Dean Hagerman

I have been waiting for Grodens new book for a long time, I am still looking forward to it

Im also positive the 6thFLM is calling the police on Groden

One or more of these 3 motorcylces should have appeared in Moorman 4, which is missing (Moorman gave it to Lumpkin, who lost it.)

This is one missing photo I would love to see

Back on track, witnesses who I do not believe at all ranked in order

1. Beverly Oliver, I do not believe one thing she has ever said

2. Gordon Arnold, I do not believe Gordon Arnold was in Dealey Plaza at all that day

3. Ed Hoffman, I think he may have been standing where he said he was and may have seen some movement or something in the area behind the fence and made it into seeing a gunman, his father said he liked to tell tall tales

Duncan

So you think Badgeman was wearing a jet pack, ok let me ask you this...

Do you think The Other Camera Man was wearing a jet pack also, or did I prove to you that he could have in fact been standing on the retaining wall behind the Pyracantha Bush?

Why bump this thread with the same info you posted in the new thread you made?

Are you obsessed with Harry Dean?

I read through all of the info you posted and none of it changed my mind torwards Harry Dean

I agree with you Mike, I dont like it at all, but once you get used to it it wont be that bad, I used 6 different forums and every one is different

I did really like the old (as in one day old lol) ED forum format, it was easy to use and nice on the eyes

has as much backing in real science as a Uri Geller spoon.

<!--quoteo(post=194619:date=Jun 7 2010, 05:58 PM:name=Dean Hagerman)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Dean Hagerman @ Jun 7 2010, 05:58 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=194619"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=194577:date=Jun 7 2010, 07:12 AM:name=Jack White)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jack White @ Jun 7 2010, 07:12 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=194577"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->David, citing the Amazing Randi...the <b>professional debunker</b>...is not a good choice.

Jack<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

The Amazing Randi is awesome

<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

No, just "Amazing". And only when he sticks with magic.

Jack

Yes Jack I am only talking about his magic, and his shows where he debunks other magacians and pyschics

I could care less what he thinks about the assassination or any other conspiracy

I hate change just as much as the next guy

But this happened to the forum im a Mod at, and after a month or so you forget about the old format once you get used to the new

2. He was on either the second or more likely the first floor at 12:30pm

Bingo!

David, citing the Amazing Randi...the professional debunker...is not a good choice.

Jack

The Amazing Randi is awesome

I was re-directed to the Hacker website (Nice lame choice of music)

I ran my Spyware just to be safe and nothing was infected on my computer

Hell, I debated McAdams, didn't I?

Greg did you debate McAdams on Black-Op? If so how in the world did I miss that?

Im going to check the Black-Op archives, if I cant find it can you post a link please Greg I would really like to listen to the debate

Thanks

Dean,

I debated McAdams on The Paul Garson Show in 1999 (I think that's the right year). This was before the internet was "user friendly" and meticulous archives were kept. Unfortunately, there is no known record of the debate, except in the minds and memories of those who "ear" witnessed it.

Len Osanic did record it on CD and sent me the ONLY copy. It was a "streaming" broadcast rife with long "blank spots" in it. I was unable to recover it in its entirety, and only a very small portion remains.

I regret that I cannot provide it...

No problem, I would have loved to hear you go toe to toe with McAdams

Hell, I debated McAdams, didn't I?

Greg did you debate McAdams on Black-Op? If so how in the world did I miss that?

Im going to check the Black-Op archives, if I cant find it can you post a link please Greg I would really like to listen to the debate

Thanks

Hey guys,

You got me!

The pics posted by David J. and Bernice M. [[thanks yall ]] are the clearest i have ever seen of Lovelady's shirt. If that's his shirt then that's his mug.

I am on dial up so there are many things i can't do to make a pic more clear for example.

So now for the last and final time i will put the subject to bed in my mind. Having heard from the likes of John D. and Gary M. and Dean H.

gently nudging me to look again at the evidence, and then seeing the evidence more clearly than ever before i stand corrected.

Thanks guys and girl!

jim

Jim I used to believe it was Oswald in the doorway

Until I read the page in Robert Grodens TKOAP (The page that Bernice posted showing Lovelady wearing the shirt)

That changed my mind

Its Lovelady no doubt in my mind

I find this two e-mails to be intimidating, coercive, and disturbing.

Doug Weldon

My thoughts as well Doug and Greg

What is Judyth trying to do? Its like she is trying to strong arm Mary

Martin and Lewis were close friends:

John,

I am sorry we could not agree upon keeping the question on the update. I understand you believe in its relevance. Thank you for keeping a reasonable tone.

Dean

We could not agree?

You mean You did not agree with Johns question

This thread is so one sided that I come here and get an awesome laugh everytime I read one of Deans new jokes..I mean posts

Dean if you keep this going much longer im going to have a heart attack from laughing so hard

He misinterprets anything that comes close to him.

Tink

I hope you dont mean that

I know that you own "Bloody Treason" as you posted a scan, if you have read Noels book there is no way you can back up what you just said

How can you be "introduced" to someone without meeting them? It would be like my telling people I had been introduced to Barack Obama because someone made me aware of him. This is absolute nonsense.

Doug Weldon

How does Judyth get away with posting stuff like that, good catch Doug

(and I am still waiting on that article!)

I have been racking my brain as to what I can write that will speak up to defend my side of the gun/ballistics issue

I have not thought of anything yet

I must say that while "Bloody Treason" is my favorite book on the assassination (I dont say that lightly as I have read and own a large library of books on the assassintaion) Twyman is wrong on this issue

Like Todd pointed out I saw the picture he just posted in POTP and knew that it was a shell within seconds of seeing the picture

I am in no way saying this discredits Twyman or his amazing book, he was just wrong on this issue

So I will only re-appear to talk to those who are willing to engage in a respectful and reasoned conversation with me about JVB’s claims.

Shot 1 hits JFK shallow to the back

Shot 2 hits JBC causing his wounds

Shot 3 hits JFK in the head, strikes the chrome, shatters and sends a fragment to wound Tague.

3 up, 3 down and no magic.

So did your shot # 1 exit JFKs throat Mike?

If not how do you explain the wound in the front of JFK throat?