Joseph Backes

Presenting claims is not evidence. There is no evidence of election fraud in the 2020 election. They had over 60 times to present such evidence in many different courts and judges. They failed every time. Dominion had FOX internal emails and texts. All of Fox's on air claims against Dominion were false. And Dominion could prove it. Fox was caught lying to the judge and he called them XXXXX in court. They withheld evidence and got caught doing so. They were sanctioned for doing so. There was no way in hell Fox was going to win this case. You're in a cult, Michael.

Was this why Tucker Carlson got fired? -

The BBC on Carlson's firing. -

Keep in mind, Fox shareholders are suing For over the settlement. So, that's another lawsuit. Smartmatic, and its own shareholders. Is there another?

Speculation - Carlson probably got fired as a result of the Dominion lawsuit and settlement. Why was Fox / Rupert in a panic to settle at the very last moment? To prevent any evidence from going into the public record and to prevent any of their employees from being questioned in open court. Many think there was something beyond what is in the news now that would have been revealed in court. Whatever that might be could still come out in the other voting machine lawsuit with Smartmatic if they don't settle and have a trail in open court. He embarrassed Fox. And that was a really big settlement.

More from CNN on Carlson -

https://www.cnn.com/2023/04/24/media/don-lemon-cnn/index.html

And now Don Lemon is fired too. Odd it's on Tucker Carlson got fired day. https://www.politico.com/news/2023/04/24/cnn-host-don-lemon-terminated-from-company-00093495?fbclid=IwAR2R3lcFPCs-bl7mH6tYtAG3-_ghIIwwsvnRFo9iTvKGhUUbyibfA6cT3ao

How Fox reported the departure: https://www.cnn.com/videos/media/2023/04/24/tucker-carlson-fox-news-part-ways-vpx.cnn

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/24/business/media/tucker-carlson-fox-news.html https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/30/us/tucker-carlson-gop-republican-party.html https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/30/business/media/tucker-carlson-fox-news-takeaways.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/media/2023/04/24/tucker-carlson-leaves-fox-news/

Good riddance. Bye Bye, Tucker. https://www.cnn.com/2023/04/24/media/tucker-carlson-fox-news/index.html

Today is a good day. I agree with you Bob. I was sickened to see people fawning over Tucker Carlson as though he is our new leader. And Moderators, please don't delete this thread. We need to talk about things that affect JFK assassination research today. The research is a current thing, affected by current events. The question remains, was he fired? Probably. And that Schnapf and co won't be appearing on Tucker's precious show anymore is a great thing. https://www.cnn.com/2023/04/24/media/tucker-carlson-fox-news/index.html

In other words, you're an ignorant jerk who doesn't know what the hell he's talking about.

What do you mean remove and replace?

NARA releases 422 new JFK assassination records - https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release2023

Jim, Thank you. I often try to acquire the books and articles you mention. You often will mention a book or some source that despite my large collection I don't have. I bought "Last Call," based on your appearance on BOR. It's great to have a book or something that answers the zombie claims that just won't die. Joe

I'll open it up to anyone. Who is Mike Bender and where did he write or talk about the 1960 presidential election and Chicago? Thank you

Jim, WHERE did he do this? A book, an article, a website, a presentation, podcast, etc?

Jim, could you elaborate on this? Who is Mike Bender? Did he write a book, an article on this? If so, what book or article? Thanks, Joe

When I click on the link Douglas posted I get bounced right back here. Anyone else? So, one thing on the CIA museum ( which is not open to the public ) is this - https://www.pbs.org/video/secrets-on-display-1680905113/ Joe

BTW, the reason why I post this is because good JFK researchers are like Mehdi Hasan. The WC narrative is a lie, a lie of deliberate distortion, lies of omission, egregious error and deliberate error. And whenever confronted with the facts WC writers and apologists will still stand with it. That's what Taibbi is doing, yeah, I'm completely full of it but I'm still right. It's not just a fight about evidence, facts and reality. It's often an ideological fight too. And you rarely if ever win fighting the ideologues but you have to fight them too.

Some JFK assassination researchers, who should know better, think Matt Taibbi and the "Twitter Files" are akin to Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers. I couldn't believe they think it's real. I was glad to see someone confront Taibbi. It doesn't happen enough.