AREA SNAG” In the exact center of these circles on the card is a capital letter “G”. “Richard Case Nagell” anagrams to: “N CIRCLES A 1173 ‘G’ AREA” Referring to the Ayers signature with the strange flying lowercase “e” at the end, “Lee Harvey Oswald” anagrams to: “AYERS 1173, LO WAVE ‘E’” Or, "LO 1173, AYERS WAVE 'E'" There’s a bunch more and I’ll try to compile them into a proper post. But my point is that a major story telling technique of Richard Nagell’s “ICO” group was to create enigmatic events for us to notice and solve, and many, if not most, had their roots in naturally occurring full anagrams of the names of the ICO members. Most of the examples above are not very informational, they are there to let us know that the ICO group was intentionally creating events. Many of these corresponding anagrams/events, however, turn into, or lead to, information-packed puzzles. Maybe in my old age, I’ll start living out the anagrams of my name. This would mean that I’d take up nude skydiving, become a professional jockey, always wear a red propeller beanie, have an image of Pee-wee Herman tattooed to my forehead, and subsist on a diet of nothing but Kumquats. And that’s just the short list. Anagrams as self-fulfilling prophesies. Please believe that I have anagrammed the daylights out of all of my friends names, and once in awhile, I find something interesting that pertains to them, and I surprise them with it. Start anagramming “Richard Case Nagell”, “Lee Harvey Oswald”, and “Igor Vladimirs Vaganov (which I submit was a created name), and you will find many, if not most, of the confounding enigmas associated with the assassination. Start solving ICO's anagram puzzles, and you may discover that everything is connected. I don’t think this has been mentioned before, but take a look at the top line of the bottom two paragraphs on the Hidell card. The word “violation” has been toyed with. This, I submit, was so it would be noticed and I think I know why, but I’ll leave it to you to discuss what you believe it says. Something similar happened to the number "62" on Nagell's phony version of Oswald's 1173 card. A=0)(B=1)(C=2)(D=3)(E=4)(F=5)(G=6)(H=7)(I=8)(J=9)(K=10)(L=11)(M=12)(N=13)(O=14)(P=15)(Q=16)(R=17)(S=18)(T=19)(U=20)(V=21)(W=22)(X=23)(Y=24)(Z=25)

Sandy, SUPER! I’m conducting a test to see if two ID photos of Lee Oswald are “exactly” the same, or are in fact a very similar pair of 3-D stereo images, possibly taken at the same instant with a 3-D camera like the Stereo Realist. I suspect that Lee Oswald was photographed with such a camera, and that this camera was intentionally tilted 90 degrees to make the pictures look the same to the casual observer. At the top of this page in a Sandy Larsen post (3 posts back), is a grouping of four ID photos of Lee Oswald, two rows of photos with two photos each. Both rows contain the same pair of images but they are reversed. The top row is there for comparison purposes only, so focus your attention on the bottom row. The left picture on the bottom row came from Oswald’s phony Selective Service card, and the right photo came from Oswald’s DD Form 1173 under discussion on this thread. The common tool available in 1963 for viewing 3-D photo cards was the Stereoscope. https://www.etsy.com/listing/508387211/antique-bent-wood-stereoscope-viewer?&utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=shopping_us_b-art_and_collectibles-collectibles-other&utm_custom1=4378eead-1330-4031-8102-87175185688f&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIs8jnlYyA1gIVTZF-Ch2Bwwt0EAQYAyABEgI_bPD_BwE The Stereoscope's wire holder takes a 3 by 7 card bearing a pair of stereo images. To adjust the focus, the holder slides on a stick that brings the photos toward the viewer or away. With my rather poor vision, and without a card in the holder, I can touch the end of the holder stick to my monitor and the focus for the images that Sandy posted is about right . If your vision is perfect, I don’t know what to say - cut the holder stick off? Make some stereo cards from Sandy’s post? You need to point your device between the two images on the bottom row - don't try to look from side to side - you'll go mad. Assuming you can view these images with a device, here’s what I’d like to convince you that you will see: The bottom set of photos will show mild 3-D. You will see “Oswald’s” nose protruding, depth in his eye sockets, his chin protruding from his chest, etc. The top row of two photos are there for comparison and should not display 3-D. This allows you to look back and forth between the top row and bottom row and more easily perceive the differences between them. Go back and forth several times. Do it 50 times. 3-D on the bottom set, no 3-D on the top set. There is no background in these pix, and it’s background and foreground differences that take your breath away in commercial 3-D. Oswald's 3-D face is not all that breathtaking. That would require big differences in perspective, and a close-up facial shot, and I might assume that this mild photographic treatment was intentional so as to not make the stunt too obvious. See what you think. I bet if you start asking around, you’ll find three people that have a Stereoscope in their closet.

