Bill Brown

"They told Acquilla Clemons to keep her mouth shut about seeing two men involved in the shooting." Clemons doesn't say she saw two men involved in the shooting. She makes no mention of the two men being associates.

Craig obviously has zero credibility.

Yep. But, he still told me what he told me.

I've talked to Roy Milton Jones, Jr. (the teen on the bus) and he told me that when he saw Oswald's face on the news that night, he recognized him as being on that bus.

Ghost written? No. The book is very clearly written by McMillan and makes no bones about it.

Cincy? There goes the neighborhood.

Rose (and others) were fooled by Harris. That didn't make them dirty or the type who would "cook up fake evidence" against a suspect. Rose didn't "cook up fake evidence" against Adams. I think you're confusing prosecutorial misconduct (which certainly existed in this case) with a certain homicide detective being the type who would commit the same type of misconduct. Adams should have been allowed to sue the county because of Mulder's (the Prosecutor) misconduct during the trial but that is not to say that Rose "cooked up fake evidence". Once you accept that Rose did not "cook up fake evidence" against Adams, then you realize that none of this relates to the Kennedy assassination since Mulder was not around in 1963.

Not necessarily. Wrong? Yes. Dirty? How so?

"These ten points deliver a conclusion that what was in Oswald's paper bag from Irving that morning was, as he said to his interrogators, his lunch, full stop." Carried tucked up underneath his arm pit?

It's threads like this one which diminish the quality of this forum. It is well-known that Frazier served in the Army and the article linked above hasn't "brought to light" this information, even back in 2008 when the article was published. His time in the service came after the events of 11/22/63. Secondly, Frazier testified during the Shaw trial and mention is made of his time in the Army. He was asked to give the length of his rifle in terms of feet and inches and even though he broke that weapon down many times while in the service, he severely underestimated.

Whaddya say, David. You up for it? 😆

The only reason you know Humes burned his autopsy notes is because he told you so. Kinda silly for him to disclose if there was anything nefarious going on.

"...although Bill Brown has objected to me that the Callaway/gunman exchange occurred too far south on Patton for Acquilla Clemons to have seen it." No. You're misrepresenting what I did say. I said the exchange between Callaway and the fleeing killer took place too far down Patton (three-fourths of the way to Jefferson, from Tenth) for it to be the exchange described by Clemons, who said the exchange took place on Tenth.

"Most of the naysayer Nimrods here couldn't tie his shoes let alone debate or discuss the details of the case with him." "DEWEY DEFEATS TRUMAN"

You have np idea what you're talking about (again). Someone was keying the mic for about ninety seconds before Bowley made his report. You'd rather run away than learn something.

"up 10th (original affidavit)" What she actually said was "ran west on E. 10th across Patton". She didn't say "up 10th". "up Patton (WC testimony)" Which is exactly the same route taken by the killer which the other witnesses described. This does not automatically exclude what she said in her original affidavit: "ran west on E. 10th across Patton". "down the alley (based first on the crime scene sketch & later on recorded interviews)" Markham's son (James) was friends with Jimmy Burt and Bill Smith. No doubt, James Markham heard Burt and Smith's version of seeing the killer in the alley almost down to the next block. It is not that far fetched an idea that Helen heard from her son James that the killer was seen in the alley.

"Benavides was not at the scene at the time of the murder." Then who was keying the patrol car radio mic for about ninety seconds before Bowley got on?

No. Jimmy Burt said he saw the killer in the alley almost down to the next block (behind the Texaco station). Burt did not say he saw the killer flee the shooting scene via the alley. Helen Markham testified that she saw the killer flee to the corner of Tenth and Patton, south on Patton and then cross Patton over to the west side of the street. That was the last she saw of him because she then went over to Tippit.

"I know that Dale Myers says that Harold Russell was Sgt. Hill's witness in the car with him at 1:26, but Russell did not attend a lineup, and he was further away from the suspect when he saw him than was Scoggins. Russell is a possibility, but still less likely than Scoggins. Or for that matter the interchangeable Callaway!" No. The witness in the patrol car with Hill was indeed Harold Russell. This comes from Russell himself in a February 1964 interview with the FBI.

On film.... Reporter: "Were you in the building at the time?" Oswald: "Naturally, if I work in that building, yes sir." Oswald admits, on film, that he was inside the building at the time of the shooting. Therefore, Oswald was not out by the front steps. If Oswald was not out by the front steps, then he is not prayer man. If Oswald is not prayer man, then who cares who prayer man was.

Of course the 2nd floor lunchroom encounter occurred... Mr. BELIN. What did you see? Mr. TRULY. I saw the officer almost directly in the doorway of the lunch-room facing Lee Harvey Oswald. Mr. BELIN. And where was Lee Harvey Oswald at the time you saw him? Mr. TRULY. He was at the front of the lunchroom, not very far inside he was just inside the lunchroom door.

Nice post, Pat. But, you claimed Oswald had an alibi. I say he had no such thing. What exactly is Oswald's alibi?

"...it didn't do Sirhan any good." Sirhan admitted, in a televised interview, that he shot Bobby Kennedy and even explained his motive, in detail.

"At this point I'm bowing out." Good idea.

Again, this is real simple. You said that Benavides said the hair squared off ABOVE the collar. But, Benavides never said that. This matters. The argument could be made that the straight-edge collar caused the collar line (the hair) to give the appearance of being squared off. That argument could not be made if Benavides had actually used the word ABOVE. Just stop misquoting witnesses.