-
Posts
4,737 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by Michael Clark
-
I am bumping this because I want to know if it is OK to question the identity of another member, outright! Such as was done here? I raised such a question previously and was sternly warned. I have seen this befor (Pat Speer / Shton Gray, posts by john Simkin. There is something fishy about another member, and it Relates to this Mark Henceroth fellow. I am going to report this post so Admins see it.
-
China has popped-up quite a bit in my reading, but never (as I recall) as a concerted focus. E. Howard Hunt and his wife met in China. I think it is LBJ that makes curious mention of a particular Congressman's "friends in the China Lobby". Winston Lord (Skull and Bones) visited China with Nixon and Kissinger, but was cropped-out of the photos taken there. I feel that Winston Lord is somewhat neglected in the overall analysis of the politics of this period; his wife was born in China, and both are still alive.
-
We have heard the "Walton Whine" many times. He whines that no one pays any attention to his topics. He has basically given-up posting topics, only having posted one this year, and has instead taken to mulling around like a outcast kid on a playground, kicking around and ridiculing other kids activities because no-on wants to play with him. http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/profile/7252-michael-walton/?do=content&type=forums_topic&change_section=1
-
I have asked myself this question. My speculation is that within Russia, and The USA, the beginnings of a desire to restore an old-world-order, as the New-World-Order were being set into motion; a longitudinal plan to ensure the dominance of big money, restore and establish oligarchy and neo royalism as an international cabal. Basically, slavery.
-
David Atlee Phillips: The Mastermind?
Michael Clark replied to John Simkin's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
An article by John Armstrong that contains a great deal of info about David Atlee Phillips. http://harveyandlee.net/Patsy/The_Patsy.html -
New Article by John Armstrong
Michael Clark replied to Jim Hargrove's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Interestingly, no mention is made of David Morales. -
New Article by John Armstrong
Michael Clark replied to Jim Hargrove's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Excellent article! And while I don't begrudge Armstrong his larger H&L theory, the value of this article is appreciated by the fact that it delves into nothing prior to 1963. Cudos, Mr Armstrong.. and thank you for sharing, Jim, Michael -
Lee Harvey Oswald and the Linguistic Problem
Michael Clark replied to Douglas Caddy's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Hi Peter, I have a hypothesis that I have stated a few times. I try to avoid repeating ad-infintum, and to the annoyance of other members. But it is brief, and it is in response to your direct question. So I will repeat it. The straw that broke the camel's back was Guantanamo.I believe that American control of Guantanamo would not have survived peace negotiations, normalization of relations or detente. A perpetually antagonistic relationship with Cuba is what was prescribed for Cuba and is, indeed, what we got. Michael -
Larry Crafard, employee of Ruby until 11-23-63
Michael Clark replied to Michael Clark's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Greg's article cites an article by a Peter R Whitney, for whom I cannot find any data. http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/creatingapatsy.htm -
Larry Crafard, employee of Ruby until 11-23-63
Michael Clark replied to Michael Clark's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Greg Parker posted an in-depth article on Larry Crafard at ROKC. Larry is interesting to me, and, as far as I know. He is still alive. I am still reading the article... https://reopenkennedycase.forumotion.net/t1654-larry-crafard-214-w-neely-st-decoded -
My response is shallow, Ron, but I never listened to a word the guy said once I heard his TV name, "Jake Tapper"; how utterly ridiculous.
-
Lee Harvey Oswald and the Linguistic Problem
Michael Clark replied to Douglas Caddy's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Good video. Yet, LHO did not kill JFK. The video and such threads are a waste of time and debate. That is my opinion. I think it is important to point out what I am saying. Investigation into LHO is being "On the Trai of the Non-Assassin". No disrespect meant, Michael. Regards, Michael -
George, your faux demure to Cliff is weak. It was an unnecessary and disrespectful stab at Cliff. Your belief that Dulles was the "CEO" of the assassination is clear to anyone who pays any attention to your plentiful surmises. Indeed you have said as much in this thread. To say that you accept a published researcher over a forum member is unnecessarily disrespectful. Hell, I would accept a conclusion arrived-at by DVP over anything that you offer.
-
The Dual Life of Albert Osborne
Michael Clark replied to James DiEugenio's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
My answer to this is that the MC trip had to be known to people outside of the agency and the Bureau. That trip and the evidence for it was intended to keep the Anti-Castro Cuban's on board with their part in the assassination, so it was, and had to be known to them. Indeed they probably witnessed LHO's NOLA sheep-dipping first hand. The highly-against-protocol Veciana-DAP LHO meeting served the same purpose, but that was one man who returned to his compadres and said "it's legit, and it's a go". In the case of MC, the STORY of LHO's MC trip had to come-out, even if the evidence for it was bogus. In the case of the Veciana-DAP-LHO meeting, a simple threat to Veciana's survival would suffice. We see, in these stories and operations, confidence building measures to keep the Cubans in on the plot. Of course, IMCT, they got double-crossed. -
Agreed, Cliff, Your point agrees-well with Dulles being sheep-dipped rather than complicit in the Assassination. Thus he was forced into the cover-up, and therefore complicit in that. I believe that Dulles, and Angleton, were stovepiped out of, and insulated from, the assassination operation. Yet both were, through intrigue, facing the possibility of being implicated in that operation, thus ensuring their participation in the cover-up.
-
Nevermind.
-
Nevermind
-
New document releases 2017 and beyond
Michael Clark replied to David Butler's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
This is damning stuff. Amazing. -
Citizen Lane--Documentary on Mark Lane
Michael Clark replied to James DiEugenio's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Wow, this solid evidence of a war against the truth, against American Citizens, against justice, and evidence of conspiracy. Paul Trejo would have to argue that Lane was hot on the heels of Walker and the government did all of this to protect the discovery of the Walker conspiracy. And Paul will find it increasingly impossible to argue that there was no coup, and that the government was not involved. I really did not expect to see the truth come out in these releases, but voila, in strange turn, the truth is being laid bare by the very efforts that were made to disguise it. Thanks guys. -
Did the Dallas Radical Right kill JFK?
Michael Clark replied to Paul Trejo's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
A phone line can only be used 24 hours a day at, best. It can be only tapped 24 hours a day, at best. It wasn't in use 24 hours a day. Your repeated claim, suggests that this was the only phone line in the world that was tapped 24 hours. It's a stupid claim. Your platitudes spill out of you like Junk off a garbage truck. Hawks do the watching. You just told us that "surely any CIA agent would have known that".... More recycled, throwaway plattitudes, from Paul Trejo. A pile of garbage logic, Paul Trejo.- 1,044 replies
-
- jfk
- assassination
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Witten's report on Oswald in Mexico just released
Michael Clark replied to David Boylan's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
I think Paul Trejo is experiencing a flash of, shall we say, "inspiration", from his recent attendance at a "nuance" workshop. -
That's rich. Paul-"IMHO"-Trejo, the cherry-pickin' prognosticator, is demanding that we deal in "facts"! Lol
-
Montreal is more than Permindex
Michael Clark replied to David Josephs's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
"Century International Arms is an importer and manufacturer of firearms that is based in the United States. The company was founded in 1961 in St. Albans, Vermont, with offices in Montreal. In 1995 the company headquarters and sales staff moved to Boca Raton, Florida and to Delray Beach, Florida in 2004" https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Century_International_Arms