Cory Santos

Well when you personally know and interview many individuals who were at the BOP and later involved in Florida then you can correct me lol. Your statement clearly indicates the Florida operation stopped. It did not. That was my point. It is regrettable if you meant something else but you were not eloquent enough to prevent multiple interpretations of your statement.

deleted

You are incorrect on a few points there. For example, the Cuban/CIA operation did not “vanish”.

Disgusting Thank you Matthew for noting this.

Fair point.

It would have been more valuable as coming directly from Sen. Cooper and not another party. I understand what you are getting at but it will not quiet a wc person because they will say it is repeated by someone else.

Thanks but what was the actual evidence?

This has to do with the assassination how?

Oh but wait! For you see the JFK records release was seen as a victory for transparency by leader Schumer. So much so that it is a model for future disclosures. Yes, disclosure is a theatre enjoyed by the truly naive when the watchmen decide for you. And people here are worried about misinterpreted anti-RFK political propaganda. Bravo morlocks, bravo. https://www.democrats.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/schumer-rounds-introduce-new-legislation-to-declassify-government-records-related-to-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-and-ufos_modeled-after-jfk-assassination-records-collection-act--as-an-amendment-to-ndaal

Snap. Now give up the lottery numbers.

Perhaps. . . It does seem like an odd coincidence you would say this when this is in the news today. Please share your insider info Matt. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/manchin-potential-third-party-2024-presidential-run-if-i-get-race-im-going-win

Apparently it won’t be unfortunately. The equal effect of the law is more a fallacy when actually it is more often the result of an unequal effect of viewpoint favoritism.

Agreed.

Wow. A bill signed by President George Bush (R) with an intent to bring transparency to the American people which was not fulfilled, but actually, destroyed by Joe Biden (D). Interesting and well played Joe. 👏👏👏 Thank you President Bush for trying.

I cannot speak for him. However, asking him if he knows something is a fact because the Warren Commission says so is no more relevant than asking him his thoughts on the autopsy or shirt evidence. The key is he cannot confirm a rifle was brought into the building. He cannot provide any insight into Oswald’s mindset which establishes he planned to kill a president that day. So asking him about the ownership of the rifle, for example, is pointless.

Your welcome. I’m surprised you thought those points were relevant. Next.

Except asking questions like those which you asked above are pointless.

Thank you Gil. this needs to be read again. This is what I was getting at with DVP above. You put it very nicely though I might not agree to an extent with you on Marina.

It does matter if he ate lunch. If he did, he would most likely have done so on the second floor. Thus confirming her sighting of him. That really hurts the theory he was on the sixth floor waiting for the delayed motorcade.

So let’s go over this. DVP, you find Frazier credible as your basis for Oswald not eating lunch on 11-22. Even though Fraziers testimony is clear he was not with Oswald throughout the morning, specifically at noon-when the employees took their brakes for lunch. Frazier testified he saw him once earlier that day working on the sixth floor. That’s it. So Frazier saying he did not bring a lunch DOES NOT prove Oswald did not eat lunch. So you have ZERO evidence Oswald did not eat lunch that day. Just speculation. As to our witness, Ms. Arnold, who said she saw him eating, without getting into the particulars of her statements and the issues with what she was asked etc., Fraziers testimony supports her version. Frazier testified that 1) he (Frazier) usually ate with the guys on the first floor 12 -12:45 a.m. 2). He testified he never saw Oswald eat lunch or ate w him. 3) He did not know where Oswald kept his lunch. Thus it is safe to conclude based on Frazier’s testimony that Oswald did not eat lunch from 12-1245 on the first floor usually. Otherwise Frazier would have answered these points differently. This lends credence to Arnold’s testimony seeing him on 2nd floor eating around 12:15. Oswald in fact did most likely, based on Fraziers testimony, eat alone on the second floor where Baker spotted him drinking a soda after the assassination. See, my points are based on facts. Fraziers testimony lends credibility to Arnold’s version which is supported by Baker seeing him where she said she saw him earlier. The problem is you ignore inconvenient testimony like Frazier saying where the shots came from, but choose to selectively enjoy other misinterpreted points. For example, the bag Oswald brought in. Frazier clearly was badgered but stuck to his opinion on the length and width of the package and identification of it. It wasn’t the same package. Also, why did he not see Oswald leave the building? He was right there for several minutes? To address your ludicrous theory regarding the shots, please explain the science behind your opinion that a person who is standing underneath a window a few floors up, thinks the loud -many witnesses claimed the first shot was loud- came from a different area other than over his/her head? That really is ludicrous and you have no science showing that the acoustics in Dealey would have fooled someone underneath the sixth floor shooting a loud rifle. Just admit it. Frazier correctly identified the area where the shots came from and that is why questioning about that was cutoff so quick. Admit you have no evidence Oswald did not eat lunch that day.

On what evidence are you basing your opinion that Oswald did not have lunch before the assassination on 11-22. I am not asking for your speculation. What facts are you basing your opinion on.

Based on what?

So is it your opinion Oswald did not eat lunch prior to 12:30 on 11-22?

Then he could be incorrect about other things too then. Certainly, you agree with that right?

You did not respond about Frazier saying the shots came from the underpass.