Ian Kingsbury

Just scissors and sticky-backed plastic were available in 1963 !. Paul you are looking a bit tired lately I prefer the Hogwarts avatar But I can see you are just " keepin it real bro".

Bill Just read Blakeys cop out speech ,what a crock of s@@t. Did he sign up for the fame ?. Why not just admit he knew he was being controlled was he that naive?. Ian He lives in a gray/grey world ? It's a shame the gray/grey matter was not More abundant ,and he had the advantage of seeing how the Warren omission Worked out problems.....ignore them . Perhaps the template was faulty.

Sprague was told by CIA ifyou want access to the files you have to sign a Non disclosure contract ! . Instead we get Blakey and Joannides what a team.

B Hargis got hit cos of where he was ,if you draw a line from the knoll Through the right forehead of JFK it intersects times is withinthe position Hargis is in . All good here Ian

What I find odd is the fact that Blakey was no dummy But "hey they tricked me too" is a bit hard to swallow considering The direction of the HSCA investigation. Once a lawyer always a lawyer.

Bernice Nice gif I agree so does this chap!. http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr161/lect/history/newton3laws.html Perhaps Dallas physics are different from all others?. Ian

Ray I can see a shadow around the pocket more on the left side of the pocket And the top of the pocket appears as a broken line of white and red pixels But a horizontal line is visible . No you do not have Cinque's syndrome . That is characterised by throwing your toys from the pram When nobody agrees. Which is interesting because people notice the toys but the thrower Is left with nothing to play with!. Ian Edit typo not content surprisingly

I think Lee is fortunate that the midget Lovelady impersonator is not around to see this. Obviously a Chiropractor would know if it looked like the subject was sitting? Perhaps he could mark the gif with where the midget Lovelady impersonators Head would be if he was sitting?. Can it be a striped deckchair and the midget Lovelady can say "I was speaking to the producer the other day". I could give you a definitive answer then as to the identity of the subject in question. But I think I can safely say its not Ronnie Corbett. Hope this helps .

No the new pope will do nothing and we all sit helpless as it goes on Just like the Saville tragedy.

Nice post Bob you got a 2 zealot response and I also notice That DVP helped along the way . It warms my heart to see a truly cooperative study.

“The dangerous man is the one who has only one idea, because then he'll fight and die for it.”

I do find all this very interesting and have decided to send DVP a bright orange robe and a set of finger bells

Thanks Ray it appears that the reporter mistook an April note for a November note Hope he checks his bank balance with more research than this piece. The Journo's dilemma devil one on shoulder and a Mockingbird on the other!.

There is an ominous lack of Mack in this thread He is usually Quick to quell any questions concerning himself?.

One of these days, it'd sure be nice if someone would sue the pants off of a few of the conspiracy-happy clowns (like DiEugenio, for example) for defamation of character, as a result of the clowns constantly calling various people liars, Presidential murderers, "accessories after the fact to murder", and various other specious and vile charges that the clowns couldn't prove if their lives hung in the balance. And get the case in court!!!!!!!. I am afraid it's a question of "New balls please" Only this time you get to question the actual argument . its not going to happen is it?. They just have to collectively "suck it up" Like we do with your posts . With the W.C non conclusion looking more ridiculous every day and The HSCA gaining microscopic kudos for actually claiming a conspiracy Ensures that nobody would prosecute if it meant all that is learned here Would reach the public . Perhaps you should sue me Dave for the sake of America or at least For the sake of the America you would like to live in and I bet your world is all in Various shades of grey filmed by Capra!.

150?? multiply that by about 20. According the Wikipedia article about the Essex-class aircraft carrier “Crew: ca. 2,170 (ship), 870 (air wing), 160 (flag)” that comes out to 3200. According to the FAS the crew size for such ships was 2,631-3,448. This is another aspect of the story that doesn't add up. According to a 2001 Gallup Poll about 2.6% of Americans (10% of 26%) could speak German. Thus if the same proportion 1961 crew spoke German as the general populace in 2001 about 80 would have been conversational in the language. I have no idea how the crew would have compared to Americans as a whole but presumably the % of German speakers was higher in 1961 than 40 years later. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essex_class_aircraft_carrier http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/cv-9.htm http://www.gallup.com/poll/1825/about-one-four-americans-can-hold-conversation-second-language.aspx Sorry I should have made it clearer I presumed it would be an officer Tasked with this operation.

