Jump to content
The Education Forum

Michael Crane

Members
  • Posts

    1,301
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Michael Crane

  1. I would expect that if this flap is real....do you really think that it would be black on the inside? I was able to blow up the death stare picture real big,but it was too big of a file the site told me.
  2. I was just able to see one of the withheld documents & this is what it looked like.
  3. My take? No president is going to open up the records.If RFK.Jr decides to open them up....they will be bullsh*t documents,but I can see the CIA or Secret Service saying that the documents are now "missing" Other presidents besides Kennedy's will be persuaded by "others" to keep them sealed. What can you do if the documents are stolen or missing? complain and that's probably it.
  4. Everywhere you turn around,something had to be altered,stolen,mishandled,withheld,replaced,omitted,falsified,added or even killed. The cover-up team had to be shitting their pants with all of the stuff they ended up having to do to.
  5. We interupt this broadcast to bring you the following report.... No bullets or fragments were discovered on the x-rays at autopsy. The x-rays were taken at a minimum of 3 times. However...James Jenkins says that bullet & bone fragments were brought into the morgue later in the evening ( a total of less than 2 whole bullets) < ----- Dennis David. This concludes this test of the Emergency Broadcast System.
  6. If push comes to shove....can the next president reverse this order?
  7. So glad to hear that. I sincerely enjoy being able to communicate with elite researchers such as yourself.All this time,I thought that the evil forces had gotten to you Gary Mack style.That you were denying a low or EOP back of the head wound. Hip,hip hooray!
  8. Hello Joe, I think it's safe to say that everybody on the forum has seen the Zapruder film. Here is my take (Jim Rome style) The Zapruder film has been tampered with.There are plenty of still frames that appear to show a "side of the head blowout" What the plotters have done is "combined" a frontal shot along with the rear shot making it appear as 1 shot. The head spray lasts longer than one frame as stated by Dino Brugioni ( who also states 6 or more shots) *Is the flap even real? I'm not convinced one way or the other.
  9. So Pat, Do you believe that there was this amount of damage done by one bullet that entered from behind? Or was it something closer to this?
  10. Pat, There has to be a massive size hole in the head to be able to remove the brain. Once again,in my opinion,this diagram if true,represents the condition of the head after the brain has been removed. I still say that pictures were taken all during and maybe even some after the autopsy (Spencer) Hell,there was probably some X-rays that were taken late or after the autopsy also.
  11. What I'm saying is that circle does not represent the actual wound.It is merely a entrance point IMHO. I remember reading over & over about a bullet entrance at about a location that is "slightly above and to the right of the EOP" So over there in that general vicinity.
  12. I don't know how much manipulation Robert put into this. His clay illustration of JFK's head with the top & side damage I believe was taken during the autopsy.
  13. Entry location and not entry wound in my judgement. The frontal shot obliterated alot (not all) of damage/trajectory/path to the rear of the head. Just my $.02 cents which doesn't buy alot.
  14. This is my idea of cherry picking to suit my own belief 😉 I don't think it was this low 😞
  15. Shoot, I don't know about today,but when my interest in the assassination started...I thought that the Mob killed Kennedy.It's been so long,that I can't even remember what year my thoughts changed.
  16. I don't think that I have ever commented on the Prayer Man threads,except to say how tall the height is at the top of the door. But seeing this picture right here,suggests to me that the man is too heavy to be Oswald. Just my .02 cents. I will see my way out now.
  17. Pat, I think it would be foolish to say that there was not any top of the head damage.But,I don't think it would be foolish to say that there was no top of the head damage at Parkland Hospital.
  18. Ah,the good ol' backtracked story. I hate when that happens. Especially that witness that got shot in the head that said he couldn't identify Oswald.
  19. I'll try, In your 1st post you said... "Bethesda DR. Commander Humes said he didn't know why he nor anyone else didn't weigh JFK's brain upon his removal of it in his autopsy procedure. A procedure so standard in autopsies of criminal action head wound victims it is ludicrous that such an arrogantly confident man like Humes could have missed this top priority criminal case evidence procedure just by forgetfulness." Although from the sound of things,Humes was in charge of the autopsy,but he did not have a part in dissecting & weighing the organs.Jenkins makes it sound like Humes was working more on the head with Finck. Jenkins clearly states that SOP were not done on JFK.Boswell didn't measure the weight of the brain before he handed it over to Jenkins to finish it up. In other words...Humes only had a part in removing the brain before he gave it to Boswell.From there...it was in Boswell's court? That's the way I take it.
  20. The only thing that I can add is,that it was Boswell who was responsible for weighing the brain. On this occasion,instead of Jenkins doing the work on the organs & Boswell writing down weights & measurements,it was the complete opposite.
×
×
  • Create New...