David, you seem to be a pretty good hand with graphics and there’s something you might want to try sometime. I suspect that the photograph on the DD Form 1173 and the one that passes for its twin on Oswald’s phony Selective Service card are not identical. What I suspect is that they are a pair of 3-D images taken with a Stereo Realist camera tilted 88 degrees to the right (90 degrees is close enough), and when properly sized, rotated to the right, and properly aligned side by side, a 3-D image can be perceived with the aid of a Stereoscope. https://www.etsy.com/listing/508387211/antique-bent-wood-stereoscope-viewer?&utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=shopping_us_b-art_and_collectibles-collectibles-other&utm_custom1=4378eead-1330-4031-8102-87175185688f&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIs8jnlYyA1gIVTZF-Ch2Bwwt0EAQYAyABEgI_bPD_BwE I can only do crude graphics and I can’t post photos right now, but it seems to me if one found the best examples of each photo, sized them properly, etc., and did a transparent overlay, one might be able to decide if they are slightly different in the up-down plane or not. I made some slightly crude image pairs and sent them to Sandy the other day but unfortunately he wasn’t able to perceive the 3-D that I thought I was seeing. The 3-D, if indeed it is present, is not breathtaking like some of the old commercially made Stereoscope image pairs, but I’m seeing enough to keep me interested. Sandy Larsen, would you be willing and able to post that group of four photos I sent you? If so, it would be nice if the image pairs ended up being 6 to 7 inches wide on a typical monitor. An experiment. If I’m wrong, please accept my apology in advance. Tom

Thanks Jim, No, I don't suspect anything sinister, but it just didn't seem to make sense, like so many other things.

Sorry David, you’re probably right and I still give up. Tom

“They are actually parts of a stamped “JUL(y)” Your opinion, David. You win - I give up.

Edit.

Hi David, If I have this right, military cards were and are standardized at 2 1/8 inches. This question may seem trivial, but maybe not. Can you make an educated guess as to the diameter of the red and blue circles? I favor the photo-letters being “IUL” with a tiny hand-written number “91” on the “I”, but maybe not. Tom

The lull on this thread persists, so I’ll posit a riddle. The Oswald 1173 card and Nagell’s obviously forged copy of that card have a companion card. The forged Alek J Hidell Selective Service card that was supposedly found in Oswald’s wallet on assassination day. There are several red flags on the card, and one of them is the fact that the alias, “Alek J Hidell,” is signed in bright green ink. Why is this? Answer: Because the name of the card's forger, “RICHARD CASE NAGELL”, anagrams to: “LH GREEN ALIAS CARD. C” Or, "LH CARD, GREEN ALIAS. C" “C”, Richard C Nagell, told us stories, hundreds of them, stories about the assassination plot that he and his friend Lee Oswald were tangled up in. To hear these stories, one might need to listen in a new way.

Jim Hargrove, In the fourth post on page #1 of this thread, you posted Exhibit No. 50, which I assume is both the front and the back of Oswald’s DD 1173. Why do the front and back appear to be quite different in shape? Tom