James DiEugenio

Its pretty incriminating. She has evidence that both Hoover and the LAPD knew that Maheu was behind it.

Not in the article no. But Lisa has seen them and she uses them in her book on page 492ff. She also reveals the link between Cesar and Maheu in there.

Joe, I think you are missing the point. What these notes say is that Oswald got the drink before he went outside. From what I can see, this is three sources now. Again, who is the fourth guy at this interview? Also, how do we know these are from Hosty?

Just to decipher the cursive writing-- Who is at this interview? From what I can see, its Fritz, Bookhout, Hosty and who is the fourth guy?

These are from diaries of Meier's talks with Maheu. As you know this would be admissible in court.

That is really a good find by Malcolm. Nice one fishing it out Bart. This seems to be from hand notes before they were transmitted and typed into a report. Therefore its the closest thing we have to a tape of Oswald in detention. BTW, how many notations do we have now depicting him as being outside? Is it three? Andrej: yes, it would seem that Hosty, to be kind, forgot his notes.

I have to say, Tom Jackman is really a gutsy guy for writing this stuff. I think there is one mistake in it though. I do not think that Roselli owned that racetrack where Sirhan was a walker. But man, I give this guy a lot of credit for putting this material in the Post. The comments section is really going back and forth as you can tell there are a lot of people who are really resistant to this material and simply do not want to face facts. Hopefully some people from our side will tune in and set them straight.

Don't ask me how it happened. But Ben Bradlee must be turning over in his grave right now. If you recall, Bradlee had his journalistic hit man on the Kennedys and the assassinations Ron Kessler do a hatchet job on Bill Harper back in the seventies. Now, Tom Jackman does a nice article on Lisa Pease and the RFK case. Is this Jeff Bezos letting reporters be reporters while he goes after Trump? Anyway, let us enjoy it while we can, before the Bilderberger Group goes after Jeff. https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2019/02/09/cia-may-have-used-contractor-who-inspired-mission-impossible-kill-rfk-new-book-alleges/?utm_term=.52d4d39ed7a8

John Kowalski took up where Maurice Phillips left off in his survey of the Bloomfield papers at the Canadian archives in Ottawa. (Funny, Fred Litwin lives there and somehow he could not do this?) He also discusses the Metta book based on the papers and research out of Italy. Whatever one thinks of all this, it makes the whole Mitrokhin KGB stuff advocated by Litwin look simply stupid and silly. https://kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-reviews/the-canadian-archives-michele-metta-and-the-latest-on-permindex

As Lisa wrote in The Assassinations, and in her current book, the whole "wrong Wayne" thing was improbable because there is evidence Wayne had GIlbert's card also. Lisa exposed this back in 2003. (See, The Assassinations, p. 599. A Lie too Big to Fail p. 321) Nelson was not the only one who saw Wayne with a rolled up poster running away from the scene. And she was not the only one who thought there was a weapon inside it. (So did Joe Klein.) There were actually several people who witnessed Wayne running away. And Nelson sure as heck was not the one who tackled Wayne. The guy who tackled him said he had seen Wayne previously that night with a girl and three other men, one of whom resembled Sirhan. (The Assassinations, p. 598) Wayne was arrested because of his suspicious behavior running from the scene of the shooting. Why would he be doing that? Wayne's excuse was he wanted to use a phone. Steve Fontanini, a newsman himself who also ran after Wayne, did not buy that for a simple reason. Wayne was running out of the press room, a room full of telephones. (ibid) Fontanini did not buy this excuse but the LAPD did. Manny Guittierez of SUS thought there was really something remiss with the Gilbert/Wayne association. And he though Wayne was lying about it. He is the one who pushed for the polygraph. Unfortunately, it was done by Hernandez with the above odd results. Some funny air condidtioning I guess back in those days.

Chris, thanks for that. man that makes it even worse. Davey, me and Sandy just answered everything you posted above. You should work in the Department of Redundancy Department.

