Joe Bauer

Talking about Mockingbird counteraction against films that threaten the power status quo : 5:28NOW PLAYING WATCH LATER ADD TO QUEUE Murder of a Movie-How J. Edgar Hoover Killed "The President's Analyst" 5.1K views6 years ago Bayside Productions Trailer for our new documentary about comedy director Ted Flicker.

Exactly. Every person I know who is a rabid follower of their "can do no wrong" fearless cult leader Trump has the same answer when I ask them if they are going to send back their evil socialist/communist Democrat Covid relief checks... Every one of their Trump loving Republicans voted "against" this. "What? Heck no! Going to take every penny they send me! Yet their guy left everyone to fend for themselves for 9 months after last March's first check. There is no rational logic to their political judgments. Trump would see them in the street...yet they would follow him to the ends of the Earth! I always try to explain that if you are part of the 1% wealthiest class in this country, idolizing and supporting Trump makes perfect sense. His #1 priority is to make the super rich richer. Hence the massive tax cut for the wealthy in 2017. Trump's first action. But to see trailer park, backwoods folk who are living the poorest West Virginia/Mississippi/Arkansas/Louisiana life willing to risk their life for Trump...a guy that could care less about their poverty...is just nuts.

I have watched many interviews of interesting historical figures ( notorious and not ) conducted by Patrick Bet-David and found them very compelling. I found his interview of James Jenkins compelling as well, yet I also sensed just enough discrepancies on the part of Jenkins recollections regarding his participation and observations in the Bethesda Naval morgue to consider them with important questions. Not the least of which were ones that differed from his fellow Navy corpsman Paul O'Conner's accounts. Jenkins mentions ( at least in one account) that he kind of thought the brain he was handed ( supposedly JFK's ) seemed smaller than normal. He even states he had at least a fleeting thought that maybe the brain he was handed might not have been JFK's? Jenkins mentioned a severed brain stem, cut on both sides? As if this was a suspicious anomaly? Jenkins holds a model brain in his Patrick Bet-David interview and explains what part of JFK's was missing and how much of it was ( a little less than a third ) and says the rest of the brain looked somewhat normal? In another interview didn't Jenkins mention Humes stating that JFK's brain just fell out of JFK's skull and into his ( Humes's ) hands? Didn't Jenkins also once describe how a brain could turn into mush if it had been internally obliterated by a through and through high powered bullet as JFK's had? I don't think about or question Jenkin's personal character. Seems fine to me. However, he seems much less sure about his recollections than his fellow right there next to JFK's body corpsman Paul O'Conner who was stating his observations ( and never wavering from them or changing them ) for years from way back before Jenkins ever started to share his, Also, at a time when they would have been sharper and easier to recollect imo. And O'Conner wasn't afraid to share his detailed recollections even under sworn oath! The JFK brain testimony is all over the map. Humes states he didn't weigh the brain and Jenkins stated neither he nor Boswell did either. Humes didn't even have an answer as to why JFK's brain wasn't weighed. JFK's brain goes missing completely? O'Conner stated JFK's brains were basically fully gone from the skull all during the observation room autopsy. JFK's brain, it's handling, study, removal, weighing and storage record is simply so corrupted and even obliterated it renders the official autopsy finding totally useless. And validates total suspicion of the entire procedure ... in spades.

Honestly, I had similar thoughts and a feeling that I can't articulate well that Beatty may have not been the best casting choice for the role? Maybe too good looking? Maybe not convincingly weary enough looking after battling alcohol addiction for years previous? Maybe not as shaken and worried appearing? Especially during and after he was barely escaping harrowing life and death attempts on his life? The rushing Dam release fight to the death, the barely saved airplane exploding incident, the creepy darkened room meeting with his Parallax handler who discovered Beatty wasn't who he claimed he was and one wrong adlibbed answer to his questions could have resulted in immediate death? In his meetings with Hume Cronin after several of these incidents and when Cronin himself was murdered, Beatty just seemed too casual in sharing them or just getting on afterwards imo. Dustin Hoffman would have been waving his arms and wide eyed frantic as he was in "Marathon Man" and "All The President's Men. Even Redford would have expressed a more scared and concerned demeanor as he was in "Three Days Of The Condor" imo. Not a major flaw in the entire film but just an idly curious main character casting observation and contemplation.

