Joe Bauer
-
Posts
6,416 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Joe Bauer
-
-
Just read Trump, McConnell and Repubs are trying to restrict the next round of stimulus checks to people who make $40,000 a year and less.
I make $10,000 in SS, but my wife works and combined we make more than $40,000.
Guess we won't get any checks.
Why do the 1% in charge always look for ways to cut everything to the middle class and poorer?
-
Trump Rat Michael Cohen Thrown Back In Prison!
Trump and his current fixer attorney Barr must be thrilled.
27 mins ago - Former Trump attorney Michael Cohen was thrown back into federal prison Thursday for violating the terms of his release into home confinement, ...Guess dining at fancy upscale restaurants is not considered "essential" outdoor activity for home confinement criminals. -
1 hour ago, Douglas Caddy said:
The Supreme Court just wimped out on Trump’s tax returns — and handed him a political victory
[This is a must read]
Johnson is right. Our Supreme Court just handed Trump the victory he wanted in keeping his tax records hidden.
Let Trump tie the investigations up for years.
It is truly a tragic injustice for us all.
Well, maybe Vance can push to fast track the Trump tax records investigation anyway, even if Trump's lawyers will fight like rabid dogs to block him at every turn.
-
Rudy Guiliani Calls Cops On Sasha Baron Cohen.
Says a streaking pink bikini clad Cohen attempted to prank him during a fake set up interview about the Coronavirus at the "Mark" hotel.
Guiliani was so concerned at this sight ( he didn't recognize Cohen at first ) he called the cops. Guiliani said Cohen wasn't very attractive in his get up of a pink bikini with lace fringes adorning his very hairy body and legs.
Guiliani knows what's attractive in this genre. Check out his own cross-dressing action with breast smooching Donald Trump back in the day. One would think the Dems might want to send this same Trump/Judy Guiliani video link to potential swing voters this election. Along with his Billy Bush "grab em by the pu$$y" tape.
Enjoy Guiliani/ Trump fans:
Apr 14, 2006 - Yes, it's former NYC mayor Rody Giuliani in drag having his "breasts" shamelessly violated by "Apprentice" tycoon Donald Trump. Clip from ... -
PTSD = Post Trump Stress Syndrome.
The entire country seems afflicted.
What a legacy.
-
As much as I thought the latest Hoffa disappearance film "The Irishman" wasn't very good, I could believe the Frank Sheeran story if for any other reason, it's simple efficiency and practicalness.
Do Hoffa quick and get rid of the body quick.
Having a local crematorium under your control would be a great asset to any organized crime organization.
The absolute best way to get rid of a body with no chance of incriminating body and body injury evidence left behind.
-
1 hour ago, Douglas Caddy said:
I just burst out laughing reading this latest Trump raging tweet storm.
Reading this just bolstered Trump's family expose book writing niece Mary Trump's damning psychological assessment of her uncle in spades.
A person consumed by extreme self-obsessed thoughts and driven by deep emotional insecurities.
These latest three Trump tweets make him look so emotionally fragile and insecure to the point of spoiled child tantrum behavior.
Lashing out in such an overly animated and angry way and in so many scattered and seemingly disconnected directions and ways ( Obama committed crimes against me and nobody did ANYTHING ...Whaaaa! ) it's disturbingly irrational and adolescent stunted.
And it's also disturbing to see Trump's frantically unstructured writing style.
Words illogically written in capital letters in what seems like a desperate attempt to emphasize their importance. Misspellings that show he is not even thinking about projecting Presidential intelligence to 60 million of his followers.
These SCOTUS income tax rulings actually are going to keep his returns locked up in court until after the elections which is much more a victory for Trump than not.
Yet, I think this latest frantic tweet storm by Trump clearly reveals how obsessed he was about his taxes being revealed and his still great fear in what the SDNY prosecutors may uncover and release to their grand jury in their investigation.
There must be some outrageously damning information in Trump's tax records for him to react so tweet frantic in response to the SCOTUS rulings allowing Vance and his office to see them.
-
No post. My mistake.
