Jump to content
The Education Forum

Attorney's file on Roger Stone, LaRouche and Russia influencing the 2016 presidential election

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The traitor-in-chief encouraged Russian interference in our election.

I protest against the USA interfering in other countries' elections so I'm sure as hell gonna protest when it happens to us.

Twitterbots: Anatomy of a Propaganda Campaign

Internet Research Agency archive reveals a vast, coordinated campaign that was incredibly successful at pushing out and amplifying its messages.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

As suggested some weeks ago, Roger Stone's legal team's efforts to establish the source of the concept that the DNC was "hacked" rather than "leaked" has resulted in a more complete picture. As suspected, the sole attribution and the sole investigation was conducted by the DNC's own security agency - Crowdstrike. Further to this, Crowdstrike's own investigation never produced a finalized report, and the government received only a redacted draft. It therefore appears that the entire concept of a Russian hack, which the US government claims as "established fact", relies entirely on a redacted draft by a private company hired by the DNC.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeff, it just occurred to me, are you related to Roger? You are definitely the forum's foremost Roger Stone legal expert. Or maybe you're just attracted to his image and personality?

It looks like the rest of your life will be dedicated to exonerating Russia. I know it's just inconceivable that they would resort to such things other than, as you say  a little novice dabbling in Facebook, right?

It's not the heroes in the white hats, villains in the back hats world that you want so much to believe.

Of course the Russians screw with us and we screw with them . Are you really that naive?

Figure it out, it's easy,  it's cheap and it can be done with impunity. What fool country wouldn't do it?

It's called life in the big leagues and I think there are millions of even Canadians who are worldly enough to understand that, even if you don't.


Edited by Kirk Gallaway
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

The revelation that the sole evidence held by federal prosecutor's regarding the alleged GRU "hack" of the DNC was a redacted draft "report" by the DNC's own private security firm has now been joined by the revelation that no actual evidence exists to tie the Internet Research Agency to the Russian government, and a federal judge has ordered that public statements asserting such ties should be stopped. The IRA was a clickbait firm, and the idea that it was a Kremlin-led psyop program designed to "sow discord" in the US electorate was always ridiculous nonsense.

The entire "Russiagate" concept has been shown to be without foundation. As was predicted long ago by those journalists and researchers who actually looked at the details.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jeff Carter said:

a federal judge has ordered that public statements asserting such ties should be stopped.

A Trump appointee.  He's stacked the court with die-hard loyalists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

'This wasn’t just a briefing’: Pompeo grilled CIA analysts on Russia findings

The DOJ is now reviewing those same findings after Mike Pompeo found no wrongdoing in how the agency concluded Russia wanted to help Trump in 2016.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Once again President Donald Trump shows his willingness to fight the "Deep State" aka "British Empire. President Trump has declassified the name of one of the suspected Saudi conspirators. There s a on going lawsuit by survivor victims and victims families against the Saudi Government. British agent Barrack Obama vetoe'd the bill allowing the 911 victim's to sue but congress nullified the veto.


WASHINGTON — The Trump administration decided Thursday to declassify a key name long sought by relatives of 9/11 victims who are suing Saudi Arabia over allegations of that country's involvement, but declined to release the name publicly.

The name of the individual, which the 9/11 families believe may support their allegation of Saudi involvement in the terror attacks, will be disclosed to the plaintiff's lawyers under a protective order. The order makes it illegal for those attorneys to release the name to the public, meaning the identity of the individual will remain a secret — at least for now.

The decision by the FBI and the Justice Department was a partial victory for the 9/11 families, who have been fighting in court to compel the Trump administration to hand over the name. Terry Strada, who chairs the group 9/11 Families & Survivors United for Justice Against Terrorism, called it "a good result."

“The families are dedicated to getting to the truth, and we shouldn't have to beg for this sort of basic information, or be kept in the dark, about the Saudi role in the attacks," Strada said in a statement.

Still, the administration did not declassify other documents the 9/11 families have sought as part of their lawsuit, although the FBI said more documents could be produced in the future.

The FBI pointed out that the name of the individual had been the families' top priority, calling it "the primary piece of information that the plaintiffs in the 9/11 litigation have been seeking."

The Saudi Embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The White House, which earlier referred all questions about the matter to the Justice Department, also did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The long-awaited decision involved whether to disclose the name of a person who allegedly directed two men in California who assisted hijackers in the 9/11 attacks. The 9/11 families and their lawyers believe the person may be a Saudi official, but the name was redacted when a 2012 summary of the FBI's inquiry into the matter was previously released.

But the decision pitted President Donald Trump's efforts to show he's seeking justice for 9/11 victims against his desire to maintain close ties with Saudi Arabia, already strained in the wake of the killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi by Saudi agents last year. Trump has worked to preserve the relationship with the Saudis despite widespread criticism in Congress of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman's leadership.

Lawyers for the 9/11 families have sought to get the unredacted version released by the FBI, and a deadline for the Justice Department to decide whether to release was delayed several times at the government's request, most recently until Thursday.

In the end, the Justice Department declined to invoke the "state secrets" privilege, a provision in U.S. law that allows the government to refuse to release information in lawsuits that could undermine national security. The FBI said in a statement that the decision was made "in light of the extraordinary circumstances of this particular case."

"The Attorney General has decided not to assert the State Secrets privilege over that name," the FBI said.

Advocates for the 9/11 families were given some reason for optimism this week when Jim Kreindler, a prominent attorney representing some of the 9/11 families, was a guest of the White House at a ceremony at the Pentagon marking the anniversary of the attacks, several people familiar with his attendance tell NBC News.

White House officials have previously maintained that the decision about how to handle the legal matter rests with Attorney General William Barr. But the significant implications for the U.S. relationship with close partner Saudi Arabia, combined with Trump's past record of seeking to influence Justice Department decisions, has raised speculation that he might get more personally involved.

Although 15 of the 19 attackers in the 9/11 attacks were Saudi citizens and mastermind Osama bin Laden was born there, Saudi Arabia's government has long denied involvement in 9/11. The 9/11 Commission that investigated the attacks found it likely that Saudi government-funded charities did fund the attacks but did not find evidence that the government or senior Saudi officials were involved.

The lawsuit against Saudi Arabia was enabled by a 2016 law called the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act that allowed for a civil suit against a foreign state if it supports international terrorism against Americans or their property. Former President Barack Obama vetoed the law, warning it could create a precedent for the U.S. or its officials to be sued in foreign courts, but Congress voted to override his veto.

Edited by Jim Harwood
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in

Sign In Now

  • Create New...