-
Posts
4,737 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by Michael Clark
-
Ruth - a typewriter - 15 days
Michael Clark replied to David Josephs's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Iganov.. working the phone tap, directed by... Hunt, who wrote the letter, (or informed LHO about his FBI status).... who was instructed by MCcord, who was working off of plans drawn-up by..... Liddy, who, with William F. Buckley were working with the nod of the NE establishment. .?- 265 replies
-
- mexico city
- ruth paine
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
At 22:00 "you pick up wetbacks in chihuaja, you back them in anything on wheels, You promise them freedom and you give them death, you are an assassin, you are a butcher!" Not much has changed in 33 years, Rip Torn is great, great movie.
-
And Paul, as usual, shows no respect to forum members or the casual reader by not offering a Warren Commission quote. ---------------------------- ""Paul has told me point blank that he repeats himself ad infinitum in order to influence the casual passers by here." (intentionally in quoted and no reference made to the originating thread)
-
Ruth - a typewriter - 15 days
Michael Clark replied to David Josephs's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
He he he he!... lol! I actually feel kind of bad, It is not my nature to be amused by watching another person crumble in a way that Paul is crumbling. I am looking to reset myself, but not in this post!- 265 replies
-
- mexico city
- ruth paine
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
The Death of Hank Killam - The Ultimate Cold Case
Michael Clark replied to Robert Howard's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
"Carroll is a recognized authority on the history of the Society of Friends on the Eastern Shore of Maryland and Virginia" I keep getting drawn towards the Quaker angle. We're not talking about farmers and horse carts. And while pacifism sounds great, I am seeing that as more af an excuse to send other guys to die thing. William Buckley's father was buried in a NC Quaker cemetery, yet he was, I believe, Catholic. -
The Death of Hank Killam - The Ultimate Cold Case
Michael Clark replied to Robert Howard's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Ok, I jumped the gun, not James, bother of the famou WFB. Yet, the Buckleys had roots in Dallas. -
The Death of Hank Killam - The Ultimate Cold Case
Michael Clark replied to Robert Howard's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Man, the early EF researchers seemed to have been digging through a trove, tossing aside silver, looking for gold. I'm not calling any fault, I'm just thankful that they have turned-up and documented all of this stuff. -
The Death of Hank Killam - The Ultimate Cold Case
Michael Clark replied to Robert Howard's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Quoted from above: Mr. Dolva, that's way more than just curious!!!!! "Another curious FWIW: William Frank Buckley, Jr. (b. 1925) — also known as William F. Buckley, Jr. — of Manhattan, New York County, N.Y. Born in New York, New York County, N.Y., November 24, 1925. Brother of James Lane Buckley; married 1950 to Patricia Taylor." -
The Death of Hank Killam - The Ultimate Cold Case
Michael Clark replied to Robert Howard's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Kenneth Carroll was a Swathmore Graduate. Swathmore (Donald Trump) and Phillidelphia keeps turning-up under ever stone that I look under. http://www.swarthmore.edu/Library/friends/ead/5287carr.xml Abstract Kenneth Carroll was a professor of Religious studies at Southern Methodist University in Dallas beginning in 1952. He also spent a sabbatical at Haverford College as the T. Wistar Brown Fellow in 1969 and 1970 and retired to Easton, Maryland, in 1986. Carroll is a recognized authority on the history of the Society of Friends on the Eastern Shore of Maryland and Virginia and has written widely on this and other subjects. Collection primarily consists of correspondence related to Carroll's research and publications, but also includes writings and miscellaneous papers. -
Ruth - a typewriter - 15 days
Michael Clark replied to David Josephs's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Paul Trejo knows. He speaks otherwise. I am avoiding the four letter word which that equates-to.- 265 replies
-
- mexico city
- ruth paine
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Ruth - a typewriter - 15 days
Michael Clark replied to David Josephs's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Yup, Paul is wrong, and he knows it.- 265 replies
-
- mexico city
- ruth paine
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
The St. Ruthie and St. Michael "We both know" call
Michael Clark replied to Michael Clark's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
2 hours ago, Paul Trejo said: "Bear in mind, that mailing any letter to the Soviet Embassy in Washington DC would guarantee that the FBI would intercept it. So, if (and only if) Lee Harvey Oswald actually wrote this letter (as I maintain), he would certainly know this. " (Bold, above, is mine) Paul So, if LHO did not mail the letter, he would not know that such a letter would be intercepted? I am not seeing anything coherent in your argument. -
Ruth - a typewriter - 15 days
Michael Clark replied to David Josephs's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
(Bold, above, is mine) Paul So, if LHO did not mail the letter, he would not know that such a letter would be intercepted? I am not seeing anything coherent in your argument.- 265 replies
-
- mexico city
- ruth paine
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Paul, you are conflating what you are referring to as a "transcript" with what you are quoting as a "fib". Why don't You quote and source you're "original transcript" and why do you quote your "fib" without sourcing it. Are you making stuff up?
