Ian Kingsbury

So is this thread about a lie or supporting the authenticity of the Zfilm?. I.e the limo stopped Chaney rode forward JFK turned backwards Just in case Mr Mandela Jr is tuned in!.

James Thank you Ian

James Would the characteristics of the wound be consistent with a hit on Connally alone after the head shot say z340 when Connaly was laying To his left leaving his torso exposed between the seats ?. Ian

Tommy Don't you think if Kostikov was indeed in Mexico that he would have been shadowed Therefore all eyes and cameras on who tries to contact who that's what they were there for After all . The CIA would have loved a picture of Oswald in Mexico but alas. I thought Harry Dean said Oswald went to Mexico to be tricked by Gabaldon In a fake "CIA" office. Ian P.s. if Kostikov was in Mexico then Atlee-Phillips would have known!.

Tom I followed on from Daniels lead and found this http://ilovetypography.com/2008/04/25/extreme-type-terminology-part-4/. Also I found this interesting ASCII developed from telegraphic codes. Its first commercial use was as a seven-bit teleprinter code promoted by Bell data services. Work on the ASCII standard began on October 6, 1960, with the first meeting of the American Standards Association's (ASA) X3.2 In case of an odd or extra symbol rather than number or letter. Ian

It's good to have a thread to let off a bit of steam would you agree?.

He has to define the evidence first ...surely?.

Yeah, right. Anybody who has the gall to think Oswald was guilty (or "no conspiracy") is automatically labeled "CIA".Makes me sick. You wish!.

Thanks for the heads up Dave it's obviously one to avoid like Reshaping History. I hope it has the same thermic value also. Toodle pip old bean.

Perhaps Mockingbird is losing its grip http://video.msnbc.msn.com/the-rachel-maddow-show/51872612

Tom I would certainly like to try and help I will send you an email address to your pm. Can you run classic on your mac? . If you can find a copy of NIH image for macs you may find it helpful it was developed To distinguish the colour variances in brain cancer cells its shareware and quite a powerful tool . I will try graphic converter as well as these have been successful in restoring some Victorian family photos . All the best Ian

Tom I will try and find the posts of Christophe he was using software To develop images taken in Dealey some pictures appears to Clarify areas and enhance the view. His was purely software on an image and they looked similar. I guess it's like the 3D pictograms some can see while others look !. Ian

Tommy . Can you see what it is yet?. Ian http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microdot Scoff then read wrong Read then scoff correct It's your avatar!. Hahaha

Tommy Do you remember Christophe at Duncan's forum ?. Who ran some algorithms over some of the pictures from Dealey?. Ian How do you think they make integrated circuits ?.

Tommy Blow this up............ Ian

Tommy Did you look?. Ian

Tom Measure me for a strait jacket too I see at least four faces The large one on the lower right is the largest and it appears symmetrical. I will try iPhoto on my mac!. Ian P.s. inside the a ...Dulles?.

Tom I tried using photo software but it gets too pixelated but I did notice That just in front of the first line appears to be block spelling out "Joe" I can see the additions to the letters but the faces Are beyond the software I am using. Ian

Possible title "never again"!.

The last truths told about The body were at Parkland hospital By the doctors attempting to save the life of thier president. Then the body got stolen anything after that was designed to Confuse and disseminate. Are any of the photos real?. The body at Bethesda does not look the same as it left Parkland Especially the throat wound(argument).the photographer does not recognise The photos ,the developer does not recognise the film. I am just inserting this post as there are very many readers who do not Understand the finite medical implications me included . The medical reports start to stink after parkland they are supposed to. There was a 1/4" hole in the right forehead yes or no?. There was a big hole in the back of the head yes or no?. Why do the photos not show this?. Answer they are not meant to.perhaps the originals did. If you want to get the 75 % who believe in the conspiracy To understand it you have to simplify the explanations.

Tom This gets more compelling with every post ,finding the picture must have been A shock? Ian

"Holy Fetzerooni batman".

Don I have some reservations about Oswalds role but I agree with the statement. If the "Oswald involved somehow" researchers/readers do not support the statement It at least will make those unaware question the statement anyway!. IOW The statement begs the question "Well what did he do" by then you are into the conversation Or able to drop in a real fact or two. Last year I fitted some stone lintols and Jambs at a History teachers home He was unaware of many aspects of the case and woefully unaware of the American foreign policies ( Kennedys not Dulles)at the time. I recommended " JFK and the unspeakable " and when he finished to give it to the school library. Ian

Patience Len!.

Martin http://www.marksobel.com/COMMISSION/menu.htm There are clips at YouTube looks interesting!. Ian