James DiEugenio

RP: There are people with horrific backgrounds as children and THEY never killed anyone. Sirhan never killed anyone either.

David, You want to give them stuff that is easy to understand but has good information in it. I would give them things like Crossfire, JFK and the Unspeakable, Breach of Trust, Six Seconds in Dallas.

Thanks for posting that Rob. That is one of the most inspiring, uncensored, anti MSM comments I have seen in a presidential debate. No wonder the DNC wanted to limit the debates and hold them at odd hours.

Joe, you don't see the difference? HRC is a Democrat. Secondly, Trump does not appear to have followed Kissinger nearly as often as HRC. It would have been like JFK listening to Foster Dulles.

Rob, thanks. That is one I didn't know about. Kissinger is a guy who has to be the post war champion of genocides: East Timor, Bangladesh, and Cambodia. Although Cambodia gets the most attention, the one in East Pakistan (Bangladesh) is really striking. Because in that one, the American chief counsel got pretty much his whole staff to sign onto a memo asking Kissinger to intervene in the mass atrocity that was occurring. If I recall correctly, Archer Blood got something like 21 signatures--which is really something since they all knew they were risking reprimand. Not only did Kissinger turn down the request, he and Nixon actually sent planes to West Pakistan to aid the genocide!! (Gary Bass, The Blood Telegram) I guess that mentorship helped her in the Libya debacle.

How can it be a parlor trick when John Newman saw it done while on duty for the NSA?

Ray, that show was really something. What an eye opener to the audience. Rob, that is what happened to Sirhan during one experiment. The psychiatrist had him stick a hat pin into his forearm until it was bleeding but h told him not to cry out in pain. And he did not. People do not understand how powerful hypnosis is if you have the right subject. John Newman told me that they would have these seminars at NSA and they would do these kinds of things to subjects who would get called up to the stage. And they they would not believe what they did after.

Can Kirk really not be aware of the whole South China Sea dispute which HRC did all she could to escalate as Secretary of State? Pretty easy to find. And my God, HRC in Libya, in Honduras, her smears of Putin and Russia: she actually compared the Crimean referendum to join Russia to HItler's takeover of Austria and Czechoslovakia! There is a real student of history for you. And she wanted to do the same thing she did in Libya in Syria. (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-people-hillary-clinton-idUSKBN179058) Are you really denying she was and is a neocon? The woman who spends Xmas with Mr. Genocide, Henry Kissinger each yuletide season? The evidence is pretty much overwhelming. Obama's choice of her as Secretary of State was a blunder of the first magnitude. But after he got mugged by the Gang of Three--HRC, Rice and Power--in their disaster in Libya, he decided not to be played again in Syria. And how can anyone not see that Putin was correct in helping Assad in Syria? Tulsi Gabbard was good on this issue. HRC was spouting the PNAC/ Robert Kagan line. Which is why Kagan endorsed her in 2016. That endorsement is quite a badge of dishonor in my view.

JC: I think the notion that the Democrats “preferred to lose with Hilary than win with Sanders” sums up a lot, and there is a profound refusal to deal with that. You got that one right. The evidence is that Sanders would have pounded Trump. And it was Sanders who gave us people like Pressley and AOC.

Gary: Do you mind if I ask why you do not release an E book version?

I hate to rain on anyone's parade and I will not comment any further but I will just say that this is not the way I heard this story many years ago from one of the sources named in it.

Andrew: Again, I think you are missing the point. Its not about who you like or you don't like. Its about a shadow government that is going against what our government is supposed to be about. From what I can see, Russia gate would not have happened had it not been for the Steele Dossier. Which was financed by Perkins Cole, representing the HRC campaign. Now, Steele also gave the dossier to the FBI and to John McCain. And this is what started this whole thing. And it mushroomed after Trump was elected since Buzzfeed published it online. If the Steele Dossier is a backed up, solid piece of investigative reporting then why is Trump still in office? Why has Mueller been at work now for going on two years? I think the answer to that is pretty obvious.

Its not just Pena, its also William Walter from the Garrison inquiry. And its also the info from McBride above.

Andrew, The comparison with JFK is not the point. As I tried to say earlier, it does not matter who the president is, be it Nixon, JFK or Trump. Our side is supposed to be about universal standards and evidence. Even Adam Schiff admitted that the Steele dossier was used for the FISA, but his argument is it was not the only thing used. As per the dossier, have you read it? Talk about a shoddy piece of work. It really does read like oppo research, which it was. (I misspoke, the name of the firm is Perkins Cole.) If I had to compare it to anything as far as amateur night it would be the first FBI report on the JFK case of December 9th. Which was so bad the WC would not print it in the volumes. Buzzfeed should have never printed it. BTW Robert, how did Buzzfeed get it? Through Steele or the FBI or Perkins?

Geez Kirk, what took you so long? But you came out firing on all pistons as usual, with that civics lesson stuff and predictably dividing Wheeler and Carter and Jim/me off to one side. Clearly, there is a segment of the FBI that wants to get rid of Trump. Especially after Comey was canned. I would even say that this extended over to the Justice Department with Sally Yates who also had deep reservations if Flynn was "compromised" by the Russians. There is little doubt that the Power Elite wanted: 1.) War with Syria, and 2.) Cold War II.(That whole thing in Ukraine was so misrepresented by both the MSM and Washington it was sick.) For whatever reasons--whether he was compromised or he just was not interested-- Trump did not do it. The real irony here that no one wants to address is this: I think HRC would have done both.