Wish I had the intellectual chops to discuss the film worthily like McBride and Jim Di. I just watched it again Friday night. Ominously thought provoking. Kind of extreme scene jumping editing at times? One scene Paula Prentice is hysterically telling Beatty she is going to die, the very next scene is her wrapped in a sheet on the morgue table with a toe tag. Couldn't help but notice the connection to a Lee Harvey Oswald type patsy plot line. Wonder if there have actually been companies like the Parallax one in our lifetimes? The actor who portrayed Austin Tucker ( William Daniels ) played Dustin Hoffman's father in "The Graduate" and the crazy New Jersey suburban family father in "The President's Analyst" and was president of the Screen Actors Guild from 1999 to 2002.

Agree. Same here. I remember back in the 1950's and 60's when a commercial break on a television show advertised "1" product! Now, they can actually run through 10 to 12 (or even more!) products during a commercial break. To me it's dizzying. I almost always just press the mute button and get up and do something else until my show comes back on.

OMG!!!! HA HA HA HA HA !!!! Funniest thing I have heard since ... I don't even know. Franken should have fought to keep his Senate seat.

The nation’s cartoonists on the week in politics BY POLITICO STAFF

I thought Mark Lane kicked Buckley's articulation arrogant and pretentious butt in that interview/debate. Lane showed his Buckley matching intellectual chops without the head back, raised eyebrow, looking down the nose, snidely toned manner WFB was known for. The more Lane deflected Buckley's weakness searching intellectual fencing thrusts with deft parrying and countered with his own two touches to Buckley's one ( the Dreyfus affair for example) the more Lane won over that debate judging audience imo. In the end, even Buckley made some "touche" concession remark regards Lane's performance...stating "something like " he wouldn't be poorly served having Mark Lane represent him legally?

I can't sleep but about 3 to 4 hours a night (for years now) so when I saw this linked memorial video about Marie Tippit and that it was almost two hours in length, I figured heck ... I'll just keep it running and watch it as long as it held my interest. I got through over half of it until the older church service person got up to talk about Ms. Tippit and apparently he and everyone else there failed to realize his microphone was shut off! More than half of the Marie Tippit church service audio was cut off on that video. Obviously, as Joseph McBride has mentioned after meeting Ms. Tippit in person, she clearly seemed to be a good, kind, gentle, maternally loving, socially thoughtful and giving, unspoiled and unpretentious person. Amazing thru viewing hundreds of photos of her taken over the course of her life, she always seemed to have a kind, gentle, soft and even wise smile and look in her eyes "in every one" save for one or two? A petite woman, wholesomely attractive without trying to be ( that picture of her with her daughter in their bathing suits when she must have been in her late 50's or early 60's was incredibly attractive for her age ) and she kept her health and fitness her entire long life it seems. J.D. Tippet was obviously a very lucky man to have found and wedded such a good, kind, loving and moral woman. I was impressed by her son's love and admiration for her all his life until her passing. The son did talk about his father's killing. Supposedly by the hand of Lee Harvey Oswald. Only in a way however, to describe Ms. Tippit's not expressing any animosity toward Oswald or his family ever. She harbored no vengeful or hateful feelings about her husband's killer or killers. Also her son described Ms. Tippit's great appreciation for the huge world wide reaction to her widowed plight. The time, effort, kind sympathy and as we know massive financial aid giving to her by thousands of people really effected her sincerely. I wonder if Ms. Tippit never went through rough financial stress after her husband's death due to the huge amount of funds donated to her? And did she ever remarry? Thanks for posting this Marie Tippit memorial tribute video JM. I found it warmly touching and interesting. Seeing Ms. Tippit through this extensive photographic assemblage I got a sense that she truly was a good, kind, gentle, thoughtful, humble, moral and very maternally loving woman.

Surely true.

