Jump to content
The Education Forum

Nic Martin

Members
  • Posts

    292
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Nic Martin

  1. Thanks. ;) Yeah, he doesn't sound very credible, but has anyone ever been able to prove for sure that he did or didn't live with Ferrie? It'd be an interesting look at Ferrie's character, even if all of his stories about the assassination are indeed just stories.

  2. I remember reading that Raymond Broshears shared an apartment with Ferrie in 1965, and remembered talking to Clay Shaw with Ferrie present several times. In August 1968, Broshears said on a Los Angeles tv program that Ferrie admitted to be involved with JFK's death, and that the actual assassins crashed off the coast of Corpus Christi and were killed. He also claims Ferrie told him that "no matter what," Ferrie would never kill himself.

    What evidence is there against him and these claims?

  3. it seems to be difficult to engage in serious discourse on many issues in this forum, invariably some chest-thumping has to be put up with. I don't know anything about this dispute between Craig and David,presumably there is some history there.

    I can sympathise with with Craig if he has promised in the past a "seamless DPlaza film sequence" and not yet delivered. In my own experience which started on that sort of issue about 4 months ago, getting the technique right to the point of feeling reasonably satisfied with the results took me about two months daily work , sometimes up to 16 hours a day. Fortunately I have had that sort of time available, and will again in the future. Many people would not. I'd certainly encourage others to work on such things, though apparently it's not something that many are interested in doing. Perhaps a bit less bickering would help in getting people to feel it is a worthwhile thing?

    As far as looking to set up 'camps' or 'groupings' I'd suggest that such things might not be a healthy thing, one invariably risks getting involved in some sort of compromise. The cronyism that form part of the ethos of 'special interest' groups, that close rank and devalue truth seeking is part of the whole problem that this forum has to now deal with. I believe that sort of herd mentality is generally not engaged in by serious researchers. Those who DO regard sharing of thoughts and research material as a wortwhile thing fortunately will continue to do so.

    I suspect that many who do take these issues seriously would be more likely to engage in discussion if they felt that they would not risk getting involved in some petty disputes. However, as these disputes seem to be par for the course here, a little time and reading past the sillyness generally enables one to stay on track.

    It would be nice to continue to have responses to the posts on the backyard photo's.

    I don't get any of it either, you'd think grown men & women could have a civil discussion without fighting like alley cats. The vast majority of this community has a severe flair for histrionics.

    The backyard photos, if real, mean that Oswald did own the rifle supposedly used to kill JFK, and the gun used to kill Tippit. It also implicated him as a Communist, as he was holding Communist literature.

  4. The gutter shot theory again? Well, have you ever looked into a storm drain? It's not very wide. Can you imagine getting someone in a firing stance in that teensy little space and still have them be able to concentrate enough on the task at hand? Even if JFK could be seen, like Ron Ecker said - JFK was dead by that point anyway.

  5. I know, though, that Mr. Dankbaar really doesn't like me. Maybe he doesn't like being challenged by a teenager, or maybe he just dislikes that I believe respect should be earned ( so him being my elder doesn't automatically mean I'm going to pucker up to his rear ). Maybe he dislikes that I don't believe Files. Hell, I don't believe Judyth Baker either, and Nancy's never been rude to me.

    I don´t want you to change your opinion, but I´m curious to hear why you don´t believe what Files have said.

    Mark

    Mark, you need to read (if you already hav'nt) the many debates that have already been had on this forum, concerning Mr Files. Its not that people dont want to debate this subject with you but, I suspect, many dont want to "Rehash" arguements long dormant. If you go to the forum index, you can easily find the relevant threads.

    Regards, Steve.

    That's what I was trying to say, thanks for getting it across in the words I couldn't find. :]

  6. Nic

    I must confess that when I started to read about Files I wasn´t sure if he was telling the truth. It was to good to me true. Soo you had to sceptical. But the more I study it the more convinced I bacame.

    Don´t debunk it at once. Read about him and watch the interviews with him. If you don´t belive him, that´s okey with me. But you just can´t let go of something that you believe in.

    Hopefully one day we all have the proof of what happened in Dallas. Some investergators will get disappointed  because their belief was wrong and some investergators will be happy because their belief was correct. Maybe one day I will be sad because my belief was wrong but I´m also gonna be happy for that person who had the right belief.

    Mark

    I HAVE read about him, and watched the interviews with him. His body language implies he was lying, and there's not a single fact he can give that can't be easily debunked. I don't read one sentence and stamp "xxxx" across the person's forehead. I like knowing what I need to prove DIDN'T happen when I'm thinking, "Sigh, this person's just another sad conman."

    Look, I can't force you to "see the light" as it were, but not many people are going to take you seriously if all you contribute is the same Files garbage Wim pushed here before he either got kicked off or left. If you actually find a piece of evidence that can't be dismissed, something new, something you found on your own, maybe people will be easier on you. However, we've heard all this before, and rehashing it gets kind of pointless after a while. I'm really NOT trying to be mean here, I just want to warn you, that the majority of people here, aren't going to side with you on this theory short of video footage with Files narrating firing shots at JFK that synchs up perfectly with the Zapruder film.

  7. Hi Mark,

    First and Foremost...welcome aboard, your spelling is great dont worry about it..

    As for Files and his story, simply wash your hands and forget about it, its a lie..

    Ryan,

    Why should I forget about it? I don´t believe it´s a lie. To me Files is credible.

    Mark

    I thought the possibility of Files being credible was out there, too, when I first started researching it. After all, why would someone confess to something they didn't do? However, there is no dead-on evidence proving, or even SUGGESTING, any of Files' story is true.