-
JDF: response to "Altering Threads" Comment
Michael Clark replied to Michael Clark's topic in JFK Discussions
Also, I do frequently edit-in some new information on threads so I don't have to bump a thread. I always make a note of that when I do it. If I have never replied to a thread, then I do not have a place to edit-in anything, in which case I have to bump it with a response. -
Lois Liggett: Challenge to Jim Di Eugenio
Michael Clark replied to Michael Clark's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Also, I was given more to chew on and hopefully will have some confirmation tomorrow that the Carousel/Mac Liggett/Ruby photo is properly Identified. I made an inquiry today and I expect a response tomorrow. -
Lois Liggett: Challenge to Jim Di Eugenio
Michael Clark replied to Michael Clark's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Following Kirk... I am not sure how these things work, but I have the impression that a person or entity can sue someone, then settle out of court, under a confidential agreement for one dollar. The record will show that the suit was in some way successful. I apreciate that Jim, as a researcher, or due to some history, cannot, or will not, give an inch on somebody like Nigel Turner's witnesses without feeling like he has lowered his own bar in regards to recearch cridibility. So the baby goes out with the bath water. But that does not have to be the case for everyone. The rest of us can say that, for example, Lois Liggett is credible and her story makes sense, without any deference to the credibility of Nigel Turner. That said, I'd like to see a researcher be more up-front with the reality of that situation More importantly I would have much more respect for a researcher who can express that situation in critical terms, instead of normative terms lie "boloney", "poppycock" or "hogwash". All that said, Jim doesn't owe me anything, my expectations are set, and I thank him for what he does. -
JDF: response to "Altering Threads" Comment
Michael Clark replied to Michael Clark's topic in JFK Discussions
Quoting Jim here so he gets a notification of this response if he has notifications set on. I also edited-in a link in the original thread so others can see this more-thorough and more-honest reply than I gave in the original thread. -
Since my response to the following statement was not strictly true, I felt it deserved an explanation. Jim Di Eugenio said: "Boy, when you go to work on this site, you alter about six threads and bring things up from eons ago" My reply was: "I haven't altered anything Jim. I've been told that my bumping has annoyed.... If I raise an old thread it is to keep other threads on-topic, or otherwise worthwhile. " I replied as I did because I had not altered anything at the time Jim made his post, I don't know what he was referring to. Also, the thread I was responding to had been updated a few times, the last being 2013. It makes far more sense to add to an existing thread than create a new one, unless admin or consensus says otherwise, which has not been the case. In fact, since coming to EF, I have received a lot of support, encouragement and thanks for "going through the stuff in the basement and attic", so to speak. I have altered other threads. These were threads that were meant to be altered and have posts changed-out, like my Top Ten thread. I have deleted posts that were in response to infighting which I engaged in, and don't belong on the forum, as a matter of decorum. I have not "altered" threads with the perpose of materially changing the record that forum posts create. I have not altered a thread in an unethical or cowardly way, or to hide that I have made some stupid or errant claim; those posts remain.
-
He is often identified as Gary Eugene Marlowe sorry for the bump...
-
(E-mail to Ernie) "No, there is no truth that we removed any of your comments because of your tone, or anything having to do with you, or any individual. We made the decision several months ago to disable all comments on our entire website, as moderation of the comment board was becoming too time consuming for our small operation." We have seen that before, in the "Harrry Dean: Memoirs" thread... "When I intruded into the thread at 1504 it was because of what Thomas Graves had posted at 1503. He had warned that this conduct may continue after the chill urged the the administration. I suggested we would be disappointed if it did so. Effectively pointing out we expect both parties to comply with Kathy’s instructions. It is clear to me Ernie Lazar has indeed complied, however it is less clear that Paul Trejo has changed after the 72 hour chill. This thread is now closed. James Gordon"
-
On the Michele Clark thread the links to this article were redirected to oblivion. I am fixing those links here. The article is titled "The Secret History of Airplane Sabotage" by Sherman Skolnik http://www.apfn.org/skolnicksreport/shistory.html http://www.apfn.org/skolnicksreport/shistory2.html http://www.apfn.org/skolnicksreport/shistory3.html http://www.apfn.org/skolnicksreport/shistory4.html
-
John Liggett and Lois Liggett
Michael Clark replied to Shanet Clark's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
The above is from the following thread. I would love to have that link to Ferrie's phone records to see if there is a connection to the Liggetts, the funeral home, or even the Carousel. -
John Liggett and Lois Liggett
Michael Clark replied to Shanet Clark's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
David, I edited-in some more information on that in the last post of the previous page. I didn't want to keep bumping the thread.