Kirk, you are correct and I concede I have been in error. Though barely. Biden's final 2020 primary vote percentage total versus all the other Democratic candidates was 51.63%. Biden was behind Sanders, Warren and even Buttigieg in Iowa until South Carolina and then Biden started pulling away with that huge surge from the black voter base which was almost exclusively for him alone ( over 80+% ) over all other candidates. Biden didn't even campaign ( with meager staff and funding ) in many of the states where he pulled off startling victories. Which tells you other top influence power brokers in those states organized his support there. Can't help sense that political deals were made behind the scenes between Biden's camp and those state power brokers to swing that kind of one-sided support to Biden despite his not even campaigning in them. Perhaps a promise to choose a black woman as his VP? Warren and Sanders and others never had a chance with the black vote. Even though their working and poverty class economic policy proposals would help black Americans even more than Biden's! Biden had the black vote completely locked up way before hand, hence he did not even need to campaign in most of the heavy black voting block states. Regards Bloomberg running primarily because he thought Biden was such a weak Democratic party lead candidate and not because Sanders and Warren were doing well against Biden early in the primaries and Biden was looking so bad in the debates his numbers shrank after two of them...I would like to post a few reported facts and Bloomberg statements ( edited I admit but still quoted ) that dispute that premise imo. From "The Hill." Former Vice President Joe Biden won 10 of the 14 states to vote on Super Tuesday, a totally unforeseen turn of events that fundamentally reshapes the Democratic nominating contest and appears to make him the front-runner in the race. Biden’s campaign was in serious trouble only one week ago. He was running low on money, had not campaigned or staffed up in the Super Tuesday states and was hunkered down in South Carolina for what many believed to be his last stand. Now Biden’s victory in South Carolina looks like a turning point in the race. He also made a clean sweep across the South, where huge turnout from black voters and suburban women propelled him to victories in Virginia, North Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas and Tennessee. Following Sanders’s thunderous victory in the Nevada caucuses, it appeared he might steamroll competition on Super Tuesday by running up huge margins in California and Texas. There were fears among Sanders’s rivals that he’d build a potentially insurmountable delegate lead. Now, the former vice president looks unstoppable in the South and in states with large numbers of African American voters, making him the favorite to win the nomination. Sanders could still close Biden’s delegate lead California now looks like a firewall of sorts for Sanders. It could take days or weeks for the final tally to come from the Golden State, but Sanders stands to gain from winning the biggest delegate prize in the country, where 415 delegates are at stake. The question for Sanders is whether he’ll be able to run up the score — polls taken before Super Tuesday showed him leading by between 17 and 21 points. At the moment, with about 76 percent of precincts reporting, Sanders has only picked up about 50 delegates on Biden in California. He leads with 33 percent support to Biden’s 24 percent. The Associated Press called California for Sanders as soon as polls closed, indicating that he’s in line for a clear-cut victory there. And there are states voting soon that Sanders won in 2016, such as Michigan and Washington, and others where he’ll be expected to do well, such as in Arizona. Still, Tuesday night raises serious questions about Sanders’s campaign. The Vermont progressive’s inability to win over black voters was fatal for his 2016 primary campaign, and he is struggling just as mightily against Biden this time around. Bloomberg went bust Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg ended his campaign on Wednesday and threw his support behind ( weak candidate? ) Biden. Bringing an end to his quixotic unprecedented spending campaign that relied on his wealth more than anything else. Bloomberg was on the ballot for the first time on Tuesday night, and the hundreds of millions of dollars ( some say 1 billion ) he spent in just three months did not buy him very much. Biden’s victories were astonishing in part because of how vastly he was outspent and outmanned by Bloomberg, who entered the race over fears that Biden was a weak front-runner. >>> I DISAGREE. <<< Bloomberg didn't run against Biden. He knew Biden had the huge one-sided black vote already sewn up. Bloomberg wasn't even trying to woo the black voter Biden base. I don't recall Bloomberg's massive ad and mail campaign attacking or countering Biden. They were much more inferring a difference between him as a so-called corporate economic policy "moderate" and the progressive lean the primaries were taking with Sander's victories and with Warren doing well also. Biden barely spent time in most of the states that he won. In some of the states, Biden didn’t have campaign offices or staff on the ground, while Bloomberg blanketed the airwaves and had a sophisticated operation with dozens of offices and hundreds of staffers in places like Virginia, which Biden carried by 30 points over Sanders. Now, Bloomberg appears poised to influence the race in the way many believed he should have from the start — putting his money and muscle behind ... "Biden." The weak candidate Biden? And who will look to further consolidate the centrist vote and ... pull away from Sanders. Of course! Leaked Audio Bloomberg Defends Big Banks, Calls Warren ... https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics... In a 2016 audio recording from what is thought to be a private Goldman Sachs event, Bloomberg first can be heard referring to the audience as “my peeps.” With Bernie Sanders capturing early state victories and Elizabeth Warren ranking second in a new nationwide poll, Bloomberg will be likely looking to stop the progressive candidates’ momentum in tomorrow’s debate. But this new audio gives Warren new ammunition to, once again, ruthlessly drag him on national television. Bloomberg's candidacy was not about competing against "weak candidate" Biden. It was about stopping Sanders and Warren

Have watched a half dozen short scene clips of the film since last night. I've seen the film once or twice before. Will be watching it in it's entirety again later today.

