Chris Davidson

Same execution, different angle.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hKVp5-bwYU6JD0glP6sFQjhVkohr4ucd/view?usp=sharing Sorry about the initial link. The default preference for sharing changed on me. The link should be fine now.

Rather obvious when used in a comparative manner.

Following up on the missing distance/bouncing frames from the previous postings. 10.2ft/5.49ft per sec = 1.8579...sec x 18.3fps = 34 frames 5.49ft per sec = 3.74mph = .3ft per frame .3ft per frame equals half the speed of the limo from extant z301-313 and beyond.

How much of that motion blur was determined by the following relationship? 18.3fps/35shutter speed = .522 ratio 48fps/100shutter speed = .48 ratio

Different for the slow-motion setting:

What shutter speed are you using?

1964 Mercury Park Lane Breezeway

Don't hold your breath on that one. But, if someone is bold enough to provide the requested Zframes, they can use a few Bell frames for color syncing.

Now, imagine the surveyor(Robert West) provided you(Tom Purvis) with some pertinent documentation that fully supports the 10.2ft difference, which is comprised of 34 zframes and transformed into 6.7 vertical inches. I'll call it the bouncing transformation.

And, if you would like to see how the elevation(put in the form of "lead" height) was adjusted for those approx 34 frames/10.2ft in conjunction with a shot reaction circa extant z207, look no further than CE560. It just takes some simple converting to realize the connection: 10.2ft/18.3ft horizontal(1ft vert change on a 3.13° slope) = .557ft vertical .557x 12" = 6.68" It looks like some entity was trying to remove and then combine two shots into one, on film, the approx 10.2ft farther down Elm.

There is no difference between the previous posting and what the WC was doing with their other documentation. .9ft traveled in three frames = .3ft per frame. .3ft per frame x 18.3fps = 5.49ft per sec/1.47 = 3.734mph. CE884, trying to adjust(slow down) the limo speed in accordance with a film where frames were removed. .3ft per frame x 34 frames = 10.2ft Unless, you were under the impression that the limo was traveling at 3.734mph circa extant z168.

Rest assured, knowing that once you have common events occurring within different films and include the plotting of such events, the alterations (in numbers form) will rise to the surface. For instance: Tyler's distance from extant z313.3-447.5 = 134.2zframes The distance is 1190ft - 989.6ft = 200.4ft 200.4ft/134.2frames = 1.493ft per frame/1.47(1mph) = 18.58mph Add back those 34 missing frames from above to the same span/equation: 200.4ft/168.2frames = 1.191ft per frame/1.47 = 14.83mph 18.58 - 14.83 = 3.75mph limo speed increase in the extant zfilm by eliminating 34 extant zframes. Now, how many frames did Myers state the Towner film consists of, syncing with that 22.8fps rate? (167) So, in this particular instance, it took approx 200ft for the film sync's to reveal approx 34 missing frames.

In fact, if you look at Myer's start time for Wiegman at extant Z246 compared to Mark Tyler's at extant Z280, which is an approx 34 frame difference, then add that frame difference starting where Nix gets cut at extant Z411, you would wind up near extant Z447(Wiegman/Z sync) where it appears Jackie is still laid out in Wiegman(John Butler frame) which follows suit with what we see in early Bell at extant Z435, using the underpass shadow sync point(counting backwards gif) between Bell/Z. If you are so inclined to count backwards from the underpass shadow sync point, take note of how many frames that span is. Or, you can bypass all that by realizing that Myer's camera frame rate for Towner's film at 22.8 was pure BS and using a more credible 18.3fps rate for Towners camera and an extant Z sync, the difference for the Towner filming span would equate to 1.8 seconds = 33 zframes at 18.3fps It's like following bouncing frames.

It would be a good reason why Meyers didn't include this part of the Bell section in his multi-sync project and why Nix was cut at that point in time. The red "X" representing approx where the Bell early frames would sync on the timeline, counting backwards from the underpass shadow sync point between Bell/Z.

Yes, the odd film out is Z. Jackie backwards using Bell and Jackie forward using Z. Stabilizing Clint allows a look at the upper sprocket hole stationary "bounce" past the light pole. Looking at the way Clint's right knee crosses over the spare tire housing and he falls on his ass, are you sure Jackie wasn't the one pulling Clint into the limo? All this in less than a second. Simply amazing!!!

In fact, if the Wiegman frame(most recently provided by John Butler) is supposed to sync/plot with extant z447, and shows what appears to be Jackie in that similar, laid out position, her continuity works in Nix, Bell and Wiegman. The odd film out is Z.

Not a bad guess. Just might not be exactly the way it was altered.

Of course the math side could be confirmed by using Mark Tyler's LIMO distance entry between extant z411-434 at 50.7ft. Guess what the distance is between Position A and the start of the data entry at extant Z161 on CE884. If you arrived at 50.7ft consider yourself a genius. When you start altering films that are supposed to sync, at some point, the compilation of those alterations will rear its ugly head.

Then ask yourself how Jackie was layed out on the trunk in Nix's last frame, later sat down in Z and finally was back on the trunk in the same position in Bell (as with Nix) with the same orientation to Clint approx 23 extant zframes later.

First show the impossible actions of human beings in the following link. Next, show how two films reveal the timing/syncing problem associated with those actions below.

Mark, I always look for similar comparisons. For example, compare the white stars on the car flag when I slow down the film for 5 consecutive frames. On the last slowed frame, now look at the policeman's "striped" vest and the white stars on the flag. Once again, this gif is running at approx 17fps. I used the front tire for stabilization.

Compare the following gifs(waving in background) to the Z drummer lady above. I've removed the distraction(pretend it's the limo) and sequentially removed every other frame. Now compare it to the Z wave. Then test it yourself by standing in place waving, then start walking backwards and keep waving, while trying to keep the same waving speed. What happens? Humans are capable of certain actions, just not some of what we see in the extant zfilm.

Do you consider "splices" in a film as transitions? Perhaps the splice at extant z157 started one of the frame removal series. I'll provide another example of this, connected to the drummer lady reference. Comparing should be a little easier that way.