Why are you misrepresenting the evidence, Pat? There was no money found in Oswald's room on Beckley. The $13.87 was found IN OSWALD'S POCKETS when he was arrested. [see WR, Page 745, below.] I think it's ironic that certain conspiracy theorists are raking Gary Mack over the coals for making a mistake about the note, and here we have Pat Speer making a similar mistake--claiming some money was found somewhere where it definitely was not. Nice hunk of irony there indeed. And you and Raymond are totally missing the boat regarding Oswald leaving behind his wedding ring and nearly all his cash ($170.00) in Irving on November 22. How many times had Lee EVER done such a thing prior to 11/22? Answer: Never. Doesn't that suggest something to you, Pat/J. Raymond? "Junie needs new shoes"

Harry Are you implying Oswald knew there would be a "bill to pay" Aside from his own sacrifice?. Ian

Rothstein Must have had a handler to advise him how to deal with this, Otherwise it's his a## on the line in a foreign country. Perhaps he was shadowed all the way through the deal Not someone covering but observing?. In the spy game giving your opponent the deal he wants is Sometimes more productive and waving dollars is those amounts (20 to 40 grand in today's money) will bring out the worst in people And we are not talking common everyday folk are we (Stasi,KGB,OGPU etc) Berlin was a big learning curve after the war and many relationships formed On both sides . It makes me think Rothstein was guided or led into this situation Cos he was the only German speaker on a boatful of how many Men 150 or more?. Knowing who is bent and who deals straight is half the spy game The rest is sheer bluffing and bravery it's the unknown!. Luckily Rothstein had the backbone to continue and rescue the couple But if they were OSS/CIA they could have been burned anyway by their own side Perhaps they were later disposed of for getting caught in the first place. How "real" was Harry Lime and did he leave a legacy of connections in place on Both sides .its all a bit TINKER TAILOR but that's how they roll.

John I agree wholeheartedly Ali/Clay could not "hide" whatever his name was. But he never wanted to hide his name change was a statement in itself Where as those that hide behind an alias are not convinced by their own argument. ( I will hide in case I am wrong) . I have encountered many ,many Warren supporters with aliases But very few truth seekers hiding behind a pseud. Perhaps it's something to do with our psychological make up . I wonder if Dr Fetzer has a Pseudonym subconsciously rooting for The other side.

Has anybody on this forum seen the camera original of Zapruder?. If not what are we comparing to?. The WC had it ,the HSCA had it and who knows who else . And now there are a million copies!.

ROFLMAO! Sad/funny but true Ray .

Robin The guy in the checked shirt in Hughes is the guy in the checked shirt in Altgens6. Dr.Fetzer and the OIP group are insisting that this is not Billy Lovelady so following that Single line of logic it's possible JFK was shot from a train passing over The triple underpass as Officer T F White insists that a train passed by and he did not see or hear anything Concerning the shooting.another one to add to the OIP . I believe segments were cut from the Ztoon to cover up certain aspects of the shooting If this puts me in the alteration isn't group then so be it I can only say what I see and I am allowed To be wrong, it's no good beating an idea into someone or beating one out. Dr Fetzer suffers from too many letters after his name commonly known as iamalwaysrightus syndrome So please allow for this human failing when dealing with him. Your gallery is excellent, I remember the Willis thread very well at Duncan's And you rarely get into arguments you let the images speak for themselves If its that obvious that I can see it then others can see it too. Cos I is crap at da pictures mate. Ian

Thanks Robin That's not string like is it?. Ian

Pat How could Braden describe the rifle thus :- http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?docId=19906&relPageId=54 When the rifle shown has the leather pistol strap ?. Were the backyard photos available to him?. Ian