0:26NOW PLAYING WATCH LATER ADD TO QUEUE Lee Harvey Oswald, Marita Lorenz and Frank Sturgis

Agree. At one point in a broadcast interview, Biden even promoted the fact that he wasn't like "those guys." Meaning Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, the new progressives in Congress, etc. Who were fighting for more stimulus aid, meaningful student debt relief and not letting corporate Wall Street have their way as usual. Biden wasn't one of those dangerous to the status quo "socialists!" I was stating Biden's corporate favoring ties way back during the primaries. I saw a connection between Michael Bloomberg's brief 3 month but unprecedented massive billion dollar presidential primary candidacy run and Biden's eventual improbable "plurality" only win, made possible because Bloomberg diluted Warren's and Sander's vote counts, which before Bloomberg entered the field were actually ahead of Bidens. At one point, Biden did so poorly in the televised debates, he was 4th in the polls! That's when Wall Street gazillionaire icon Bloomberg decided to enter the race. Bloomberg is "quoted" as telling his "people" during a Goldman Sachs meetup that Bloomberg considered Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders more dangerous than Donald Trump. His mission in running was to get them out of there. Biden is a much more safe President for the corporate Wall Street interests. Biden's pick for Treasury Secretary ( Janet Yellen ) is also Wall Street friendly. Having collected 7 MILLION dollars in speaking fees from corporate America.

Some would say Sturgis was just an inveterate, even trained xxxx, always promoting and planting false stories. The main points of Sturgis's statement do seem to check out however. Did Sturgis get the identity of "Deep Throat" wrong? Maybe the Mark Felt story isn't true? Or, could there have been another "Deep Throat" besides Felt? That seems quite plausible imo.

So enlightening. Comprehensive documentation. Special notice: The screen shot blowup of the newspaper article quoting former SS Chief U.K. Baughman in which he states the Texas School Book Depository building would ( should ) have been considered a "key" threat one with it's top floors secured during the passing of JFK's limo underneath. Especially considering the "two" sharp angle slowing down turns directly underneath those TXSBD building upper floor windows. Several of which were open just at this time. And, not mentioned, were any police or SS or any other JFK security men placed behind the Elm street grassy knoll pergola and picket fence area that went for several hundred feet and were perfect hiding places for shooters? If not, that easy to notice security threat lapse is mind boggling.

WATCH LATER ADD TO QUEUE Bill O'Reilly Interviews Frank Sturgis 1977

Right on KIRK! Well said my Berkeley brother. Unlike you however, and like tens of millions of others in this country my wife and daughter and I "do really need" that $1,400 check. My daughter and wife lost their benefitted jobs in the middle of last year due to the Covid crisis. Unemployment is barely enough for us to pay the rent. I have thousands due in medical co-pay bills. Three times now our cars ( mine is a 14 year old junker-other two are 9 years old. ) have needed $1,000+ repair work jobs in the last 7 months. Trump and his cheapskate Repub minions gave out one $1,200 stimulus help check in the entire 2020 year! Then one dinky $600 check in January? $1,800 dollars ( even doubled for two resident households ) helped most get through ONE MONTH of financial needs. You are so right, lower than $75,000 previous year household income Covid job loss citizens should have had monthly help all 12 months. Many reports in the news now about renters unable to pay their rents and who owe up to or beyond $10,000 just for that expense! Some even $20,000! Trump left tens of millions of real provable job and income lost Americans to twist in the Covid stressed wind. I don't know how many of them are even making it.