-
21 hours ago, Douglas Caddy said:
Alan Dershowitz Writes Essay Defending Longtime Jeffrey Epstein Associate Ghislaine Maxwell, Assails Netflix Documentary Allegations
From the article: As for Maxwell, Dershowitz writes in his essay that he never saw her do anything untoward and assumed she was simply Epstein’s girlfriend.
My wife and I were introduced to Ghislaine Maxwell by Sir Evelyn and Lady Lynne de Rothschild, and we subsequently met her on several occasions — generally in the presence of prominent people such as Bill and Hillary Clinton, Nobel Prize-winning scientists, presidents of universities, and prominent academic and business people. We never saw her do anything inappropriate. We knew her only as Jeffrey Epstein’s thirty-something girlfriend.
If Maxwell didn't do anything remotely illegal, why would Dershowitz even have to negotiate an immunity agreement for her ?
If she was innocent of any crime doing, why take up super expensive lawyer fee time and government prosecutor time protecting her from prosecution or lawsuits by victims of Epstein's sexual abuse?
Dershowitz admitted he had a massage in Epstein's sex den N.Y. mansion.
He downplays it by saying he kept his underwear on and his masseuse was an older women with a Germanic name of "Olga."
One gets the image of a typical, big boned, stern faced, tough body slapping German discipline type person.
There are so many suspiciously contradictory elements to Dershowitz's Epstein sex mansion massage story.
Dershowitz says he had the strip down to his undies massage even though he doesn't really like massages? Then what would compel him to do something this out of the ordinary for him, and to disrobe for it to boot?
Epstein says he wasn't really friends with Epstein.
Sharing a business lunch or dinner with a client is one thing, but having a full body rub down massage at a legal client's private home ( paid for by the client ) sounds laughably more of a personal relationship than a legal business one.
Epstein remembered the masseuse's actual first name from many years ago ... Olga?
Did she wear a name tag? If not, he must have been socially bantering with her enough to ask her name and such. And yet, the whole experience was unpleasant for him?
Epstein says he called his wife right after he received the massage? Why? Guilty conscience perhaps? What did he say to her? Honey, I just had a full body massage in my underwear by a woman named Olga..and let me tell you, it was very unpleasant. ?
I would think just the masseuse's Germanic name "Olga" might have been a turn off to Dershowitz and he might have immediately stopped such an intimate hand rubbing and squeezing on bare flesh encounter like this.
Dershowitz claims he didn't know if other young women were in another part of Epstein's N.Y. mansion while he got a rub down from Olga?
He wasn't sure either way? He can't say there weren't? Typical clear answer avoiding legalese.
Also, one would think someone as experienced with nefarious characters like Epstein would know that having an undies body massage in their private residence might be surripticiously taped. Dershowitz didn't even think of this? Was he that naive?
And, Dershowitz had not one fleeting thought or pondering about Epstein's other nefarious activities such as his involvement with the majorly reported Tower Financial/ Steve Hoffenburg 450 million dollar ponzi fraud scheme ( Hoffenburg was sent to prison for long stretch) that went on for years before the Epstein underage sex abuse charges? No sense of distancing himself from such closely involved person in this big time criminal scheme?
And why is it that Dershowitz's deep sense of righteousness in defending the indefensible mostly involves the most famous and wealthy?
Now he is a good character promoting publicity person for the poor, unfairly maligned G. Maxwell?
Please.
It doesn't make common and especially moral sense.
-
1 hour ago, James DiEugenio said:
What a good question that is.
Man, was Buddy Walthers a good detective or what?
Al Mattox told me that Walthers said Barrett picked up a bullet in Dealey Plaza in that famous picture. Where they are just about next to each other.
Jim, is the Al Mattox you mention sheriff Al Maddox? The fellow in the July, 1996 You Tube Video that is shown recounting Jack Ruby palming him a folded up note that said there was a conspiracy and that his motive for shooting Oswald was to silence him?
Jack Ruby passed a note to this guy before he died...he wanted someone to know? -
3 hours ago, W. Niederhut said:
I felt like a character in George Orwell's novel 1984, living in a world where reality and history have been erased and re-written to manipulate the masses.
Everyday now we have an Orwellian dichotomy in national news coverage.
