W. Tracy Parnell

He is? How about this from Dan Hardway: Real Hillbilly Views: The Prosecutor's Tale

Anatomy of a James DiEugenio Citation (onthetrailofdelusion.com)

Paul Groody ~ W. Tracy Parnell (wtracyparnell.blogspot.com)

I prefer not to share too much information on the Internet. But yes, I have learned a little HTML and I learned to write (what little I know) by necessity.

I'm sure he does but the way you worded it made it sound like he was "running" you. You can resist all you want but you are the textbook definition. See Uscinski, p. 23. No. If it did that the mainstream media, politicians and everyone else would be forced to admit it.

Great trait to have. I taught myself many things, so we have that in common.

Ok, I'll agree that is a better wording.

Here is the thing about Sandy. He's a forensic dentist when you need one. He's a physicist when you need one. Now I see he's an expert on the Zapruder film and has found things that Zavada couldn't. Amazing! Sorry Sandy, I couldn't resist.

"always protesting her innocence, even though over the decades researchers have uncovered much evidence to the contrary." There is exactly no evidence to the contrary. All that exists is suspicions by theorists. "Both he and Ruth have always denied involvement in the plot and coverup, yet much evidence connects them to it. " Again, there is no evidence only suspicions. "Ruth, who spoke and taught Russian, was invited to a party by George de Mohrenschildt, a White Russian CIA asset who was ‘babysitting” Lee Harvey Oswald at the request of the CIA. " This is Curtain's opinion only. This is based completely on statements made by de Mohrenschildt to Epstein when he was being paid $4000 by Reader's Digest. Two explanations-DM was quite mad by this time (he had been committed). Secondly, he wanted to give Epstein something new for his money. Moore denied that he asked DM to "babysit." "she got Lee a job in the Texas School Book Depository, despite calls to her house from an employment agency offering him a much higher paying job. " Enough has been said here about this. but briefly, there is no proof (and there never will be) that Ruth was aware of the higher pay and purposely withheld the information. "Those who wish to kill to make a name for themselves obviously claim credit, but the Paines seem not to get this. Their claim makes no sense, yet they both repeat it in the film." The Assassination and Mrs. Paine-LHO Would Have Admitted Guilt? ~ W. Tracy Parnell (wtracyparnell.blogspot.com) "She has her defenders and they appear in the film along with well-known supporters of her and the Warren Commission’s conclusion that Oswald did the deed alone: Max Holland, Gerald Posner, Priscilla Johnson McMillan, Jack Valenti, Michael Beschloss, and Peter Jennings. This is not incorrect but misleading. Valenti, Beschloss and Jennings appear in archival footage only and briefly. The bulk of the Ruth defending is done by Ruth, Holland and PJM. The Assassination and Mrs. Paine-LN Experts Diminished? ~ W. Tracy Parnell (wtracyparnell.blogspot.com) Now, pardon me while I do some real work. I can only waste so much time on these pointless discussions.

The Assassination and Mrs. Paine-The Strange Beliefs of Vincent Salandria ~ W. Tracy Parnell (wtracyparnell.blogspot.com)

It is indeed more common than one would imagine. However, a competent (and honest) prosecutor will seek to verify the information before taking it to trial and not rely simply on the "confession."

I think if you look at my articles, you can probably tell. But I'll give you one: "Her testimony led to the WC’s conclusion that Oswald, and Oswald alone shot, the president." If you take the things CTs always mention (Walker note, note to Soviet embassy etc.) and get rid of them, LHO would have still been convicted had he lived. Her testimony was helpful as it was from someone who knew him fairly well in the his past. But it certainly did not "lead to the WC conclusion." That is a large overstatement-it was an accumulation of evidence of which hers was a small part. I have a blog post planned on this for later.

Several of the statements made by Curtin in support of the film are not correct. See my series for details: W. Tracy Parnell: The Assassination and Mrs. Paine (wtracyparnell.blogspot.com)

Yes, give him a chance and if he does something wrong, he will be called out for it I am sure.

Yes, you beat me to it.

Good try. What they said was: "Lee Harvey Oswald himself probably visited the Cuban Consulate at least once since his application for a Cuban intransit visa bears his signature." After that admission, they go on to discuss possible impersonations and so on.

I don't think so either. But for the sake of argument, let's say he said that. It just means that he told two different versions of the story regarding where he was. At least one of these is then false by any standard. This would fit right in with the other lies he told while in custody.

Chapter 19 of The Bishop Hoax is now online: https://wtracyparnell.blogspot.com/p/19-no-hes-not-him.html This chapter begins the last section of the book and focuses on Phillips and the Maurice Bishop allegations. Highlights: Fonzi conducts an unauthorized experiment by bringing Phillips and Veciana together. But the results are not what he had hoped for. Veciana hatches a scheme to "confirm" his Maurice Bishop bona fides.

I agree. But there is a big difference between the motorcade going right by the TSBD and continuing down Main as far as blaming the assassination on LHO. Makes more sense if the motorcade is right below him. I call those who believe in the lone assassin theory LNs (stands for "lone nutter" which is not that complimentary sounding) and those who believe that a conspiracy killed LHO as CTs (since they believe in at least some conspiracy theories). No disrespect intended.

Nick Nalli's Response to Gary Aguilar and Cyril Wecht (onthetrailofdelusion.com)

What happened to the money? If a phone call was made it was by the CIA to gather information. This was a technique they had used. Was Oswald a Tool of the CIA (dperry1943.com)

That's not a prevarication. That's called "he said she said." If you are saying that all she did was befriend Marina so what if that is true? Like Bugliosi said, it doesn't go anywhere. If you think she did more then you think she was in on it.

No, her motive is the point, at least as far as most CTs are concerned and I agree with them. They believe she withheld the job information to keep LHO at the TSBD. You may not believe that or be concerned about it, but they do and are. If she withheld the information from LHO (I don't believe she did) because she figured he had a job and best to leave it alone considering his instability-so what? It was a benign motive and nothing to do with anything. No. The traditional route was down Main Street. The motorcade only went to Houston and Elm because of the decision to have the luncheon at the Trade Mart. And that was not confirmed until November 15th. Another building was considered for the luncheon and the motorcade would not have needed to pass the TSBD if that location were used. The only way for theorists to defeat this is to say there were several patsies in varying locations to cover all the possibilities. This adds complexity to the plot and increases the chance of failure. Speaking of adding complexity, the Manning article does that in spades. His six degrees of separation type theory adds several more conspirators to the plot including Frazier, Pauline Bates and several others. I didn't find it credible, but some may. Thank you.

The Assassination and Mrs. Paine-LHO Would Have Admitted Guilt? ~ W. Tracy Parnell (wtracyparnell.blogspot.com)

It doesn't make any difference about the message because the whole argument goes nowhere. According to CTs, the purpose of her withholding the information about the better job was to make sure LHO remained at the TSBD. But as DVP points out in the other thread, in addition to the problems with the coffee klatch theory you have the fact that Ruth could not have known on October 15 that the motorcade would go by the TSBD. Therefore, she had no motive to withhold information even if she had it. The coffee klatch and the realities of the motorcade defeat the notion that Ruth "placed" LHO in the TSBD for most. I believe Morley is working on a theory that concedes LHO got a job there by chance and works from there although I don't know where he is going with it. It makes more sense anyway.