Oakley also suggested that when we are stuck on a problem in learning, that it is helpful to "do something completely different for awhile and then come back" to the problem, because during that time, the brain is "working away in the background and making these connections" which we are unaware of, but help to solve issues. I find I have to do this stepping back and looking at everything JFK/Oswald related event with a new perspective every couple of years. It seems to present things in a more reasonable or at least refreshed light imo. Excuse the black background, I couldn't copy the text and lose it for some reason. I do want to share again about stepping back now and then and looking at the most basic, pretty much consensus accepted facts we know about the Oswald case with a simpler, more broad or just different take to see if maybe the answer key is more forest through the trees obvious than one might think? Oswald is the ultimate truth hidden puzzle. Still a confounding conundrum after 58 years! Mailer took him on and felt he had him figured. Many others too. Vincent Bugliosi created the world's heaviest literary door stop in his "Oswald alone did it" tome. My own study of Oswald and his doings in his short 24 year long life ( as non-credible layman as this has been ) has left me just as unsure about his guilt in the JFK affair as ever. Like thousands of others interested in Oswald you just get exhausted trying to get a handle on him, his actions and his involvement in the "Big Event." Often I just contemplate the simplist of questions regarding LHO. The most obvious and head shaking incongruities. Why get involved in extremely inciting political activity in New Orleans? Why do this so publicly? Newspaper coverage, filmed by others, radio appearances? You don't even have a job and your family desperately needs financial help? Why take the most guilt incriminating photos one could ever imagine with the backyard photos and make and keep copies and even hand them out? Why so much planning with the General Walker shooting like casing his home, making maps and drawings, probably observing Walker's night time study room presence, finding a prearranged nightime shooting location, getting his rifle there unnoticed and burying it in a safe location afterwards, coordinating his travel to Walker's home and an escape plan and even giving Marina a "if I am caught" note to help her and his daughter avoid any associative guilt problems? Yet, Oswald has hardly any similar pre-planning with his next hit assignment of the "President of the United States" in broad daylight with hundreds of bystanders just below him and dozens of armed security too? Was this a suicide mission? Oswald's set up, execution and escape plan with this 1000X more important hit is to simply carry his gun in with witness Buell Frazier seeing it wrapped up in his arm, build a wall of boxes around him on the 6th floor and his window perch in his spare work down time, make two bullseye hits on JFK in 6 seconds, toss his 3 times fired rifle behind some boxes, run down the stairs to stop in the lunch room to buy a machine dropped soda pop, then, casually walk down to the first floor entrance, dispurse phone location advice to reporter Robert McNeil and then saunter ( not run ) a few blocks to get on a city bus, then get off and hail a cab ( with first allowing another lady the first cab ride in his southern gentleman manner ) and then simply riding back to his Beckley room and from there ... It's all just incongruously crazy! Oswald was relatively intelligent. He was tested and placed in a marine job assignment that took more mental ability than truck driver, cook, parachute rigger, MP, etc.. Air Flight control assignment requires some abstract mental acuity ability. Oswald learned the Russian language to debateable degrees..."on his own!" Try that challenge. Oswald arranged and carried out world travel itineraries. Coordinated boat, train and plane travel and through a complicated set of geographic and political obstacles. He did more world travel than most 24 year old American men even though much of this was military related. He read constantly. How then could studying for and acquiring a simple drivers license and learning to drive a car elude such a person? Not knowing or seemingly wanting to learn how to drive a car crippled Oswald in so many ways here in the states, especially in his role of husband and father? Oswald did exhibit a fair amount of normal young man behavior socially besides some rough passages in his adolescent New York City time. He joined the junior Civil Air Patrol. He joined the Marines. He messed around with club girls in Japan. He got the clap or some other VD. He got into a couple fist fights as so many Marine enlisted men do. In Oswald's Russia time diary he mentions eyeing at least a few Russian girls starting from his first arrival there and in Minsk it sounds as if he probably even scored and wasn't a virgin when he met Marina. He went to dances and hoofed it. Maybe not as disco savvy as John Travolta in "Saturday Night Fever" but he at least got out there and tried. Oswald got along normally with Marina it seems in most ways until they came to America. He truly loved and doted on his daughter Junie from her birth and he reportedly liked and even playfully engaged with other children in a normal way when he was around them. LHO wore his wedding and Marine Corps rings to the end. My point is Oswald wasn't your typical socially frustrated mentally deranged killer type. Texas U. Tower nut case Whitman, delusional Mark Chapman, Bush family friend mental case John Hinkley, acid burnout Manson brainwashed Squeaky Fromme, frustrated Palestinian rage Sirhan Sirhan, dark apartment poster living Arthur Bremmer, or even alcoholic jealous rage filled Mac Wallace. Oswald was far from fitting of the mentally insane, socially frustrated, drug or alcohol addled or even suicidal murderer mold. He was noticeably withdrawn, even surly and disagreeable to some to certain degrees. But not in an overtly unpredictable outburst or threatening sense way imo. He didn't drink and lose control in public. He took Marina and Junie to parks, shopping, he listened to classical music. He was frugal and didn't even indulge in overeating. Those are self-control, self-disciplined traits. This social and personality reality about Oswald so contradicts his reported crazy, risky Walker, JFK and Tippit actions from a mental state perspective it just adds to the seemingly unsolvable Oswald puzzle. When you throw in Judyth Vary Baker and her exact same O'Reilly Coffee cover job hiring day as Oswald... the Oswald puzzle game really gets going. Where's my valium.

