Michael Clark

Dear Tommy, That is well put. It is also a concise and collegiately offered distinction that opens a dialogue that, I believe, needs to be broached. Cheers, Michael

I don't think he felt that he was smarter than anyone. His interests, self-education and affliction set him apart and he would recognize that as a problem and a flaw. These things (affliction aside) would be as much a comfort as a curse. Today, these things are less stigmatizing. Education and the ability to put a name on an affliction and thereby explain and express its nature make things a lot easier. IMO

I think that Oswald had some flaw which, in his day and age, would have marked him and held him back in social and professional situations. I took a guess at Aspergers being a possible affliction at one point and I soon found that others had made the same observation; so I am inclined to go with that. Today, it would, perhaps, not be held against him so strictly. It was mild enough to allow him entry into certain circles, but it was present enough that further along he would be kept at arms length and ousted in some circles and eventually dispensed with by the CIA. Cheers, Michael

Three related threads.

Chris, that seems to be an excellent explanation. Cheers, Michael

Cross referencing another thread.

"Later, a file was opened on "Lee Henry Oswald," that was placed into the Agency's central files. This would have been a "marked card" or "barium meal" operation that would allow "somebody" within CIA to scrutinize where that information went within CIA, and watch from where within the Soviet infrastructure that false-name data was reflected back to Langley [via CIA moles within GRU or KGB,]" According to the above speculation, LHO was of great interest to the CIA, even beyond that which his sabbatical to the USSR, would appear to warrant. Or, planting information markers was a matter of routine for Angleton, or the CIA in general.

I cought the tail end of this while driving home a few minutes ago while listening to our local, Albany, NY., NPR affiliate, WAMC. I was hoping to find a written essay to share but I have only found the audio version. Here it is. http://wamc.org/post/listener-essay-i-was-wrong

As an aside, this is, perhaps, where and when LHO recieved his forged Alex Hidell selective Service card and instructions to go to the Texas Theater to meet his contact/handler/demise. Cheers, Michael

Roger That. Cheers, Michael

Essentially, yes. I see the two physically engaging as they confront Lovelady. I don't see the WiB as being being an old waif who needs the assistance of the WIW. Cheers, Michael

I see a couple patsy-herders, closing in on LHO and Lovelady, keeping an eye on Frazier as well. So I vote yes; not that Dorothy Hunt really needs help up the stairs. Cheers, Michael

I think he would be torn apart in the media and in his community. The prosperity of his children would be threatened. I don't think that, at this point, he would be killed or suicided. The bad guys may also have some irrelevant dirt on him that they were able to, at some point, drag him through. Cheers, Michael

There has to be the makings of a South Park episode in this thread...

Are you guys seeing what I am seeing just behind and between MM and JH? I see a guy with a green gun, he's dressed in all green, camouflaged, real hard to see. I think we should call him All Green Man (AGM). He looks as guilty as sin to me. I wonder if the commission tracked him down? Cheers, Michael

Replies in bold, above.

Here is an Edwin Walker thread. I am linking it to the page in the thread where Paul T begins posting. It is a Good thread because there is a lot of anlysis on Paul Trejo's posts; including posts from Robert Charles Dunne.

That is incorrect. I didn't make such a reference. I don't know who Albert Doyle is. I think I have seen his name, possibly as a member here, but I have no recollections of his opinions or postings. Again, I have made no reference to him all, and, of course, no reference to him in relation to you. Cheers, Michael

Bill, the hyperbole in your complaint that you are being expected to do an onerous amount, (26 volumes of WC testimony), of research to back the vulumnous totality of your assertions on these threads is utterly disingenuous, at best. Surely, given your apparent tremendous interest in this portion of the larger investigation, it would be expected that you would familiarize yourself with the relevant testimony after being divorced from those readings for thirty years. Of course, if your purpose is to pull up some popcorn and toy with some folks who are trying to come-up with answers to this mystery, then semantics, misdirection, a faux scepticism and a paper cap declaring your expertise will surely get you through your daily excercise. It appears you have been fooling people for years. I don't see that fact as a guarantee of your future experience; but I don't make it a habit of trying to predict the future, yet I do tend towards optimism. Cheers, Michael

I was referring to General Walker. I was following-on in your response to Paul Trejo. Oswald had a wife, kids, mother, brother.

Can anyone restore this link? Whatever work this once pointed to is highly recommended in this thread.

And typical. find a gay man, with no family, no ancestry, no progeny, an outsider even among his peers, and lay the blame on him. Like then USS Iowa turret explosion, the Navy initially blamed the incident on a sailor whom they claimed to be a homosexual.

At 11:30

It wasn't mentioned in this thread, so I'll add that Eladio del Valle and David Ferrie died within hours of each other. Cheers, Michael