Fusion GPS was being paid by a firm that worked for the Democratic Party, right, Lincoln Coles or something like that if I recall. Therefore, Christopher Steels was working for Lincoln Coles. Since you seem to know a lot about this Mr. Wheeler, is there any truth to the rumor that Steele was originally paid by Jeb Bush or a proxy to begin his trashy dossier?

That is really interesting David. And Ochoa tells them nada on the 8th. Then Hoover must have known the CIA was involved after since Ochoa is the guy who puts the phony trail together for Echeveria after the assassination. Man, J Edgar really knew what he was talking about when he wrote the CIA gave him a snow job on Oswald in MC.

DJ: By Early Nov Hoover knew Oswald had not been there David: What do you base this on? Two weeks before JFK is killed and Hoover knows the CIA is full of it on MC?

LOL

Geez, 2400 pages. How will I get someone to review this for me? Gary, do you have a brother?

The point is if one disagrees with someone else's policies one can always say that the person is imbalanced or unhinged, or even a traitor or a dupe. I mean if one recalls Marxmanship in Dallas by Revilo Oliver, that is what he said about JFK, that he was a commie dupe. LeMay compared JFK to Neville Chamberlain. People in NIxon's own party thought he was nutty over the Xmas bombing. Let us get real and honest about that issue. What I am talking about is the use of that statute, the 25th amendment. I just do not see how that applies. And the fact that it does not shows just how far out there these FBI guys were. But further, if one recalls Peter S. He was high up there in the FBI hierarchy and he said, there is no there there. Collusion is not a crime. Recall, Comey was fired well over a year ago, going on two. And Mueller still has not proven this charge in relation to Trump. So what McCabe is describing, this appears to be an extralegal use of the Constitution. I mean Rod R wearing a wire on the president? I mean with that kind of stuff going on, Trump almost had to fire McCabe. But this is what our political system has come to. Sort of like two feuding fraternities on campus.

Please note, after not replying to my specific arguments, FC tried to ridicule the PM crowd. He got reprimanded for the sealioning. Now he comes back here and again, he does not reply to my original questions. Instead he gives me three alternatives to pick from. None of which I buy into. He thens says I only ask questions which are mostly irrelevant. Utterly and completely wrong. The reason I posed those question is because they raise the most serious problems with the radio traffic. If Nelson got the same message Tippit did about Oak Cliff, then why did neither Tippit nor Nelson directly confirm that? Again, if they got the same message why did Nelson end up in Dealey Plaza and Tippit in Oak Cliff? And why was Nelson never interviewed and asked about this divergence? Third, why were they sent to Oak Cliff when there already was an officer in Oak Cliff, namely Mentzel. And why was Jackson never asked about these inconsistencies? These raise the most serious problems with the DPD. And also the reluctance of the WC to do a real investigation into the Tippit murder. Check the index of the Warren Report. Are Mentzel or Nelson in the index? Why not? Are they not important witnesses in the Tippit case? FC, you must agree that Murray Jackson is important? I mean President Andrew Jackson is in the index, but Murray is not. Now let me produce some evidence that you will also not find in the WR. Where was TIppit from about 12:30 until he was killed? What I am about to tell you you can find in my essay or in McBride's book. 1. Parked in a GLOCO station looking at a viaduct that connects up with Dealey Plaza. Five witnesses saw him there. 2. Pulling over a car, and running out to open the back door and look at the floor. 3. Running into a record shop and using the phone and then leaving abruptly. So In addition to never explaining the weird radio traffic which Nelson did not obey and which needlessly put TIppit in Oak Cliff when someone else was there, why did the WC never list these facts about the most crucial half hour of Tippit's life? They would seem to most objective observers to be rather interesting. Do they not suggest that TIppit was looking for someone leaving Dealey Plaza and when he could not find him, he went and made a phone call to receive redirected instructions? And it was those instructions which led to his death? This is not asking questions. This is asserting evidence which you ignore. Because they lead to a conclusion you do not like.

You mean about Warren and the 25th? As an attorney, do you agree with my interpretation?

Read this one and weep: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/430465-warren-officials-have-constitutional-duty-to-invoke-25th-amendment-if Wow, talk about mobocracy. What the heck is she thinking of? I like Warren, but this? See, in my view, what is supposed to separate us from them is that with us its not just who's ox is being gored. We uphold a standard for everyone that should be obeyed. Impeaching Trump is one thing. If you think you can do it, then try. Personally I do not think the votes are there in the senate. At least not right now. But to fabricate some kind of mental incapacity with psychiatrists that have never examined or observed the guy? C'mon. And BTW, I am not just saying this now. Way back in the nineties, when the film Nixon came out, we did an issue of Probe magazine showing that Watergate was a booby trap, one in which the real perpetrators of a devilishly clever plan escaped unnoticed. And people like Woodward, Bernstein and Sy Hersh, they all obfuscated the public as to what really occurred. I despised Nixon then, as I do to this day. But in a real way, the guy was the victim of a sophisticated plot.