Ray Mitcham

Trump knows he is going to lose, and IMO has a plan to rob the election by some nefarious reason. Maybe declaring `martial law when the Earth is threatened by aliens. Sounds crazy but this guy is the craziest ever. Be sure when he loses, as he surely will, he won't; go quietly without an unholy fight to stop Joe Biden taking over.

Trump's team will spin that his supporters were obeying the medical instructions to self isolate.😂

And declare Martial Law, and try to take over the country

Don't think so, Paul. I transcribed the conversation of the shuttle captain, from a Youtube video, and unfortunately have lost the source. Just as a matter of interest, have a listen to Robert Dean US NATO Intelligence Analyst United States Military, in this interview.

“The crew of space shuttle “Atlantis” contacts mission control to report that an unidentified “structure” can be seen moving around outside the spacecraft. “The last view we had was through binoculars. The best way I can describe it , it is some kind of reflective cloth or a metallic looking type of cloth. A structure that is not definitely not rigid., or it’s not a solid metal structure. “ Perhaps NASA could tell us what they saw..

The guy centred is Aaron Torgalski . You can make out his name on his badge. Let's hope he is prosecuted.

Mr Gugino appeared to have a police helmet in his left hand, maybe trying to give it back to the police. They all deserve to be sacked for letting him lie there unconscious in the street with blood streaming from his head. Thi is the cop whooshed him over. Should be locked up.

I found this series of Congressional hearings on UFOs to be very illuminating. Were all the witnesses, telling lies, imagining what they saw or just romancing? Decide for yourselves.

Listen to the head of the Air Force Academy's speech against racism. Well said, Lt Gen Silveria. Your country needs more people like you.

Seems he has lost the military. This by James Maddis IN UNION THERE IS STRENGTH I have watched this week’s unfolding events, angry and appalled. The words “Equal Justice Under Law” are carved in the pediment of the United States Supreme Court. This is precisely what protesters are rightly demanding. It is a wholesome and unifying demand—one that all of us should be able to get behind. We must not be distracted by a small number of lawbreakers. The protests are defined by tens of thousands of people of conscience who are insisting that we live up to our values—our values as people and our values as a nation. When I joined the military, some 50 years ago, I swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution. Never did I dream that troops taking that same oath would be ordered under any circumstance to violate the Constitutional rights of their fellow citizens—much less to provide a bizarre photo op for the elected commander-in-chief, with military leadership standing alongside. We must reject any thinking of our cities as a “battlespace” that our uniformed military is called upon to “dominate.” At home, we should use our military only when requested to do so, on very rare occasions, by state governors. Militarizing our response, as we witnessed in Washington, D.C., sets up a conflict—a false conflict—between the military and civilian society. It erodes the moral ground that ensures a trusted bond between men and women in uniform and the society they are sworn to protect, and of which they themselves are a part. Keeping public order rests with civilian state and local leaders who best understand their communities and are answerable to them. James Madison wrote in Federalist 14 that “America united with a handful of troops, or without a single soldier, exhibits a more forbidding posture to foreign ambition than America disunited, with a hundred thousand veterans ready for combat.” We do not need to militarize our response to protests. We need to unite around a common purpose. And it starts by guaranteeing that all of us are equal before the law. Instructions given by the military departments to our troops before the Normandy invasion reminded soldiers that “The Nazi slogan for destroying us…was ‘Divide and Conquer.’ Our American answer is ‘In Union there is Strength.’” We must summon that unity to surmount this crisis—confident that we are better than our politics. Donald Trump is the first president in my lifetime who does not try to unite the American people—does not even pretend to try. Instead he tries to divide us. We are witnessing the consequences of three years of this deliberate effort. We are witnessing the consequences of three years without mature leadership. We can unite without him, drawing on the strengths inherent in our civil society. This will not be easy, as the past few days have shown, but we owe it to our fellow citizens; to past generations that bled to defend our promise; and to our children. We can come through this trying time stronger, and with a renewed sense of purpose and respect for one another. The pandemic has shown us that it is not only our troops who are willing to offer the ultimate sacrifice for the safety of the community. Americans in hospitals, grocery stores, post offices, and elsewhere have put their lives on the line in order to serve their fellow citizens and their country. We know that we are better than the abuse of executive authority that we witnessed in Lafayette Square. We must reject and hold accountable those in office who would make a mockery of our Constitution. At the same time, we must remember Lincoln’s “better angels,” and listen to them, as we work to unite. Only by adopting a new path—which means, in truth, returning to the original path of our founding ideals—will we again be a country admired and respected at home and abroad. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/06/james-mattis-denounces-trump-protests-militarization/612640/

A rather ironic fate for a lynching tree.

I'll come with you, George. 😀

From an anonymous tweeter. " Warning : Trump and Putin are almost certainly planning something big to escalate tensions. My guess is they will stage what look like large domestic terrorist attacks by protestors to justify invoking the Insurrection Act and taking over state governments. I hope I’m wrong." So does the whole world. Where is the law abiding Moscow Mitch McCoward?

It's started folks. The take over is in progress. Minneapolis will be the Krystal Nacht of the US Fourth Reich. Seems Putin is succeeding in getting his requirements per his stooge in the White House. I told you this would happen in October last year. Where are the law abiding Republicans whilst this is all happening?

I started my career with Olivetti typewriters, and we were shown how to compare different fonts and the resultant print. Every typewriter, because of the way they were built had individual differences in the output they produced. Look at the numeral 1 on each document. The number is lower than the rest of the type, Especially noticeable in the address "126 Exchange Street." I agree with Dawn Stanford, It would appear that both W2 forms were produced on the same machine.

Post deleted. Double posting.

Unfortunately it's blocked over here.

Great work, Andrej. Love to see a pro at work.

Placing a pen cap in the gap of a missing tooth strikes me as the kind of daft thing young lad would do for a laugh.

This is a copy of Tom Wilson's view of the back of the head, in the Moorman photo. Sorry if it isn't very clear as it was copied from the book "A Deeper Darker Truth."

Tom Wilson found a hole in the back of the head in the Moorman photo.

As you say that was a mistake by the author of the article, Dave McNary, not the producers of the film. Doesn't denigrate the producers in any way.

Tom Wilson found a hole in the back of the President's head in his investigation of the Moorman photo as follows:

Posted my contribution as James was posting his. The slits in the shirt don't line up if they were bullet Holes (but when if ever, has a bullet caused a slit rather than a hole?) but are in the correct position if caused by a nurses scalpel removing the tie.

Ron, looks to me like the result of the nurses cutting JFK's tie to get it off rather than them trying to untie it. There is a corresponding cut on the other side of where the tie would have had to have been cut , which is is just hidden in the photo by the Getty label. The hole in the back of the shirt seems much too low for it to be involved in the throat wound.