Michael Crane

My name under Mike Crane was "The ugly" Mike Crane My name under Michael Crane was Michael "The toweler" Crane

Wow! I am simply amazed & overwhelmed of the amount of knowledge & resources that this forum provides.You people are incredible! Nothing short of awesome IMO.

Where`s James Richards? He could probably post a picture of my son & I at Disneyland. ;-)

I was just wondering if anyone who has the resources has had time to check and see who the registered owner was? Texas 711 TQC

Looks like it "might" say "Cross Country" in the back & "might" say "Custom" on the side. *Don`t hold me to this.

I`m sorry Jack,the only difference I can see in the 1st pic is what is directly in front of the man on the far left ...sorry.

I couldn`t help but notice that your letter was dated May 7th 1993.Although I`m having some difficulty trying to read his response,I would think that it was possible by this time that Dr. Perry might have chosen to not give you an honest answer because,it could possibly have meant the shortness of life.

"Scientifically sir,it is impossible for this wound to have not entered from behind or to have not exited from behind" *or something to that effect Dr. Humes Warren Commission Testimony

I remember reading this book a long time ago,and I can`t remember it having anything to do with JFK`s son.I could be wrong,but don`t think so.

I attempted to view your work,but was unable to.I got an error message on both lnks. HTTP Error 404

Just wanted to say that I was buying a Valentines Day gift and just got a chance to see your post,and wanted to thank you sincerely. Michael Crane

Bernice, I can`t thank you enough for taking the time trying to verify my statement.I have edited this post because of my reading comprehension.I just noticed that it wasn`t Mr. Robinson`s statements that I was reading but somebody else`s notes.I do believe that I might not be that far off on my position about the wax. Once again thank you for contributing your time in this matter. Michael Crane.

I am referencing a bullet "entrance" in the temple area where the hairline meets. Take a look at page 84 in Robert Groden`s "The Killing of a President" (paper back) for better reference.The circular type hole that looks to be blown out on the top half. *Of course we are talking about the right side.

Thomas, With no disrespect intended,do you still believe that JFK was not "hit" in the side of the head (temple area) a wound I believe the mortician said he covered up with wax? * I could be wrong about the mortician saying that,but I did read somewhere that it was covered up with wax. ** BTW I hate rabbit holes.

It`s probably old news to most of the prestigious researchers that this forum has onboard but,it was "new" to me & hopefully news that the forum can benefit from knowing about. http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20071218/index.htm

Oswalds Shadow I just wanted to ask if anybody knows what time this comes on the West Coast? (PST)

Bernice, I must say that is by far,the best image I have ever seen regarding the condition of the head at the time of the shooting (specifically the back of the head) and now I can honestly say that,I am no longer convinced that there was something sinister about the area that this "black area" appears.I do however remain skeptical. Thank you so much for the kind gesture.

I`m pretty sure that this must have been brought up & discussed before sometime on this forum but,it seems like everytime I see an image of frame 313 (give or take a few frames) there always seems to be a "black area" in the back of the Presidents head that prevents us from seeing the damage done in that area. Is there any images out there enhanced or not,that gives us a clear view of the condition that the Presidents head was in at that time? Any information or opinions is encouraged & appreciated.

Alot of changes taking place in the faster version.I believe that the Police Officer passing by on the motorcycle,could possibly distort the sequence.

Sneaky bastids are pulling disappearing acts.

Upon closer inspection,it appears that the gentleman in the hat seems to be A) Walking down a sloped terrain B)Gotten shorter c) Changed locations D) None of the above

This one is over my head.I`m not sure if your suggesting that the distance is not correct or the background scenery is not correct.Something tells me that this might possiby be a case of a Incredible Shrinking Man? Brain dead minds wanna know.

I also believe that the actor pretending to having a epileptic seizure,was using the same method a magician does using "slight of hand."

Bishop = Phillips IMO I cant remember where I read it but,it was somewhere in the book "Someone would have talked" that persuaded me to come to this opinion. Just my .02

I think that the assassination was planned in New Orleans,carried out in Dallas,and covered up in Washington. IMHO there must have been a small group or individuals in the government,military & organized crime that were involved in this conspiracy.That a decision was made,that JFK had to be eliminated,and the guilty parties,would never have to worry about being brought to justice.