Ian Kingsbury

Paul Maybe a deal was struck "you get the film I disappear" What are the odds of filming the 2 events randomly?. This makes him (Martin) part of the plot would you stick your head out For a looksee's?. There must be many for whom the penny has dropped , those facilitators With an ignorant part to play the small details that have leaked that cannot be Proved because the participants part whosever small has become self evident Only those on the outside of the planning would want to be "involved". Ian

Read my last post. Just because you wrote it it does not make it true. If Brennan lied how is that different from your views on Roger Craig Did he starting his lying career at 12:31 on 11/22/63?.

Yes. Of course he did.(Brennan's lie) But it's not the type of "lie" you think it was. Was it a Wesley Frazier type of lie or more of a Ruthless Paine type of lie? I know it's not a great big whopper of a lie as told by David Atlee Phillips Perhaps you could afford us some sort of gauge to help us.

Dave Was Brennan frightened before they arrested Oswald or after?. Ian

Yes neo-Nazis make very credible sources. Like a nice Chimmichurri ?. Any old nazis still in your neck of the woods?.

Steven Follow the money I guess? http://www.mikepiperreport.com/Articles_Archive/AmericanFreePress/AFP2008_07-12/Michael_Collins_Piper_AFP20080707_JFK_Assassination_Link_Found_To_Recent_Financial_Swindle.html Ian

Civil ?.

Publish and be damned,or lauded!.

Hubbard media purchased stations from the church of LDS, And do not forget the SBT could work down there as the water Drains the other way down the plug hole , different Fizzicks Bruce!.

Does the newspaper have a website?.

No mas! Not enough mass = not enough energy to do the damage Kerb concrete has higher compressive strength and is more compact Than shuttered concrete . If the upper split after hitting the chrome how did it Elevate itself over the windscreen frame. If a fragment hit the chrome it's even less Likely an even smaller piece could carry enough energy to actually damage the kerb. Kerb and pedestrian concrete /slabs are more impact/ damage resistant as Indicated by the drain cover. Finer more compact grains of the right size to interlock the Portland Cement a bit like a fractal mass. Then simply do the math and prove your case. Ive done it already and there is plenty of mass allowable and plenty of remining velocity. Lets not go with what we think, lets do the work and prove the point. show us what you have and how the fragment gets over the chrome?.

Removal of evidence?.

No mas! Not enough mass = not enough energy to do the damage Kerb concrete has higher compressive strength and is more compact Than shuttered concrete . If the upper split after hitting the chrome how did it Elevate itself over the windscreen frame. If a fragment hit the chrome it's even less Likely an even smaller piece could carry enough energy to actually damage the kerb. Kerb and pedestrian concrete /slabs are more impact/ damage resistant as Indicated by the drain cover. Finer more compact grains of the right size to interlock the Portland Cement a bit like a fractal mass.

I wonder how this could be done if there were cuts and or bits missing, Unless they were attempting to "prove" the final cut and interpret the events we see In the "film of today" .either the timing is out or the film is not complete. If Mr West's survey is accurate you could build a 3d model of the plaza Then run the film through it using the west notes and Shaneyfelts data It cannot be outside certain parameters if the fixed positions are there. IOW I would not expect a 30-40 foot difference until this is shown physically Most will not understand just looking at numbers or a plat covered in contours And other distracting marks/ references. Myers tried that just using the car data and it would appear he got some of his data wrong.

Terrii Have you met anybody lately that raised your suspicions?. Ian

Dulles and his cohorts (posted extensively by Tom Scully) Had their own agenda for Amerika . Justice should have been served at Nuremburg not bypassed For power everlasting. Keepin it in the "family" how many Bushes went to Veitnam?. I bet more went to the Whitehouse!.

http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-22033212 Have we seen all the JFK footage?.

So Mr Lamson has not seen the in camera original either?. What's in the vault ? ,anybody know?. Has anybody here seen "the kings new clothes"?.

Why no splices on the family side of the film?????.

Len Have you seen the in camera original?. Ian

N' grind

SOP for davie jo when his teat is in the wringer...run away...fast. Not only that he did so without ever addressing the topic of this thread. He made a claim but cries foul and tosses out insults when asked to defend it. The way I see it, DJ was originally hoping that the members of the forum would uncritically accept his conclusion about the hands not being Oswald's in order to bolster the assertion that the backyard photos are fake (and bolster his reputation as well?). But, when asked to specify exactly what is different about the hands, all he could say was that the fingers in one of the photos were "fatter" than in the others, disregarding the fact that that blown-up photo's resolution is fuzzy. The only other thing he has said, lamely, in support of his original assertion is that the hands in the backyard photos can't be Oswald's because of the overwhelming evidence that the photos are fake. IMHO, that's begging the question at it's finest. But I gotta compliment him on one thing. In his original post about "the hands" on the How Many Rifles thread, he said that the hands in the BYP and in the photos taken of Oswald after he was arrested "simply do not match," but in a recent post to me he wrote only that the hands don't seem to match. So I guess he is making progress of sorts. Mr. Josephs says he wonders why I'm so doggone tenacious (he didn't put it exactly that way but that's the gist of it) on this question about the hands. Well, all I can say is that as far as I'm concerned, none of us should allow LN or CT "researchers" to flout their unsupportable conclusions and just look the other way, no matter how much we may want to agree with them overall. --Tommy Right on Tommy , that was the Warren Commisions job! , Not David's intention. Ian

POGUE The magazine for the discerning Klansman Fashion! It's the Friday night BBQ Rope or Rifle ? Should you wear dungarees after sunrise?. Ettiquette Moonshine with fish? Do I take grits to a lynching?. At some point those guilty of the cover up will get behind an alternative to their Lies But this is not the one!. Lee did John Wayne Gacy eat all the cucumber sandwiches?. Ian

David Thanks for bringing this to our attention I will have a butchers And let you know . Ian

Typo