Just watch Fox News and then MSNBC on the same evening.
Same events reported. Completely different realities in their presentation.
Must be hard for young people in this country trying to figure out the truth of what's happening all around them. Just the press of a TV remote button and you see two polar versions.
Was listening to national CBS news on the radio yesterday. Lead story was the Covid-19 case increases.
CBS reported this:
The number of Covid-19 cases are "higher" in some states ...
and then 1 minute of flat general coverage.
No mention of any controversial contradictions or urgent pleas for immediate changes to lock down or mask policies by over-whelmed health providers and experts in areas being inundated like Houston, Texas, etc.
Local newspaper news reporting on this subject with headlines like:
Covid-19 Case Increase Exploding To Record Levels. Hospitals Overwhelmed.
Experts demand immediate review of Trump re-opening push and policies.
I notice that most television and radio MSM downplays almost every Trump involved story like this.
Listening to national news radio, you just don't hear the same urgent concern about the most troubling anxiety and controversy causing Trump actions, words and policies that is a daily reality all around us.
Trump's impeachment trial was barely reported as a Trump negative for about one week after it's conclusion by the bulk of MSM. The MSM could have really gone after Trump after this rare but super important highest level Congressional rebuke. But, it's not even mentioned anymore. You'd think Trump was just a fairly normal President by their placid coverage of such things.
What MSNBC and sometimes CNN and of course some internet news sites like Huffington Post and public radio reports actually reflects the true reality of the Trump driven conflict of interests that has engulfed our society to unprecedented divisive, angry and anxiety causing degrees.
Our national political news coverage is so starkly divided in it's opposite reality presenting it's pathological.
Mark Lane isn't mentioned much on these most important best books lists.
He did arouse millions to want to know more about it all, did he not? Certainly me.
Garrison's "On The Trail Of The Assassins" remains one of my top 5 tomes.
His writing was engagingly and intelligently witty to boot.
-
Witness contradictions never end with Oswald.
So, did Oswald's co-radar men offer to chip in for Oswald's departure via hardship because they all hated the guy that much?
Did no one ever locate any of his 5 or 6 co - radar unit members and ask them any questions about Oswald such as the Donovan recount of them chipping in to get Oswald out of there?
-
On 7/1/2020 at 10:54 PM, James DiEugenio said:
The whole thing about Banister's office is that it was a station for just about everything there was going on with the rightwing.
It was not just the CIA. Banister communicated with the FBI, the OAS and he was even in communication with George Lincoln Rockwell.
Delphine Roberts was as conservative as Banister was. And its not accurate, as many people think, that she first talked to Summers.
She first talked to Bob Buras of the HSCA. She told him about Oswald being there and Banister giving him an office. And how angry he was that Oswald printed 544 Camp Street on one of his flyers. And how Banister told this to Newman the building owner at the time, and James Arthus the custodian. When Oswald came in, Banister met with him privately.
Roberts once said that Martin was looking for Oswald's file on the day of the assassination. That is the real reasons Banister was so angry. Martin later said that if Roberts had not intervened, he thought Banister was going to kill him, not just send him to the hospital.
If I recall correctly, much of this was left out of the HSCA report. It should not have been. Scott Malone later talked to Mary Brengel who said that Roberts told her that Oswald was at 544 Camp Street.
So for Thornley to be there would fit right in with who he was. And for him to deny it, that would also suit his whole "I was the guy playing the piano downstairs, did not know what was going on upstairs" mask. And which the WC cooperated with him to maintain.
It almost makes you wonder about that move from Whittier to New Orleans in early 1961. And somehow, like magic, Thornley ends up in the middle of the only other group of people in the USA who are using Oswald's name at the time. That is way too early for the assassination being planned, but still.
Jim, do you think Guy Bannister had any relationship with Joseph Milteer?
-
Greg, do you have any thoughts regards the reported phone conversation between Ruth Paine and her separated husband Michael Paine the day of or next day after the assassination where Michael reportedly said to Ruth "We both know who's responsible" in their back and forth about the assassination?
It has been suggested that Ruth's phone line was tapped by some agency due to her harboring Marina Oswald.