    Saying you shot JFK is a surefire way to get lots of press, lots of attention, and no risk of jail time because the evidence is buried knee-deep under rumors, lies, twisted facts, and debunked theories that keep getting pulled back to the surface by new researchers that only know what Dankbaar tells them.

    I know, though, that Mr. Dankbaar really doesn't like me. Maybe he doesn't like being challenged by a teenager, or maybe he just dislikes that I believe respect should be earned ( so him being my elder doesn't automatically mean I'm going to pucker up to his rear ). Maybe he dislikes that I don't believe Files. Hell, I don't believe Judyth Baker either, and Nancy's never been rude to me.

    The Files & Baker theories are like the theory that Greer shot JFK. It's believed by a few, but most researchers here have discredited it.

  8. Oswald was considered intelligent in school, so I find it hard to believe he'd just commit to something without any idea on what it meant. He cared enough about it to move to Russia, why would he easily confuse two completely different viewpoints just to seem more, I don't know, defiant of the American standards?

    I'd expect that from today's thirteen year olds, not from someone of his age, that was considered intelligent.

  9. I don't want to sound rude, so please don't take it that way, but the Files theory is relatively ignored by most researchers now. Contradicting statements & lack of evidence, things like that.

    Maybe he was telling the truth, though. I guess nobody except Files really knows. He could be lying, but believe he's telling the truth.

  10. Is there any reason to believe there was a possible shot from behind Zapruder in the pergola? The openings were wide enough, enough cover for a potential diversion or actual shot. Has anyone ever taken a picture through the openings to see if JFK riding in the car could have been seen from that angle?

  11. If a guy was on a bathroom break when he was supposed to be keeping tabs on LHO pre-11-22, the CIA wouldn't release it because it's damning.

    Posner, McAdams, etc - are simply trying to gain credibility with wishy-washy people that haven't spent but a handful of hours looking into this case. If they look like they didn't go into research with an agenda, it equals more sales from Johnny WorkingMan & Mary Housewife because it looks like they did the job they were supposed to do. Sales equal money, and we all know how greedy this country is.

    George Joannides is DEFINITELY worth looking into, and it's a shame the government has their filthy little signatures on all the pages to block the spread of information. The NARA search shows only 12 documents relating to him but the first 4 are all HSCA business.

  12. Hi Nic,

    Hows it going. I corresponded with Harrelson for a while in early 2004. He is indeed in Colorado maximum penitentiary along with the shoe bomber Richard Reid.

    He tells me that only family members and his legal team are allowed to see him in prison, nobody else. the men who killed kennedy interview with him was done before he tried to escape and was transfered.

    As his likeliness of being a conspirator is...the debate is still going on in my mind. I talked with a man who knew him quite well, the officer that arrested him, Jack Dean, he told me that Harrelson had a con mans personality and that if you met him you would like him but that he would and did kill for money.

    Check out my Harrleson page at http://www.thepresidenthasbeenshot.4t.com , on the harrelson photos page are photos of Harrelson from high school.

    Im still looking into harrelson, but more so Chauncey Holt, as if he is telling the truth then Harrelson is implicated.

    John

    Alright, thanks for the information. :]

    I'm not sure if he was involved or not, but at this point in time, very VERY few people can be completely ruled out in my mind. It's been 42 years, and we still don't know as much as we should. To quote a horror movie, "EVERYBODY'S A SUSPECT!" This case is like a giant jigsaw puzzle. You get a nice cluster of evidence & testimony to fit, and then you pick up one piece from outside your group, and it doesn't fit anywhere.

    Anyone that's ever testified to being involved or knowing who was involved, has to be seen with some degree of speculation as to their motives, because claiming to be involved in the assasination of JFK is a dead-on way to get your name all over the internet, in countless books, and on the minds of several thousand people. It's like instant fame, and there's so many pieces of evidence that not many of these people can be proved as a xxxx beyond the benefit of a doubt.

  13. Haven't posted here in what seems like forever, haven't had much to say.. But I was driving past the Huntsville prison where Harrelson is currently serving time, and began to wonder.

    Is he completely worthless as far as a possible interview goes? I don't know of any local regulations that'd prohibit me from visiting him after my 18th birthday ( 22 days, woo ), unless they've slammed on some annoying family-only issue under my nose.. So, is it a waste of time? False lead?

    Just curious on everyone's opinions..

  14. I hadn't heard much detail about this before and had previously just disregarded it as rumor, but it sure looks interesting.

    GEE, I sure WONDER why this wasn't investigated in the ALL-KNOWING Warren Report? A Secret Service man dies on the same day as the President and it's not worth going into detail over? Please.

  15. I don't think Ruth Paine was near as into it as several researches do - I've spent most of my research time lately reading over her testimonies and comments, and she says she was outside talking to her neighbor when her other neighbor came over and they were talking about LHO's difficulty finding work, and this 2nd neighbor said he heard the TSBD had been hiring, so she called up the TSBD and checked with Roy Truly to see if they were hiring, and if she could get LHO the interview.

    So, as much has been made of her getting him the job, it doesn't seem a bit sinister to me.

  16. My grandmother told me she remembers watching television on 11-21 and looking at Lady Bird and commenting to my grandfather, "She'd do just about anything to be First Lady."

    It's simply amusing that Lady Bird has no problem placing the blame on LHO's name ( even though he was never proven guilty ), yet whines when the same is done to her husband ( claiming that it's unfair to label him as he was never proven guilty ). It's almost like she's scared for her title to be stripped away.

×
×
  • Create New...