Ron Bulman

So Tump gave up the JFK files so the cia would back off on Russia?

Bottom line. The msm is owned by the less than 1%.

Read this one. First few paragraphs hit the nail on the head and hammer down. The rest is maybe the best synopsis I've read. Though I'm no researcher or expert. And virtually all of it has and can be disputed.

OkieDokie Sir. You've piqued my interest, Again. I'll try for contact in 2-3 days. Appreciate the response. Ron.

The latest from AP. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/jfk-files-release-is-trumps-latest-clash-with-spy-agencies/ar-AAu9j6F?li=BBnbcA1 "late last week Trump received his first official briefing on the release" That's about ridiculous. It's not a subject one can absorb or properly review in less than a week. He probably had no idea who Phillips, Harvey, Joannadies or Morales were. Or what a JMWAVE or Operation Northwoods were.

Oliver Stone's take on all this is important. Without his curiosity about the subject and commitment to it we wouldn't be discussing the subsequent Act of Congress today.

I started out as a psych major. Changed after 2 years on advice of a Professor to seek a better living. No expert but a lot on this thread is nutty as a fruitcake. Sounds like the singing of a mockingbird. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird

Larry, it's been 6-7 years since I read Someone Would Have Talked, revised 2010 edition and about 4 since Nexus. I couldn't remember reference to a third important party on the Harvey - Roselli Florida fishing expedition in the spring of 63. I didn't read every cross reference tonight of them but their was one of "an unknown individual" from Chiacgo flying in to join them on page 93 of SWHT. No index in Nexus... If You, based on your research over 30-40 (?) plus (?) years, in conjunction with other serious and knowledgeable researchers think Morales may have been on that boat then That is significant potentially History revised/expanded, told truthfulluy.

Paul, seems like it's real but not that funny. Serious stuff. If Bush had Not signed the Unanimously approved Congressional Act 25 years ago some of this might have come to light then. Was he covering his own xxx? Is all This bringing That to light now, finally? Reminds me of Jack Nicholson and the MSM. "You can't Handle the Truth". We're all just peons incapable of making knowledgeable decisions if given all true information.

I don't know who Lee Shepherd is but, Bingo. IMHO. The old spook still has enough grip to squeeze a woman who's not his wife's butt cheek but not the sense not to. Seems the CIA takes care of it's own in retirement. Sometimes (see Harvey, Bill and Lee?). Was his daddy's buddy and possibly his mentor Dulles at the Farm on 11/22/63 after being fired by JFK? He (Dulles) was, unusually, in Dallas a little over a month before the execution. Read years ago (Family Secrets?) about Hervert Walkers dalliance with a secretary. A promiscuous POTUS? Oh, my. That could be a security risk. Wadda ya expect now from one who likes to grab em by the p.......

Four different items on the MSN home page relating to the JFK assassination/files at the moment. One of which is a poll, "Should Trump release all the files?" 64% yes. 10 minutes ago it was "How important do you think the files are?" 20 something % very, 40 something somewhat. A few minutes before that it was "Did LHO act alone?" Not this much attention to the subject in the msm in 25 years. I wonder if Tump or the CIA expected such. I wouldn't be surprised to see some sort of backlash to dilute or downplay the issue.

He could sing like a mockingbird couldn't he? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird

Louis is a great source isn't he?

mockingbird stuff

bump

Big Louis Armstrong fan Jason? He had a big connection to the Dallas Radical Right. Which of course organized, directed, managed and controlled, as well as covered up the assassination. They owned the cia, mafia and warren commission, that's how they controlled the cover up. Ya.

I thought he flew out on a transport plane as an unregistered passenger. It would be interesting to see his official travel records for Sept - Oct - Nov 63 and before, if they were released for public perusal in this current farce, unreacted and legible. The CIA had plenty of undocumented funds George, from may sources. Why did Harvey go fishing with Roselli for two days in the late spring of 63 off the coast of Florida?

Larry, your one of my Hero's, a Patriot I believe. Once again you have said what I thought more eloquently and intelligently than I can. Trump didn't have the knowledge, understanding, balls or courage to stand up for the American People he represents in spite of his tough guy drain the swamp image. I misunderstood the law I guess. Once again I'm not a lawyer. I thought it said the files would be released today. I. E. the time to petition for any further withholding expired at midnight Last Night. Here he says "I have no choice". https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/trump-delays-release-of-some-jfk-files/ar-AAu61rm As President, under the law, as stated in the act as originally constructed / construed, did he not have the power to say: You've had 25 years, per the law. I can't accept these Last Second pleas. FREETHEFILES, all of them, with no redactions, per the law. NOW! By Presidential Order in accordance with the law? But that would have required the moral turpitude and courage of JFK, and no president since. Pardon my anger over todays developments to any I've offended. Then again, not. If your not angry your ignorant of the big picture of the situation and it's implications or just don't care.

http://jfkfacts.org/cia-statement-trumps-cover-jfk-records/ "with no document withheld in full". I'm not a lawyer. If "no document" is to be "withheld in full", they can withhold any document in part?

http://jfkfacts.org/jfk-records-act-says-today/ Is not one of the problems that the act had no method of enforcement, no penalties for failure to comply. Funding cut for the CIA? Who's going to jail for non compliance? They're probably standing at the windows at Langley looking toward the capitol wagging their tongues with their thumbs in their ears wiggling their fingers saying nanny nanny boo boo screw you.

I had a thought a couple of years ago that as long as GHWB was still, shall we say in today's terms, patting ladies on the butt, that they wouldn't release some of the documents.

What's the point in keeping something that's illegible secret for 53 years. Defying an act of congress the last 25 to do so?

So it's the night before Christmas? And no lump of coal in our stocking in the morning? He didn't outright say all the files, with no redactions or illegible/blank pages. I await with baited breath.

Thanks for posting this. They talk about Phillips, Veciana and Fonzi, mention Morales along with ZR/RIFLE and even elaborate a little on Operation Mongoose. More than anything I've seen in the msm in the good old USA.

I think Bush signed the act because it passed unanimously. That's pretty much unheard of as Mr. Kelly noted. To have not signed it would have brought unwanted attention to Bush and the CIA he was once director of. With the level of interest at that time, which is why it passed unanimously, people would have wanted to know what reason he had for not signing it. He knew they could still fight, stall, stonewall and delay release of any documents they most wanted to protect.