Not researched at all regards Ruth Paine to any degree of valid debate. Just throwing some well known conspiracy claims involving her out there.
Michael Paine seems less humanitarian and more suspicious than Ruth is some ways.
He cultivated a brief conversation sharing relationship with Oswald. A very disingenuous one considering his elitist and condescending dismissal of Oswald as just a stupid uneducated fool in regards to Oswald's understanding of true Marxist philosophy history and meaning in the real world.
His derisive depiction of Oswald as this low class, delusional intelligent self-view person just smacked of spoiled privilege arrogance imo.
Paine liked to randomly engage other young people in political philosophy conversation ( versus religious? ) in his spare time it was reported.
Not the kind of thing most Quakers would spend their time doing, don't you think?
Ruth did a lot to help Marina. No debate there. With young children of her own, she drove all the way to New Orleans ( 500 miles each way!) to pack her Rambler station wagon to the max to bring Marina and what belongings she had back to her home where she took care of her and her child June including paying for food for several months. That's a HUGE helping hand for sure.
Marina didn't have to pay for anything to help with the house expenses from what I have read. Can't fault Ruth there.
Not sure about the reported "evil you have done" statement attributed to Ruth's daughter. Wish there was some or any corroborating info in that regard's. Ruth's CIA connected relatives does add some weight to the theory of her not being totally innocent and naive in that realm imo.
It's probably not relevant at all, but do you think Ruth Paine may haven been bisexual to any degree? Asexual? Did she ever remarry after her separation from Michael?
That's what... a 57 year long period of singleness?
-
Just viewed the video above.
I don't think those interviewed are a selective few.
I think they represent the typical Trump rally crowds.
You almost can't believe the ignorance and blind loyalty of these typical Trump rally folk.
This is the bulk of Trump's base.
Even Trump knows that the majority of his base is this stupid.
He wouldn't come within 100 miles of these types of people in his real life.
Much of what these interviewed people related makes you realize what's wrong with our country.
This is also Rush Limbaugh and right wing propaganda radio's base listening audience.
You can show these people the crazy contradictions of reason and logic in their answers to questions about Trump...and yet they either can't see it...or they just shrug and look at their questioner with a blank "so what" look when they do!
You can't embarrass these mindless people. It's like they are "proud" of their own ignorance!
It's truly disturbing to realize maybe half of all Americans are this irrational and full of hate for the constitutional rights of others in their own country.
You actually wonder if the term "inbred" and it's inference of genetic digression is applicable here.
-
On 7/5/2020 at 2:46 PM, James DiEugenio said:
The thing is, Ruby connected to McWillie, Trafficante and Civello/Campisi.
There was simply no question about the first. Then there was the report that Ruby met with Trafficante while the Don was in detention in Cuba. Civello and Campisi were local Mafia ringleaders. And the latter visited him in jail.
That's just the Mob side of Ruby.
Did Ruby actually fly to Cuba and then visit Trafficante in jail there?
His doing so indicates a deeper mob connection for Ruby than the one the Warren Commission painted for sure.
If Ruby didn't have the jailed Trafficante meeting then it's not even worth debating or contemplating it's implications.
How does one prove either scenario? Very frustrating to not know either way.
If Ruby visited Trafficante my theory is this was set up by Lewis McWillie.
McWillie's ties to Trafficante were real and significant. I could see McWillie asking his idolizing friend Ruby ( someone low level and much less conspicuous ) to be the messenger in such a situation where McWillie could not see Trafficante himself because he was too well known by Castro as a fairly major player in the mob controlled Havana scene. Maybe McWillie could be arrested?
McWillie later manages Sinatra's Cal-Neva casino and hotel in North Lake Tahoe?
McWillie was a obviously a "somebody" in the Mob gambling racket world.
Ruby's idolizing of mob gambling operations expert McWillie for decades would reasonably indicate that Ruby himself was in someway involved in the racket of gambling ( perhaps in a much smaller way in Dallas such as bookmaking and card games ?) or in the very least somewhat aware of it's operational set up in the much larger scale venues of Cuba, Vegas, etc. imo.