Its new for a book. As per Wayne, consider just this one page: On April 10, 1969, after the trial was long over, Lt. Hernandez administered a polygraph to Michael Wayne. One of the lie detector questions proposed for Michael Wayne was: “Were you truthful when you stated you couldn’t remember where you obtained Gilbert’s business card?” But this question was never asked. Naturally, Hernandez told us Wayne’s answers showed “no pattern of decep- tion,” but the audio tape of the session tells a different story. You can hear the polygraph machine recording in the background. After a series of preliminary questions, Hernandez asked his official questions. “Mike, were you born in Cali- fornia?” Wayne answered “No” and the polygraph continued at its normal level. “Other than Wayne, have you ever used a different last name?” Wayne responded “No,” but that was not entirely true, as he had gone by Wien. Perhaps that is why you can hear the polygraph making a bigger sound here, as if the needle is recording more stress on this answer. “Did you come here intending to lie to any of my questions?” Hernandez asked. “No,” Wayne said, but the polygraph sound is even louder here. Perhaps knowing Wayne would react to this, Hernandez threw in an easy, meaningless question on his list that was not on the original list. “Do you own a dog?” Wayne said no and the polygraph machine quieted. “Is there anything about the assassination of Senator Kennedy that you’re afraid to tell me about?” Wayne answered this and the next several questions “No,” but the sound of the polygraph grew louder again. So again, Hernandez asked a question of no consequence: “Are you married?” The next question was the big one, and Wayne’s “No” response brought a lot of action from the polygraph machine. “Do you remember meeting Keith Gilbert?” The next question was asked differently from what Hernandez had written down. Hernandez had written, “Did you and Keith Gilbert know each other previously?” Instead, Hernandez asked, “Do you remember talking to Keith Gilbert?” Again, the polygraph sounded loud here, which is perhaps why Hernandez asked another question that was not on his list. “Did you lie to my last question?” The needle of the polygraph continued to be loud, as if swinging in a wide pattern. Several other questions were asked, but the next one that drew a big reaction was “Do you remember ever giving one of your business cards to Keith Gilbert?” The needle appeared to swing widely here. Wayne explained he did have business cards in seventh grade. Perhaps that is the Wayne business card in the record, where Wayne spelled his last name Wien and gave an address that is not now in existence in Los Angeles (if it ever was). The reason this is important is because Gilbert was an extreme rightwing member of the Minutemen; the group that was involved in all kinds of violent actions including illegal training camps for exiles against Cuba. In the early stages of his inquiry, Jim Garrison suspected them of having a role in the JFK murder.

RIck: Isn't that hysterical? Oswald somehow forgot that he happened to drop his wallet at the scene of the crime? When in fact, according to the official story, the Hidell name would link him to both the handgun and the rifle. Chris: I am not sure if that reporter commentary is the same one from when the film was made, or it if was dubbed in later.

And if I recall, were they not both typed and unsigned?

BTW, is that not a rich turn of phrase: they have a conclusion but only a hypothesis to support that conclusion. Then how much forensic weight does your conclusion have? Answer: none.

Do you know how dangerous that wallet, which was actually filmed, is to DVP and his mentor VB? In his inflated, pretentious and vapid doorstop book, Bugliosi tried to deny it was Oswald's. No joke. He tried to say it was really Tippit's wallet. Even though there is documentary evidence it could not have been Tippit's wallet. I go into all this in The JFK Assassination: The Evidence Today. (p. 126) DVP never called out his master on this issue. Clearly what happened is that the police realized they had a problem. If Oswald had a wallet on him in the cruiser car down to the station, then how could they explain the wallet at the Tippit scene? Would it not suggest that somehow, someone created this other wallet to frame Oswald? (And then it got even worse with the third wallet at the Paine's.) It is astonishing that the WC never even mentioned this issue when there was a film of it in Dallas for all to see. This is what kind of fact finding body they were.

Thanks for that Paul. What a phrase that will live in infamy. Redlich is one of the culprits who does not get enough attention. He was really important in the WC March of Folly.

Micah: In the chapter on Too Many Holes, its at around Figure 9. Ron: Is it not amazing that no one until Lisa ever dug into this guy even though he simply radiates suspicion?

Sandy, yes that is all correct.

That is true Ron. But I have to add that Pat Speer has discovered evidence that although the Magic Bullet BS had not been codified yet, people like Ball and Belin realized in late December that they had a drastic shortage of ammo and a surplus of wounds. I think the actual Magic Bullet was decided upon in either March of April of 1964. Does anyone know the exact date?

That is a really interesting question. I would like to say I know the answer but I do not. Mike LeFlem did a review of a book about CD Jackson for us, but it did not deal with his death.

Hopefully that will deal with the assassination, and then a wrap up with Book five. I really hope he does not go to six books.

Nice article by James Finn pointing with specifics as to how Henry Luce and CD Jackson literally broke the presses twice to cover up evidence of conspiracy in the Z film. And then how they lied about what was in the film to cover up a front shot. Nice to have friends like this in high places doing dirty work for you. https://kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-articles/life-magazine-warren-commission-issue-october-2-1964?fbclid=IwAR1s27nd5634iMJiqxzc5yvQ4dqPRiqdpw8N--RqFmXJnyWEqq14YIUeryQ

Ever since about 1993, the broadcast media has done everything it could to pummel the public consciousness with the whole WCR was right baloney. That is about to change. I am not free at this time to describe them, but there are a couple of major media events on the horizon that will do much to spur interest.

Oh no, there is a Mossad/Israeli connection to Permindex. Peres brother was on the Board. And there is also one other connection. We will be talking about that soon at K and K. I think you mean Daniel Pipes who is Richard's son. And yes h head been busy with the Islamophobia stuff, and he is also big on the JFK case. See, politically, these people are pretty much contrary to JFK in just about every field of foreign policy one can imagine. So that is why I say that Litwin's book is really a political tract.