It was to me a surprisingly interesting aspect to the events of 11,22,1963 how much both Mrs. Tippit and Marina Oswald received in donated monies from tens of thousands of Americans sympathetic to their shared brutally murdered husband widowed plights. Marina Oswald more so than Mrs. Tippit, obviously because of the widespread hate for Lee Harvey Oswald, generated in great part by the Dallas PD and Dallas DA who both publicly proclaimed Lee Oswald as the lone gunman guilty party in JFK's and Tippit's murders within just hours of their occurrence. Dallas homicide Captain Will Fritz loudly proclaiming to a packed crowd of national and even international newsmen "This case is cinched!" We have our man. Dallas D.A. Henry Wade when asked in front of a nationally broadcast news conference whether he felt Oswald was the guilty party said: "I would say that without any doubt he's the killer - the law says beyond a reasonable doubt and to a moral certainty which I - there's no question that he was the killer of President Kennedy." In today's dollars Mrs. Tippit received well over 1 million dollars, Marina Oswald less but still in the hundreds of thousands. Marie Tippit and Marina Oswald came from backgrounds worlds apart, yet those who donated funds to them obviously chose to see them only in the view of widowed mothers with children / innocent victims of circumstances beyond their control. I was inspired by that widespread humanitarian effort ( and in Marina Oswald's case a non-judgmental caring donation one) expressed by tens of thousands of Americans, many only able to send a few dollars. It reminded me that that kind of compassion and caring is truly a real trait of our society along with less than admirable others. I always wondered about Mrs. Tippit's true life relationship with her husband J.D. Tippit. Was their marriage stressed? I wonder too whether J.D. Tippit was of a similar race sentiment as many if not most of his Dallas PD brethren. Did J.D. Tippit look upon JFK as most segregationist did at that time ... with vile hatred? Or, maybe he just wasn't of that more extreme view?

Egads ...that's a lot of blood and brain matter exploding out of JFK's obliterated skull. Looks like a bulls-eye hit on a watermelon. I've seen You Tube video film of large game animals being hit in the head by rifle bullets more potent than the Carcano and can't recall seeing their skulls being exploded to that degree. Yes, human skull bone is less thick than many game animals...but still? Notice SS agent limo driver Bill Greer is looking "straight back" at JFK the second his head explodes? Greer testified differently to the WC regards turning his head fully back to see the head shot.

So JF, do you assign any credibility to Colonel Dan Marvin? If so why? If not, why? Also, do you have any thoughts on what created the indentation in the chrome windshield frame? It was round, fingertip deep and lifted all the metal around it 5 inches across and 3 inches high.

Every witness claimed they heard at least three shots. The question is, which one missed? The first ... second ... third? Which one wounded James Tague? Since the bullet that supposedly went through JFK's back and neck and then through John Connally was recovered almost intact, the bullet fragments found on the seat and floor and the fragment that reportedly made the significant dent in the chrome windshield frame had to have been made by the bullet that obliterated JFK's skull and brain...correct? Proving which of the three shots missed would really help clarify the time frame of the shooting. And which could either bolster the premise of Oswald being able to get off the three shots by himself...or not. Yes, eye/ear witness testimony is all over the place in this case. However, the sequence of the last two shots being very close together seems such a consensus above all others by a broad margin, I would reason that this observation is pretty valid.