I don't think Ruby would have idolized McWillie as much as he did ( he says so in his Warren Commission testimony ) if he detested gambling in a personal moral sense and wanted nothing to do with this mob racket. Ruby hung around race tracks when he was younger. Another indication of his interest and attitude toward gambling.
There is a You Tube video that I am sure everyone on the forum has seen. It is an interview of a retired Dallas Sheriff by the name of Al Maddox.
I assume it isn't hard to prove the fact that Maddox was involved to some degree in the security detail while Ruby was incarcerated and being moved back and forth between court appearances. And that in this duty, he ( Maddox) was physically close enough to Ruby at times to have had been able to touch him.
Maddox's shocking Ruby recollection comment in this interview is that Ruby reached out to shake Maddox's hand and when their hands met, Ruby palmed a folded hand written note into Maddox's palm.
Maddox described Ruby's hand as very sweaty which Maddox guessed was due to Ruby's declining health situation with his cancer diagnosis.
Maddox makes the incredible claim that Ruby's note stated the JFK assassination was a conspiracy and that Ruby's true motive for killing Oswald was to silence him.
This claim by Maddox is mind blowing to me if true.
It would destroy the Warren Commission's credibility regards their findings relative to Ruby.
And show that Ruby was fabricating nothing but lies throughout his testimony and interrogations.
Or, was Ruby playing one last crazy desperate card/hand of life saving poker, thinking perhaps this note to Maddox would get passed to higher ups, who would then re-open the whole investigation into Ruby's guilt and motives thereby buying time where perhaps something else might come up to change Ruby's doomed fate?
The most frustrating part of the Ruby/Maddox note story is how Maddox didn't do anything with this bombshell Ruby confession. And, just kept it in his personal possession which resulted in the note being lost at some point.
I wish I could have asked Maddox why he did nothing with the note?
How could Maddox NOT know what a mind boggling important and incredible history changing piece of evidence he had with this Ruby confession note?
I would want to know why he kept the note and it's contents totally to himself until it was finally lost. Why he waited until he was long retired to even reveal the story.
If I truly believed Maddox's story and could talk with him personally, I would probably lose it and angrily yell at him how could he be so negligent, irresponsible and selfish in doing nothing with such a dynamite Ruby note?
Or, in a calmer state, ask Maddox "did you keep the note because you simply didn't believe it?"
Or that you thought Ruby was losing it and made this claim up in an unbalanced state of mind?
Or, you didn't want the American people knowing this truth? If so...why?
Or, were you simply fearful for your career ( or your life ) in deciding to not bring to note to higher authority level attention?
Could you imagine what these higher authorities might have done with such a Ruby handwritten " I meant to silence Oswald" confession revelation?
-
Besides what Maxwell has in her safe/secrets deposit box , I believe Trump's former fixer attorney Michael Cohen ( now replaced by Bill Barr ) still has a lot of truly damaging dirt on his former client/boss Trump as well.
Only Cohen can't come out with this while Trump is in office and has his personal AG in place to perhaps throw Cohen back in prison if they feel they must to protect Trump.
Look for a tell-all book by Cohen if Trump is somehow defeated in the next election.
Cohen could use a nice 2 to 4 million dollar book advance to get him and his family back on tract.
Maxwell could spell complete doom for Prince Andrew. How far could it get? Jail time? Ostracized from the Royal Family? Stripped of his "Prince" title?
Maybe she can verify that the now well known photo of Prince Andrew with his arm around Virginia Giuffre is real?
And countless others who may have been compromised by her lover/ cohort Epstein?
Bill Clinton? Alan Dershowitz? Heck, even George Stephanopoulus had some contact with Epstein? Woody Allen? My God...think of the tidal wave of Earth shaking celebrity bring downs if Maxwell rats.
Speaking of Alan Dershowitz, he claims his relationship with Epstein was much more professional than personal friendship.
Yet he actually "admits" to getting a personal massage in Epstein's New York Sex den mansion himself ( go for it Al Baby! ) but says this meant nothing because he "kept his underpants on" and his masseuse was an older, big boned, Germanic woman with huge man like hands and hairy forearms.
