Jump to content
The Education Forum

Cory Santos

Members
  • Posts

    1,548
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Cory Santos

  1. So he wrote the paper that lead to drug convictions?
  2. So Lance is a life coach now? He wants to help the conspiracy theorists-is he one because of his ufo stories and beliefs? Will someone please give him a ufo award or something?
  3. Every post which you make Lance appears uncivil Lance. So if you took my post as uncivil… well good. You can read. Why should anyone be any other way towards you? Your intentions here seem obvious with your insults to everyone. You are not here to honestly debate it seems. But I find it funny you seem to claim to be this ufo expert-no one I’ve asked knows of you- yet you won’t answer if you are a conspiracy theorist for believing in ufos. Simple question. Lance no likes simple answers me thinks. I find it very laughable you even bring up Mr. Lear’s name. My understanding of your own posts suggest you accept awards you claim you didn’t earn apparently lol. Hey when you accomplish 1/10 of what John Lear did maybe you can cast stones. As for Jim DiEuginio -whom I have disagreed with often but civilly-I do believe some people here have serious jealousy issues as they were not on tv regarding the records release. This helps understand their views. Go ahead Lance have the last word and you can think everyone is impressed by you but for those very few who read your posts are not. If your intentions are not what people think, do better. Don’t insult everyone.
  4. So Lance, have these same people covered up the existence of ufos and/or little green men? Yes or no will do.
  5. But isn’t he a conspiracy theorist for believing in ufos and little green men running around hunting cows and making interesting designs in wheat fields?
  6. Really? I didn’t catch that. Yeah during script discussion I mentioned that but of course all credit to you for your new catchphrase you created. Even better then “fanboy”.
  7. Gee I wonder who said that to you yesterday at lunchtime?
  8. Wait if you do not watch Fox, as you said you do not earlier, how do you know that lying is “commonplace” for Fox? You have no basis. Unless you are only repeating what someone else told you. This destroys any credibility on the issue.
  9. Then I can’t help you. You didn’t comprehend what I wrote.
  10. Wasn’t the point of my post Joe. Feel free to read it again if you need to.
  11. This tells so much history. https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2022/157-10014-10227.pdf
  12. I will leave it at this, all networks try their best I think. Whether liberal or conservative it seems that if someone wants something, such as the release of records as you do Sandy, it seems logical that any help is good help. However you feel differently and seem to only want non-Fox or One America News type news sources. If that is your opinion it is your opinion. You fairly answered my questions. I am sure other fine networks will catch on and add programming on this subject.
  13. Yeah. But you don’t know them either so you really can’t judge if someone is a xxxx solely based on tv performance. So…. https://www.politico.com/amp/story/2019/08/28/trump-lawrence-odonnell-deutsche-bank-1476863
  14. Lol serious zero drink comedy hour now. You believe our government had more than one Oswald running around the world and you make statements like above? Oh geez. Ok.
  15. No, he did not hit it out of the ballpark. Anything a Republican does is for their own good and never for anyone else. Did you not know that? SMH. I am not being serious of course.
  16. So I suppose you like Dan Rather at CBS? No? Oh, ok, you like honesty so probably over at NBC with Brian Williams? I could go on. Your bias is not anti-lie, it is anti-Republican. It is ok to admit it.
  17. No, it is a Republican conspiracy within a conspiracy. Someone wake up Lance, he loves those types of things.
  18. Pages 2-3 basically show that the "no invasion agreement" by the Kennedy administration would prevent recruitment within Cuba to accomplish overthrow. It clearly shows that the Cuba was was in affect stopped and pushed into the shadows by JFK. It mentions, I think the frustration of many with JFK in that it states however, the "higher authority", i.e. JFK, wants "maximum effort" against Castro and eventual overthrow. Can you imagine what they must have thought about JFK and Vietnam? Perhaps along the lines of go win a war but do not engage! That seems a reasonable interpretation. On page 10, I think a very important note is made. Under section 9: Communist Party Operations, it basically states infiltration of pro-Cuba groups was needed. This document is dated November 27, 1962. While it recommends ending of the conventional Mongoose program, clearly, continued efforts were to be made more quietly. Now, consider, LHO meets George De Mohrenschildt in September 1962 and then rents a post office in Dallas in October 1962. Then in the spring of 1963 he allegedly begins his odd activities which will become the basis of the lone nut, i.e., Langsdale, New Orleans, Mexico City, etc. His focus becomes the Fair Play for Cuba Committee. Why? Was his role to infiltrate Cuba for intel per this memo? Why does he shift his focus from the Soviet Union to Cuba? Especially since JFK clearly was keeping a hands off policy. Perhaps. . . perhaps not. But then why did he try to go to Cuba in 1963? When that fails he goes to the Soviet Embassy. I think this document supports Jim's argument about what was happening behind the scenes. Clearly, powerful people, were very upset with the situation and in their views and many others, they were right. This document explains why Cuba seems to drop off the map during the LBJ administration. Either way, anyone who disputes that this document is important does not understand the history and geo-political environment of the 1960s.
  19. Tell us what you really think! No bias there right?
  20. Yeah, I read his memo. Memorandum on Certifications Regarding Disclosure of Information in Certain Records Related to the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy | The White House
  21. Big time YES. Shows they were in direct conflict with JFK’s policy.
×
×
  • Create New...