Ray Mitcham

Great comments, Sandy, with , which I totally agree.Well said.

KFC have introduced a new menu item, called Chicken Hawley. It's consists of chicken legs, but nobody knows what they taste like 'cos they keep running away off the plate.

Posted for people like Ben who may have missed the presentation last night, in order that they might make their own minds up, instead of getting somebody else's opinion. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48HH4LVn07g

Yep. And your comment about it is?

I wonder if it will hit home with the people who believe it, Doug. I doubt it though, very much.

Tribe expects violence if Trump is indicted. AS opposed to....? Great cheering from the majority of the populace and fireworks, a la the 4th, countrywide.

He was, Dave. Depends on what you call inside the building. Is being at the the top of the steps considered to be inside the building?Or do you consider, that he was outside the building? Was he looking OUT of the building from the top of the steps or not? Semantics is such great fun.

Karl, the camera didn't need a separate key to wind it up. It had a built in lever at the side of it that you used to wind it up.

In regard to the Minox in custody, who was responsible for filling it with some substance (?) to stop the opening and identifying the source?

Rather apt that friendship was mis-spelled as "FIENDSHIP">

In your opinion, in the photo, John, does the "rear" windscreen slope forward (i.e. the top of the windscreen faces South)or backward (i.e. the top of the windscreen faces North) ?

I agree, a case of seeing what you want too see.LOL No explanation of the difference in the construction of the top of the car.

Thanks, Chris. Nice to see someone with superior skills posting.

Disagree, John, but then that's what the forum is all about. Compare the lines of the two roof supports. (Shown in yellow) No matter what your perspective is, they go in totally different directions..

Compare this cropped photo of the rear roof support of the Johnson Press car, to the windscreen upright and the wheel arch shown in Pat Speer's photo Z161. Both slope the wrong way. Just don't match.

Re the Johnson Press car in frame 157, there is nothing wrong with the direction, it is travelling, i.e. North on Houston. Perhaps John can point out why the "triangular" shape of the rear roof support back has disappeared. Same with 158/160. All we can see is the backward slope of the windscreen.

Sorry, John must have missed your post. A chaser is someone who chases after another poster who won't admit he(or she) is wrong. For example, remember the case of the post shadows?(I'm still waiting for an apology by the way.) You seemed to think I was picking on you, particularly, but I can't let incorrect posts go by without saying something.

At the risk of being called a "chaser" by John , maybe he might look at this photo which has had the chrome hue reduced. and see if he thinks he may be wrong.

Ben, Perhaps it may be better for the UN to propose this. I know Russia has the Security Council by the throat, but that shouldn't stop it, proposing a humanitarian corridor in Ukraine.

With risk of Russia threatening to use chemical weapons, it is time for NATO to say if the Russians use them, then NATO will move into Ukraine. There is only so much, civilization can take. The Russians will have been warned, chemical weapons are against the civilian population, and they will pay for their use.

Jim, I recently watched JFK Revisited and must congratulate you and Oliver Stone on magnificent film. At last somebody has told us what the ARRB really found out. Kudos.

I must have missed the part of the story where Oliver Stone admits JFK Revisited is a flop. Maybe Tracy could enlighten us.

Thanks Ron, very enlightening.

Wrong post.