Oh Please!
Jeff Epstein underage sex pawn Virginia Giuffre claims she did Dershowitz 3 times!
Wonder how their competing lawsuits are doing in the courts?
-
1 hour ago, David Andrews said:
Why no perp walk photos or mug shots of Ghislane in the MSM? Is that symbolic of real power? Or of real (or, at least, temporarily convincing) cooperation?
Goes with the off-brand strangeness of arrest at a secluded-in-plain-sight American residence.
One would think the authorities would want to mythologize these images of the Dragon Lady, as if they'd brought down Cersei Lannister.
It would be fair to show her arrest process mug shots. But the elite class seems to avoid this public humiliation.
Never saw the mug shots of billionaire Martha Stewart after her arrest. Countless others.
Locally, our police agencies regularly give the press mug shot pics of child molesters, violent robbers and drug arrest perps with their typical disheveled hair, wild eyed meth addicted look with numerous horrible oozing red facial sores and puckered and indented lip lines from tooth loss.
This practice is meant to instill the image of our protectors saving our streets and communities from these perps ( including the "Living Dead" zombie looking meth addicts) and as a means of public humiliation as well.
Yet, If G.Maxwell isn't as much a serious criminal perpetrator of harm to children and deserving of this mug shot public humiliation, who is?
-
In his Mount Rushmore rally did DT at all mention the historical respect preservation of our great American hero General George Armstrong Custer and the event of over one third of Custer's entire regiment being wiped out by the very Indian tribe protesting his PR stunt visit to their sacred homeland ... the Lakota Sioux?
There aren't any statues of Custer there...are there?
-
Will South Dakota's Governor Kristi Noem have to go into quarantine because she met with Don Jr's virus infected girlfriend Kimberly Guilfoyle in the last two days?
-
Wow!
What a dynamic, testosterone pumping video of James Brown above!
-
6 hours ago, Paul Jolliffe said:
What is more interesting is that Hunt’s alibi for 11/21 and 11/22/63 was destroyed, under oath, by his own stupid admission that his children could not place him with them at home in Washington that weekend!
Further, the combination of both Marita Lorenz’s sworn statement and the Angleton/Helms memo would seem to be pretty good evidence that Hunt was indeed in Dallas then. Not proof beyond a reasonable doubt, but not bad.
By his own admission to his own son, E. Howard Hunt was involved (somehow) with the assassination!
The murder of the president was an act of an enormous collective ego - these guys were sure they could get away with it!
Paul, from your post above I take it you feel E. Howard Hunt was in some way involved in the JFK assassination?
At least to some degree?
So many people, even here on this forum, discount Hunt's involvement and especially the account he shared with his son St. John Hunt, even though St. John Hunt has an actual tape of his father stating this account ( I think no one disputes the tape actually being E. Howard Hunt ) with specific names mentioned by E.Hunt such as Morales, Frank Sturgis, Cord Meyer and LBJ himself.
Personally I have always been fascinated with Hunt's JFK "Big Event" end of life confessional tape.
If his account is true...we have an insider's account as to who planned and coordinated the JFK murder in Dallas, Texas, 11,22,1963!
An absolute "highest level insider" who was deeply involved with some of the most important covert actions ever taken in the world of political espionage both domestically and foreign during this time period.
Hunt is such a high level "spy" he is involved with the highest levels of our government and secret government agencies and for a long time.
Any volunteered tape confession of something as mind blowing as his "Big Event" story
cannot be so easily dismissed because of this highest level background imo.
Yes, at the time of this taping Hunt did show some signs of dementia...at least regards his slower and more halting speaking. But compared to witnessing dementia in my own experience, his cognitive skills were pretty good over-all.
And I do believe Hunt could have done this all for his son St. John Hunt thinking that his confessional tape might fetch a six figure sum from some national book publisher due to it's mind blowing content and context.
Still, the story itself is so incredible in who it implicates, if it was perceived to be "too good to be true" then E. Hunt and his son St. John Hunt tried a scheme that backfired.
I still can't fully believe that E.Howard Hunt could throw out something so outrageously government rule and lying shocking that if it was to be believed, could throw our entire nation, our government and our MSM into a state of righteous revolt.
