Jason Ward Posted August 21, 2017 Author Share Posted August 21, 2017 An interesting proponent of releasing the assassination files early: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Clark Posted August 21, 2017 Share Posted August 21, 2017 17 minutes ago, Jason Ward said: An interesting proponent of releasing the assassination files early: Where did you get that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Ward Posted August 22, 2017 Author Share Posted August 22, 2017 (edited) 33 minutes ago, Michael Clark said: Where did you get that? this collection: https://archive.org/details/edwinwalkercollection . . . search within collection for 'lamar' as in Congressman Lamar Smith https://archive.org/details/edwinwalkercollection?&and[]=lamar Jason Edited August 22, 2017 by Jason Ward Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Trejo Posted August 22, 2017 Share Posted August 22, 2017 3 hours ago, Jason Ward said: An interesting proponent of releasing the assassination files early:.. <snip> Jason, Ex-General Walker, IMHO, was proud of his role in the JFK assassination, and did not fear being exposed about it. He truly believed he did the right thing, and that JFK was in cahoots with Khrushchev and Castro. Walker was, after all, a dedicated JBS member. IMHO, General Walker was behind every single leak of his name to the newspapers with regard to JFK and Oswald. The German newspaper, the DMN, the National Enquirer, all of it. Walker was the leaker, because he wanted to be known. He wanted the credit. (His accomplices, however, would waste anybody who talked too much.) Also, General Walker was always paranoid about the "second shooter" who tried to kill him on April 10, 1963. He was sure there was a second shooter, and that the second shooter was still at large, and was still gunning for him. This was first exposed in volume 1 of the WC volumes, in the testimony of Marina Oswald's business manager, James Herbert Martin. Walker sent an envoy to talk to Marina Oswald about it. Regards, --Paul Trejo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Trejo Posted August 22, 2017 Share Posted August 22, 2017 (edited) 19 hours ago, Michael Clark said: Jason, Harry Dean regards Paul Trejo as a crook, a thief and a xxxx. I have personally inquired of Harry Dean on a particular question, and his answer was as as straight-forward and clear as one can hope for; and that answer jibed, technically and legally, with historical suppositions. Paul Trejo is not held, in any manner, with respect by Harry Dean. In fact, it is because of Paul Trejo's crooked, false, inaccurate and self-serving use of Harry Dean's story that Harry's story is held to such difficult scrutiny. I am an admirer of Harry's occasional recollections and poetry on this forum. I feel bad that he, and we, have to suffer the presence, on this forum, of Paul Trejo. Michael, The only dispute that Harry Dean and I ever shared was over his naming of the LDS as a part of the JFK conspiracy. I dispute that to this very day. Other than that, I accept everything that Harry Dean has ever told to me personally, and over years of sharing friendly email. It was Harry Dean who introduced me to Dr. Jeff Caufield. I sincerely doubt, Michael, that you ever spoke with Harry Dean. I'd like to hear Harry Dean HIMSELF repeat what you claim he said -- if you don't mind. Regards, --Paul Trejo Edited August 22, 2017 by Paul Trejo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry J.Dean Posted August 22, 2017 Share Posted August 22, 2017 It was an answer to Mike re; FPCC asking if I knew a federal agent, I think his last name was North? when I was an officer of Chicago FPCC. My answer was that agent was no doubt working against FPCC in Latin american and Canada efforts to destroy FPCC, and that agent was not known to me. This was a post under FPCC on E. Forum recently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Brancato Posted August 22, 2017 Share Posted August 22, 2017 Harry - address the question please. Is Michael Clark correct when he asserts that you called Paul Trejo a crook, a thief, and a xxxx? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry J.Dean Posted August 22, 2017 Share Posted August 22, 2017 NO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry J.Dean Posted August 22, 2017 Share Posted August 22, 2017 Just now, Harry J.Dean said: NO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry J.Dean Posted August 22, 2017 Share Posted August 22, 2017 Re; above post. Correction details. Just found the post in question. It appeared on E Forum 27 July, under title Principle Of Reversal, and agent mentioned by Mike was McCord. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Brancato Posted August 22, 2017 Share Posted August 22, 2017 Harry - did you talk with forum member Michael Clark? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry J.Dean Posted August 22, 2017 Share Posted August 22, 2017 Paul B, Just as described via post above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Trejo Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 15 hours ago, Paul Brancato said: Harry - address the question please. Is Michael Clark correct when he asserts that you called Paul Trejo a crook, a thief, and a xxxx? Paul B., You just saw Harry Dean reply NO! to your question. Do you really need more? Regards, --Paul Trejo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Brancato Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 (edited) Me? No. I then queried him about whether he talked with Michael Clark. His answer was not understood so I asked again. I guess his answer is that the only communication he had with him was on a previous thread. Is it not obvious to you that I asked him these questions because I found Michael's statement questionable? He didn't say definitively 'no' until I repeated the question. I proceeded from there because I wanted an answer on the record as to whether he ever communicated with Michael Clark. Edited August 23, 2017 by Paul Brancato Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Clark Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 22 hours ago, Paul Brancato said: Harry - did you talk with forum member Michael Clark? I brought off-forum talk to the forum. I should not have done that. My direct question to Harry, was on a forum post. The fact that we will not name names, here, is a testament of the fear that endures. I have been scolded appropriately. Paul Trejo's use of the death notice, the RIP thread, of a highly-regarded forum member (BM) to further his Walker bunkumemt, will continue to drive me to a contempt for him. Sorry, I Can't let that go. Paul never apologized. He is a Bot. Paul Trejo is a loud incessant, prevaricating bot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now