If LBJ and Cord Meyer and Hunt's crew actually made the JFK assassination happen, then we as a nation would be required to shake every aspect of our federal government to the core with indictments regards the cover up.
And every bit of historical information on LBJ would be re-centered around his role as the most treasonous American ever.
So, Paul, how much "do" you believe of Hunt's JFK "Big Event" confessional tape and story?
-
41 minutes ago, James DiEugenio said:
Ron: I saw that story about Abbot now decreeing masks as mandatory.
I don't know why he did that somersault. Its quite puzzling. But as far as the effect goes, its like closing the barn doors after all the horses have escaped.
Texas is in bad shape.
" it's like closing the doors after all the horses have escaped."
Ha!
Perfect analogy.
-
Since I first posted the original thread Trump has been immersed in more than a dozen new outrageous nation troubling, dividing and concerning controversies with him at the center.
The protest tear gassing, bible holding photo op in front of the church, his defending Confederate names of bases, his tweeting a "White Power" shouting video, his new "Bountygate" affair, his push back on Black Lives Matter, his humiliating Tulsa rally turnout ( 6,000-no outdoor crowd at all ) after bragging about having 60,000 there, his team pulling separation tags off seating there, his endangering 3,000 people attending his no mask Phoenix church rally, his advance campaign team contracting the virus, his SS members under quarantine... and on and on. It never ends!
Oh, and don't forget the thrashing of Trump by Bolton in Bolton's new book where among many outrageous charges, Bolton claims Trump asked the Chinese to help him in our next election !
Followed by Trump's attacking Bolton as "washed up" before he (Trump) even appointed him to his staff ( uh, which makes Trump look totally incompetent again ) , the court rejection of a Bolton book stoppage, the SCOTUS rejection of Trump's agenda in two areas including abortion, the rejection of the Trump family's lawsuit to block his niece's tell-all.
This is just the latest "one month's" worth of almost unbelievable craziness involving our President.
Cherries on top of a mountain sized sundae of 3 and 1/2 years of the most authority and constitution abusing, unethical and nation angering and dividing and anxiety causing presidential leadership in 100 years.
What more does our mainstream news media have to see us suffer through before they finally call for Trump's resignation in a unified consensus way as they did regards Nixon in 1974 and Clinton during Lewinski times?
Okay, so there is possibly only 6 more months of Trump madness, however, the call for his resignation to end all this nation dividing craziness is just as needed and valid right now.
Some well known figures in the main stream media individually have and are still passionately calling for this. Chris Hayes at MSNBC is the latest.
But, by and large, the MSM has purposely downplayed Trump's constant and never ending crazy nation dividing and upsetting behavior.
No consensus front page calls for Trump to resign ( like they did with Nixon and Clinton ) which has enabled him in getting away with it all without consequences. And it looks as if they will continue doing so until he is voted out. What a monumental failure of their most basic tenets and ethics and responsibility by our protective fourth estate imo.
The Trump presidency has been like a surreal, exaggerated crazy TV reality show.
What a relief ( hopefully ) from this national anxiety causing nightmare come this following January 20th.
The Paine Files
in JFK Assassination Debate
Posted · Edited by Joe Bauer
J D
Did you respect Maddox's integrity when you met him?
Do you believe he told you the truth about Walthers and Barrett?
If so, what do you make of this interview video of Maddox relating how Jack Ruby passed a note to him saying "it was a conspiracy" and "his ( Ruby) motive was to silence Oswald." ?
Did you ever hear this Ruby to Maddox note story either before you talked to Maddox or after this interview?
If you don't believe Maddox's note story, any thoughts on why and why Maddox would make this up?
And if Ruby actually palmed this folded letter/note to Maddox, wouldn't you also wonder why Maddox would keep this explosively important confession note to himself?
You met the man and asked him questions. Maddox was right there close to Jack Ruby from the day he shot Oswald.
Curious also, why more researchers didn't jump out of their shorts to interview Maddox after Maddox made this explosive "it was a conspiracy" Ruby confessional letter statement?